Posts Tagged ‘yeast’

Elimination diet
An elimination diet is a method of diagnosing idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74) and certain other

forms of food sensitivity where indirect tests, such as skin tests, are unhelpful. The principle of the

elimination diet is very simple. It begins by removing from the body every food that could possibly

cause a reaction, and seeing if this produces a symptom-free state. If it does, the elimination diet

then presents the body with different foods, each in its pure form, to see which ones cause symptoms.
While the principle is simple, the practicalities of the elimination diet can be much more complex, and

it is vital to understand the details fully before you start. There is absolutely no room for

‘cheating’ with this diet – one mouthful of cake is enough to ruin the whole thing. You need forward

planning and a lot of self-discipline, backed up by a good stock of the permitted foods for moments

when hunger overcomes you. Some cooked foods, stored in the freezer in individual portions for quick

defrosting, are a great help.
Doing an elimination diet incorrectly is not just a waste of time. Some people acquire new

sensitivities during the diet, which may make it very much more difficult to do a second elimination

diet. So plan ahead and get it right first time.
The planning stage
First of all, start an accurate symptom diary. This will give you a precise picture of how bad things

are now, before you try any dietary measures. A detailed daily symptom record, covering a period of

about two weeks, can be very useful, whether or not you actually do an elimination diet. It can serve
as a baseline against which to judge the effects of any future treatment.
Before you begin an elimination diet, you must see your doctor and ask if it is safe for you to do the

diet. Read through the next four pages first – the more you know about elimination diets, before

talking to your doctor, the better.
There are some conditions where, although an elimination diet can be very helpful, it should not be

attempted without full medical supervision. Two main causes for concern exist:
•    For people who are undernourished to start with, the elimination diet may be too demanding – it

is difficult to eat enough calories during the first few weeks of the diet, unless an elemental diet is

used as a supplement (see box on p. 196). If you are underweight, or have rheumatoid arthritis or

Crohn’s disease, the possible use of elemental diets is something you should discuss with your doctor.
•    With certain diseases (see list that follows), the testing stage may induce severe symptoms.

Sometimes these can be life-threatening and need immediate medical attention.
Medical supervision during food testing is recommended for anyone with these conditions:
•    Crohn’s disease – testing can bring on a prolonged relapse. Very small amounts of food should

be tested initially, and the quantity slowly increased.
•    Brittle asthma – after a period of avoidance, a culprit food can bring on a severe and possibly

life-threatening asthma attack.
•    Atopic eczema – the risk of reactions is higher if skin tests are positive (see p. 198).
•    Chronic urticaria – occasionally there is an immediate reaction to an offending food. It is

advisable to test foods in very small portions oust a mouthful) at first. If there is no reaction

whatever after four hours, a normal portion can be tested.
Note that an elimination diet is not suitable for anyone with true food allergy (see p. 62). If you

have ever had an immediate reaction to any food, or any symptoms in the lips or mouth, testing foods

can be dangerous. Caution is also necessary if you have ever reacted to a food with violent vomiting

and/or diarrhoea some hours after eating. This could be due to an infection, of course, but such

symptoms can also, very rarely, result from true food allergy (see p. 64). Finally, if you have ever

suffered anaphylaxis from any cause – not just food –the testing phase of an elimination diet might be

risky. Ask your doctor’s advice.
Once you have your doctor’s permission to try the diet, work out how the stages of the diet will fit in

with your life over the weeks or months ahead. Until it is over, eating food made by other people is

virtually out of the question. When eating away from home, you must either take prepared food with you,

or just eat very simple foods – such as permitted fruits or nuts. Think about the practicalities of

carrying food for meals away from home.
Finally, devise the diet you will follow during the exclusion phase (see right), locate shops that sell

the more unusual foods, and stock up on everything required.
You will continue to eat a lot of these foods for the first few weeks of the testing stage, so you may

want to buy extra stocks and refrigerate them for
longer storage, especially if the sources of supply are some distance from your home.
Note that food ingredients in medication could interfere with the results of the elimination diet. For

example, if you are very sensitive to maize (corn), the cornflour that is added to many antihistamines

and other drugs could create much confusion. Food-free medicines are available – talk to your

pharmacist about this initially, then to your doctor if you need a different prescription.
The exclusion phase
During the first part of an elimination diet, you exclude all the foods that you normally eat, plus any

closely related foods. For example, if you normally eat oranges, you should avoid all other citrus

fruits, including lemon, limes and grapefruit, even though you do not normally eat these. If you

normally eat plenty of broccoli, you should omit all its relatives, such as cabbage, kale, spring

greens and cress.
The best way to conduct the exclusion phase is not to follow a set menu, such as the well-known

‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet, but to draw up your own list of permitted foods. This can include foods that you

have never eaten before, and those you eat rarely.
The list should run to at least ten items. One problem with an exclusion phase that consists of only

two foods (as in the ‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet) is that you are bound to eat a huge amount of these foods.

This is asking for trouble if you have a tendency to food intolerance, because you can quite quickly

become sensitive to new foods if eating them in large amounts.
Your list of permitted foods should include:
Some starchy items. These are essential for keeping hunger at bay: try some of the more exotic root

crops, such as sweet potatoes, yams, dasheen and cassava. These are available in large supermarkets and

in small shops catering to Indian, African, Chinese and Caribbean communities. (Cook them as you would

potatoes. In the case of cassava, it must be boiled, not baked.) You can also eat parsnips, turnips,

chestnuts and pumpkin. Tapioca, sago, buckwheat, millet, quinoa and sorghum are other possibilities: a

health-food shop is a good source of some of these. Use rice if it is not normally part of your diet.

Do not include sweetcorn or maize meal, even though you do not normally eat these –corn products are

very widely used in packaged food, and sensitivity to corn is not uncommon.
Several fruits and vegetables that you don’t normally eat. Exotic produce such as mangoes and okra can

help a lot in keeping the diet tasty. Avocados, which are very rich and nutritious, can be included if

you don’t eat them often.
Some protein items. For carnivores, this is the easy part – any meat that you don’t normally eat is

suitable. Consider turkey, rabbit, pigeon or game, for example. (Soak rabbit meat in salt water

overnight to get rid of the strong taste, if you dislike this.) Strict vegetarians have more problems

here, since goat’s milk, sheep’s milk and all birds’ eggs are disallowed – their proteins are much too

similar to those of normal milk and eggs. Soya products such as tofu should definitely be avoided, as

should other pulses initially, because sensitivity to these is a possibility among vegetarians. Quorn,

or mycoprotein, could affect anyone sensitised to yeast, and should not be included. Fortunately the

exclusion phase is fairly brief, so a low intake of protein will not be disastrous. Including some nuts

on your list of permitted foods will help, as these contain protein. If nuts are part of your normal

diet, you may have to resort to rarely eaten kinds such as macadamias, cashews or pistachios.
Elemental diets
An elemental diet is a powder that contains all the nutrients the human body needs but is free from the

substances in food that provoke allergic and intolerance reactions. It is mixed with water to create a

complete substitute for food. Originally designed for space travel, this totally synthetic form of

sustenance is also known as ‘the astronaut’s diet’.
Used alone during the exclusion phase, elemental diets are the basis for the ultimate – and

theoretically foolproof – elimination diet. They sustain you through the exclusion phase, and continue

to provide your basic diet during the testing phase.
For anyone with multiple food sensitivity, using an elemental diet circumvents the problem of finding

ten or more safe foods with which the elimination diet can begin.
Those who are underweight can also benefit from using an elemental diet, simply as a calorie-boosting

supplement during the exclusion phase and testing phase.
Unfortunately, elemental diets taste fairly unpleasant and are quite expensive. You
may need a prescription, so talk to your doctor. Ideally you should get an elemental diet that does not

contain sucrose (sugar).
Some items that make good snacks. Nuts, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, fresh fruit and dried fruit are

all useful for times when you are away from home, or feel hungry between meals. At the outset of the

diet, use only unsulphured dried fruit –available from health-food shops. At a later stage, you can

test ordinary dried fruit (all of which is treated with sulphur preservatives – see box on p. 207).
A cooking oil, preferably one that you have not used much in the past. Use this fairly liberally, to

keep the calorie content of your diet at a reasonable level
Note that this is a very plain diet – you eat the permitted foods and absolutely nothing else. You

cannot use spices, herbs or other flavourings. Salt is allowed, but sugar is out, as are tea, coffee,

alcohol and all soft drinks. You must drink only mineral water and pure juices from permitted fruits.
Don’t use canned or packaged versions of the permitted foods. Buy raw food and cook it yourself. The

idea is to avoid food additives and other contaminants, such as those from the linings of cans.
Throughout this phase, and the next, you must be very careful not to eat too much of any one food.

Never eat any food every day, and stay away from any food that you begin to develop a real passion for

– this is always a bad sign in people with food intolerance. It is better to go a little hungry

(assuming you are not underweight to start with) rather than binge on any of the permitted foods.

Acquiring new sensitivities is all too easy.
Assuming you do have food intolerance, and you have excluded all the foods that affect you, there

should be a complete clearance of symptoms within 7-10 days. The response is usually unmistakable. A

partial or slight response is probably just a coincidence, and should be discounted, except for those

with rheumatoid arthritis (see below).
Be warned that you may feel a great deal worse before you get better. For those who do have idiopathic

food intolerance, the first 5-6 days of the diet can be very unpleasant – usually they suffer the same

symptoms as before the diet, but far more severe.
Some conditions, such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, may require a longer exclusion

phase, but there is no point in continuing beyond three weeks. Bear in mind that long-term structural

damage to arthritic joints may prevent a complete recovery. A partial but sustained improvement in the

joints, accompanied by a distinct improvement in general health, suggests that food could well be

playing a part in causing the disease, and that it is worth going on to the testing phase.
Symptoms that are only intermittent, such as chronic urticaria or migraine, pose a special problem. You

need to decide, before starting the diet, how long the exclusion phase should continue in order to give

you a clear sign that your state of health is improved. A symptom diary is vital here. If, for example,

your symptom diary shows that you sometimes have a week that is symptom-free but you never get through

two weeks without an attack, then your exclusion phase should continue for two weeks.
You should only go on to the testing phase if you improve during the exclusion phase. If you do not

improve, you have excluded the possibility of food intolerance, and can give up the diet.
The testing phase
This part of the diet, which is sometimes called the reintroduction phase, takes about eight weeks. It

requires careful observation of your symptoms, and constant self-discipline about everything you eat.

You should not stop or delay the testing unless you are ill – it is vitally important to complete it as

quickly as possible.
Foods have to be reintroduced one at a time, with a space between in which symptoms can be observed. It

sounds simple, but this is where errors can easily occur.
During this phase, as well as noting your symptoms daily, you should also record absolutely everything

you eat.
For the first 2-3 weeks you should test foods that are unlikely to cause symptoms. Start by testing

fruits, vegetables and meats that you do not eat very often normally, but which you do like. If they

pass the test, you can use them to vary your diet. This will make life much easier and reduce the risk

of developing new sensitivities.
Next test foods that you do eat reasonably often, but not every day. Leave the most likely culprits –

the foods you eat very regularly, such as wheat and milk products – until you have established a safe

diet that contains at least 25 different foods. This safe and relatively varied diet should be the

backdrop against which you test staple foods.
The testing procedure changes over time, because your sensitivity may decline as the diet progresses.

During the first eight weeks, you should test one food each day, eating a normal-sized portion for

lunch or supper. A reaction to the food might occur quite soon after the meal, or some hours later. Any

symptoms that occur within the following 24 hours should be provisionally attributed to that food.
Unfortunately, bowel symptoms can sometimes take longer to develop – up to 48 hours. This can confuse

things when a new food is being tested every day.
There may also be uncertainty about intermittent conditions such as chronic urticaria. You may not be

absolutely sure that the problem really responded to the exclusion phase. If so, when the symptoms

recur during the testing phase, this may be due to a food, or it may just be coincidence.
Should there be any doubt about which food caused a particular set of symptoms, cut out all the suspect

foods for now, and retest them after a couple of weeks, using a three-day testing procedure (see

below).
When a reaction does occur to a food, stop all testing and go back to the safe diet until you feel

completely better. But don’t wait too long before resuming testing. You need to get through most of the

testing within eight weeks because, for some people, intolerance to the foods begins to fade after

that.
This does not mean that the intolerance has been ‘cured’, unfortunately. A period of eating the food

regularly will soon bring the problem back.
If you are still testing foods after eight weeks, you must change to three-day testing – eat a normal

portion of the food every day for three days, stopping only if you get symptoms. Should you have no

reaction to the food by the end of the fourth day, you can consider it safe. (But leave it out of your

diet for at least another four days.)
There are some special procedures for testing certain foods:
•    When you test wheat, even if it is quite early on, use the three-day test procedure (see

above). Reactions to wheat can be very slow. (If you have rheumatoid arthritis, you should spend a full

five days testing wheat, and eat it at least twice a day.) Don’t use bread to test wheat because this

also contains yeast and other ingredients. Use a pure wheat cereal such as Shredded Wheat – moisten it

with fruit juice if you cannot have milk. Note that some people who react to whole-wheat are sensitive

to the wheat germ, and can tolerate refined wheat, as in white bread and flour. For others only white

flour is a problem – they are usually reacting to additives in the white flour. Careful testing will

sort out these issues.
•    Test milk before cheese and butter. You may react to one but not the others. If you react to

fresh milk, wait a few weeks, then test evaporated milk. Later, you can test goat’s milk and then

sheep’s milk. Some people can tolerate these, but must be very careful not to consume too much of them.
•    You can test yeast using Marmite or yeast-based B-vitamin tablets. Do this before you test

mushrooms, •    At some point, test a canned food. This is to check for reactions to the lining

material used on cans. Choose something that contains no other ingredients or additives, such as

carrots. Test it first in a frozen or fresh form, so that you are sure you don’t have a reaction to the

food itself.
•    Throughout the testing period, continue with cooking all your own food from scratch. At a

fairly late stage in the testing, when you have tested most foods, spend three days eating packaged

food. The idea is to eat a wide range of different food additives all at once. Read the labels

carefully (see p. 172) to check that all the food ingredients are ones which you have already tested

and found safe. You are unlikely to react to these packaged foods, but if you do, you should then

conduct tests with all the individual food additives. You may need some help from a dietitian for this

(see p. 201).
Testing becomes more and more uncertain after 12 weeks. If you
have not completed it by then, reintroduce all the untested foods.
Should your symptoms come back, cut out all those foods again,
then test them individually.
What next?
For anyone who recovers during an elimination diet, and successfully identifies their problem foods, a

period of complete abstinence from those foods follows. After about a year, it is worth testing the

foods again, as the sensitivity may have subsided. (Don’t do this if you have rheumatoid arthritis –

see p. 23.)
If, after a year or two, you find that a food no longer makes you ill, don’t go back to your old ways –

remember that you must only eat the food occasionally. Once every three or four bays is a good rule of

thumb for a food to which you were previously intolerant. You might get away with having it slightly

more often than this, but never go back to eating it daily. If it starts to become your ‘favourite

food’ again – the thing you fancy more often than anything else – watch out.
Good nutrition is an important issue for anyone avoiding certain key foods. If you have cut out all

milk products, for example, you should probably be taking a calcium supplement, unless you eat a lot of

other calcium-rich foods. Ask your doctor to refer you to a dietician or nutritionist if you feel you

need help.
An elimination diet for children with eczema
Before putting your child on any kind of restrictive diet, it is vital that you talk to your doctor.

The risks of malnutrition are far higher for children, and there can be serious long-term consequences,

such as stunted growth or impaired intelligence. You must therefore have medical consent and

supervision for an elimination diet.
For young children with atopic eczema, there is rarely any need for a stringent elimination diet, such

as that described on pp. 194-7. Children are usually sensitised to only one or two commonly eaten

foods.
In the case of recently weaned infants, it is enough to simply cut out individual foods, one at a time.

Avoid each food for two weeks, while observing symptoms carefully.
For older children a simple elimination diet, with an exclusion phase which avoids just the most likely

culprits, works well. The foods that you should exclude at the outset are:
•    any food which has given a positive skin-prick test (see p. 69)
•    any food which you think may have caused digestive symptoms, such as diarrhoea, either now or

in the past
•    eggs, milk and all milk products
•    beef and chicken
•    citrus fruits (oranges, lemons etc.)
•    food additives.
If the child’s skin is no better after a week of this diet, cut out the following foods as well:
•    peanuts and other nuts
•    soya
•    fish
•    wheat and maize (corn)
•    tomatoes
•    lamb.
If there is no response after another week, food is unlikely to be contributing to the eczema.
For the testing phase, use three-day testing, as described on p. 197, if you have fewer than ten foods

to test. Use one-day testing if you have more than ten foods to test.
You should begin by testing a very small amount of the food. Wait ten minutes for any symptoms (not

just skin symptoms – the mouth or stomach may also be affected) then give a little more if nothing has

happened. Build up gradually to testing a normal portion of the food.
A more cautious approach is required for children who give positive skin-prick tests to foods, or have

a history of symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract. They are more likely to suffer severe symptoms

in the lips, mouth and throat – the type of reaction associated with food allergy. Emergency medical

treatment may be needed. You can see if there is any likelihood of a severe immediate reaction to foods

by starting with a test on the face, and then the outer lip (see box on p. 23). If nothing happens, it

is probably safe to go on to the next stage – giving the child a very small amount of the food to eat.

However, you should have medical supervision for Rare reactions
Very occasionally, atopic eczema sufferers on milk-avoidance diets develop a sensitivity reaction to

calcium supplements. There is no scientific explanation for this, but it has been very well documented

in two children. Should you encounter this problem, the answer may be some alternative natural source

of calcium: sardines or other small fish, eaten whole, are one possibility, assuming your child will

eat fish. A dietician can advise on how much is needed per day.
There has also been one well-documented report of a child reacting to mineral water. When the water she

usually drank was changed to another brand, her eczema cleared up. This is very unlikely to be a common

problem.
this procedure in the case of foods that gave positive skin tests. If your child has both severe eczema

and additional symptoms (such as nettle rash, or symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract) it may be

advisable to have medical supervision when testing all foods.
Bear in mind that atopic eczema naturally fluctuates a great deal. To observe the effects of trying out

a food, you need the child’s skin to be in a steady state. That means being absolutely consistent about

applying steroids and moisturisers, avoiding (for the period of testing) any stressful situations that

could provoke a flare-up, not exposing the skin to sudden doses of irritants or airborne allergens, and

keeping scratching under control. Be aware of other factors that could muddy the waters by provoking a

flare-up of eczema – such as teething, or a cold (see p. 44).
If certain foods are identified as provoking eczema symptoms, and you decide to cut the food from your

child’s diet, a nutritional supplement may well be needed. Ask your doctor to refer you to a

nutritionist or dietician.
Other diagnostic diets
These diets are not used by (or even known to) the majority of doctors. While some, such as the

low-nickel diet, have been subjected to rigorous scientific testing and have shown their worth, others

have not been tested scientifically. The evidence in favour of them is purely anecdotal – in other

words, doctors have used these treatments repeatedly and observed good results with some of their

patients. That is not hard science, but it is how innovations in medicine often begin.
There are few risks with any of these diets – the number of foods to be avoided is small, and you are

most unlikely to become malnourished. Your doctor should not object to you trying any of these diets,

however sceptical he or she may be about its possible benefits.
Low-nickel diet
This diet is sometimes of benefit to adults with eczema. There are various pointers which indicate that

the diet may help, as described on pp. 55-6.
Make sure that you have absolutely no contact with any nickel (e.g. in jewellery, jeans studs, watches

or hair clips) throughout this diet, and for at least two weeks before starting it.
Ideally you should also stop treatment with steroids or antihistamines a week or so before starting the

diet. This allows any improvement to be easily observed. Obviously you should get your doctor’s

permission to do this.
The diet could take anything from six weeks to six months to take full effect. Some people have a

complete clearance of their eczema, while for others there is a partial but distinct improvement.
The foods with a high nickel content, which should be avoided as far as possible, are:
•    shellfish
•    green beans and peas
•    beansprouts and lucerne sprouts
•    dry beans and lentils (pulses) of all kinds; soya protein and products containing it (e.g.

vegetarian sausages and burgers)
•    spinach and kale
•    lettuce, leeks
•    wheat bran (avoid bran cereals and other products; replace wholemeal bread with white bread, or

eat it in moderation only – you can get plenty of fibre from fruits and vegetables; do not eat

multi-grain breads at all)
•    oatmeal, millet and buckwheat
•    raspberries, prunes, pineapple, figs
•    chocolate and cocoa
•    tea from drinks dispensers (restrict intake of other tea and coffee, and don’t make them too

strong)
•    peanuts, hazelnuts, almonds and marzipan
•    liquorice
•    sunflower seeds, linseed
•    baking powder, in large amounts
•    vitamin or mineral preparations that contain nickel (check the label carefully), Nickel is also

found in drinking water, and absorbed from certain cooking utensils, so:
•    Do not use items plated with nickel (e.g. tea balls, some tea strainers, egg beaters). The

extremely shiny appearance of nickel makes these easy to recognise.
•    Do not cook acid fruits in stainless steel pans, since the acid leaches some nickel out of the

stainless steel. An enamel cooking pot is safe.
•    Minimise the amount of tinned food that you eat.
•    In the morning, run off the first litre of water from the tap, as this may contain nickel

released from the tap itself.
Several other foods and drinks seem to aggravate the skin of nickel-sensitive people, even though the

foods are not rich in nickel. These foods and drinks should also be avoided:
•    beer, wine
•    herring, mackerel, tuna
•tomatoes, carrots, onions, apples; oranges and other citrus fruits, including their juices.
Low-chromium and low-cobalt diets
Skin sensitivity to chromium or cobalt can, very occasionally, result in a tendency to react to these

same metals when consumed in food or drink (see pp. 56).
Unfortunately, both chromium and cobalt are essential for good nutrition, so avoiding them is fraught

with problems. You would need the help of a really good dietician, or a doctor with a particular

interest in nutritional problems, to guide you through a diet of this kind.
The only measure you can safely take at home is to cut down on excessive consumption of these metals,

for three weeks only, to see if this produces any improvement in your symptoms. If it does, that should

encourage you to seek expert help for a more thorough avoidance diet.
In the case of cobalt sensitivity avoid:
•    all canned and bottled beer.
In the case of chromium sensitivity avoid:
•    beer, wine and cider
•    yeast extract and yeast tablets
•    black pepper
•    calf’s liver
•    wheatgerm and wholemeal bread
•    cheese.
If you also have nickel sensitivity, avoid nickel-rich foods (see p. 199) at the same time.
Low-histamine diet
Histamine in food is mostly produced by bacterial action. The majority of people can break down any

histamine they eat, as long as the amount is not excessive (see box on p. 67).
Temporary susceptibility to histamine may accompany viral hepatitis or other liver conditions.
A permanently impaired ability to detoxify histamine is relatively unusual. When it does occur it can

result in symptoms such as chronic urticaria, migraine or recurrent headaches. A low-histamine diet may

help in these cases. All of the following should be avoided:
Very high histamine content:
•    red wine, champagne
•    tuna, sardines
•    Emmenthal and Camembert cheeses.
High histamine content:
•    beer, white wine
•    anchovies
•    Gouda, Roquefort, Stilton and all other well-matured cheeses
•    salami and other well-matured sausages, Westphalian ham
•    sauerkraut
•    spinach
•    tomato ketchup.
If you improve only partially on this diet, this may indicate that you are on the right track

(histamine is indeed the problem) but that the bacteria in your gut are undermining your efforts with

the additional histamine which they generate. You can investigate this possibility by trying a

low-carbohydrate diet, as described on p. 53.
Low-amine diet
Naturally occurring substances called amines, found in many different foods, can have a drug-like

effect on the blood vessels, making them open up a little and so increasing the blood flow. The effect

is usually small, but some people are more susceptible than others. A low-amine diet is worth trying if

you have chronic urticaria or migraines, and have not improved with other treatments. A low-amine diet

can also be useful in atopic eczema: amines in food are not a basic cause of eczema, but they can

aggravate the rash by increasing blood flow to the skin. To begin with, cut out all foods listed below:
Very high amine content:
•    all cheeses except cottage cheese
•    dark or plain chocolate
•    yeast extract (Marmite etc.), miso, tempeh, tomato paste, tandoori spice mix, stock cubes,

ready-made sauces •    cola drinks, orange juice, tomato juice
•    any dried, pickled or smoked fish
•    sausages, pies and smoked meats, beef liver, chicken skin
•    broad beans, spinach
•    sauerkraut
•    almonds.
High or moderate amine content:
•    milk chocolate
•    soy sauce
•    beer, wine and cider
•    pork, including bacon and ham, salami, chicken liver, offal
•    all fresh or tinned fish, except white fish
•    all nuts except chestnuts and cashews
•    sesame seeds, sunflower seeds
•    avocados, aubergines, mushrooms, tomatoes, broccoli, cauliflower
•    olives and olive oil
•    oranges, lemons and other citrus fruits
•    pineapples, bananas, raspberries, strawberries, pineapples, plums, grapes, dates, figs, kiwi

fruit, passion fruit.
Continue for at least three weeks, and longer if your symptoms are normally intermittent. if you

improve, you can then experiment with reintroducing small portions of foods from the second list, three

or four times a week. Gradually build up to a higher intake, but cut back if your symptoms return.
Organic diet
The objective here is to avoid pesticides, i.e. chemical sprays applied to kill fungi and insect pests.

This may be helpful for people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
`Chemical-free’ or ‘unsprayed’ food (crops grown without pesticides) will do just as well as 100%

organic food (which is grown without either pesticides or artificial fertilisers).
The highest intake of pesticides is from fresh fruit and vegetables, so if your budget is tight,

concentrate on buying organic or chemical-free versions of these. If you have a garden, growing some of

your own food will reduce the cost.
You can also reduce the pesticide content of ordinary fruits and vegetables by:
•    Storing them for as long as possible before using them, because the pesticides break down quite

quickly
•    Always peeling them. With difficult-to-peel items such as peaches and tomatoes, pour boiling

water over them and leave them to stand for a few minutes first, as this loosens the skin. Rinse in

cold water, then peel.
•    If peeling is not possible, washing them very well with soap or detergent, then rinsing them

thoroughly
•    Cooking them, as this drives off some of the pesticides; avoid inhaling the steam and ventilate

the kitchen well while doing this.
You should drink mineral water from a reputable source, or use a very high-quality water filter (not a

jug filter).
Additive-free diet
Food additives are occasionally the culprit in chronic urticaria (see p. 53). At the same time as

avoiding additives, people with chronic urticaria should cut out other potential culprits – alcohol,

spices and all aspirin-like drugs (see box on p. 151).
An additive-free diet may also be of value for some people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
In the case of children with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), also called Hyperkinetic Syndrome, the

role of additive-free diets is a contentious issue (see p. 81).
An additive-free diet is very healthy but quite hard work. It means making all your own food from 100%

fresh, unmodified produce (you cannot have bacon or ham, and even things like cooked chicken and

ready-to-eat salad can contain some additives; so does most restaurant food). Note that wines, beers

and other alcoholic drinks can contain many additives without declaring them on the label. (German

bottled beer is an exception here.) Baked goods sold unwrapped can also contain many additives without

declaring them.
Stop using toothpaste unless it is an additive-free brand. You can buy such toothpaste from a

health-food shop – or use sodium bicarbonate powder instead. Drink mineral water or filtered water (you

need a good-quality filter for this, not a jug filter).
Medicinal drugs can contain colourings and other additives, so you should try to get additive-free

versions. Talk to your pharmacist about this initially.
Assuming the symptoms clear up, testing can begin, but you will probably need medical help to work out

exactly which additives are at fault. It is difficult to organise these tests at home, because most

foods contain such a mixture of additives.
With chronic urticaria, there is the possibility of quite severe reactions on testing, so medical

supervision is desirable. You can undertake cautious testing with small amounts of tap water, spices

and alcohol at home, but make sure you are in a position to get emergency medical help if you need it.

Aspirin or aspirin-like drugs should not be tested at home. Life-threatening reactions are common in

sensitive individuals, and temporary avoidance can heighten your reaction.

When it comes to making bread and cakes, wheat has some remarkable cooking properties that nothing else

can match. Its characteristic proteins, called gluten, form very strong elastic threads. These make a

stringy dough that can be stretched and stretched as the bread rises. As a result, the bubbles of gas

given off by the yeast or baking powder are all embraced by the dough, giving an open, airy consistency

to the finished product.
Have no illusions – without wheat flour you cannot make a crispy baguette or a well-risen cottage loaf.

If you are able to eat rye, then rye flour makes a pretty good substitute, because it also contains

gluten, though not as much as wheat flour. But a gluten-free diet excludes rye too (see p. 177), and

then baking definitely becomes a challenge.
Even on a gluten-free diet, however, you can still make several perfectly edible, even delicious, types

of bread and cake. The secret, especially with bread, is to accept that the texture is going to be

different from wheat-based bread, but to add enough interesting flavours to give the finished product

its own special character. The gluten-free bread you make at home will taste vastly better than the

pale and pappy commercial substitutes – and at a fraction of the price.
Wheat-free and gluten-free bread tends not to keep as well as ordinary bread, so make a batch of small

loaves and freeze some of them. You can slice them before freezing, then extract and defrost a few

slices at a time, as needed. Bread that is not frozen should be kept in a plastic bag in the

refrigerator. Even when kept in this way, the bread gets rather dry and tough after a few days, and

will benefit from being toasted. Try spreading it with butter, margarine or solidified olive oil (see

page 182) before putting it under the grill – this revives bread far better than ordinary toasting.
Pastry-making without wheat is also a challenge (see p. 180) but cakes, biscuits and other sweet items

are much less of a
problem. As long as you accept the limitations of non-wheat flours, cakes can be made perfectly well

using gluten-free flours. With the right culinary tricks, you can even make a light fluffy sponge (see

pp. 180-81).
To thicken sauces and gravy, you can use cornflour or any other non-wheat flour.
If you have an allergy or intolerance to other foods, besides wheat, the recipes here can be adapted

accordingly. For example, commercial egg replacers (see p. 186) can be used in place of eggs, and milk

substitutes (see p. 183) can replace cow’s milk.
Wheat-free diets
This section is for people with an allergy or intolerance reaction to wheat. Those with coeliac disease

should read the section on gluten-free diets.
In devising a successful diet for yourself, you need to take account of two factors:
1 How sensitive are you? If you have a true allergy (see p. 62) to wheat, you may be very sensitive and

need to avoid even the tiniest amount of wheat. But if you are just intolerant of wheat (see pp. 74-6),

you probably won’t react to such small amounts. so you don’t need to be so careful.
2 Are you sensitive only to wheat, or do you also react to related cereals, namely rye, barley and

oats? Some people have to avoid these as well, because of cross-reactions (see p. 14).
Those who are highly sensitive to wheat and have cross-reactions to related cereals, need to follow the

same kind of diet as the most sensitive coeliacs (see Gluten-free diets). Ready-made gluten-free foods

(such as bread and biscuits) can be useful, and they should be safe for you, unless you are

ultra-sensitive.
Those who don’t have any cross-reactions to related cereals can tolerate the following:
•    rye bread and rye crackers, as long as they are 100% rye
always double-check. If you buy rye bread from a local bakery, and it is unlabelled, make sure the

staff understand that you must always have 100% rye bread. Ask them to tell you if they ever change the

recipe – and jog their memories about this from time to time.
•    beer – as long as it is brewed using barley. Most is, but watch out for German Weissbier, which

is made from wheat.
•    oatcakes, as long as they don’t contain wheat flour or bran. Check the label carefully.
Gluten-free diets
A gluten-free diet is more restrictive than a wheat-free diet, since gluten is also found in rye,

barley, triticale and spelt. All these must be carefully avoided.
At one time, this list would have included oats as well, but new research suggests that the proteins

found in oats, called avenin, are sufficiently unlike gluten to be safe for many coeliacs. If you have

coeliac disease, you must have medical approval before eating oats. Only those who are healthy and

doing well on a gluten-free diet should try oats, and they should not eat more than one small serving

(less than 50g/13/4oz) per day. It is vital that the oats are grown, harvested, transported, milled and

packaged separately from all wheat to avoid contamination. See your doctor regularly for check-ups (and

if possible a biopsy) to check that the oats are not causing problems.
Various flours are used to make gluten-free breads, including
flours derived from rice, potatoes, soya beans and buckwheat (not
a true wheat). These are sold in health-food shops, and can also
be bought by mail order. For gram flour, try Indian groceries. There
are also special gluten-free bread mixes available in both health-
food shops and pharmacies, but these almost always contain
soya, and it is best to avoid eating too much soya (see page 71).
coeliacs who are extremely sensitive to gluten, and have to
avoid all trace of it, should be very careful about ready-made food.
These are just some of the unexpected sources of gluten:
•    Thickeners and stabilisers sometimes contain traces of gluten. These additives are very widely

used in ready-made foods.
•    A number of food additives (including caramel, citric acid, dextrin, mono- and di-glycerides,

gum base, malt, malt flavouring, maltodextrin, maltose, MSG and vegetable gum) are manufactured from

wheat, barley or oats. Although the amount of gluten/avenin they contain is extremely small, it can

affect a few coeliacs.
•    Barley enzymes, used to make rice milk, some brands of soya milk, soy sauce and miso, can leave

minute traces of gluten in the finished product. Blue cheese can also contain minute traces of gluten

(see p. 174).
•    Whisky and gin – both grain-based spirits – can contain gluten. So may distilled white vinegar.

These will only affect the most sensitive coeliacs, whereas beer must be avoided by all coeliacs, since

it is made from barley.
•    Composite ingredients in ready-made food are covered by the 25% rule (see p. 174), and

frequently contain wheat.
•    Wheat flour may be used as an aid to food preparation, leaving tiny residues in the food (see

p. 174).
•    Non-wheat flour may be delivered to the factories, or transferred from one area to another,

through hoppers or vacuum tubes that have previously been used for wheat flour. Very low levels of

contamination can occur in this way, sufficient to affect those coeliacs who are extremely sensitive.

This is one problem with gluten-free foods (see below), unless they are made in dedicated gluten-free

factories.
•    Products labelled ‘gluten-free’ may not be suitable for the most sensitive coeliacs. Testing

for very small amounts of gluten is difficult, and the international standard set by the FAO/WHO (not

more than 200 parts per million) is dictated by what can be accurately measured, and therefore policed.

Many countries (e.g. Sweden and the United States) feel that the permitted level of gluten should be

lower, and have set their own standards. These higher standards can be achieved by careful control of

the production methods.
There is a great deal of useful information about gluten on the
Internet, but there is also some very misleading information on one
particular website. It is advisable to consult several different sites.
Wheat-free baking powder
Some brands of baking powder contain a little wheat flour. You can make a wheat-free version by mixing

60g (2oz) sodium bicarbonate with 125g (41/2oz) cream of tartar and 60g (2oz) of a non-wheat flour.

Sieve together very thoroughly.
Brown bread
This mixture of buckwheat and potato flour makes a light-textured loaf that also toasts well.
PREPARATION TIME: 15 minutes, plus about 1 hour rising time
COOKING TIME: about 35 minutes
MAKES: 1 large loaf
250g (9oz) buckwheat flour
250g (9oz) potato flour 1 tsp salt
1 sachet easy-blend yeast
25g (1oz) butter
1 tbsp black treacle 1 large egg, beaten
Mix the flours, salt and yeast in a large bowl and rub in the butter. Dissolve the treacle in 225ml

(8fl oz) hand-hot water. Add this and the egg to the flour, and mix to a soft dough. Transfer to a

buttered 900g (21b) loaf tin, wrap in a polythene bag and leave in a warm place for about 1 hour – or

until the mixture has risen to the top of the tin.
Bake in a preheated oven at 220°C/ 425°F/gas mark 7 for about 35 minutes until risen and firm to the

touch. Remove from the tin and tap the base – it should sound hollow. If not, return to the oven for a

further 5 minutes. Cool in the tin for 10-15 minutes.
Variations: many different kinds of flavourings can be added to this bread. Try seeds such as poppy

seeds, mustard seeds, caraway seeds and onion seeds (Indian stores usually stock these with their

spices). Sunflower seeds and sesame seeds – either plain or lightly toasted – are also good. A

combination of black olives, sun-dried tomatoes and a pinch of mixed herbs makes a Mediterranean -style

bread.
Seeded rice bread
This makes a delicious, ‘nutty’, textured loaf that is yeast-free as well as wheat-free. It toasts

quite well.
PREPARATION TIME: 30 minutes COOKING TIME: 40 minutes MAKES: 1 small loaf
150g (5′12oz) brown rice, well rinsed
100g (31,2oz) rice flour 100g (3V2oz) fine oatmeal
1 tsp wheat-free baking powder
1 tsp salt
50g (13/4oz) sunflower seeds
25g (1oz) linseed
1 large, slightly under-ripe pear. peeled, cored and coarsely grated
2 large eggs, beaten
2 tbsp vegetable oil
4 tbsp buttermilk, live natural yogurt, milk or milk substitute
Cook the rice in plenty of boiling water for 15-20 minutes until tender. Drain thoroughly and cool

slightly.
Preheat the oven to 200°C/400°F/gas mark 6.
Combine all the ingredients in a large bowl, then transfer to a well-oiled 450g (1 lb) loaf tin and

bake for about 40 minutes, until slightly risen and golden, and firm to the touch. Cool slightly, then

turn out onto a wire rack and leave until completely cold. Serve cut into thick slices.
Banana loaf
This semi-sweet bread is yeast-free as well as gluten-free. It is good for packed lunches – and it

toasts well.
PREPARATION TIME: 10 minutes COOKING TIME: about 1 hour MAKES: 1 large loaf
4 medium ripe or under-ripe bananas 300g (10′,12oz) brown rice flour, sieved 100g (3112oz) butter,

softened
2 tbsp wheat-free baking powder 2 large eggs
225ml (Bfl oz) milk or soya milk
Butter and line the base of a 900g (21b) loaf tin. Peel and cut up the bananas and place in a food

processor with the remaining ingredients. Blend thoroughly, then transfer the mixture to the prepared

tin Bake in a preheated oven at 180  350°F/gas mark 4 for about 1 hour until risen and firm to the

touch. Cool in the tin then turn out onto a wire rack and leave to cool completely.
Rich herb bread
This is useful for those who have to avolo yeast as well as wheat/gluten.
PREPARATION TIME: 20 minutes COOKING TIME: 30-40 minutes MAKES: 1 small loaf
1108 (4oz) gram or chickpea flour
1 tsp syrup or honey
2 tbsp olive oil
1 tsp salt
1 unripe pear, peeled and grated
200m1 (7fl oz) boiling water
2 eggs
V2  onion, finely chopped
fresh herbs (thyme, tarragon or marjoram)
Mix the first five ingredients, then pour on the boiling water. Separate the eggs, beat the yolks

thoroughly and add to the flour mixture when It has cooled, along with the onion and herbs. This

mixture should now be the consistency of double cream. If too thick, add a little more water.
Whisk the egg whites until they will stand in soft peaks. Carefully fold them into the flour mixture.

Pour into a well-greased loaf tin and cook at 180 - C/ 350°F/gas mark 4 for 30-40 minutes.
Seeded rice bread    Pressed prune and walnut bread
Crispy millet baps
Tasty and filling, these are popular with children. They make no pretence to be bread but are an

excellent substitute for breakfast toast or a lunchtime sandwich. They are free from yeast, milk and

eggs, as well as wheat.
PREPARATION TIME: 30 minutes COOKING TIME: about 20 minutes MAKES: about 20 small baps
225g (Boz) millet seeds
1 tsp salt
150g (5′,12oz) peanut butter (or cashew, pecan or another nut butter)
1 tsp sesame seeds, toasted until golden
oil for frying
Wash the millet and soak overnight. Wash again to remove the starch, drain and add 600ml (1 pint) water

plus the salt. Boil over a low heat for 20 minutes, or until the water is absorbed.
While still hot add the nut butter and sesame seeds. Mix together well using a potato masher to break

up the millet. Take egg-sized lumps of the mixture, roll into a ball between the palms of your hands,

then squash into a flattish shape. It is vital to do this while the mixture is still warm.
Fry the baps in oil over a low heat, for about 20 minutes, or until the outside is golden and crunchy.

(They can also be frozen, and then fried from frozen, for a quick meal.) Serve with fruit or a salad.
Savoury spiced pancakes
This variation on a traditional drop scone makes a good substitute for bread. The pancakes are

delicious served warm from the pan. When cold, they may be reheated in a moderate oven.
1008 (3112oz) gram flour
1008 (3 72oz) rice flour
1 tsp wheat-free baking powder
1 tbsp ground cumin
large pinch of salt
1 large egg
300mi (112 pt) coconut milk
vegetable oil for frying
To serve:
Skinned and chopped fresh tomato mixed with a little freshly chopped coriander, or fried mushrooms with

chopped spring onion and parsley moistened with a little crbme fraiche.
Mix the dry ingredients together in a bowl then beat in the egg and coconut milk to give a thick

batter. Set a large non-stick frying pan or griddle over medium heat. Generously oil the surface of the

pan then drop well-spaced tablespoons of the mixture into the pan.
Cook until the edges of the drop scones start to form bubbles and the base of each is golden, then

carefully turn and cook on the second side until golden. Keep warm, covered with a clean tea towel,

while you make the rest.
Serve warm, spread with butter or topped with one of the savoury mixtures.
Variations: for sweet drop scones omit the cumin and add 25g (I oz) caster sugar and either a sweet

spice such as cinnamon, or the finely grated zest of 1 lemon or orange.
Pressed prune and walnut bread
Based on a traditional Spanish recipe, this is delicious served with cheese, or as a snack on its own.
PREPARATION TIME: 10 minutes, plus overnight COOKING TIME: 45 minutes MAKES: 1 x 18cm (7in) loaf
500g (1 lb 2oz) ready-to-eat pitted prunes 100g (3%2oz) walnut or pecan halves 50g (13/4oz) brown rice

flour
1 large egg, beaten
Place all the ingredients in a bowl and mix together. Press into an oiled 18cm (7in) sandwich tin,

cover with oiled foil and cook in a preheated oven at 170°C/ 325°F/gas mark 3 for 45 minutes. Place a

heavy weight on top and leave until completely cold before unmoulding. Serve cut into thick slices

using a serrated knife.
PREPARATION TIME: 25 minutes MAKES: about 27
Walnut macaroons    Lemon surprise pudding
Millet tabbouleh
Tabbouleh is a salad from the Middle East that is traditionally made with cracked wheat. Millet makes a

very tasty wheat-free alternative. This dish can be useful for packed lunches.
PREPARATION TIME: about 40 minutes MAKES: 4-6 servings
175g (6oz) millet 7 tbsp olive oil
3 tbsp lemon juice
3 tbsp each freshly chopped mint and
flat-leaf parsley
2 spring onions, finely chopped
salt and pepper
Place the millet in a saucepan with 1 tbsp oil and cook over medium heat, stirring, for 2-3 minutes

until lightly toasted. Stir in 350ml (12fl oz) boiling water and simmer uncovered for about 20 minutes

until the water is absorbed and the millet seeds are just cooked. Transfer to a bowl, stir in the rest

of the oil and season generously. Stir in the lemon juice and fork it through the mixture. Leave to

cool, then add the herbs and spring onion and stir well.
Variations: add other finely chopped ingredients such as tomato, red pepper or dried apricots.
Wheat-free flan pastry
Make a flan as suggested below, or chill the pastry then grate it roughly over a savoury or sweet pie

filling. For a savoury pie, the grated pastry can be mixed with grated cheese.
PREPARATION TIME: 15 minutes, plus 30 minutes freezing
COOKING TIME: about 20 minutes MAKES: 1 x 20cm (8in) flan case
125g (412oz) fine cornmeal (maize flour) 50g (13/4oz) gram flour
25g (1 oz) arrowroot powder
25g (I oz) ground almonds
75g (23/4oz) butter or baking margarine 1 egg white
Mix the dry ingredients together in a bowl then rub in the butter. Mix to a soft dough with the egg

white. Press the pastry evenly into a 20cm (8in) fluted flan tin and set in the freezer for a minimum

of 30 minutes.
Preheat the oven to 200′C/400′F/gas mark 6 and cook the flan case towards the top of the oven for about

20 minutes, until lightly golden.
Variation: for sweet pastry, add 25g (I oz) caster sugar
Rich cheese biscuits
These crisp biscuits are good to serve with drinks. Store them in an airtight tin.
PREPARATION TIME: 20 minutes COOKING TIME: about 25 minutes MAKES: 20 biscuits
55g (2oz) soya flour
40g (1 V2oz) potato flour
40g (I Y2oz) rice flour
115g (4oz) butter, softened
1158 (4oz) Cheddar cheese, grated
1 large egg, separated
2 tbsp seeds such as celery or poppy
Mix the flours together in a bowl, then work in the butter, cheese and egg yolk to give a firm dough.

Roll into 20 balls. Lightly whisk the egg white and turn the balls in it until lightly coated, then dip

in the seeds to coat lightly.
Space the balls well apart on baking trays and press down firmly to flatten. Bake in a preheated oven

at 200°C/400 T/ gas mark 6 for about 25 minutes until golden. Cool slightly then transfer to a wire

rack. Leave until cold and crisp.
Whisked sponge cake
This cake’s lightness lies in the whisking. A trail of the mixture, falling from the whisks, should

remain visible for at least 30 seconds. Then it’s time to add the flour.
PREPARATION TIME: 25 minutes COOKING TIME: 25-30 minutes MAKES: 1 x 23cm (91n) cake
75g (2314oz) gram flour
50g (13/4oz) cornflour
4 large eggs
125g (4 V2oz) caster sugar
50g (13/4oz) butter, melted
To serve:
jam or lemon curd
whipped cream (optional)
caster sugar
Sift the flours together. Butter a 23cm (9in) spring-release tin and line the base with greaseproof

paper. Using a handheld electric whisk, whisk the eggs and sugar in a heatproof glass bowl over a

saucepan of simmering water for about 10 minutes until thick and mousse-like.
Fold the flour into the egg mixture in 2-3 batches until completely incorporated, then fold in the

butter.
Transfer to the prepared tin and cook in a preheated oven at 190′C/375′F/gas mark 5 for about 25

minutes until risen and golden. Cool slightly then remove from the tin and cool on a wire rack. When

cold, split and fill with jam or lemon curd, and whipped cream if wished. Dust with caster sugar.
Walnut macaroons
These biscuits are good with coffee. Store in an airtight container. If you want, only decorate half of

them with walnut halves, then sandwich together with the other halves using coffee-, chocolate- or

orange-butter cream, or whipped cream. Do this just before serving.
PREPARATION TIME: 15 minutes COOKING TIME: about 45 minutes MAKES: 24
rice paper
2 egg whites
100g (3112oz) golden icing sugar
1008 (3 Y2 oz) walnut pieces, finely
chopped
grated zest and juice of 112 small unwaxed
lemon (if waxed, wash thoroughly in
hot water)
24 walnut halves
Line a large baking tray with rice paper. Whisk the egg whites in a heatproof glass bowl until stiff.

Stir in the icing sugar, chopped walnuts, lemon zest and juice, and stir over a saucepan of simmering
water for about 10 minutes until the mixture is slightly stiffened. Drop well-spaced spoonfuls of the

mixture onto the rice paper and top each with a walnut half.
Bake in a preheated oven at I 50′C/300′F/gas mark 2 for about 45 minutes. They should be risen but

still slightly chewy. Cool on the tray, then trim away the excess rice paper.
Lemon surprise pudding
The surprise is in the two layers. You end up with a creamy lemon sauce topped with a delicate sponge.
PREPARATION TIME: 20 minutes COOKING TIME: about 45 minutes MAKES: 4-6 servings
50g (1314oz) butter
125g (4 Y2oz) caster sugar
2 large eggs, separated
25g (1 oz) cornflour, sieved
25g (1oz) fine cornmeal (maize flour), sieved
finely grated zest and juice of 2 unwaxed lemons (if waxed, wash thoroughly in hot water)
250m1 (9fl oz) milk To serve:
icing sugar
Cream the butter and sugar with 1 tbsp hot water until pale and fluffy. Beat in the egg yolks followed

by the flours. Slowly stir in the lemon zest and juice, and then the milk. The mixture may appear to

have curdled but this is normal.
Whisk the egg whites to form soft peaks, then fold into the lemon mixture. Transfer to a 1 litre (13/4

pint) ovenproof dish and set in a roasting tin. Pour hot water from a kettle around the dish and cook

in a preheated oven at 180°C/350°F/gas mark 4 for about 45 minutes, until risen and just firm to the

touch. Dust with icing sugar and serve immediately.
Apricot and apple Eve’s pudding
This wheat-free Eve’s pudding can be varied by changing the fruit. Try peaches, strawberries or

blackberries instead of the apricots.
PREPARATION TIME: 30 minutes COOKING TIME: about 1 hour MAKES: 4-6 servings
400g can of apricot halves in juice
2 medium cooking apples, peeled and thickly sliced
50g (1314oz) caster sugar
Topping:
125g (472oz) butter, softened
125g (4 Y2oz) caster sugar
2 large eggs
125g (4V2oz) ground almonds mixed with
1 tsp wheat-free baking powder
50g (1 31ioz) flaked almonds
To serve:
pouring cream or whipped cream
Pour the juice from the can of apricots into a saucepan, add the apple and sugar and cook gently for

about 5 minutes, until the apple is softened. Remove from the heat and stir in the apricots. Transfer

to a 1 Iltre (13/4 pint) ovenproof dish.
In a separate bowl, cream the butter and sugar together until pale and fluffy then beat in the eggs one

at a time. Fold in the ground almonds and baking powder. Spread the almond mixture over the fruit and

sprinkle with flaked almonds. Cook in a preheated oven at 180°C/ 350°F/gas mark 4 for about 1 hour

until risen and golden and just firm to the touch. Serve with pouring cream or whipped cream.

Allergy: Selecting the Right Food

An avoidance diet is for people who already know what food or foods affect them, and simply need to

avoid those foods. A diagnostic diet is for those whose symptoms suggest that they might be suffering

from food sensitivity of some kind, and who cannot be diagnosed by indirect methods such as skin tests,

because true food allergy is not involved. A diagnostic diet is intended primarily to show whether or

not food is causing the symptoms.
The diagnostic diets themselves fall into two basic categories. Firstly, there are diets that, by a

process of elimination, identify a particular food (or foods) as a cause of symptoms. Called

elimination diets, these are used to diagnose idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74) and certain other

kinds of sensitivity reactions to particular foods. An elimination diet is purely diagnostic - simply a

means to establish which foods are at fault. To this end, all commonly eaten foods are avoided at the

outset, and each food is then tested individually. Once an elimination diet is complete, the

information gathered is used to establish a suitable avoidance diet. For example, if milk, wheat and

oranges caused symptoms during the testing phase of the elimination diet, those foods are all avoided

in future.
Secondly, there are specific diagnostic diets, which are a great deal simpler to carry out than

elimination diets. A specific diagnostic diet aims to reduce the intake of a particular substance that

is found in certain foods. The substances concerned -histamine or nickel, for example - are known to

cause particular symptoms in susceptible people.
A specific diagnostic diet simply cuts out all the foods that contain large amounts of the substance
under suspicion. If this diet alleviates the symptoms, and does so consistently, it is plausible that

the substance concerned is indeed the culprit. However, the diet should be stopped and then started

again, preferably several times, to check the response. Once the sensitivity is confirmed in this way,

the avoidance diet which follows is basically the same as the diet used for diagnosis.
Note that there is no agreed terminology for these different kinds of diet, and the definitions given

above will not necessarily be followed in other publications. You may even come across ‘elimination

diet’ being used to mean ‘avoidance diet’, which is particularly confusing. If you are consulting other

sources of information, check the context carefully to see what meaning is intended.
There is one odd man out in this chapter - the diet to protect against asthma, described on pp. 206-7.

It is neither an avoidance diet nor a diagnostic diet, but a health-promoting diet of the kind commonly

advocated to combat other widespread conditions, such as cancer and heart disease. In fact, it has a

remarkable number of similarities to diets that reduce the risk of these other diseases.
The anti-asthma diet is immensely healthy, whereas many avoidance diets carry a risk of malnourishment.

An allergic individual following any kind of restrictive diet - especially a child - should be

medically assessed for the possible risks. That is why it is important to talk to your doctor before

starting any dietary treatment or investigation. A referral to a dietician or nutritionist may be

necessary, and your doctor can arrange this.
When malnutrition does occur as a result of self-treatment, there are often very complex factors at

work. One potential hazard with dietary treatment is that psychological problems can easily become
entwined with obsessions about food. Eating can be a potent form of self-expression, or a way of

exerting control over oneself and others. Many doctors have seen patients who are mistakenly convinced

that food sensitivity is at the root of their health problems, or those of their children. In some

cases, no amount of objective evidence to the contrary will deflect people from such beliefs.
A few people with mistaken beliefs of this kind impose very restrictive diets on themselves - or

sometimes on the whole family. The food rules that they establish may be a way of limiting contact with

the outside world, avoiding other problems and issues by making diet the central focus, or simply

making demands on other people’s time and attention.
The current fad for identifying ‘food allergy’ using very dubious diagnostic tests (see p. 93) will

probably send many more psychologically vulnerable people down this route.
Another unhelpful trend in the dietary field is the wholesale (and usually ineffective) use of

vitamins, minerals and other supplements for a great variety of diseases, including allergy and other

forms of sensitivity. It is important to realise that none of the sensitivity diseases described in

this book has nutritional deficiency as its primary cause, so supplements are not a major part of

treatment in most cases. For the majority of people with some kind of sensitivity disease, a supplement

will make only a small difference, if any. However, it is true that, with some sensitivity problems,

certain supplements may be helpful to certain individuals. The use of Vitamin C in asthma (see p. 207)

is one example of this, and there are some other instances mentioned in Chapter 2.
Generally speaking, it is better to get the vitamins, minerals and other nutrients you need (such as
antioxidants) from food, not from tablets. Studies of adult-onset asthma have shown that only natural

Vitamin E protects against the disease: supplements have no effect.
Many vitamins and minerals, along with various plant and animal extracts, are now referred to as

nutriceuticals - in other words, substances that are classed as nutritional supplements for legal

purposes, but are being marketed as if they were medicinal drugs (pharmaceuticals). Many doctors are

concerned about this, if only because of the duplicity involved. These substances can be sold freely to

the public only because they are, in theory, nutritional supplements, yet they are actively promoted to

the public as if they were drugs.
The marketing is usually indirect, to avoid falling foul of the law, but very effective nonetheless.

Advertisements for the product avoid making any medicinal claims, since these would be unlawful, and

just speak vaguely of ‘health-giving properties’. The specific medicinal claims are made in magazine

articles (which often appear right beside the advertisement), penned by journalists who have been

supplied with a great many ‘facts’ - actually unsubstantiated claims -by the manufacturer of the

supplement. These claims are reproduced uncritically, so the journalists are simply acting as

mouthpieces for the manufacturer. There is no law preventing this.
This is a ruse that circumvents important laws intended to protect consumers from misleading

advertising. Few of these products are likely to be damaging - although there are concerns about some,

especially beta-carotene supplements (see p. 207). What matters here are the large amounts of money

being made from products that frequently have few benefits for those who take them.

What exactly is in ready-made food? People with food sensitivity, especially those with severe food

allergy or coeliac disease, need a simple answer to this question, but frequently they don’t get one.

Research among food-allergy sufferers has found that, in the course of a year, half of them

inadvertently eat the food they are trying to avoid, owing to a lack of information about ingredients.

Restaurants and canteens are responsible for many of these accidents, and most of the fatalities (see

p. 111), but packaged food also plays a part.
Unfortunately, many food ingredients that are potentially allergenic, such as milk and eggs, appear in

packaged food without this being stated on the label in everyday language. The information is usually

there somewhere, however – you just need to know what words to look for.
Decoding food labels
The problems with food labels fall into two general categories:
•    some of the ingredients are described using technical terms. These are usually specific

constituents of the original foodstuff e.g. lactalbumin, one of the proteins found in milk.
•    some manufactured ingredients can be made from different starting materials. So an item such as

‘edible starch’ could be made from either wheat or maize (corn), while ‘hydrolysed protein’ could be

made from soya, maize or yeast, sometimes with wheat added.
One day, no doubt, manufacturers will realise what a burden this type of obscure labelling imposes on

their allergic customers and will start using plain language. In the meantime, food-allergy sufferers

just have to learn all the terms that may be used for their culprit food or foods.
Labels used in health-food shops and delicatessens are another matter altogether. Here the problem is

with exotic-sounding items, such as kamut, which is actually an allergenic food (wheat).
Maize (Corn)
Items always made from maize: cornflour, cornmeal, cornstarch, dextrose, polenta
Items sometimes made from maize: baking powder, cereal starch, edible starch, food starch, glucose

syrup, hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, malt, malt flavouring, modified starch,

modified food starch, starch, textured vegetable protein, vegetable gum, vegetable protein, vegetable

starch
Note that the gum on envelopes and stamps is sometimes made from maize, and that many medicines contain

cornstarch.
Eggs
Items always made from eggs: ovalbumin
Items sometimes made from eggs: lecithin (In fact this is rare in foods – lecithin is usually derived

from soya. Only in pharmaceuticals is lecithin likely to be derived from egg.)
Terms used for egg on cosmetics and toiletries: Ovum
Fish
Be very cautious when travelling. The use of fish meal as an ingredient of spicy sauces is common in

Southeast Asia, and in some parts of Africa. The strength of the spices may make the flavour of the

fish undetectable.
Milk
Items always made from milk: casein, casemate, lactalbumin, whey
Terms used for milk on cosmetics and toiletries: Lac
If you see the term ‘dairy-free’ on standard packaged foods, you can safely assume that the contents

are free from goat’s and sheep’s milk, as well as cow’s milk. But be more wary with homemade or locally

produced foods labelled ‘dairy-free’ - some
people think that ‘dairy’ refers only to cow’s milk.
Parev or pareve is a term used for kosher (Jewish) food that contains neither milk nor meat. However,

there can be contamination with traces of milk.
Lactose is a sugar produced from milk, and while it is not allergenic itself, it may contain a trace of

allergenic milk proteins. The amounts involved are tiny, and will only affect the most sensitive

individuals.
The label ‘non-milk fat’ sometimes misleads people if they just glance quickly at labels. The fact that

a product contains non-milk fat does not, of course, mean that it is entirely milk-free -remember to

look for all the synonyms of milk (see above).
Nuts
Items always made from nuts: frangipane, marzipan, praline
Standard packaged food will almost always include the nuts by name, but if you are buying other food

(e.g. from a stall selling home-made food) watch out for the above names.
Be very cautious about unrefined nut oils (see p. 110). Almond essence may be produced chemically, in

which case it is safe, but some is made from real almonds and could be allergenic.
Terms used for nuts on cosmetics and toiletries: Prunus, Juglans, Bertholletia, Corylus
Peanuts
Items always made from peanuts: arachis oil, groundnut oil satay sauce
Unrefined peanut oil should be avoided. This is not much used, and unlikely to be encountered except in

Indian and Oriental cooking. Most groundnut oil sold in Britain and Europe, or used in packaged foods,

is refined and considered safe (see p. 110).
Alternative names: arachide, beer nuts, cacahuete, earth nuts, goobernuts, groundnuts, monkey nuts
You are only likely to encounter these names on imported food, or when travelling. Always be very

careful with Indian or Southeast Asian food, where the use of peanuts is very common and often not at

all obvious. Avoid chocolate from Poland, which often contains peanuts that are not declared on the

label.
Items sometimes made from peanuts: hydrolysed vegetable protein. (The usual source is soya or wheat,

but some is derived from peanuts.)
Terms used for peanut on cosmetics and toiletries: Arachis hypogea, Arachis oil
Sesame
Items always made from sesame or containing some sesame: gomashio, halva, hummus (houmus), tahini, the

drink Aqua Libra
Alternative names: ajonjoli, berme, gingelly, teel, til, simsim
Check carefully for sesame in any food from a health-food shop or a stall selling home-made food, and

in foods from the Middle East, or Chinese packaged food (e.g. stir-fry oils). Sesame oil is always

unrefined and therefore allergenic (see p. 110). Watch out for contamination by traces of sesame in

bakeries and delicatessens where goods are sold unwrapped.
Term used for sesame on cosmetics and toiletries: Sesamum indicum
Shellfish
Items sometimes containing shellfish: curry paste, fish sauce and other sauces/pastes used in Southeast

Asian cooking
Standard packaged food should mention shellfish specifically, but you may need to read the label

carefully. Be cautious about bottles of imported sauce, and home-made or takeaway food.
Soya
Items always or usually made from soya: miso, soy sauce, textured vegetable protein, tofu, vegetable

protein
Items sometimes made from soya: hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, lecithin, vegetable

gum, vegetable starch Changes in ingredients
Unfortunately, the ingredients of a product can change without any obvious warning on the label, or any

change in the packaging. You should always check the label in detail, every time - even on foods that

you have eaten before without any trouble.
Wheat
Items always made from wheat: bran, flour, graham flour, hard flour, strong flour, wholemeal flour

(there are non-wheat brans and flours, of course, but the words ‘bran’ or ‘flour’, without any

qualification, usually mean wheat)
Regional names for particular types of wheat: bulgur or bulgar wheat, Chilton, couscous, dinkel, durum,

einkorn, farro, fu, kamut, semolina, spelt, triticum, triticale (a hybrid of wheat and rye)
Items sometimes made from wheat: baking powder, cereal binder, cereal filler, cereal protein, cereal

starch, edible starch, food starch, hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, modified food

starch, modified starch, starch, textured vegetable protein, vegetable protein, vegetable starch.
Assume that bread, crispbread, pastry, pasta and noodles are made from wheat, unless definitely

labelled otherwise (and read the label in detail too, because a little wheat is often added to items

such as rye bread and rye crackers).
Note that buckwheat is not wheat at all - it is not even a cereal. Nor does it commonly affect

coeliacs, as is sometimes claimed, though a few coeliacs may develop an intolerance reaction to it,

through eating it very regularly.
For more information on avoiding gluten, see p. 177.
Yeast
Items usually made from yeast: leavening
Items sometimes made from yeast: hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein
Labelling loopholes
Manufacturers do not have to include on the label:
•    Any ingredients used in an earlier manufacturing process e.g. yeast used to make bread for

breadcrumbs, wheat flour added to spices or mustard powder during the grinding process, or bread used

to innoculate blue cheeses with mould -this can leave minute traces of gluten in the cheese.
•    Residues left by substances used during processing, such as wheat flour used to dust processing

lines or prevent dried fruits from sticking together. Manufacturers do not need to declare these

residues on the label because the substance serves no function in the final product and is present in

amounts that are considered insignificant. The vast majority of those with coeliac disease or food

allergy will tolerate such microscopic traces, but the most sensitive individuals may not. Some

coeliacs are even affected by food additives manufactured from cereals (see p. 177).
•    The individual constituents of a composite ingredient (such as salami on a pizza), if that

composite ingredient makes up less than 25% of the finished product. This is called the 25% rule. As

from November 2005, this is all set to change, thanks to the European Parliament. The contents of a

composite ingredient like salami will be listed in full. A few composite ingredients with officially

defined contents (such as jam, or chocolate) can be listed just as ‘jam’ or ‘chocolate’ if they make up

less than 2% of the product. Likewise herb mix or spice mix, if less than 2%. But there are certain

items that must always be listed if they are anywhere in the product, and however small the amount.

They are: milk, eggs, tree nuts, peanuts, sesame, mustard, celery/celeriac, fish, crustacean shellfish

(shrimps, prawns, crab etc), soya, wheat and all other cereals that contain gluten. Sulphur dioxide and

sulphites must be listed if more than 1 Oppm. This list will be reviewed from time to time.
`May contain’ labels
Labels reading ‘May contain nut traces’ are springing up like weeds on packaged food. Similar labels

relating to sesame, milk and eggs are also starting to appear.
Allergy sufferers, suddenly unable to eat foods that they formerly enjoyed, feel very frustrated about

this development. Many suspect that these labels are often just a defensive tactic - warning off

consumers with food sensitivity when the chance of the food containing the allergen is actually very

small. The danger is that some allergy sufferers may stop taking the labels seriously. Teenagers, in

particular, are increasingly dismissive of ‘May contain’ labels, and this is a huge worry for parents.
Could the need for ‘May contain’ labels be eliminated altogether with more careful factory procedures?

The problem here is that, with nuts, perfect cleaning of production machinery is extremely difficult.

Most machines have nooks and crannies in which a nut from one production process can become lodged,

only to free itself later during the making of a non-nut product. It is quite possible that someone

could encounter a whole nut, or substantial pieces of nut, in a non-nut product. That is why no one

with nut allergy, even if it is relatively mild, should disregard ‘May contain nut traces’ labels.
Some makers of confectionery and biscuits have now set up dedicated nut-free production lines, with

stringent precautions to avoid any possibility of contamination. This allows them to market products

that are guaranteed nut-free. If you cannot purchase these locally, you may be able to order them by

mail or over the Internet (see p. 255).
Note that packaged foods that have been produced on nut-free production lines in the past can be

switched to different production lines, that necessitate a ‘May contain nut traces’ label.
In some cases, a product is manufactured in two separate places, one of which is nut-free, while the

other is not. Consequently, the same product may sometimes be sold with a ‘May contain’ label and

sometimes without. Don’t disregard these labels, however illogical they might seem.
Packaging errors
As most people with food allergy are now aware, ready-made foods sometimes go out in the wrong

packaging. Alarming cases that have occurred in recent years include hazelnut yoghurts labelled Toffee

Yoghurt, and Vegetable Bake (containing nuts) sold in packets intended for Vegetable Lasagne (no nuts).
Manufacturers are increasingly aware of the hazards and when mistakes are discovered, allergy

information websites and organisations such as the Anaphylaxis Campaign are quickly informed, so that

they can alert allergy sufferers.
Belonging to such an organisation (see p. 255), and/or checking websites regularly, is definitely

recommended for anyone with food allergy. However, you should bear in mind that no information service

can protect you completely from this hazard. The odds against it are high, but one day you might just

be the unlucky person who first discovers a packaging error by suffering an allergic reaction. To

protect yourself as far as possible:
When is a nut not a nut?
Those with nut allergies often worry about eating nutmeg and coconut. In fact, allergic reactions to

these are rare. People with nut allergy are no more likely to react to nutmeg or coconut than anyone

else.
Tiger nuts or chufa nuts are not nuts at all, but the roots of a sedge plant – they are most unlikely

to cross-react with true nuts.
Peanuts, botanically speaking, are not true nuts at all. They are legumes (pulses). There can be

cross-reactions with soya and/or lupin (proceed very carefully with this novel food ingredient) but

reactions with other pulses are rare. Cross-reactions with tree nuts such as almonds and Brazils are

quite common however (see p. 15). Many people with peanut allergy can in fact eat tree nuts, but they

should be aware that a cross-reaction could develop at some stage.
Because cross-reactions between tree nuts are so common, doctors tend to speak simply of ‘nut allergy’.

However, it is possible to be allergic to one type of tree nut, without being allergic to others.
•    always check that the food in the packet looks like the photograph on the packet
•    double-check, when you serve the food, by noting the conspicuous ingredients of the meal

(carrots, for example), and ensuring that they are indeed on the list of ingredients – any discrepancy

should make you suspicious
•    note the smell and appearance of any ready-made food, before you taste it. Do this even for

very simple things such as flavoured yoghurts
•    only have a very tiny mouthful at first, and if you have any tingling of the lips or other

symptoms, however mild, stop eating immediately (this is helpful for true food allergy only, not for

coeliac disease)
•    be especially cautious about vegetarian food if you are allergic to nuts or soya.
Latex in food
Those with latex allergy may react to very small traces of it in food. This sometimes occurs with

packaged food or restaurant food that has been prepared by workers wearing latex gloves. On one

occasion a highly allergic individual reacted to a water glass that had been handled by someone wearing

latex gloves. The amounts of latex involved are minuscule, and only affect those with severe latex

allergy. However, there is a strong case for workers handling food to wear non-latex gloves, especially

with the rise in cases of latex allergy.
There are also reports of people with latex allergy reacting (usually very mildly) to cold-seal

adhesives in food
wrappers, such as those used for ice cream. The reaction only occurs if the wrapper actually touches

the lips or mouth.

Moulds and Other Fungi

The air around us is full of bits and pieces that are mostly too small to be seen without a microscope - pollen grains, mould spores, fragments from plants, fibres from clothing, specks of ash from smoke, skin flakes and diesel particles. Of these, mould spores are by far the most abundant.
Except in very dry climates, there are more mould spores in the air than anything else. In Britain the record count is over 160,000 spores per cubic metre of air, compared to a record pollen count of only 2800 grains per cubic metre. Luckily, mould spores are not particularly allergenic or even more people would be suffering as a result of inhaling such huge quantities of them.
Spores are produced by moulds and other fungi, and they are to the fungus what seeds are to a plant – they can grow into new fungi. Doctors generally speak just of ‘mould allergy’ because moulds are the most common offenders, but larger fungi – mushrooms and toadstools – also produce allergenic spores. For example, a bracket fungus called Ganoderma, that infests dead trees and produces spores prolifically in mid-June, has been found to affect 16% of asthmatics in one part of New Zealand. Bracket fungi occur all over the world, but until recently no one had suspected them of causing allergic reactions, so the extent to which they cause allergies has not been investigated. The same is true of other large fungi.
Yeasts (single-celled fungi) are also found in the air, and it is possible –though this has not been investigated – that people with an allergy to yeast in food would also react to inhaled yeasts.
Indoors and out
Mould spores are a particular nuisance because they can be produced both indoors and out. There are different species of mould in different places, and you may be lucky and only react to one or two uncommon species. But many moulds grow in a very wide range of situations, both indoors and outdoors. There are also cross-reactions (see p. 14) between some of the moulds, unfortunately, which means that people generally react to a great number of different moulds. You will probably need to reduce mould growth inside your home as well as avoiding mould-rich places outside. Changes to your garden that eliminate havens for moulds, such as leaf piles, may also be helpful.
Moulds may only be growing in one part of a house – the cellar perhaps – but can be carried all around the house on air currents.
The size of the allergen particles
Most mould spores are between 2 and 10 microns in size. A few species have spores that are smaller than 2 microns.
(A micron is one thousandth of a millimetre.) Some people with mould allergy may be protected by an ordinary dust mask (see p. 109), but most will probably need a better-quality mask.
Avoiding outdoor moulds
Moulds live in the soil, and grow on any decaying plant matter, such as dead leaves, dying plants, fallen trees, hay and straw. Spore counts are highest in the autumn. A thick covering of snow reduces the numbers of mould spores in the air dramatically. Once the snow melts in spring, moulds flourish on the plants killed by the cold, so spore counts soon rise again.
The effect of the weather on spore release is very complex. Some moulds like to release their spores when it is dry and windy, but others favour fog, mist or dew. Rainfall washes a lot of spores out of the air, but it stimulates the release of some small spores.
A few pollen information services also give current mould-spore counts, but predicting spore counts for the following day is well-nigh impossible.
Drastic avoidance measures, for those who are severely sensitive, include moving to a desert or semi-arid area where there are far fewer mould spores in the air.
Listed below are the mould-rich situations and activities which could provoke your allergy symptoms. If they do, you should avoid them, or wear a mask that will prevent the spores being inhaled (see box on p. 120).
Places
• Near fields of cereal crops in late summer, because of moulds growing on the cereal leaves. Symptoms are likely at harvest time, when combine harvesters disperse the spores.
• In forests and old orchards, in gardens with compost heaps or piles of dead leaves, and in greenhouses.
• Near springs, waterfalls, and other damp, shady places.
Times
• During late summer and autumn, when moulds flourish outdoors on fallen leaves and fruit.
• Following the first frost of autumn, which triggers spore release by fungi in the soil.
Activities
• Disturbing compost heaps, damp straw or hay, piles of grass clippings or heaps of fallen leaves, all of which are absolutely full of moulds.
• Collecting up fallen leaves or fruit.
• Watering the garden because mould spores are released when water hits the dry soil.
• Mowing grass, if the clippings were not cleared up after the last mowing. Unless the weather is very dry, the clippings tend to go mouldy.
• Removing dead leaves or flowers from plants.
A dangerous mould allergy
Anyone with asthma who also has allergy to the mould Alternaria should –with their doctor’s agreement – increase their dose of preventer inhaler (e.g. steroid or cromoglycate) during the spore-producing season. Research shows that severe near-fatal asthma attacks often occur during the Alternaria spore season among those allergic to this mould.
Spore release by Alternaria usually occurs in the summer or autumn, but the timing varies from one part of the world to another, so check with your doctor or a local pollen/spore monitoring service. Alternaria can live outdoors in soil, and on seeds and plants. Indoors, it is a denizen of window frames, carpets and textiles.
Indoor moulds
These are the indoor situations that can be difficult for mould-sensitive people. You should either avoid these, wear a mask, or tackle the problem at source – for example, by reducing dampness (see p. 119).
Places
• Buildings that are damp, because moisture encourages mould growth. Never sleep in a room which has mould growing on the walls or window-panes. In addition to damp houses – now very common – you may encounter moulds in old churches and church halls.
• Buildings that are near lakes, rivers or the sea, because of the dampness of the air. Rooms with humidifiers.
• Bathrooms and shower rooms, unless well ventilated, owing to the steam and condensation.
• Rooms that are generally left unheated, and are therefore colder than the rest of the house, as these tend to suffer from condensation.
• Buildings with dry rot or wet rot. Not all mould-sensitive people react to the spores of these dreaded timber-rotting fungi, but some do.
• Buildings where old timbers are being removed, as this stirs up huge numbers of spores.
• Buildings where central heating has recently been installed, as the warmer temperatures in the building stimulates the existing moulds to release their spores.
• Buildings with lots of indoor plants. There are moulds you cannot see growing on the surface of the soil around a potted plant.
• Cellars and basements. Conservatories can also be full of moulds if not well maintained.
• Antique shops, farms, mills, holiday cottages.
On the first day of Christmas…
Christmas trees usually have moulds (which you can’t see) growing on the needles. When the tree is brought indoors, the warmth encourages these moulds to shed their spores.
Times
• During the winter, when there are usually more moulds growing indoors due to condensation.
Activities
• Handling clothes, curtains or furnishings that smell mildewy: they may be dry now but they will still be full of mould spores.
• Handling vegetables or fruit that have been stored a long
time, or in damp conditions (e.g. in plastic wrapping). Note
that this can include mushrooms – they often have white
moulds growing on them, which can be quite inconspicuous. If looking around your house for moulds, bear in mind that they vary a great deal in colour. Bread, vegetables, cheese and other foods that are past their best grow green, grey or white moulds, often furry, and these are the ones most people are familiar with. But the black stuff on the walls of bathrooms and in the door seals of refrigerators is also mould. In some situations it takes a practised eye to spot this type of mould – around window frames for example, or in the patterns of bathroom-window glass, it can easily be mistaken for ordinary dirt. On shower curtains and cubicles you may find pinkish-red moulds as well as these black kinds. Garden plants and crops can have bright orange moulds (called ‘rusts’) on their leaves, as well as the more familiar grey or black kinds.
Combating indoor moulds
The crucial task here is to reduce dampness and condensation in the house – see p. 119 for the details – as this encourages mould growth on all kinds of surfaces, including walls, ceilings, windows, bathroom tiles, shower curtains, and even carpets. Once you have reduced the humidity, then you can have a big clean-up and remove the spores that have been left by moulds.
If your allergy symptoms are very bad, and you need some immediate relief, then you could get someone to clean away the mould growth and spores first, then tackle the damp problem, then repeat the cleaning operation. Obviously, this is less efficient, but it may be the best approach if you are severely affected.
Note that the cleaning will, in itself, stir up a massive but unseen cloud of spores, so the allergy sufferer should not be at home during this work (see p. 109).
Cleaning away moulds and stopping regrowth
There are two aspects to this task:
• a one-off effort to clear the accumulation of mould growth and old mould spores – trillions of them are probably lying around your house – since these spores are the cause of the allergic reaction
• an ongoing effort to prevent the regrowth of moulds in problem areas such as the bathroom.
Get rid of any furniture that smells ‘mildewy’: it is packed with old mould spores. Fabric items that have this smell should be washed thoroughly. Old clothing, books and newspapers may also be a source of mould spores.
Any carpets or other porous materials (e.g. ceiling tiles, wall panels) that have ever been soaked by flood or storm waters should be disposed of now – and, unless everything can be dried within 24 hours, this should be always be done if there is water penetration in the future. Research shows that such materials quickly become infested with moulds. Check above the flood line, as water can seep upwards through the walls or panelling.
On fridges and freezers, clean out the rubber seals around the doors, going into all the crevices to get out the black mould that lives there. Also clean out the drip-pans of fridges, freezers and dehumidifiers. Keep shower heads and air conditioning equipment (including the filters) very clean. This all needs to be done regularly from now on.
Clean off all the mould growing around windows, or on walls and ceilings, tiles or other surfaces. Alcohol (e.g, white spirit or surgical spirit) kills it very effectively, without the use of water, and it takes a long time to grow back again. You could, alternatively, wash down the walls with a mix of one part bleach to two parts water. (But note that chlorine fumes may be irritating to the airways of those with rhinitis or asthma.) Special anti-mould sprays are also available, but try them out cautiously as they too may be irritants. Do not brush mould growth off with a dry cloth, as this simply disperses the spores. In the future, keep an eye out for new mould growth, and remove it promptly.
Buy a new shower curtain and replace it regularly, or clean it thoroughly with an anti-mould spray.
Can foods and mould spores cross-react?
Some people with mould allergy appear to be affected by eating mushrooms, or foods that contain yeasts or other fungi, e.g. certain well-ripened cheeses, dried fruit, soy sauce and vinegar. There has been little scientific investigation of these claims.
No cause for concern
The drug penicillin – which can cause severe allergic reactions – comes from the Penicillium mould. Fortunately, there appears to be no cross-reaction between the drug and the spores of Penicillium.
Cut down on the number of houseplants, and find a new home for any that need constant moisture. With the remaining plants, take off dying leaves and flowers promptly, and remove the top layer of soil occasionally, replacing it with fresh soil or – even better – sand or grit. Pot-pourri should also be evicted, as it can be full of mould spores.
Use vegetables and fruit promptly, and do not allow bread to go stale, or jam to go mouldy.
What to do if these measures fail
Where there is an invincible damp problem, a really powerful dehumidifier used during the day in bedrooms, and at night in the sitting room, will kill off most moulds and defeat their efforts to regrow. Close all the doors and windows in the room where the dehumidifier is operating, and shut off air vents. Note that air conditioning will also reduce the humidity of the air, but not as much.
Keeping mould spores out of the airways
Ordinary house dust can contain a lot of mould spores. The allergic individual should not dust, vacuum clean, sweep floors or make beds until the anti-mould measures have begun to bite. Ideally the allergic person should go out while housework is done, and the house should be thoroughly aired before their return. If this is impossible, then wearing a good mask all the time is essential. A special vacuum cleaner that retains allergens, or vents them outside. may be helpful in addition to the mask.
Even though you have cut down on moisture and condensation, and tackled mould growth, there could still be a lot of mould spores around, especially in an old house, one that has been very damp in the past, or one that is close to water. If symptoms persist, then think about hiring or buying a high-quality HEPA air filter (see p. 108) to take mould spores out of the air.
Do not use fans or fan heaters, as these churn up mould spores from the floor and other surfaces.
Beating athlete’s foot
Allergenic fungi can grow on your body, as well as in your house (see pp. 16-17). If athlete’s foot is playing a part in your allergies, it is vital to treat the infection thoroughly with drugs, because the fungus grows deep into the skin and can quickly stage a come-back if not completely destroyed. You should also be careful not to reinfect yourself:
• always dry your feet very thoroughly, especially between the toes; kitchen roll does a better job than towels, and can be discarded, reducing the risk of re-infection
• wear cotton socks and shoes made of leather or canvas, which allow sweat to evaporate; only wear trainers or gumboots, or any other footwear that makes your feet feel sweaty, when you really need to
• when your feet get wet, change your socks and shoes promptly
• launder all towels and bath mats at high temperatures when you start the course of anti-fungal drugs, and again when you complete it
• never share towels, bath mats, socks, sandals or shoes
• wear flip-flops at the swimming pool or sauna, and in changing rooms; if any other member of the household has athlete’s foot, take the same precautions in the bathroom at home – and make sure they seek treatment.
Occasionally athlete’s foot is a misdiagnosis for atopic eczema of the feet, which is a common problem among allergy-prone children (see box on p. 45). If the skin between the toes is not affected, it’s unlikely to be athlete’s foot and more likely to be eczema.

Candidal Spores of the Fungus, Candida Albicans.
`As a small child Jason was plagued with ear infections which led to many courses of antibiotics,’ Hannah Mitchell recalls. ‘Eventually he started to get symptoms such as an upset stomach, itchy bottom, flu-like symptoms and extremely itchy eyes. The GP prescribed eye drops and when I put them in Jason screamed his head off. In the morning every single eyelash had fallen out. Jason’s health deteriorated and a few months later his eyebrows started to itch. Within two days every single eyebrow hair had fallen out. His eyes were worse and I was offered steroid eye drops again. Reluctantly I accepted.’
‘Putting the drops in caused Jason extreme pain. The red patches of skin around his eyes spread and the itching increased. I was at the end of my tether when I came across a book in the library about food-related illness…
What Hannah discovered from her reading was that, for many with diarrhoea, bloating, wind and an itchy bottom, the cause can be an overgrowth of yeasts in the gut, caused in part by repeated courses of antibiotics which kill off friendly gut bacteria in the gut flora (see p. 204) and allow yeasts to flourish. This is not mainstream medicine, which is why none of the doctors who had seen Jason mentioned the possibility of yeast overgrowth.
Yeasts are microscopic fungi, so anti-fungal drugs are needed to kill them. However, reducing the intake of sugar in the diet is also very effective because yeasts living in the gut thrive on sugar. Hannah took matters into her own hands, and tried out a diet containing no sugar and no yeast. (The reason for avoiding yeast in food is discussed below.) There was some improvement and, encouraged, she went back to the doctor and asked for anti-fungal drugs.
The doctor agreed, and to Hannah’s immense relief, the combination of diet and drug treatment worked for Jason – it cleared the diarrhoea, wind and itching, and eventually allowed his eyelashes and eyebrows to grow back. (Note that few other patients with yeast problems suffer hair-loss – this is a very exotic symptom – but yeast overgrowth can produce some other quite unusual reactions.)
The elusive culprit
So far, you will notice, I have not mentioned Candida. Among those doctors who study and treat this condition, this particular yeast was once considered the prime suspect. Indeed, the disease itself was called ‘candidiasis’. But the role of Candida is now considered doubtful by many.
Researchers such as Dr John Hunter, of Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, have tried to find Candida in their patients without success. ‘I think now we have to reject the idea of Candida causing the symptoms,’ says Dr Hunter. ‘But I do believe that there is an imbalance in the gut flora – the micro-organisms that live in the gut. I believe that’s at the root of so-called “candidiasis”.’ This new evidence has not yet affected beliefs about candidiasis’ and ‘Candida’ in the complementary health field.
The fact remains that anti-fungal drugs have proved very helpful to many patients with the typical cluster of symptoms –diarrhoea, wind, bloating and an itchy anus – that were previously attributed to Candida. Given the effectiveness of these drugs, it seems probable that yeasts of some kind are playing a large part in this condition. So the term ‘yeast overgrowth’ is being used, rather tentatively at the moment, as a label for this condition. The yeasts concerned have not, as yet, been identified.
The facts about Candida
This box is about Candida as understood by conventional medicine, rather than ‘Candida’ and ‘candidiasis’ as understood by alternative medicine.
The yeast known as Candida lives naturally in the gut, usually causing no trouble. Problems are usually caused by Candida only when it sets up home in the throat, vagina or penis (’thrush’ infections). Such localised infections have well-defined symptoms and, in most cases, are easily treated with anti-fungal drugs. Patients with damaged immune systems, caused by anti-cancer drugs or AIDS, often develop more widespread Candida infections, but this never happens to people with a normal immune system.
Inhaling steroids and not rinsing out the mouth afterwards can make asthma sufferers more susceptible to Candida infections in the throat (see p. 145).
Other symptoms that have been linked to yeast overgrowth are:
• fatigue
• poor concentration
• irritability, depression and confusion
• headache or migraine
• severe premenstrual problems
• recurrent cystitis
• skin rashes
• aching muscles
• chronic urticaria.
Sometimes there is constipation rather than diarrhoea. Recurrent thrush – a genuine Candida infection in the vagina – can also be a feature of this problem. Occasionally allergic symptoms such as asthma seem to get worse with yeast overgrowth.
Is there an allergic reaction to the yeast?
Those with symptoms typical of yeast overgrowth may give a positive skin-prick test to Candida, but what this means is debatable. For one thing, not everyone with this condition gives a positive test. For another, some entirely healthy people give a positive skin-prick test to Candida. To complicate matters, there are a lot of cross-reactions (see p. 14) between different kinds of yeasts and moulds, due to similarities in their chemical constituents. So the positive skin-prick test does not mean that Candida itself triggered the original IgE-response.
The question of whether some kind of sensitivity reaction to yeasts is occurring in those with yeast overgrowth, and contributing to their symptoms, is an interesting one. The benefits from avoiding yeast in food (see Diagnosis and treatment) suggest that it may be – but this is a question that cannot be answered at present.
Diagnosis and treatment
Unfortunately, this is one of those ’suck-it-and-see’ conditions, where diagnosis and treatment are the same – you try the treatment for yeast overgrowth, and if it works you assume that the disease is, or was, yeast overgrowth. This is far from satisfactory, but is the best that can be done at present.
It is only worth trying this treatment if you have quite a number of the symptoms listed. Bowel problems and an itchy anus are characteristic, and if you have neither of these it is unlikely the treatment will help you.
A key part of the treatment is a no-yeast-no-sugar diet (see p. 205). This diet has been developed on a largely pragmatic basis, and seems to work – but why? The rationale for cutting out sugar is clear – it feeds yeasts in the gut. But why avoiding foods containing yeast should help is uncertain. Possibly the yeasty food supplies some special nutrient that benefits the yeasts living in the gut. Alternatively, there might, for some people, be a sensitivity reaction to the yeast in food (see left).
If it seems that you are on the right track, because there is some improvement with this diet, ask your doctor for anti-fungal drugs. You should take these in addition to the diet. Nystatin (see box below) is very safe for most people, since it is not absorbed from the gut. Bacterial replacers (see p. 205) may also be useful.
You may need a referral to a doctor who is knowledgeable about yeast overgrowth but try to avoid those doctors and alternative therapists who are part of the ‘Candida’ craze, and think that ‘candidiasis’ explains a huge variety of illnesses. You may not have yeast overgrowth at all, so you need someone with an open mind.
Eczema and yeasts?
Doctors have found that some children whose eczema looks very red, and is not responding to treatment, have IgE in the blood against a range of yeasts and other fungi (Candida, Trichophyton, Saccharomyces and Pityrosporum). Given the tendency to cross-reactions among fungi (see main text) it is not clear exactly what these reactions indicate. A proportion of these children get much better on anti-fungal drugs, including a drug called nystatin, which is not absorbed through the gut wall – so cannot reach the skin. The eczema improves, and at the same time there is a fall in levels of anti-fungal IgE in the blood. In other words, a treatment that can only affect fungi living in the gut benefits the skin. Exactly what is going on here is unknown, but the important point is that the treatment seems to work. This is a controversial topic, but since nystatin is an extremely safe drug, your doctor may be prepared to try it out. A course of 3-4 weeks is the minimum needed.

Food Intolerance
The comments of those who have recovered from food intolerance after many years of ill-health are always memorable. ‘It’s like getting my life back again,’ said one woman. ‘I had actually forgotten what it felt like to be well,’ said another, ‘the effect of cutting out certain foods was just amazing.’
For most of those with food intolerance, the disease begins very subtly and gradually – first one symptom (persistent and unexplained diarrhoea, perhaps) then, some years later, another (migraine or headaches) and then, when a few more years have passed, another symptom (such as joint pain or muscle aches). Steadily increasing levels of irritability, `fuzzy-headedness’ or inexplicable tiredness may accompany this decline in health.
Most patients have no idea that all these symptoms are connected until they try an elimination diet, and everything clears up at once, quite dramatically. As one former sufferer described it: `Some of the stuff that got better – well, I’d been like that so long I thought it was just the way I was –grumpy and exhausted, and feeling terrible if I didn’t eat meals on time. It was an absolute revelation to feel completely OK again.’
What does ‘food intolerance’ mean?
In this book, food intolerance means any reaction to food where the immune system has no proven central role.
All the people I have described so far have idiopathic food intolerance, which means, food intolerance with no established mechanism – in other words, doctors can’t say exactly how it is caused. This is a highly controversial area.
The definition of food intolerance used in this book means that it also includes metabolic abnormalities, which do have a well-established cause. These are due to defective enzymes (see upper box on p. 75).
The question of what words mean is a key part of the debate over idiopathic food intolerance. At one extreme, you may come across doctors who call this problem ‘food allergy’, using the original meaning of the word ‘allergy’ (see p. 6). (Some of these doctors use terms such as delayed food allergy and masked food allergy, to point up the distinction from true food allergy, but not all do.) Using the word ‘allergy’ in this context causes a lot of aggravation and confusion, so the term ‘food intolerance’ has, for a long time, been widely accepted as a useful one that avoids unnecessary conflict.
You will also hear the term ‘food intolerance’ used to mean idiopathic food intolerance only – this is probably the most common usage. When the term is used in this way, metabolic abnormalities are being thought of as a separate entity altogether.
A new twist has recently been added to this long-standing wrangle over meanings. When mentioning food intolerance in their literature, some of the major medical organisations (those who dispute the very existence of idiopathic food intolerance) now say simply ‘food intolerance e.g. lactase deficiency’. To anyone familiar with this field, it looks suspiciously like an attempt to redefine ‘food intolerance’ so that it means nothing more than ‘metabolic abnormalities’. The idea seems to be that, if you deny a disease a name, it will go away!
In the medical wilderness
The main text of this article is about idiopathic food intolerance, a disease with a distinctly dubious reputation among doctors. Because it is so controversial, few doctors actually look at the evidence that it exists – which is in fact quite strong (see box on p. 77). Such evidence is simply ignored in most of what is written by the major medical organisations debunking idiopathic food intolerance.
This lack of medical recognition is very unfortunate for patients with idiopathic food intolerance, whose debilitating symptoms could be eliminated, rather than simply being treated (usually to little effect) with drugs.
This prejudiced attitude to idiopathic food intolerance also plays into the hands of those offering bogus diagnostic tests and phoney treatments, often at a very high price. These practitioners
– who have moved in to fill the gap left by conventional medicine
– are a considerable part of the problem, helping to give idiopathic food intolerance a bad name.
The waters are muddied even more by the fact that some people who believe themselves to have food intolerance are actually suffering from psychological problems, which they prefer to attribute to food. Many more have picked up on food intolerance as something rather glamorous to suffer from, inspired by all the media reports about food intolerance among celebrities. All these patients are a good source of revenue for the less scrupulous fringe practitioners and are unlikely, therefore, to be discouraged from their beliefs.
Fortunately there are enough conventional but open-minded doctors, often GPs, who have come to realise, through experience with their own patients, that elimination diets have a remarkable curative effect for some people. The ones who benefit are often the doctor’s ‘old faithfuls’ – those with long-term multiple symptoms, who have been referred to innumerable specialists and treated with all kinds of drugs, but who never get much better. The conventional view of such patients is that they have psychological problems that are being expressed as physical symptoms. This may well be true for some – but others have idiopathic food intolerance.
One of our enzymes is missing
Metabolic abnormalities are a distinct type of food intolerance. Unlike other kinds of food intolerance, metabolic abnormalities have a clearly understood cause: an enzyme that carries out a crucial task in the body’s metabolism is either missing or inept. The problem is generally caused by a defective gene and is therefore inherited.
The most common metabolic abnormality is lactase deficiency leading to lactose intolerance (see p. 79) — this may or may not be inherited. Other metabolic abnormalities include:
trehalase deficiency, lack of the enzyme which breaks down a substance in mushrooms and most other fungi, including yeast. galactosaemia, a defect in the enzyme which processes galactose, one of the sugars found in milk (cow’s or human). This is a serious disease and sufferers must avoid milk scrupulously.
fructose intolerance, which is extremely rare. Those affected have an unpleasant taste in the mouth on eating fruit and other sources of fructose, so avoidance is no particular problem.
phenylketonuria, also very rare. Those affected are usually identified early in life, by a routine blood test.
Is it just placebo effect?
Doctors who doubt the very existence of idiopathic food intolerance will say that people who recover on an elimination diet are just experiencing placebo effect — a psychological response that operates with any treatment, whether effective or ineffective, simply because people believe that the treatment will work. But this is to ignore certain facts:
• Placebo effect produces a fairly small improvement in most people — you have to be very suggestible to feel enormously better. By contrast, when people respond to an elimination diet (the standard method for diagnosing idiopathic food intolerance —see p. 194) they usually have a sudden and dramatic improvement.
• Most of those with idiopathic food intolerance have had it for years and tried all sorts of treatments. They have often experienced some small benefit from these, probably placebo effect. When they try an elimination diet, they have a response that is in a completely different league.
• The idea that all the different symptoms are linked has never occurred to many people who try an elimination diet — they are often trying it for just one symptom, and are staggered when everything clears up. Placebo effect relies on expectation.
• Placebo effect doesn’t last very long — it fades over the ensuing weeks and months. Avoiding the culprit food usually produces a lasting improvement for those with idiopathic food intolerance.
Symptoms
The symptoms of idiopathic food intolerance come on slowly after eating the offending food, and the foods to blame are often those eaten very regularly, such as wheat or milk. Consequently, the symptoms from one meal tend to overlap with those from the previous meal and people with idiopathic food intolerance are more-or-less unwell for most of the time. It Is usually not obvious that food is at fault.
All the symptoms of idiopathic food intolerance are common ones that can be caused in other ways. And no two patients have exactly the same set of symptoms.
(As far as doctors are concerned, neither of these attributes gives the disease a respectable air.)
These are some of the symptoms commonly reported:
• headache or migraine
•diarrhoea, sometimes with bloating and wind; this is often diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
• in children, stomach aches
• occasionally constipation
• nausea and indigestion
• joint pain
• aching muscles
• a constantly runny or blocked nose (this could be perennial allergic rhinitis linked to food – see p. 68)
• glue ear (see p. 29)
• fatigue and a general feeling of vague ill-health.
Asthma and eczema, triggered by specific foods (see p. 68), can also be part of the picture.
In babies, colic is often caused by food intolerance, including foods the mother is eating which come through into the breast milk in tiny amounts (see p. 202).
Less common symptoms include:
• recurrent mouth ulcers
• stomach or duodenal ulcers
• chronic urticaria (see pp. 50-53)
• swelling (angioedema).
The following diseases have also been linked to idiopathic food intolerance in some patients:
• Crohn’s disease
• palindromic rheumatism (intermittent episodes of joint inflammation)
• rheumatoid arthritis.
Psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, or hyperactivity in children can sometimes be due to food (see p. 80) but it is rare for such psychological effects to occur without any physical symptoms.
Remember that every single one of these symptoms and conditions can be caused in some other way. However, the constellation of migraine/headache, joint pain and diarrhoea is highly characteristic of idiopathic food intolerance.
How might intolerance be caused?
No one knows how idiopathic food intolerance is caused. There are probably many factors involved, with a slightly different mix of factors in each patient. This would help to explain why the symptoms are so extraordinarily varied, with no two sufferers exactly alike.
Although symptoms accumulate over the years, some people can in fact pinpoint the moment when their problems began. ‘I had this terrible bout of diarrhoea from eating too much melon. I lived near a farm and they were free, because of a glut, so I just gorged myself on them. Although I was over the diarrhoea in a couple of days, I was never what you’d call “regular” after that, and the least thing would upset me. Eventually the doctor said it was irritable bowel syndrome. When the other problems began, ages afterwards – headaches and hypoglycaemia and fatigue – it seemed like something quite separate. I never associated them in my mind with the diarrhoea.’
Bad diarrhoea can clear the intestines of their beneficial bacteria, known collectively as the gut flora (see p. 204), and this is probably what initiates food intolerance in such cases. Large doses of antibiotics (as are sometimes given before an operation, e.g. a hysterectomy), or prolonged and repeated courses of antibiotics, given for glue ear or acne, can also disrupt the gut flora and lead to food intolerance. A study of hysterectomy patients has shown that antibiotic treatment before the operation tends to result in irritable bowel syndrome – a common symptom of idiopathic food intolerance – afterwards.
A few interesting observations suggest that minor metabolic abnormalities – a defect in certain detoxification enzymes – may sometimes play a part in idiopathic food intolerance. This is especially likely where there is intolerance to food additives, or where there are behavioural symptoms (such as hyperactivity) or symptoms involving the nervous system (such as migraine).
A third factor that could play a part for some patients are food-derived exorphins. These are fragments of proteins (called peptides) produced by the digestion of food proteins. They happen, probably by pure coincidence, to resemble the substances called endorphins that we all produce for ourselves. Endorphins
are our internal painkillers. They modify nerve impulses in the body and brain, reducing sensations of pain, and improving the sense of well-being. The receptors to which they bind are the same receptors that bind morphine and heroin - it is the intensive stimulation of these receptors that makes these drugs so effective.
Food-derived exorphins may sound like the stuff of science fiction, but they have actually been demonstrated in the digestion products of wheat and milk. They may exist for other foods as well. They are nowhere near as strong as morphine, but do seem to improve mood.
These exorphins may explain the strange observation (made repeatedly, by a great number of initially sceptical doctors) that patients with idiopathic food intolerance often eat huge amounts of their offending food, and ‘can’t live without it’. Often they eat the food several times day, sometimes at every meal. With a ubiquitous ingredient like wheat or milk, this is not particularly difficult - wheat cereal and milk for breakfast, a cheese sandwich at lunchtime, pasta with a creamy sauce for supper, a milky drink and biscuits at bedtime.
Any of these abnormalities is likely to be just one factor in a multi-factorial disease.
Diagnosis
Unfortunately there are no simple accurate tests for idiopathic food intolerance. The kind of tests you may see offered commercially (in advertisements in health magazines for example) are very inaccurate, and a waste of money. Consequently, the only way to diagnose idiopathic food intolerance is through an elimination diet, in which you cut out all the foods you commonly eat, and then -if you get better - test them one by one.
It sounds easy but it isn’t, so make sure you read all the instructions for doing the diet before you start (see pp. 194-7). You should also see your doctor and get his or her approval. Some symptoms - such as severe diarrhoea or headaches -should be investigated by conventional methods first, in case there is some serious underlying cause.
The first step in diagnosis is to decide if a food really is the cause of the symptoms, and the second step is to identify the food or foods concerned.
The first step is crucial. One of the problems with the diagnostic tests that are advertised - such as those using samples of hair or blood - is that they begin with the second step. In other words they assume that food is the problem (see p. 93).
When it comes to the second step, remember that although common foods are often the culprits, almost anything that is eaten can cause idiopathic food intolerance. Every patient with this problem is different in the foods they react to.
Treatment
Avoidance of the food is usually the best treatment for idiopathic food intolerance - however most people do not have to avoid their problem foods for ever. After a while - it could be six months or it could be three years - you can usually go back to eating it again, but in moderation. You must never start eating the food in large amounts again, and it is best not to eat it every day - certainly not at almost every meal, which is the usual pattern for cow’s milk and wheat in the Western diet.
If you find the restrictive diet too difficult, you could try desensitisation treatment (see pp. 210-13). This can work very well.
The patients who should avoid the culprit food indefinitely are those with Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis: a severe and irreversible relapse can occur otherwise.
The evidence
The evidence for idiopathic food intolerance is more substantial than its opponents would have you believe.
One very well-conducted and interesting study involved children with severe migraine who were investigated by a research team at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London. These are children who are very difficult to treat successfully by normal means. On an elimination diet, 88% of those children got better — an astonishing number. Not just their migraine, but all sorts of other symptoms as well, including aching limbs, runny noses, asthma, eczema, diarrhoea, wind, mouth ulcers and hyperactivity. Some of these children also had epileptic fits, and even this symptom cleared up on the diet, recurring when culprit foods were tested.
A notable feature of this study is that, of the five researchers involved, four were deeply sceptical at the outset. Their report notes that they ‘embarked on this study believing that any favourable response, such as that claimed to substantiate the dietary hypothesis, could be explained as a placebo response. The positive double-blind controlled trial… provides clear evidence that a placebo response was not the explanation.’
Other studies with good scientific credentials have demonstrated a role for idiopathic food intolerance in adults with migraine, and for sufferers from irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn’s disease. There are also good studies of individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis and palindromic rheumatism (an episodic form of inflammatory arthritis) who have responded dramatically to avoidance of a particular food. Some of these patients were given several double-blind challenges and showed changes in certain immunological tests, as well as joint symptoms, when challenged with the offending food. This suggests that the immune system could be playing some part in these food reactions.

Various other things can irritate the skin and make atopic eczema flare up:
• cold weather
• dry air
• long car journeys
• sweating heavily; clothes or shoes that trap sweat may also cause problems
• dust mites, which can act as an irritant, even if not an allergen
• tobacco smoke
• solvents and other chemicals encountered at work
• skin contact with fruit (especially citrus), vegetables, and sometimes other foods. The spray generated by peeling potatoes can even produce eczema on the face.
Anything which increases blood flow through the skin makes the itching worse:
• heat, especially a hot bath or being too hot in bed
• anger or embarassment
• hot drinks of any kind
• coffee, tea and alcohol because of the drug-like substances they contain
• vinegar and spicy foods
• chocolate, soy sauce, yeast extract, orange juice, tomatoes and other foods that are rich in amines (see p. 200).
Various changes in the body can make the eczema worse:
• teething, in babies
• colds and other viral infections
• in women, certain phases of the menstrual cycle.
Many eczema sufferers are aware that their skin gets worse when they are upset, stressed or anxious Oust before examinations, for example). Like other allergic diseases, atopic eczema is not primarily psychological but, once it has begun, psychological factors can play quite a big part.
The good news…
…for children and teenagers, is that if you have eczema as a child, your chances of developing acne during your teens are greatly reduced.
Contact dermatitis too?
People with atopic eczema can develop contact dermatitis (see p. 54) in addition to their existing rash. There is always this risk with regularly applying creams to your skin, especially anything containing fragrance or lanolin. Antihistamine and antibiotic creams also carry this risk.
Even the ingredients in the creams prescribed for eczema – such as moisturisers and steroids – can sometimes provoke contact dermatitis. Creams are more likely to contain sensitising ingredients than ointments. Very occasionally, the sensitivity is to a preservative or emulsifier that is widely used in different ointments and creams, which means that switching brands yields no improvement. Steroid suspended in petrolatum (white paraffin jelly) is the least likely to cause reactions.
The rash produced by contact dermatitis looks no different from atopic eczema, so this sensitivity will be far from obvious. It will just seem as though the atopic eczema is not getting better.
Talk to your doctor if you think there may be a problem of this kind. He or she can check by using the suspect cream on one side of the body, and a different-but-equivalent product on the other side. Patch tests (see p. 92) may also help to identify contact sensitivity.
Diagnosis
There are five separate aspects to diagnosis:
1 Is this really atopic eczema? There are no clear-cut tests for atopic eczema. Instead the diagnosis is based on a ‘points system’ – how many of the typical features of atopic eczema are present? The doctor adds them up, and if there are enough, then it’s atopic eczema. Sometimes all the typical features are there and this is obviously the right diagnosis, but in other cases there may be room for doubt. The doctor should rule out the possibility of contact
dermatitis (see p. 54), especially if you have eczema only, or mainly, on the hands.
2 What avoidable irritants are making the skin worse?
3 Is the eczematous skin infected? The signs of infection are usually clear, but not always, especially with fungal infections. Steroid creams can sometimes mask the overt signs of infections: if atopic eczema is not responding to treatment this possibility should be investigated.
4 Are there any allergic reactions to those infections? Or to the normally harmless microbes that live naturally on the skin (see p. 17)? Skin-prick tests or blood tests can reveal such allergic reactions where fungi are concerned. Adults with persistent atopic, eczema which is getting worse rather than better are the most likely candidates.
5 Are there allergic reactions (or other sensitivity reactions) to food, or to allergens such as house-dust mite?
This fifth aspect of diagnosis is where controversy is rife. Many dermatologists feel that atopic eczema is treated quite adequately with moisturisers (emollients) and steroid creams. The search for allergic/sensitivity reactions – in other words, for basic causes – seems unnecessary for most patients, or more trouble than it is worth. Indeed, some dermatologists believe that looking for such sensitivity reactions is actually mistaken because they are not basic causes (see p. 42).
Other specialists disagree, and feel that allergic/sensitivity reactions are a basic causative factor in atopic eczema. They concede that there are many false positives, but in their opinion, there are enough true positives in the skin-prick test results to make it worth sorting them out from the false positives. Except for patients with very mild eczema, such doctors prefer to identify and eliminate the root causes, if possible.
Patch tests are now used by some of these doctors (see p. 69) – yet another contentious issue! The time-honoured use for patch tests is in contact dermatitis, and there is a lot of resistance to using them for atopic eczema. Traditionally, the immune reactions involved in atopic eczema and contact dermatitis are seen as entirely different – the former involving IgE and being a quick reaction (identified by skin-prick tests), the latter involving other players and
Sweaty sock dermatitis
More correctly known as ‘juvenile plantar dermatitis’, this rash on the feet affects an awful lot of atopic children. It is frequently misdiagnosed as athlete’s foot, and treated with anti-fungal drugs. The important clue can be found by looking between the toes: if there’s no rash there, then it is not athlete’s foot.
being much slower (identified by patch tests). New research into atopic eczema shows this view to be overly simple (see pp. 18-19) – and it provides a rational basis for using patch tests.
If, as a patient or a parent, you are keen to search for fundamental causes, remember that this should never displace treatments to quell infection or moisturise the skin and restore its protective structure. When these treatments are neglected the whole problem can get far worse, because of the vicious circles that sustain atopic eczema.
Treatment
Treatment for atopic eczema has five possible angles:
1 calming the inflammation
2 avoidance of scratching and rubbing
3 caring for the skin and restoring its normal structure
4 treating infections
5 avoiding allergens.
One or more of these aspects may be neglected, depending on what kind of specialist you are seeing.
Calming the inflammation
Steroid creams are the mainstay of atopic eczema treatment because they calm the inflammation in the skin. The creams do carry a risk of side effects, but are safe when used correctly (see p. 147). An over-fearful attitude to steroids creams can mean that the eczema never gets under control, and this can mean using more steroids in the long run. When treating an outbreak of atopic eczema with steroid cream, it is vital to continue applying the cream until the ‘hidden healing’ has occurred (see p. 146) – don’t stop as soon as the skin looks better.
Promising alternatives to steroid creams now exist: these are tacrolimus and pimecrolimus ointments (see p. 147). Unfortunately they are much more expensive, and your doctor will probably prescribe them only if there is some pressing reason.
Tar-based ointments have a much milder anti-inflammatory effect, and can be helpful for areas of thickened skin. They were once widely used for atopic eczema, but are used less now, in part because they stain fabrics and smell unpleasant. Sometimes they irritate the skin, too, and there are concerns about safety: they contain carcinogens, and significant amounts are absorbed into the bloodstream. However no evidence has been found that these cause cancer, despite intensive searching.
Antihistamine tablets are sometimes used and while they
may not help the eczema much, some evidence suggests that
they could reduce the risk of asthma developing later (see p. 249).
Powerful drugs such as cyclosporin are sometimes used in
severe cases of atopic eczema, to damp down the immune
response. They are taken by mouth, and can affect other parts of the body, not just the skin. Very careful monitoring is needed.
Sunlight is often beneficial, because it suppresses the inflammatory processes in the skin. However, not everyone improves with sun exposure – some get worse. Careful experimentation is the only way to find out: build up the length of sun exposure very gradually, starting with less than an hour a day.
Medical treatment with UV (ultraviolet) light can produce the same effect as sunshine and suppress inflammation. This treatment may be prescribed, but you should not try it for yourself with a sun-lamp. In PUVA treatment, a plant-derived substance called psoralen is given by mouth, or applied to the skin, to enhance the response to UV light.
Kicking the scratching habit
Scratching is a substantial part of the problem in long-standing atopic eczema. Experiments with healthy people and mechanical ’scratching machines’ show that perfectly normal skin will erupt into eczema if it is scratched intensively.
There is no steroid cream powerful enough to counteract the effects of scratching. But if scratching stops, then the skin can –with the help of medication – heal up.
Note that ’scratching’, in this case, includes rubbing the itch (directly or through clothes; using a hand, wrist, chin, leg, foot, or any other part of the body), touching or picking at the skin, rubbing against sheets, furniture or another person, or using a towel, flannel or hairbrush to rub the skin. All these activities can be habitual and quite unconscious, if atopic eczema has been present for more than a few months – you just don’t realise you’re doing it most of the time.
For many with atopic eczema, another problem creeps in –scratching without itching. This may be just habit, a response to boredom, stress or anxiety, or even part of the family dynamics, in which scratching has become a form of emotional expression. Scratching alone can set off itching, and a scratch-itch-scratch cycle ensues.
The first step in combating scratching (for an adult or older child) is simply to notice how often scratching occurs. Doctors at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London issue their patients with little hand-held counting devices (tally-counters), and ask them to press the button on the device every time they scratch or rub. Over a period of days, patients discover – usually to their own amazement – just how often they do scratch. The point of the exercise is simply to become conscious of the scratching impulse, and to notice the situations which typically provoke scratching. You could use a small pocket-sized notebook and pencil to achieve the same end.
Once this awareness has been gained, then you are in a position to break the scratching habit. The methods involved –called ‘habit reversal’ – were first developed by a Swedish dermatologist, Peter Noren. It takes about 2-4 weeks for most people, but the change is long-lasting. Most eczema sufferers find that they recoup their time investment rapidly, once they are free from the chore of dealing with chronic eczema.
When you notice that you are about to start scratching, and before the urge to scratch overwhelms you, take control and do something deliberate with your hands – for example, clench your fists, while breathing deeply and slowly. Think cool non-itchy thoughts. The urge to scratch may pass. If it doesn’t, then you can allay the itch by pinching the itchy area gently, or pressing your fingernail into it, or lightly applying a little moisturiser.
In the bath or shower, don’t use flannels, and never rub or scrub the skin. Dry off by gently patting with a soft towel.
The aim is to get scratching episodes down to fewer than ten per day. In achieving this goal, relaxation exercises, stress management techniques, hypnotherapy or autogenic training (see p. 222) can also be very helpful, especially if you sometimes scratch in tense situations.
With small children, the parents have to do the noticing. Most are unaware just how much their child scratches or rubs the eczema – babies often rub against the side of the cot.
Once the awareness is there, a child over four can usually be taught the habit-reversal technique described above. With a younger child, the parents must distract the child when scratching is imminent, by talking or playing. If the child is scratching while asleep, parents should pick the child up and, very gently, hold the child’s hands away from the body. Situations and activities which commonly provoke scratching should be avoided, or planned for. Give the child something to hold while dressing and undressing, for example – keep the hands busy. But never say ‘Don’t scratch’ – it usually has the opposite effect in the long run.
For the first four days and nights, while you are trying to break the scratching habit, the child should never be alone, even for a minute – someone who is able to distract the child from scratching should always be there, and awake. Fortunately, children lose the habit far more quickly than adults.
Keep a child’s fingernails very short, and smooth them with an emery board too, so that if any scratching does occur the effects are minimised. (Soft cotton mittens, to be worn at night, are often recommended, but the cotton itself can be used to rub the skin – observe your child carefully! The same is true of all-over cotton suits.)
For this anti-scratching programme to be effective in healing the skin, there must be a determined effort with drug treatment at
Will it clear up?
Small children with eczema generally grow out of it by the age of two. Those who have eczema after this age tend to show a big improvement at puberty. Sometimes, however, the eczema can disappear at puberty, only to reappear later: so continue to be careful with your skin.
Atopic eczema is frequently the first sign of a tendency to allergies (see p. 22). Given this early warning sign, parents should take steps to avoid allergies developing, or at least reduce their severity (see pp. 244-9). One small piece of good cheer: atopic eczema and life-threatening food allergies are very rarely found together.
People with both asthma and atopic eczema frequently notice that when one improves the other seems to get worse. There is no explanation for this as yet.
Moisturisers - how to use them
Moisturisers (emollients) do two things: they increase the amount of water in the skin, and they lubricate the skin, making it less brittle.
A moisturiser is designed to leave an oily layer on the surface of the skin which stops the skin’s natural moisture from escaping. The most effective preparations, from this point of view, are ointments made from white paraffin, such as Vaseline, which form an uninterrupted waterproof layer: these are sometimes called occlusives. They contain no water, unlike creams. Although a cream forms a less formidable barrier to the escape of moisture from the skin, it does provide some moisture itself, which can soak into the skin.
The most important thing is to have something that you like using, so that you apply it regularly. There are lots of moisturisers available, so ask the doctor for different ones to try.
Applying moisturiser well is crucial:
• Apply moisturiser before your skin gets dry, as a preventive treatment.
• There’s no need to rub in your moisturiser (this can be a form of scratching). Just apply it very lightly.
• A thin layer is all that’s needed. A thick layer keeps in heat which aggravates the skin.
• Always apply within three minutes of a bath or shower.
• In addition, apply every 3-4 hours during the day. Carrying moisturiser around with you is helpful – get a small tube of moisturiser for this purpose.
• Ask the doctor to prescribe moisturiser in large quantities, to make sure you have enough. But beware of infecting big pots with Staphylococcus bacteria and then reinfecting your skin. Pump-action dispensers are safer.
Moisturiser can also be smeared onto bandages which are then wound around the affected areas at night to reduce the itch – or you can use ready-made ‘wet-wraps’ (ask your doctor about these). As long as the bandages/wraps are immovable, they will reduce nocturnal rubbing and scratching.
Avoid lotions, and any non-prescribed creams, as they could be irritating to the skin. Choose bath oils with care – some contain alcohol which is an irritant.
the same time. You should be using a steroid cream of sufficient strength, twice a day, and plenty of moisturising treatment.
By taking this ‘Combined Approach’, as Dr Christopher Bridgett and his colleages at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital call it, you should be able to clear the eczema completely, even if you have had it for years and have tried innumerable different treatments. Once this has been achieved, you can maintain an eczema-free state by watching carefully for any outbreaks of itching, redness or roughness, and treating them immediately with a short course of steroid cream (see p. 146).
Skin care
Firstly, avoid all the irritants which you think may affect your skin. Give clothes an extra rinse cycle in the washing machine, to remove all detergent. or use a non-detergent system such as Eco-balls or Aquaballs. Wash all new clothes before wearing them, to remove chemicals such as formaldehyde. Wear soft cotton or silk next to the skin.
Where eczema affects the hands, special care is needed (see p. 57).
Water can be both good and bad for eczema. When you soak in a bath, water is absorbed by the skin cells, which helps correct the dryness of the skin. But when you get out of the bath, and the skin dries, the outermost layer shrinks and develops microscopic cracks, making it even less waterproof than it was before. The way around this is to apply a moisturiser immediately after a bath or shower –gently pat the skin until partially dry, and apply the moisturiser immediately to trap the water in the skin.
For anyone with a severe flare of eczema, current recommendations are:
• soak in lukewarm water for 20 minutes, twice a day
• pat dry
• quickly apply steroid cream to the eczematous areas, then moisturiser over the top, and to all other dry-skin areas
• make sure the moisturiser goes on within 3 minutes of emerging from the water.
This works well for some people, but not all. For a few eczema sufferers, the effect of taking natural oils out of the skin (which soaking does, to some extent) may outweigh the benefits of putting water in. Or they could be sensitive to something in the tap water – the chlorine, perhaps, or pollutants. It may not be obvious that this routine treatment is not helping. As Dr Michael Tettenborn, a British paediatrician with long experience of atopic eczema, observes: ‘By the time they’re referred to me, children are usually on the standard regimen of two-soaks-a-day. One of the first things I do, as an experiment, is tell the parents to just bathe them once a week and use a moisturiser and tissues to keep them clean the rest of the time. Some children do a lot better after that.

Sinus cavities are something that most people just don’t know they have. It’s only when they start to

hurt that you find out where they are. ‘There is this terrible throbbing pain above and around my eyes,

and in my cheeks. It’s the most unpleasant feeling, but it’s hard to describe to anyone who hasn’t felt

it,’ says Gina, who suffers from chronic sinusitis (long-term inflammation of the sinus cavities).

There are no figures, but chronic sinusitis seems to be increasingly common.
A sinus cavity has no function, it is just empty space without which our skulls would be much heavier.

In other words, these airy spaces seem to have evolved simply to help us feel more ‘light-headed’. If

you have sinusitis, unfortunately, you feel just the opposite. ‘I had sinusitis for years,’ says Dr

Wellington S. Tichenor, a New York allergist who now specialises in treating chronic sinusitis. ‘I kept

working but felt like I wanted to die.’
Sinus cavities are lined with a membrane which is essentially similar to that lining the nose. It

contains immune cells and can produce mucus when necessary. Most of the time it doesn’t need to produce

much, because relatively few microbes or foreign particles get into the sinus cavities.
Any mucus that is produced should escape from the sinus cavities through narrow drainage channels,

called Ostia, leading to the nose. Unfortunately, the Ostia are very narrow – the diameter of a

pin-head – and U-shaped, making them prone to blockage. And that is not the only problem. These

drainage channels are situated at the top rather than the bottom of the main sinus cavities – this

arrangement was fine for our ancestors who walked on all fours, and therefore did not have to fight

gravity when clearing their sinuses. Sadly for
us, natural selection has not got around to reorganising things yet. It would be a completely hopeless

arrangement if not for the tiny hairs known as cilia, which lie like a carpet across the membranes

lining the sinus cavities. The cilia beat rhythmically. 18 times a second, to waft the mucus upwards to

the top of the sinus cavity.
This is a far-from-perfect system, and it is hardly surprising that it sometimes goes wrong. Chronic

sinusitis can begin in at least three different ways:
• The sinus membranes become inflamed due to an allergic reaction – 28 for likely airborne

allergens.
• The drainage channels from the sinus cavities become blocked due to events in the nose

(infection or allergy) or due to the growth of polyps (non-cancerous jelly-like lumps that can block

the drainage channels). When mucus cannot drain away, it stagnates in the sinus cavities encouraging

infection by bacteria or fungi. These infections cause inflammation.
• A bout of acute sinusitis (see box on p. 31), due to bacterial infection, never really goes

away and the persistent infection causes longterm inflammation. Note that this is unlikely: it is rare

for acute sinusitis not to clear up.
Whether the problem begins through allergy or blockage or infection, once it has begun a vicious circle

can be set up all too easily. Mucus output increases when there is inflammation, blocking the drainage

channels even more, so the sinus cavities become clogged up and increasingly uncomfortable. More mucus

pooling in the sinus cavities perpetuates any existing infections and fosters new ones.
All this infection results in more severe inflammation, causing the membranes which line the sinus

cavities to swell up. Inflammation also makes polyp growth more likely. The cilia may be lost or

severely depleted, and the mucus gets thicker. All this means yet more blockage. To cap it all, there

can be allergic reactions to some of the microbes involved (see right), fuelling the inflammation

further.
The body’s own attempts to clear the sinuses are defeated, and the problem is also very resistant to

medical treatment. This may make depressing reading, if you have chronic sinusitis, but don’t despair.

Understanding the complexities of the problem is a large part of the battle. Chronic sinusitis is not

invincible, if you have a good doctor to help you - that means a doctor who also understands these

complexities.
The symptoms of sinusitis are:
• pain and a sense of swelling or unpleasant fullness around the cheeks, or over and between the

eyes
• earache or headache; pain around the teeth
• reduction in the senses of smell and taste
• sore throat
• coughing, particularly at night
• post-nasal drip (mucus from the back of the nose running into the throat and airways)
• bad-smelling breath
• feverishness
• for some people, severe fatigue, poor concentration and even (but very rarely) psychiatric

symptoms
• irritability, especially in children.
Note that any of these symptoms can be caused in other ways, and even if you have several of them, you

may not necessarily have sinusitis. On the other hand, sinusitis can go unrecognised - to some people

it may seem like nothing more than a lingering cold.
Acute or chronic?
In medical terms, ‘acute’ means short-lived, while ‘chronic’ means long-lasting.
Acute sinusitis — a short, sharp dose of it, lasting less than 3-4 weeks - usually follows on from a

cold. Colds are caused by viruses, but a bacterial infection can follow, and it is the bacteria that

move into the sinus cavities and cause trouble. Some people are far more susceptible than others and

have an attack of sinusitis after every cold.
Chronic sinusitis means symptoms lasting more than three months, according to some authorities, but the

time point is a little arbitrary. This article deals with chronic sinusitis.
If your sinusitis has been going on for between four weeks and three months you will obviously be

asking ‘Is this acute or chronic?’ At this point, no one can say, but you would certainly be wise to

seek some expert medical treatment now, on the basis that it could be the start of chronic sinusitis.

Tackling chronic sinusitis before the problem becomes
entrenched and complex is a good plan.
Allergy and chronic sinusitis
Chronic sinusitis is not necessarily an allergic disease, but it can be connected with allergies (or

other forms of immune sensitivity) in various ways:
• Allergic reactions can occur in the sinuses, usually in conjunction with allergic reactions in

the nose.
• Even if the allergic reaction does not affect the sinuses directly, allergic reactions in the

nose can block the drainage channels from the sinuses, causing an accumulation of mucus there. This may

lead to sinus infections.
• Once sinusitis has begun, infectious fungi (moulds) in the sinuses may provoke allergic

reactions, or other forms of immune sensitivity. This allergy to ‘the enemy within’ fuels more

inflammation and more mucus production. Right now, allergic fungal sinusitis (as it is known) is a

source of heated debate - 32. Allergic reactions to some of the bacteria that are present may also

occur.
• Chronic sinusitis - however caused - can contribute to asthma. Research on children with both

sinusitis and asthma found that 80% no longer needed asthma drugs once their sinusitis had been

treated, and 85% no longer wheezed. The link may be due to post-nasal drip, increased mouth-breathing,

or to a nerve-connection between the sinuses and the airways (the sinobronchial reflex) which can

stimulate airway inflammation. Alternatively, the sinusitis may simply fire up the immune system with

messenger chemicals in the bloodstream, resulting in more powerful responses throughout the body.
• Chronic sinusitis can also be the root cause of long-standing nettle rash (chronic urticaria),

and treating the sinusitis can result in a prompt and remarkable clearance of the skin symptoms.
• Some people who have chronic sinusitis are sensitive to aspirin (see box on p. 28) - a

sensitivity which is also linked with asthma, nasal polyps, rhinitis and chronic urticaria. Avoiding

aspirin and all other aspirin-like drugs (151) may substantially improve the sinusitis.
Diagnosis
Because so many different factors can play a part in chronic sinusitis, diagnosis should, ideally,

consider the problem from several different angles:
• The sinuses are viewed using X-rays and CT scans (computed tomographic scans - they use X-rays

but give a much more precise picture). These reveal how badly swollen the sinus membranes are, which

sinus cavities are blocked, and how much mucus has collected in the sinuses.
• Endoscopy (92) may be used to look inside the sinus cavities. Polyps are best located by this

method.
• Where allergies seem to be part of the picture, the doctor may employ skin-prick tests (91) to

identify allergies to airborne allergens (from house-dust mites, moulds, pets, pollen, cockroaches,

etc.)
• Laboratory tests on samples taken from your sinus cavities will be used to show which bacteria

and/or fungi have set up home there. There may also be a hunt for the immune cells known as eosinophils

(19) or the typical debris which they generate. The presence of large numbers of eosinophils is one

indication of allergic fungal sinusitis (see below).
• Skin testing with fungi (moulds) found growing in the sinus cavities may also be tried if

allergic fungal sinusitis is suspected.
• In severe cases, there may be tests of immune function, to see whether this is depressed in any

way.
• Children may be tested for an inherited disorder affecting the cilia, or for cystic fibrosis -

mild forms may escape detection, and can produce both chronic sinusitis and wheezing.
The enemy within
The biggest controversy in sinusitis research at the moment concerns allergic fungal sinusitis. The

orthodox view of this condition is that:
• It affects a small minority of chronic sinusitis patients -fewer than 10%.
• There is a true IgE-mediated allergic reaction to the fungus (mould) growing in the sinus

cavities. This allergic reaction is detectable with a skin-prick test (91). Immune cells known as

eosinophils (19) are also key players in the inflammatory reaction to the fungus, but it is an

IgE-response to the fungus that draws the eosinophils into the sinuses.
• There is clear evidence of fungal infection in the mem- banes of the sinus cavities.
• There may also be ‘fungus balls’ - a solid mass of fungus inside the sinus cavity. Or there may

be ‘allergic mucin’, a dark sticky mucus containing fragments of the fungus.
A rare complication
In rare cases, the fungi involved in allergic fungal sinusitis can be invasive, spreading from the

sinuses to the surrounding bone. This problem needs prompt and thorough treatment with anti-fungal

drugs.
In 1996, researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA, caused a rumpus by claiming to

have identified a different form of allergic fungal sinusitis which is overlooked by standard

diagnostic techniques, and which affects 96% of patients with chronic sinusitis.
This is a staggering figure - 96% means, in effect, that they are claiming to have found the

fundamental cause of virtually all chronic sinusitis. ‘Up to now, the cause of chronic sinusitis has

not been known. Our studies indicate that, in fact, fungus is the likely cause of nearly all of these

problems,’ states Dr David Sherris, one of the researchers.
According to the Mayo Clinic team:
• The fungi (moulds) are growing in the mucus of the sinus cavities, not generally in the

membrane itself. They are not detected by normal diagnostic methods which tend to ignore the mucus. A

special method of collecting the mucus is required to detect the fungi.
• The immune reaction to the fungi is not usually an IgEmediated reaction, so skin-prick tests

are often negative.
• Finding evidence of unusual numbers of eosinophils is adequate for diagnosis of allergic fungal

sinusitis because the eosinophils are the prime movers in this sensitivity reaction to the fungi, as in

several other diseases (19).
‘We can now begin to treat the cause of the problem instead of the symptoms,’ says Dr Eugene Kern, head

of the research team. There is a lot of scepticism about these claims among other sinusitis

specialists, and so far no new treatment for chronic sinusitis has emerged.
The Mayo Clinic researchers say that they are in the process of developing a drug treatment, but that

it will take several more years before it is generally available. Existing anti-fungal drugs (taken in

capsule form) could not work on this particular form of allergic fungal sinusitis (if it exists)

because the drug does not get into the mucus. Any new treatment would probably involve inserting an

anti-fungal drug directly into the sinus cavities, which is far from easy.
All we can do for now is wait and see what emerges from the ongoing research. The current treatment for

allergic fungal sinusitis involves all the usual methods (see right) with special emphasis on steroids

to calm the inflammation, plus anti-fungal drugs where fungal infection is detectable in the membrane.

In some countries, immunotherapy is also used to reduce the immune reaction to the fungus, but this is

difficult to obtain in Britain (164).
Clearing moulds from your home may help (34). So may reducing the humidity in the house (119), as humid

conditions seem to be linked with allergic fungal sinusitis.
Treatment
Sinusitis can be very hard to treat, particularly if it has been going on for a long time. You need a

really committed attitude if treatment is to be successful.
All these treatments should be given at the same time:
1 Antibiotics for 2-3 weeks minimum (it takes this long because the antibiotic has such trouble getting

into the sinus cavities – if you are offered a shorter course, this suggests that the doctor does not

have enough expertise with chronic sinusitis, so you might be better off with someone else). It must be

the right antibiotic – commonly used ones such as penicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin are

unlikely to work because the bacteria are usually resistant to them.
2 Steroid drops in the nose to combat the inflammation. It is important to put these in correctly, so

that they have maximum effect (144) especially if you have polyps.
3 Irrigating the nose and sinus cavities daily with sterile salt water (saline). Your doctor will show

you how to do this.
4 Tablets that reduce the congestion in the nose.
5 Nose drops that reduce congestion, but for three days only (29).
6 Steam inhalations to loosen the mucus. There are special steam vaporisers on sale (ask at a

pharmacy), but you can just inhale steam from a bowl of boiling water, with a towel over your head to

keep the steam in. Adding eucalyptus oil to the water may help. For a quick-and-easy version, warm up a

damp flannel in the microwave and place it over your nose. Some doctors recommend having a steam

vaporiser beside the bed at night, when nasal blockage is most likely to occur, but if you have

allergies to house-dust mite or moulds this is not a good idea in the long term, as a damp bedroom will

favour both (and could encourage allergic fungal sinusitis).
7 A drug called guaifenesin which thins the mucus is used in some countries but rarely in Britain.

Alpha-methyl-cysteine is another drug that breaks up mucus. It is mainly used in chronic bronchitis but

some doctors also find it valuable in chronic sinusitis. If steam inhalations didn’t work – suggesting
that the mucus is too solid to be shifted – these drugs may be worth trying.
8 Anti-fungal drugs (taken by mouth) if allergic fungal sinusfis is suspected. Sometimes these have a

dramatic effect on chronic sinusitis that has previously resisted treatment.
You may also be given other drugs, such as steroid tablets. The new anti-leukotriene drugs (149) are

also being tried, with some success. As well as being taken by mouth, they can be applied directly to

the nose in an irrigation fluid, and may be helpful for those with nasal polyps.
Problems with nose drops
Nasal drops and washes contain preservatives and other non-drug ingredients. Some of these may act as

irritants – or the pH (acidity or alkalinity) of the preparation might cause problems. If you

experience burning or irritation after inserting drops or irrigating the sinuses, ask your doctor or

pharmacist about trying a different preparation.
Antibiotic resistance
Bacteria are becoming resistant to the effects of antibiotics: it is probably the biggest headache

facing modern medicine.
This is emerging as a particular problem in chronic sinusitis because many patients have been dosed

very regularly with antibiotics. Although most of the bacteria have been killed each time, the fact

that the sinus cavity is so clogged up with mucus, and so badly accessed by the bloodstream anyway,

means there is always some nook or cranny where a few bacteria survive because they have not been

exposed to the full lethal dose of the antibiotic. As you might expect, these survivors tend to be the

‘tough ones’ – those bacteria that are not just well hidden but also the least sensitive to the

antibiotic.
Repeat this process many times, with frequent courses of antibiotics (separated by intervals during

which the hard-to-kill bacteria multiply in numbers) and what happens? Eventually you breed a race of

bacteria that are completely resistant to one or more of the antibiotics taken.
If you ever get to this point with your sinusitis, treatment is going to be extremely difficult. That’s

why it is so important to treat infections really thoroughly, and get rid of them completely. Expert

medical help is essential for this treatment campaign.
Too many people with chronic sinusitis are careless about taking their antibiotics regularly, or feel

ambivalent about them and stop the course before it’s complete, or don’t see the doctor again when the

tablets are used up. This is courting disaster.
Don’t start antibiotic treatment for chronic sinusitis until you are sure you can see it through. If

you have doubts about taking antibiotics, try all the other treatments and self-help measures first.

They may be sufficient, especially if you find you have an allergy underlying the chronic sinusitis and

can tackle this successfully.
Should there be no improvement, you could then go on to the antibiotic programme: delaying this

treatment for a few months will do no harm. What is hazardous is starting the antibiotic programme and

then stopping, or not taking the drugs consistently.
Antihistamines may be prescribed to treat any allergic reactions, but some specialists feel that they

can also aggravate the problems. In their experience, antihistamines dry out the mucus so that it

sticks to the walls of the sinus cavities, rather than being ushered out by the cilia. Drying out the

mucus may make you feel better initially, by reducing the pressure inside the sinus cavities, but it

makes matters worse in the long run.
Anti-chollnergic drugs (156) are sometimes prescribed for chronic sinusitis, but they too can dry up

the mucus and should be used cautiously.
After three weeks, if the sinusitis has not improved substantially, a different antibiotic is given. If

there are any bacteria resistant to the first antibiotic infesting your sinus cavities, the new

antibiotic is intended to kill them off.
Should you still have sinusitis after another three weeks, you will be given yet another antibiotic.

Changing the antibiotic, and taking prolonged courses, is the best way of exterminating the bacteria

completely, which prevents the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (see box at left).
It is crucial that you always see the doctor promptly at the end of each course, so that there is no

gap between the courses – do not give the bacteria any opportunity to build up their numbers again. The

last antibiotic treatment should continue for at least a week after symptoms clear up.
Dealing with allergic reactions is also important:
• If you cannot get allergy tests, try to work out for yourself if an allergen is playing a part.

Ask yourself if there were any changes in your life before the sinusitis began, such as getting a new

pet, moving house, increased exposure to moulds or house-dust mite, or starting a new job with exposure

to allergens. When thinking about this, remember that allergies to newly encountered allergens do not

develop immediately – it may take up to two years. Try avoiding the allergen concerned and seeing if

you improve.
• Should you discover that an allergen is at the root of the problem, but have difficulty

reducing your exposure to the offending item, try to obtain immunotherapy (164) or another form of

desensitisation treatment (210).
• If you suspect allergic fungal sinusitis (32), it is well worth eliminating any mould growth in

your home (120). One research study showed that the moulds growing in a patient’s sinus cavities were

often the same as those growing in the patient’s house. It is possible that, by inhaling the mould

spores from moulds in their houses, sinusitis sufferers are continually reinfecting their sinuses.
Various other self-help measures can be valuable during this medical treatment:
• Reduce your exposure to cigarette smoke (including other people’s) to an absolute minimum.

Cigarette smoke acts as an irritant to the nose and sinuses, but, more importantly, it paralyses the

cilia, preventing them from shifting mucus out of the sinus cavities.
• Avoid breathing other irritants, especially ozone (130). Think about the chemicals you use both

at work and at home – could any of these be irritants that are aggravating your sinusitis?
• Don’t drink too much alcohol – it dries out the sinus membranes and makes matters worse.
• Drink plenty of water, to keep your mucus from becoming too dry and therefore hard to shift.
• Try to breathe through your nose as much as possible. The amount of oxygen in your sinus

cavities drops drastically if you breathe through your mouth, and the low oxygen level probably fosters

the growth of certain bacteria. Devices, such as nose clips, that help keep the nose open at night may

be worth trying.
• Spicy food can help to clear nasal and sinus congestion, so try eating chilli or hot curry

regularly.
• Some people find that garlic helps – either eaten or sniffed.
• If you suspect that your sinusitis might be related to food sensitivity (68) consider trying an

elimination diet to identify the culprit food.
• Observe your reactions immediately after eating – some foods, such as yeast and red wine, can

cause an immediate swelling of the nasal membranes in certain people. So can sulphite food additives.

Avoid such items if you are affected.
• Treating gastro-oesophageal reflux (acid regurgitation from the stomach after meals) can

improve sinusitis.
• See an osteopath. By gently manipulating parts of your face, a good osteopath may be able to

improve the drainage from the sinus cavities.
• Some patients experience good effects from acupuncture although there are no observable changes

on CT scans. Other alternative therapies, such as homeopathy or Chinese herbal medicines, have not been

investigated scientifically, but some patients report good results.
Prolonged courses of antibiotics destroy many of the beneficial bacteria in the intestine, and may

cause long-term bowel problems. It makes sense to take a bacterial replacer (205).
Surgery for sinusitis
Chronic sinusitis sufferers may be offered surgery to remove polyps, or to correct anatomical problems

such as a deviated septum (the central division of the nose).
These operations can be very useful, but if you have asthma try all other options first, because

surgery to the nose can sometimes make asthma much worse.
Surgery on the sinus cavities themselves is also a possibility, when sinusitis does not respond to

medical treatment. The operation enlarges the natural drainage channels, so that mucus drains away more

easily. This rarely cures chronic sinusitis completely, but it usually makes it much easier to manage.

Once the drainage channels are larger, antibiotics can be put directly into the sinus cavities, for

example, avoiding the need for antibiotic tablets.
Don’t agree to surgery unless other forms of treatment, such as allergen avoidance or immunotherapy,

have been tried to the full. Patients for whom surgery seemed to be the only answer have sometimes

found they did not need an operation once their allergies were treated.
If you decide on having an operation, make sure your surgeon has a proven track-record with this type

of surgery. Don’t be afraid to ask searching questions about how many operations of this kind the

surgeon has done, how many he or she carries out per year, and the complication rates (how often things

go wrong). It’s a delicate job, and you want a real expert.

Hayfever in Allergy

Foxtall grasses release their pollen - a potential source of hayfever symptoms.
`I gradually recognised that it was not an ordinary cold and that the symptoms were much worse on the

golf course or even during a nice day rowing on Loch Lomond.’ Dr John Morrison Smith, then a medical

student, began suffering from hayfever in the late 1930s. ‘At first I did not know what I had, and

neither did any other doctor I encountered in the next two or three years…’
All the classical allergic diseases (see box on p. 11) seem to be increasing, but none has exploded

quite so dramatically as hayfever. The physicians of Ancient Greece described asthma and food allergy,

and the Romans recorded allergy to horses, but there were no reports of hayfever. The only account –

and it is a doubtful one – comes from Persia in AD 925. Two hundred years ago, hayfever was unknown –

and careful research by medical historians has shown that this was not a case of it simply being

ignored, or misinterpreted as a cold.
The first case was reported in 1819, but even in the 1930s it was so rare that a succession of Scottish

doctors and medical students were baffled by Dr Morrison Smith’s symptoms. Today everyone knows what

hayfever is, since huge numbers of people sneeze and snuffle their way through the pollen season. There

are no certain explanations for this meteoric rise, but greater hygiene (21) may be an important

factor.
Symptoms of hayfever
The common symptoms of hayfever are well known:
• itchiness of the nose, mouth, throat and eyes – often the first sign
• a streaming and/or blocked nose
• frequent sneezing
• red, watery eyes (very rarely, hayfever affects the eyes only, with no symptoms in the nose).
Less commonly, there may be:
• dryness of the throat if the nasal blockage results in constant breathing through the mouth
• no sense of smell due to a blocked nose (but nasal polyps can also cause this – 30)
• a feverish sweaty feeling (but the body temperature is usually normal)
• swelling and inflammation of the eyelids, sometimes leading to blistering and ulceration: there

is a risk of blindness if this is not treated promptly
• recurrent sinusitis (30)
• earache, itching or a stuffy feeling in the ears, or ‘glue ear’ (29)
Some sufferers also experience:
• Oral Allergy Syndrome (an itchy tingling mouth) from certain fruits, nuts and vegetables (see

box on p. 63)
• a skin rash from pollen falling on the skin, direct contact with the leaves of the offending

plants, or with droplets of moisture from them – as when mowing a lawn or using a strimmer. If the skin

is cut or grazed, anaphylaxis can (rarely) result from direct contact with the plant (see pp. 58-9).
Even more rarely there can be:
• stomach upsets or even colitis (inflammation of the bowel) possibly due to pollen swallowed

with food or in the saliva
• irritation in the vagina
• migraine
• kidney inflammation (nephritis), leading to puffiness of the face and hands, and possibly other

symptoms
• joint pains.
The last two are probably caused by pollen allergens bound to their antibodies and carried in the blood

(13).
Diagnosis
The standard diagnostic tool here is the skin-prick test (see lo, 91). In diagnosing hayfever there are

three separate questions:
1 Is it actually hayfever?
2 Which pollen or pollens are responsible?
3 Are allergens other than pollen also involved?
Don’t be surprised if none of these questions is asked. In most countries, if you have hayfever-like

symptoms during the pollen season (i.e. when most hayfever sufferers have symptoms), the doctor will

conclude that you have hayfever - and that will be the end of that.
If hayfever seems plausible to you, and you respond to drug treatment, or manage well on pollen

avoidance (126), then -here is probably no reason to go further. Should you want a more thorough

investigation, you will need to be persistent. These are good reasons for requesting a full diagnosis:
• Your symptoms are worse in the pollen season, but they never really go away, suggesting that

you may be allergic to year-round allergens, such as house-dust mite or moulds, as well. It is worth

knowing which ones, so that you can avoid them. If you live in an area that is always warm (such as

California or Southern Australia) it may be that your culprit pollen is in the air all year round -

even so, knowing which pollen it is can help with avoidance. Around the Mediterranean, the pollen from

cypresses can keep hayfever going through the winter (or cause symptoms in winter only).
• Your symptoms are sometimes worse when they should be better, and vice versa. If you are

consistently worse indoors with the windows closed this could indicate that a seasonal indoor allergen

is the culprit - mould spores or cockroach perhaps (cockroach is often seasonal in regions with cold

winters - 118).
• Your symptoms begin before the pollen season begins, or go on long afterwards. Or the severity

of your symptoms does not match the daily pollen count for your suspect pollen. In Britain, the mould

Cladosporium herbarum produces spores in June, roughly coinciding with the grass-pollen season. Allergy

to this mould can easily be mistaken for grass-pollen allergy. You would need skin-prick tests for both

Cladosporium and grasses.
• You are much worse near home than elsewhere. It could just be a garden plant or tree. As one

California resident observed, ‘The worst offender was an olive tree on our front lawn. It’s been

removed.’
• You want to plan holidays free from the culprit pollen.
Moving house - especially to a region with different vegetation
- can be a spur to finding out exactly what your allergens are. If you are going for a full diagnosis

make sure it is done correctly. Don’t accept testing with ‘mixed tree and shrub pollens’ for example,

or ‘weed pollens’. The result tells you very little. Ask for tests with specific pollens.
Treatment
Too many people allow hayfever to spoil the summer months because they are anxious about taking drugs,

or feel that it is nobler to suffer. This book is not in any way complacent about the dangers from

drugs (see Chapter 5), but when it comes to hayfever there really is very little cause for concern. The

risks with drugs used for hayfever are absolutely minimal, and it is such a waste to miss out on the

best time of year.
Most hayfever responds very well to treatment with antihistamines (138). If they make you sleepy,

persist for a while, because this side effect often wears off - or ask for one of the new non-sedating

forms. The sleepiness is annoying, but it is only a minor side effect, and not an indication of the

drug causing any serious harm.
Cromoglycate drops (for the eyes or nose) do not work for everyone, but if they work for you, go for

them. These are absolutely the safest of the anti-allergy drugs. Steroid drops for the nose (144) are

also recommended. The dose of steroid involved is small, and very little gets into the bloodstream, so

there is no risk of serious side effects. If you suffer stinging, burning or dryness, it might be due

to preservatives in the drops, not the drug itself (see box on p. 33). Steroid drops for the eyes

should be used cautiously (144). Don’t use over-the-counter decongestant drops for more than three days

(29).
Immunotherapy is standard treatment for hayfever in many countries, but in Britain you will have a

struggle to get it (see pp. 164-8). Some hayfever sufferers feel they do well with homeopathy (215) or

acupuncture (214).
Pollen asthma
Some people with hayfever also have pollen asthma. Their asthma is worse in the pollen season but it

usually persists all year round (either because there are other allergens or irritants involved, or

just because the inflammation of the airways is self-perpetuating) whereas hayfever itself clears up.

Treating the hayfever fully with antihistamines helps considerably with the asthma symptoms.

 

In medical terms, this article covers a lot of ground.
First there are the classical allergic diseases
 such as hayfever and immediate food allergy, which are caused by the allergy

antibody, IgE .
Then there is non-IgE immune sensitivity, a category which includes a number of quite different

diseases, caused in a great variety of ways. They also vary in severity - there are serious lifelong

problems such as coeliac disease and minor short-lived problems such as contact dermatitis from garden

plants.
Finally the chapter looks at diseases where the immune system seems not to be involved, or

plays only a minor role: the intolerance reactions to food and synthetic chemicals. These are diverse

and rather mysterious in origin. They would not be described as ‘allergies’ by most doctors, though

they often are by complementary therapists (6).
These categories are not nearly as neat and tidy as they might sound. Some problems refuse to fit

anywhere, such as atopic eczema caused by food. A percentage of children with this problem have IgE to

the food concerned, while others do not - so where does it belong?
If you were expecting an answer to that question, you will be disappointed. Nor, quite often, are there

any certain and honest answers to questions such as ‘Has my baby really got asthma?’ or ‘Can you be

sure it’s irritable bowel syndrome?’ There are no answers to
such questions because most diseases do not exist in neat compartments, and the words we use to

describe them really denote rather abstract concepts.
This does not mean that the terms used to describe diseases are invalid - doctors and medical

researchers invent them to try to make sense of a complex, confusing and largely foggy reality. They

also argue over them, split them, unite them and redefine them. There is a constant desire to get the

medical picture of that foggy reality more precise and accurate (although medical politics gets

involved too - 7 -which is unfortunate).
Over time, thanks to huge amounts of research effort, things gradually get clearer. You’ll no longer

hear a doctor talk about ‘rheumatism’ or ‘arthritis’, because it was long since realised that these

categories were useless - they included a number of diverse diseases. And while doctors might say ‘food

poisoning’ or ‘heart attack’ or ’skin cancer’ to a patient, they use much narrower and more precise

terms when talking among themselves, and when ordering tests or prescribing treatment. Each of these

categories has been split into several well-defined sub-categories.
Ideally, this process of splitting continues until each disease category has a set of well-defined

symptoms (this set is known as a syndrome), plus a few simple and definitive diagnostic tests. This

will probably depend on the cause of the disease (the mechanism in medical jargon) being clearly

understood. Once the mechanism is clear, then a disease category is a truly satisfactory tool for

diagnosis and treatment.
Of the disease categories mentioned in this book only a few, such as coeliac disease and hayfever, have

reached that happy state. The majority are still somewhat arbitrary and debatable.
Some disease terms describe a set of symptoms with no clear underlying cause, for example, ‘irritable

bowel syndrome’. Others describe a well-defined response by the body, that can be caused in many

different ways - an endpoint that can be reached by various routes. This is true of ‘asthma’ or

‘urticaria’.
A third type describes a much less well-defined cluster of symptoms. Idiopathic food intolerance,

chemical intolerance and yeast overgrowth all come into this category. A few doctors don’t even see

some of these clusters as real diseases because the symptoms involved are so vague and so widely

encountered. Some of the arguments used to dismiss idiopathic food intolerance are dissected on pp.

74-7. A key point made against these diseases is that the symptoms they produce are non-specific -

common symptoms such as headache, fatigue and diarrhoea, which can arise in a great variety of ways.

Ever since Pasteur and the germ theory, medicine has been based on the idea of each disease having

specific symptoms and specific causes, and it has roared ahead on the basis of this assumption. This is

the prevailing paradigm of modern medicine, and like all
paradigms it blinds people to facts that don’t fit. Evidence is accumulating that there are diseases

which have multiple, non-specific and variable symptoms. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS - see box on p.

85) is one of these, and its recent transformation from a doubtful diagnosis to a reputable disease

recognised by conventional medicine suggests that the paradigm might be starting to crack.
To sum up, the business of identifying and naming diseases is a complex and uncertain process, in which

the concept of most diseases is only ever that - a concept, subject to change and refinement. This does

not make it worthless - quite the opposite. These concepts are the best we can do at the present time,

and accurate diagnosis is the key to getting the best treatment available now.
As regards both diagnosis and treatment, this book covers a very wide spectrum of medical opinion, from

the entirely orthodox to the frankly whacky. I have tried to give an objective view of these different

opinions and approaches, using the evidence currently available, in the hope that it will help readers

to improve their health while wasting as little as possible of their time or money. In using this

information, you should always try to work closely with your doctor (96), respecting the depth and

breadth of knowledge that conventional medicine has to offer.

 

`When I first arrived in Charlottesville in 1982, the senior allergist said “I’ve got to warn you that here in Virginia we have patients who have very severe fungal infection of their feet, and they also have urticaria. If you treat their feet, their urticaria gets better.”‘ Professor Tom Platts-Mills of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville is recalling how his innovative studies of fungal infections and allergy began. That surprising observation about athlete’s foot (a fungal infection) and urticaria (nettle rash) was made by his predecessor, Professor John Guerrant,
‘I followed his advice,’ Platts-Mills continues, ‘and found he was right. Then I started noticing asthmatics in our allergy clinic who also had fungal infections of their feet. They were mostly men with severe adult-onset asthma. We gave them skin-prick tests with the fungus Trichophyton and these were positive – showing they had an allergic reaction to it. So we tried treating them with anti-fungal drugs and the asthma got much better.’
This discovery is not an isolated instance. Research over the last decade or so has revealed that allergic reactions to long-standing infections (chronic infection is the medical term) are far more common than anyone expected. Infections by fungi are frequent offenders.
An infection becomes chronic because, although the immune system tries to rout the infectious agent, it never succeeds. Making IgE may be part of that futile defensive effort. Once the immune system starts making IgE against the allergens produced by the infectious microbe, new symptoms may begin, or existing allergic symptoms may get much worse. The link between the infection and the allergy is far from obvious, however. Both the allergens and the IgE can be carried in the
Fungal infections
‘Fungus’ means everything from an edible mushroom or a huge bracket fungus to the specks of mould on stale bread or a shower curtain. Fungal infections are caused, not by mushroom-like fungi, but by inconspicuous mould-like forms, or by yeasts (which are single-celled fungi).
Once they are flourishing, some fungal infections may be seen as whitish or creamy-coloured patches. But at an earlier stage, the fungi are so small that they cannot be seen without a microscope. They spread as invisibly as bacteria or viruses.
Some infectious fungi can exist in two different forms – a mycelial form (long thin strands, as in a mould) or a yeast form (single cells).
bloodstream, so the symptoms may be somewhere else in the body, far away from the site of infection.
If the symptoms of the infection itself are relatively mild, they may not receive medical attention. Infection-plus-allergy often explains severe long-term allergic problems for which no cause could previously be found. This is the kind of case that gets labelled as ‘intrinsic’ or ‘endogenous’, because all the allergy tests have proved negative. Most patients in this category have had years of simply being treated with steroids (often at high doses) to suppress the symptoms.
Sometimes the infection-plus-allergy is part of a larger picture, with other allergens or irritants also contributing to the symptoms, but with no stunning improvements when they are avoided because the allergic stimulus from the infection remains.
The links between allergy and fungal infections – all those that have been discovered so far – are described below. In such cases, anti-fungal drugs, taken by mouth, usually in capsule form, could be of value. However, they must be taken for an adequate length of time, normally several months.
Bear in mind that, with the possible exception of chronic sinusitis, an allergic reaction to fungal infection is a relatively uncommon cause of symptoms. It is important that, with the help of your doctor, you start with the more likely suspects such as airborne or contact allergens. These are described in detail, for each allergic disease, in the relevant sections of Chapter 2.
Asthma
the common causes and usual treatment of asthma.
Trichophyton – the fungus that causes athlete’s foot – can provoke allergic reactions that contribute to asthma, as already described. This fungus may also infect other parts of the body. Trichophyton diseases have names that begin with tinea (athlete’s foot, for example, is tinea pedis). Other terms you may come across are intertrigo (an itchy rash which develops in skin folds) and onychomycosis (also called `ringworm of the nails’ or tinea unguinum). The research on the link with asthma was published in a respected medical journal, The Lancet, but has been widely ignored, so if you think you have this problem, you may have to be quite persistent with your doctor. Very thorough treatment with anti-fungal drugs (swallowed in capsule form) is required.
Chronic urticaria
many possible causes of chronic urticaria.
Trichophyton infections in any part of the body (see above) can provoke allergies, producing chronic urticarla. A great variety of other infections, including fungal, viral and chronic bacterial
infections, can be the root of the problem in chronic urticaria . However, this may not be an allergic reaction. It could be a direct effect of the infection, provoking the immune system in such a way that it triggers mast cells by itself, without IgE.
Chronic sinusitis
 the causes and treatment of chronic sinusitis.
Long-standing (chronic) sinusitis may be due to a fungal infection with a subsequent allergy. This is now called allergic fungal sinusitis. Some doctors believe that a sensitivity reaction to fungal infection (not necessarily an allergic reaction) could account for 96% of chronic sinusitis. However this is widely disputed .
Atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis)
the causes and treatment of atopic eczema.
The Trichophyton fungus can infect eczematous skin, though this is far less common than infection by Staphylococcus aureus (see below). Among patients infected by it, there can be an allergic reaction to Trichophyton which then makes the eczema worse.
There can also be an IgE reaction to a yeast, Pityrosporum ovale (also called Malassezia ovalis), in atopic eczema. This yeast is a commensal – i.e. a natural, and normally harmless, inhabitant of healthy skin. The inflammation of eczema makes the immune system far more tetchy so that it reacts allergically to this yeast, an innocent bystander which it normally disregards.
Candida  can also provoke an allergic reaction in eczematous skin. This is a more complex story, because while Candida is a commensal in the gut, it does not normally live on the skin. However, it may flourish in the disturbed skin of eczema patients.
Those with atopic eczema may also develop an allergic reaction to toxins from Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterium that often infects skin which is inflamed by eczema and damaged by scratching. Antibiotics are needed to treat the infection .
Seborrheic dermatitis
Not so long ago, this disease – which causes a red, scaly rash on the forehead, nose and cheeks, and sometimes on the chest –was labelled ’cause unknown’. Now most doctors believe that the yeast Pityrosporum ovale could well have a role in causing it. This yeast is part of the normal skin flora (see above), but it is found in greater numbers on the skin of seborrheic dermatitis patients. As well as overgrowth of the yeast, there is an immune reaction against it, usually involving the antibody known as IgG, rather than Fungi in the lungs
One form of infection-plus-allergy has been well recognised for many years - allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, often shortened to aspergillosis.
The problem starts with the fungus Aspergillus fumigates, a ubiquitous mould that is found in special abundance in damp straw, compost heaps, bird cages and any decomposing material. Its spores are everywhere, and most immune systems quickly defeat them, but in some people, especially those with asthma, the spores begin to grow in the lungs. The fungus is found in the lung mucus, but does not actually invade the lungs. However, an allergic reation then occurs to the fungus.
This disease often goes together with asthma, or can be mistaken for asthma. There are three clues that point to aspergillosis:
• rubbery plugs of phlegm, either golden-
brown or green in colour
• fever whenever the asthma is severe
• worsening symptoms despite treatment.
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis is treated with steroids to control the allergic reaction, and physiotherapy to clear the mucus from the lungs.
Anti-fungal drugs have not proved very effective in the past. There are some newer anti-fungal drugs that may well be more useful, such as itraconazole and terbinafine. These are not widely used for aspergillosis at present, except in patients who also have cystic fibrosis or an immune deficiency. Because there has been no large-scale trial of these drugs, they are not usually given to people who simply have aspergillosis. However, they are sometimes prescribed for people who are unable to take steroids, or are not responding to steroid treatment. Anti-fungal drugs may become more widely used in the next few years, so it is worth discussing the possibility of this treatment with your doctor.
the allergy antibody IgE. Only about 12% of people who suffer from seborrheic dermatitis make IgE against the yeast.
One problem with seborrheic dermatitis is that, while it may improve with anti-fungal treatment, it usually comes back when the treatment stops. Doctors have therefore been looking for ways of keeping seborrheic dermatitis at bay after a successful course of anti-fungal treatment. One method that seems to work is to use a good anti-dandruff shampoo, in place of soap, to wash your skin once a week.
A medical earthquake
The recent discoveries about infection-plus-allergy have not posed any serious challenge to conventional thinking about allergy, because a disease of just this kind - aspergillosis (see box at left) - was already well known. A far more fundamental shake-up of traditional ideas about allergy and sensitivity has been necessitated by new research into atopic eczema. It is little short of an earthquake in the basic concepts of allergy and sensitivity.
To understand the extent of this earthquake, you need to know about the time-honoured system for classifying hypersensitivity reactions, which recognises four distinct types:
• Type I hypersensitivity — the IgE-mediated allergies  such as hayfever.
• Type II hypersensitivity - irrelevant to allergy, these antibody reactions mainly occur after transplant surgery, if the transplanted organ is rejected.
• Type III hypersensitivity - caused by a massive overload of antibodies and antigen in the blood. It is a feature of certain infections and autoimmune diseases, and can also occur in allergic reactions, though this is rare (13).
• Type IV hypersensitivity - the odd man out, because antibodies are not involved, or are not of central importance. Immune cells that can launch a direct attack are the movers and shakers here. These attacking-cells are sensitised for a particular antigen, such as dust mite or lanolin. Type IV hypersensitivity is a very slow reaction. Generally speaking, 48 hours pass, after an encounter with the offending substance, before the symptoms appear. The most common form of Type IV hypersensitivity is contact dermatitis (54).
Mystery has always surrounded atopic eczema. Although it crops up in the same atopic families that suffer from hayfever and asthma, and high levels of IgE in the bloodstream are typical of the disease, the actual role played by allergies in causing the symptoms is far from obvious.
The results of skin-prick tests - the standard test for an IgEmediated reaction - are puzzling. Patients tend to give a lot of positive results, many of which don’t mean much - the substances concerned do not provoke actual symptoms. On the other hand, skin-prick tests are often negative for substances that clearly do cause symptoms in challenge tests. Many children who regularly get eczema when they drink cow’s milk, for example, give a negative skin-prick test to milk. This conundrum has puzzled allergists for decades.
New discoveries about eczema do not entirely solve the puzzle, but they do go some way towards an answer, by revealing an immune response that cuts across the traditional categories. The most surprising fact is that even where skin-prick tests are positive and milk-specific IgE is involved in milk-induced eczema, this is not necessarily a standard IgE-mediated allergy.
While IgE antibodies may be involved, they are not necessarily teamed up with mast cells, their usual partners in crime (see box on p. 12). Instead, the IgE molecules are attached to special skin cells called Langerhans cells and dendritic cells. These have the role of picking up the antigen and showing or ‘presenting’ it to attacking-cells in the skin (a task called antigen presentation which is the ‘go’ signal that starts off all immune reactions).
The involvement of these attacking-cells, which are sensitised for a particular antigen, was a big surprise when first discovered. It makes this resemble a Type IV hypersensitivity reaction rather than a Type I.
IgE is not essential here, it seems — some patients do not have IgE for the substance that triggers their atopic eczema — but when Langerhans cells and dendritic cells are associated with IgE they do become far more zealous. This excitement is communicated to the attacking-cells, which mount a more powerful attack.
It looks as if what really matters in atopic eczema is the presence of antigen-specific attacking-cells in the skin, plus the heightened activity of the Langerhans cells and dendritic cells. If the individual has IgE for the antigen, it can play a part, but it is not essential.
In other words, this reaction cuts across two different categories of immune response — Type I and Type IV. (However, the kind of antigens that provoke the reaction are typical of IgEmediated allergy, rather than the kind of antigens that provoke contact dermatitis.) This has been exploited in a new and more sensitive set of diagnostic tests for food-induced atopic eczema (69).
Why atopic eczema is a feature of atopic families is the crucial question that remains unanswered. One factor may be that high levels of IgE in the bloodstream (not IgE for a particular allergen, but total IgE) make the whole immune system more excitable and prone to over-react. The next few years will no doubt solve this part of the puzzle too.
Peace-keepers or aggressors?
`It is bad enough having a child on an ultra-strict diet — Tim can’t have even a trace of cow’s milk or else he becomes violently ill. What makes it worse is when people — teachers, for example —ask what’s wrong. I take a deep breath and say “eosinophilic oesophagitis” then watch their eyes roll in disbelief.’
Tim’s disease is caused by a particular type of immune cell called an eosinophil. In the right circumstances, eosinophils can be valuable — like IgE and mast cells, they are geared to destroying parasitic worms . They produce some very toxic substances to kill these invaders, and it is the toxins that cause serious symptoms for Tim and others like him.
Any disease with ‘eosinophilic’ in the name involves vast numbers of eosinophils converging on some unfortunate part of the body. The stimulus that attracts them often remains unknown but once there, the toxins they generate cause inflammation (140) of a particularly violent kind.
It is only in recent years that doctors have begun to distinguish between patients such as Tim and children with classical food allergy, and to understand the cause of Tim’s symptoms. Several different forms of eosinophilic food sensitivity are now recognised (72). The exact relationship with IgE-mediated allergy remains a puzzle, because some sufferers make IgE to the culprit food but others do not.
That is not all — the eosinophil is finally coming out of the shadows and being recognised as an important agent in classical allergic diseases as well.
The fact that eosinophils appeared during the aftermath of an allergic reaction had long been known, but their role was misunderstood. What confused researchers was that eosinophils can break down histamine, the substance that kick-starts allergic symptoms. This ability gave eosinophils the appearance of peacekeeping troops, coming in at the close of battle to restore order. In fact, eosinophils are major aggressors — they do a whole lot of other things besides breaking down histamine, most of them pro-inflammatory. They can release toxins, just as they do in eosinophilic diseases, and they attract other inflammatory cells into the area. In short, eosinophils play a big part in keeping allergic reactions going once the initial burst of activity is over. This `Late Phase Reaction’ is enormously important .