Online Pharmacy - Up to 80% Off Generic Drugs
Compare Prices and Check Full List of Drugs

Posts Tagged ‘spasm’

BiDil. Complete Information.

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Brand Name
BiDil
Generic Ingredients
Isosorbide Dinitrate Hydralazine Hydrochloride Type of Drug
Vasodilator combination. Prescribed For
Heart failure in black patients, in combination with other heart-failure treatments.
General Information
BiDil is a combiRatiZ0 101 Iwo drugs that dilate (open) both arter-
2nd veins. It is the first drug product to be specifically approved for people in a single racial group for any indication. The 2 ingredients in BiDil have been available generically for years and are prescribed for a variety of uses. Isosorbide dinitrate is prescribed for angina, heart failure, and spasms of the esophagus. Hydralazine hydrochloride is prescribed to treat high blood pressure and heart failure. When people with heart failure take this drug combination, it makes it easier for the heart to pump blood throughout the body by widening arteries and veins.
Cautions and Warnings
Do not take BiDil if you are allergic or sensitive to any of its ingredients.
Do not use erectile dysfunction drugs with BiDil.
This drug may be inappropriate for you if you have had a recent heart attack or have cardiomyopathy (loss of blood-pumping ability due to damaged heart muscle) or low blood pressure, especially postural low blood pressure (symptoms include dizziness or fainting when rising from a sitting or lying position).
Long-term administration of more than 200 mg a day of hydralazine may produce symptoms of lupus erythematosus (a chronic condition affecting the body’s connective tissue), including muscle and joint pain, skin reactions, fever, kidney inflammation, and anemia, although they usually disappear when the drug is discontinued. Report any fever, chest pain, feelings of ill health, or other unexplained symptoms to your doctor. The risk of developing lupus increases with higher dosages; approximately 5 out of 100 and 10% of people taking 200 mg a day of hydralazine develop lupus. The daily dosage of hydralazine when you take BiDil can be as high as 225 mg.
Hydralazine may cause a very rapid heartbeat, potentially leading to angina pain or a heart attack.
Taking pyridoxine (vitamin B6) may relieve tingling or numbness in the hands or feet caused by hydralazine.
Possible Side Effects
✓    Most common: headache and flushing—which should disappear after your body adjusts to the drug—nausea, dizziness, weakness, and chest pain.
✓    COmmQR*, k(a% UM16 pressure.
✓    Less common: blurred vision and dry mouth; sinus irritation, rapid heartbeat, heart palpitations, high blood sugar, runny nose, numbness or tingling in the hands or feet, vomiting, and high blood-fat levels.
Possible Side Effects (continued)
V Rare-. flushing, tearing, itching, or redness of the eyes, trem-
ors, muscle cramps, depression, disorientation, anxiety,
itching, rash, fever, chills, occasional hepatitis (symptoms
include yellowing of the skin or whites of the eyes), con-
stipation, urinary difficulties, and adverse effects on nor-
mal blood composition. Other side effects may affect any
organ or organ system. Contact your doctor if you experi-
ence any side effect not listed above.
Drug Interactions
•    Do not take sildenafil, vardenafil, or taldenafil with Bidil. The combination can result in a rapid and potentially fatal drop in blood pressure.
•    Taking this drug with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressant may increase the blood-pressure-lowering effect of the hydralazine component of BiDil. This combination should be used with caution.
•    Do not self-medicate with over-the-counter appetite suppressants and cough, cold, and allergy remedies, since many contain ingredients that may aggravate heart disease.
•    Taking this drug with large amounts of alcohol may rapidly lower blood pressure, resulting in weakness, dizziness, and fainting.
Food Interactions
Take this drug on an empty stomach. It is unknown how food affects BiDil.
Usual Dose
Adult: 1 or 2 tablets 3 times a day, 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.
Overdosage
There have been no reports of BiDil overdose. Symptoms of INID11
overdose would be related to the Specific effects of each active in-
2ind can include reduced oxygen supply to heart muscle,
leading to a heart attack, abnormal heart rhythms, and profound
shock. Fainting, coma, and death may follow unless the victim is
treated. Overdose victims must be taken to a hospital emergency
room at once. ALWAYS bring the prescription bottle or container.
Special Information
Avoid alcohol.    headache, dizzi-
Call your doctor if you develop a persistent hea    ,
ness, facial flushing, blurred vision, or dry mouth.
It is important to make sure you drink plenty of fluids every day and pay attention to hot weather and exercise situations in which you might lose unusual amounts of fluids and salts. Fluid loss may lead to low blood pressure, dizziness, and possibly fainting.
If you forget to take a dose of BiDil, take it as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, skip the dose you forgot and continue with your regular schedule. Never take a double dose.
Special Populations
PregnancylBreast-feeding., Isosorbide dinitrate crosses into the fetal circulation, and hydralazine can cause low blood pressure in pregnant women and their babies. The potential benefits of B01 must be carefully weighed against its risks when your doctor considers this drug crucial.
it is not known if BiDil passes into breast milk. Nursing mothers who must take it should consider using infant formula. Seniors: Specifics about how seniors react to this drug are not
known. The lowest effective dose of BiDil should always be used, especially in people with reduced kidney and/or liver function.

Principal Drugs A-Z (dextromoramide - dimenhydrinate)

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

dextromoramide A powerful synthetic analgesic with a shorter and less sedating action than morphine. Of value in severe and intractable pain, and in terminal disease.
Dose: 5 ing or more either orally or by injection, according to need and response. Care is necessary in liver dysfunction and respiratory depression. (Palfitunt).
dextropropoxyphene An orally effective analgesic. Of value in many painful conditions, and in malignant disease its use may delay the need to resort to the opiate analgesics.
Dose: 250 ing or more daily, but doses in excess of 700 mg daily may cause toxic psychoses and convulsions. (Doloxene). See co-proxaniol.
dextrose See glucose.
diazoxide An inhibitor of insulin secretion. Dose: given orally in doses of 5 ing/kg or more daily in severe hypoglycaemia. Also of value in severe hypertensive crisis, in
doses up to 150 mg by rapid i.v. injection. Side-effects arc nausea, tachycardia and oedema. (Eudernine).
diclofenac A non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the naproxen type, pe, and used in rheumatoid, arthritic and similar conditions.
Dose: 75-150 ing daily, after food. Suppositories of 100 nigare useful at night, but may cause local irritation. In acute conditions and in postoperative pain, doses of 75 mg once or twice a day by deep i.m. injection for not more than 2 days. (Diclomax; Voltarol). Like other NSAIDs, diclofenac may cause gastric disturbance and hypersensitivity reactions. See page 165 and Table 29.
diamorphine A derivative of morphine with a more powerful analgesic an(] cough-suppressant action. It is also less liable to cause nausea. Valuable for the relief of severe pain and the suppression of useless cough. Addiction is a constant risk owing to the euphoric effects of the drug.
Dose: 5-10 nig orally or by injection, repeated as required. For severe pain in the terminally ill, addiction is of no consequence, and much larger doses are given according to need: if necessary, by continuous infusion or a syringe-pump device.
diazepam A benzodiazepine of value in anxiety states, insomnia, acute alcoholic withdrawal, and for premedication. It also has a muscle relaxant action, and is valuable when given by injection in status epilepticus and in the control of the spasm of tetanus.
Doses: 5-30 mg daily, 10-20 mg by slow i.v. injection as required, up to a maximum of 3 mg1kg in 24 hours. Absorption after Lin. injection is unreliable. It is sometimes given as suppositories of 5-10 ing. Side-effects are drowsiness, dizziness, respiratory depression and hypersensitivity reactions. Care is IICLL’N nary in glaucoma and renal and hepatic impairment. Fxterided treatment may lead to dependence and addiction, and withdrawal should be slow to avoid the risks of precipitating toxic psychosis, confusion and convulsions. (Stesolid; Valium). See pages 177 & 136, an(] Tables 5 & 15.
dicobalt edetate A specific antidote in acute cyanide poisoning; toxic in other conditions.
Dose: 300 mg by slow i.v. injection, followed by 50 ml of glucose solution 50%, repeated if required. (Kelocyanor). Sec .odium nitrite.
dicyclomine An anticholinergic agent used to reduce gastric hyperacidity and the smooth muscle spasm of gastrointestinal disorders.
Dose: 30-60 mg daily. Side-effects
include dryness of the mouth and blurred vision. (Ivlcrbcnlyl).
didanosine An antiviral agent used in HIV infections not responding to zidovudine. Dose: 400 mg daily before food. Diarrhoea, vomiting and peripheral neuropathy are side-effects. (Videx contains didanosine with antacids). See page 144 and Table 19.
dienoes A synthetic oestrogen used as a 0.025% cream for senile or atrophic vaginitis.
diethylcarbamazine A synthetic drug used in filariasis but long-term treatment is necessary.
Dose: I mg/kg daily initially, slowly increased to 6 mg/kg daily, and continued for 21 days. Low initial doses are necessary to reduce allergic reactions due to proteins released front dead %vornis. Side-effects include headache, nausea, rash and conjunctivitis. (I letrazan). See ivermectin.

diflucortolone A corticosteroid used topically as a 0.13′0 or 0.3% cream or ointment in steroid-responsive dermatoses. Of value in resistant conditions. (Nerisone).
diflunisal An anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug (NSAID), chemically related to aspirin, but with actions and uses similar to napmxen.
Dose: 500 ilig– I g daily. Care is necessary in aspirin-sensitive patients, and in peptic ulcer. (Dolobid). See page 163 and Table 29.
Digibind A highly purified preparation of sheep-derived digoxin-specific antibodies, given by i.v. infusion in digoxin overdose or poisoning. It mobilizes digoxin from cardiac receptor sites and binds it as an inert complex which is excreted into the urine, and symptoms of digoxin toxicity subside within an hour.
Dose: depends oil the amount of digoxin absorbed; 40nigcan neutralize about 600ligofdigoxiii.
I Dim
250-500 jig initially according to need. Nausea and vomiting are often signs of overdose. If the heart rate falls below 60 beats per minute, dosage rcquiresadill.ltmclit. See page 1.11 and Table 18.
digoxin- specific antibody See Digibind.
dihydrocodeine An analgesic derived from codeine, but with a more powerful action. Of value in many painful conditions where mild analgesics are inadequate. Dose: 30 mg orally after food, or 50 ing
by i.m. or deep s.c. injection at intervals of 4-6 hours according to need. Dizziness and constipation are side-effects. MIA 18).
dihydrotachysterol A sterol related to calciterol, but with more rapid calcium-mobilizing properties. It is used mainly in hypocalcaemia and parathyroid tetany, but is sometimes effective in calciferolresistant rickets.
Dose: 200 jig daily, adjusted to need according to plasma calcium levels as a solution in oil. (AT 10).
39
digitalis The dried leaf of the foxglove. It has a powerful strengthening and regulatory action oil the heart, but is now used as digoxin.
digitoxin The most powerful cardiac glycoside of digitalis and of value in heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Absorption is rapid but excretion, which depends on metabolism by the liver, is very slow, and cumulative effects may occur.
Dose: (maintanence) requires careful .iditminent, varying from 50-200 f.ig daily.
digoxin The principal cardiac glycoside obtained from digitalis leaf. It is rapidly absorbed orally, and is widely used in cardiac failure, paroxysmal tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. The diuresis of digoxin therapy is a secondary effect following on the improvement in the renal circulation.
Dose: for rapid digitalization, 1-1.5 mg initially over 24 hours: subsequent maintenance close 62.5-500 pg daily. For slow digitalization, 250-500 pg may be given daily for about a week, with subsequent closes based on the response. Elderly patients and children respond adequately to smaller doses, and tablets of 62.5 pg (Lanoxin-111G) are available for such patients. In emergency, digoxin call be given by slow i.v. injection in closes of
diloxanide A well-tolerated aniciellicide used in chronic intestinal anicielliasis when only cysts are present in the faeces. It is also used in acute infections, 5 days after a course of metronidazole.
Dose: 1.5 g daily for 10 days. (Furamide).
diltiazem A calcium channel blocking agent, used in the prophylaxis and treatment of angina, and useful when beta-blocking agents are unsuitable or ineffective.
Dose: 180-360 nig daily, reduced in renal impairment. It may cause bradycardia, ankle oedema and hypotension. potension. (Adizen; Tildiern). Sonic long-acting products with various brand mantes are used in hypertension. They should not be regarded as interchangeable, as the duration of action may vary. See page 114 and Table 4.
dimenhydrinate An antihistamine used mainly as all antiemetic in nausea, travel sickness and vertigo.
Dose: 100-300 ing daily. It may cause more drowsiness than sonic related drugs. (Dramamine).
dimercaprol (SAL) A specific drug for the treatment of poisoning by arsenic, mercury, gold and other heavy metals.

Herbal Remedies for Allergy Treatment

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Plants make a great many different chemical substances, mostly for the purposes of dissuading other living beings — fungi, insects and grazing animals — from consuming their

leaves, roots and fruits. These chemical substances are extraordinarily potent and diverse. Many taste disgusting, some are virulent poisons, and many will induce vomiting or

diarrhoea. None of these effects are surprising, given that substances such as these are produced to defend the plant. However, some of the chemical substances produced by

plants happen to have a beneficial drug-like action for people suffering from certain diseases. The effects of these substances are utilised in herbalism, sometimes known as

botanical medicine.
Over the millennia, herbalists have, through trial and error, tried to discover which plants have worthwhile effects. Indeed, this process probably began with our ape ancestors

– chimpanzees have been observed, when they are ill with parasitic infections, for example, to carefully select and eat particular leaves that have therapeutic effects. If

chimpanzees do this, it is a fair guess that the ape-like ancestors of human beings also did so.
At some point in human history – or prehistory – this use of wild plants became a systematic and specialised activity, now known as herbalism. No doubt the patients who went to

see herbalists (like patients visiting their doctors today) expected a cure for every ill, and no doubt herbalists felt bad about telling anyone that the problem was incurable.

At this point, quite a bit of wishful thinking and placebo effect (see p. 233) probably found its way into herbalism. The outcome was a mixed bag of herbal remedies – some that

worked, some that had no effect at all (apart from placebo effect), and a few that were positively toxic but whose bad effects escaped notice because of the seriousness of the

diseases being treated.
In recent times, a few herbal remedies have been put through rigorous scientific tests. As one might expect, some work and some don’t. More details of those that have been shown

to work
for allergies are given on p. 221. First, however, it is important to consider some of the misconceptions that surround herbal medicine, especially those relating to side

effects. These misconceptions are rooted in the basic philosophy of herbalism, so it is also important to look at this – and at other points of view about herbal treatment.
The ‘Mother Nature’ viewpoint
Some modern herbalists maintain that, for every human ill, nature has created a complete cure somewhere in the plant world – the job of herbalists is simply to identify that

cure. This belief is essentially religious and anthropocentric – that is, it assumes that the welfare of human beings is the central focus of the plant world. This goes against

common sense, because it suggests that plants produce a complex array of chemical components, not for their own benefit, but for ours.
A related idea, and one that is far more widely accepted, is that anything ‘natural’ must automatically be either harmless or positively beneficial to human beings. It’s a nice

idea, but nothing could be farther from the truth, as a quick survey of the plant world shows: hemlock is natural, belladonna is natural, and ricin –the most deadly poison known

– is natural. All come from plants.
Belladonna, of course, while being deadly poisonous in sufficient quantities, is also a medicinal plant. Its most significant ingredient, atropine, is a useful drug-like

substance in small amounts, and a poison in larger amounts. There is no sharp dividing line between these positive and negative aspects – even a small beneficial dose will have

some undesirable effects too.
In other words, herbs produce side effects, in just the same way that medicinal drugs do. This is almost inevitable – anything that alters body functions enough to act as a drug

will usually have some other unwanted effects.
In the case of herbal medicines, there is an added complication. Plants contain dozens, even hundreds, of different chemical substances, many of which have no benefits for

humans at all –they are just plain toxic. These plant toxins can produce various unpleasant effects of their own, to add to the side effects of the useful ingredients. So the

possibility of side effects is actually higher with herbal medicines than with medicinal drugs.
The side effects that occur with herbal treatment are sometimes very serious. Deaths have occurred in some cases, and in others, irreversible damage (e.g. to the liver) has been

done.
The ‘pure-is-best’ viewpoint
Many modern anti-allergy drugs were first obtained from plants –cromoglycate (see p. 148), for example, was originally extracted from the roots of an Egyptian plant called

ammivisnaga. The ground-up roots of this plant contain a great many other things besides cromoglycate, whereas the pharmaceutical preparations of cromoglycate are pure and of

known strength. This pure form of the drug has also been tested very thoroughly by pharmaceutical companies, in order to demonstrate its effectiveness, to identify the correct

dose, and to look for any serious side effects.
An advocate of scientific pharmacology would maintain that, with modern drugs, the patient is just taking the substance that works, not a mysterious cocktail of unknown plant

chemicals. In other words, you know what you are getting with a drug. You also know it has a good chance of working, and a relatively small chance of causing serious side

effects. With a herbal remedy, you are, to some extent, taking a leap in the dark.
Ephedra sinica, the herb known to the Chinese as Ma-huang, illustrates this point well. It contains a mixture of substances, including the powerful drug called ephedrine – it

was named after the plant. Ephedrine (see p. 156) can relieve the narrowing of the airways that occurs during an asthma attack. The presence of ephedrine gives Ma-huang the

ability to ease asthma, although it is more often recommended to help with weight loss. Unfortunately, over-use of Ma-huang can cause a spasmodic
contraction of the blood vessels in the brain, which can result in injury or death. Liver toxicity has also been recorded (see p. 220).
As for its anti-asthma ingredient, ephedrine, although this drug was once important in conventional asthma treatment, it is rarely prescribed now. Ephedrine has long been

superseded by other asthma-relievers that have a more precise effect on the airway muscles, and so produce fewer side effects.
The multiple-action viewpoint
Practitioners of Chinese herbal medicine, in preparing a treatment for atopic eczema, combine ten or more different herbs. There are some conditions, they say, that can be

treated with a single plant, but atopic eczema is not one of those. It requires a mixture – and none of the ingredients of that mixture, taken alone, has any effect. What they

are claiming is that the different drug-like substances in the herb mixture have a synergistic action, working together to treat the disease.
This same idea is sometimes applied to the many different chemical substances found in a single plant. Some herbalists argue that a herbal remedy is better than a modern drug

precisely because it contains a cocktail of different drug-like substances, the effect of one augmenting or balancing that of another.
There is no actual evidence to support this claim, but the fact that Chinese herbal mixtures have some success in treating difficult allergic diseases (see p. 221) demands that

Western doctors at least take the possibility of synergistic action seriously.
It might seem that this multiple-action viewpoint goes against the whole grain of Western scientific pharmacology – the ‘pure-isbest’ approach. However, Western medicine

frequently treats certain allergic diseases, such as asthma and chronic sinusitis, with a mixture of drugs.
Using herbal remedies safely
Always talk to your doctor before taking any herbal medicine, because of the risk of side effects, or interactions with any conventional drugs that you may be using.
If possible, get herbal treatment from someone who is also a doctor qualified in conventional medicine. Ideally, your herbalist should have access to laboratory facilities and

should order blood tests to monitor your reaction to the herb(s). Monitoring every 1-3 months is necessary with some herbs, to check for serious side effects such as toxicity to

the kidneys or liver (see p. 220).
Before buying herbal remedies from a health-food shop or via the Internet, contact the manufacturer and ask to see detailed reports of trials showing that the product is safe.
Think very carefully before taking a herb that has not The Chinese approach
One fundamental concept of Chinese medicine is that, rather than just matching the remedy to the disease, the treatment should also be based on the particular characteristics of

the patient concerned. This idea is shared by some other Eastern systems, such as Ayurvedic medicine.
Whereas a Western doctor might see you as a person with atopic eczema, a traditional Chinese doctor sees you as a person with a certain constitution which has got out of balance

and so produced symptoms in the skin. The constitution is usually the main focus of treatment, not the eczema. This approach means that different eczema patients get different

herb mixtures, and the same is true for other allergic diseases.
A traditional Chinese doctor will assess your constitution by taking your pulses (there are several in Chinese medicine, not just one), asking various questions, and studying

the appearance of your tongue – the same sort of diagnostic process that is used prior to acupuncture.
For the purposes of scientific investigations, where a uniform treatment is necessary, this traditional approach has been modified. A single standardised treatment is applied to

a particular disease – and the disease itself is diagnosed by Western medical criteria. Whether this is really comparable with traditional Chinese herbal medicine is open to

question. The same caveat applies to any off-the-peg Chinese herbal formula that is sold direct to the public, rather than being prescribed for an individual patient by a

trained practitioner.
The traditional philosophy of Chinese medicine makes for a lot of variability in herbal preparations. That is why categorical statements about side effects cannot be made –

while one mixture used for atopic eczema may contain a potentially toxic ingredient, another mixture may not.
undergone full safety trials. Find out all you can about the herb and discuss the matter with your doctor. Don’t fall for the ‘it must be safe – people have been taking it for

centuries’ argument. If a herb is only toxic to a minority of people, and its bad effects are slow to emerge (so people don’t get ill or die immediately after taking it for the

first time), its deadliness can escape notice for a very long time, perhaps indefinitely. In the case of pharmaceutical drugs, highly sophisticated information-gathering systems

are needed to ensure that such rare-and-slow effects are noticed (see p. 137) but nothing of the kind exists for herbal medicines.
Above all, do not neglect vital medical treatment (e.g. inhaled steroids for asthma) while trying out herbal remedies, as this can be dangerous. Always follow your doctor’s

advice about your drug treatment.
Risks to the liver
Among the side effects recorded for herbal treatment, liver damage is especially alarming. Deaths from liver failure have occurred with both Western and Chinese herbal

treatment. Liver toxicity has been recorded with the following herbal remedies: kava-kava, chaparral, germander, skullcap, mistletoe, senna, valerian root, jin bu huan, and

ma-huang or ephedra (Ephedra sinica). Some Chinese herbal teas prescribed for atopic eczema may also affect the liver, but this is not true of all eczema preparations – several

of the most widely used ones appear to be relatively safe.
Any medicinal herb might, in certain people, harm the liver. Should you feel ill while taking a herbal remedy, stop taking it immediately and see your doctor. The early symptoms

of liver toxicity, which you should watch out for, include jaundice (yellow
skin, and a yellowish tint to the whites of the eyes), pale faeces, dark urine, nausea and pain (usually in the region of the stomach).
Illicit steroids
Be very cautious indeed about pots of Chinese herbal cream sold for atopic eczema. Analysis of a selection of such creams found that two-thirds illicitly contained powerful

steroids – the very drugs that the people buying the creams were anxious to avoid. The dose of steroid in these herbal creams was alarmingly high, considering the purposes for

which some of them had been prescribed – such as use on the face of a baby. A substantial risk of serious side effects exists with these adulterated creams.
Sensitivity reactions to herbs
Like other natural products, herbs can provoke a true allergic reaction, and anyone with a tendency to allergies is at particular risk. Although any herb could, in theory, cause

such a reaction, some seem especially likely to do so:
•    Echinacea, which sometimes causes anaphylaxis or an asthma attack. Severe reactions may occur even in people taking it for the first time, if they are already allergic

to other plants in the daisy family (such as ragweed or mugwort).
•    Preparations containing royal jelly (obtained from honeybees) have sometimes caused near-fatal anaphylaxis in those allergic to pollen. Propolis, obtained from bees,

should also be treated with caution.
Contact dermatitis often occurs with tea tree oil and some other plant-derived substances applied to the skin (see p. 55).Herb—drug interactions
Using herbal remedies and taking medicinal drugs at the same time can be hazardous. These are the herbs that interact with anti-allergy drugs:
•    aloe vera, buckthorn, cascara sagrada bark, ginseng, and senna pod or leaf can all interact with steroid tablets
•    squill, lily of the valley and pheasant’s eye can increase the action and side effects of betamethasone (a steroid); rhubarb root also interacts with this drug
•    kava-kava, if taken with cetirizine (an antihistamine) can increase side effects such as drowsiness and poor coordination; it may have the same effect with other

antihistamines.
Note that many drugs prescribed for conditions other than allergies may interact with herbs. Some of these interactions can be serious, so check with your doctor before taking

any herbal medicine.
Herbs that may work for allergies
Of the herbal treatments that have been tested, the following appear to have potential benefits for people with allergies:
•    Chinese herbal teas for atopic eczema have shown good effects in scientific trials in Britain with both adults and children. Patients with widespread and persistent

eczema —which is particularly difficult to treat — were chosen for these trials. The puzzling thing is that when exactly the same herbal treatment was studied in Hong Kong, with

Chinese youngsters suffering from eczema, there was no improvement.
A combination of Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture shows some limited benefits for hayfever patients (see p. 215). Pilot studies also suggest that a Chinese herbal

medicine formula may work for asthma.
More surprisingly, another mixture of herbs shows promise in reducing sensitivity for people with severe food allergy (so that there is less risk of fatal anaphylaxis from

accidentally eating the culprit food). Further research is needed to confirm these results. It is hoped that daily treatment for about six weeks will give 6-12 months’

protection.
If you are interested in trying Chinese herbal medicine, it is advisable to be monitored properly, as liver toxicity has sometimes occurred (see p. 220). See a reputable,

medically qualified practitioner, who can vouch for the contents of the herbal mixtures (imported ready-made mixes sometimes contain drugs such as steroids). Be warned that the

stuff tastes vile, and you have the daily chore of boiling it up before taking it. It can have a very mild laxative effect at first. Don’t use Chinese herbal creams unless they

are guaranteed steroid-free (see p. 220).
•    Euphorbia acaulis has shown good effects with atopic eczema. Liquorice root may also help, but can have serious side effects if taken in large amounts.
•    Evening primrose oil taken in capsule form, is known to calm inflammation, and might be helpful for atopic eczema. Don’t chew the capsules, as irritation of the throat

can occur. Epileptics should not take this oil.
•    Ginkgo biloba seems to reduce the reaction to allergens. For those with asthma it may also calm inflammation in the airways.
•    Ayurvedic medicine utilises two herbs, Coleus forskohN and Tylophora asthmatics, in the treatment of asthma. The former relaxes the airway muscles, in much the same way

as beta-2 reliever drugs, making the airways open up. The latter has more general benefits in asthma, but also some unpleasant side effects: it can cause nausea and soreness in

the mouth.
•    Saiboku-to is a Japanese herbal treatment for asthma. Studies suggest that it may have beneficial effects on airway inflammation and may allow a reduction in the dose of

steroids needed.
•    Butterbur has received a lot of publicity following a study which appeared to show that it was as good as the antihistamine cetirizine for hayfever However, the study

did not assess actual symptoms of hayfever, only the patients’ sense of wellbeing. Some preparations of this drug contain substances that could cause cancer, or carry a risk of

liver toxicity. Trials of butterbur for atopic eczema have shown no benefits.
•    Perilla seed oil appears to damp down allergic responses, and may help some asthma sufferers.
Omega-3 oils
These oils are derived from certain types of fish. They are obviously not herbs, but they are often sold alongside herbal remedies in health-food shops, which is why they are

included here. Generally speaking, omega-3 oils have a calming effect on inflammation,
but occasionally they provoke skin rashes, and asthmatics who are sensitive to aspirin may find that they gradually get worse if they take omega-3 oils. This is probably due to

problems with the production of messenger chemicals called prostaglandins in people with aspirin sensitivity (see box on p. 151). The connection is that omega-3 oils can act as

raw materials for the manufacture of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. The details of how omega-3 oils cause trouble for aspirin-sensitive people are not yet understood.

Diet to Protect against Asthma

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Diet to Protect against Asthma
There is growing evidence that several aspects of the modern Western diet make asthma more likely to develop. Parts of this evidence are very convincing, while other findings are less conclusive as yet. Some people might argue that, until all the facts about diet and asthma are firmly established, no dietary changes should be recommended. However, all the dietary changes that might protect against asthma are also very valuable for general health.
This diet is potentially useful for:
0Atopic families who wish to reduce the chance of their chil- dren developing asthma. Other preventive measures, such as allergen avoidance and exercise (see Chapter 8), are obviously important as well.
•    Anyone who already suffers from asthma – with this diet, their symptoms may diminish.
The main elements of the anti-asthma diet are:
•    A high intake of fresh fruit. Researchers in Britain and the Netherlands have shown that people who eat more fruit have better lung function, and are less likely to develop asthma or bronchitis. Apples have a particularly good effect on the airways, according to one recent study. Many other studies show a link between Vitamin C – the major vitamin in fruit – and asthma prevention. This makes sense because Vitamin C is an antioxidant which inactivates the pro-inflammatory substances (called oxidants) that are found in cigarette smoke and other polluted air. In addition to Vitamin C, many fruits contain beta-carotene (see below) – mangoes and apricots are the richest sources.
•    Regular helpings of carrots, which contain the orange pigment beta-carotene. This is another antioxidant that can help prevent inflammation in the airways. It should be obtained from food, not supplements (see p. 207).
•    A high intake of fresh green vegetables, especially broccoli, spring greens, dark green cabbage, peas, parsley and courgettes. One Australian study has shown that children who eat fewer vegetables are more likely to wheeze. The benefits of vegetables may be partly due to the fact that they contain beta-carotene and (if eaten raw or only lightly cooked) Vitamin C. Dark green vegetables are also a good source of magnesium, and researchers find that people with a higher magnesium intake have healthier airways. Magnesium is believed to protect against asthma by helping the muscles of the airways to relax.
•    Plenty of tomatoes and tomato products, such as tomato juice, tomato sauce, ketchup and paste. The special protective effect of tomatoes is not entirely explained by their Vitamin C or beta-carotene content – another antioxidant, called lycopene, may be the crucial ingredient here. Good news for fast-food fans – the benefits of tomato paste are even seen among pizza eaters who are significantly less vulnerable to asthma.
•    Daily intake of sunflower seeds, or sunflower oil and margarine. These are by far the best natural source of Vitamin E, another antioxidant (see left) which helps to reduce the risk of becoming asthmatic. Vitamin E taken in supplements seems to have much less beneficial effect than natural Vitamin E from food.
•    A good intake of the minerals zinc, manganese and selenium, as well as magnesium (see p. 206). Shortage of any of these minerals may be linked with asthma. It is important not to eat too much wheat bran or unyeasted wholemeal bread, especially with main meals, as these block the absorption of several minerals.
Good sources of zinc include meat, shrimps, clams and oysters, with smaller amounts in cheese and egg yolks. Nuts, lentils and beans are fairly good sources of zinc, while soya protein blocks its absorption.
As well as being found in dark green vegetables, magnesium is plentiful in sardines, peanuts, hazelnuts, walnuts and lentils. Other fish, lean meat, milk, cheese and bananas contain smaller amounts.
Manganese is found in eggs and milk, and though the amounts are small, these are good sources because the mineral in them can be absorbed easily. While green leafy vegetables, whole grains and tea apparently contain more manganese – and are frequently recommended as a source of this mineral – in fact very little can be absorbed from those foods. Lentils are a moderately good source of manganese.
Selenium is most plentiful in fish and meat. It may be scarce in home-grown plant foods in areas of the world (notably Finland and parts of New Zealand) where selenium is lacking in the soil.
•    A limited intake of meat, especially red meat, plus a com-
-    plete avoidance of kidney, liver and other offal meats. An entirely vegetarian diet incurs a risk of mineral deficiencies however (see above). On balance, it is probably best to eat meat once a week or less.
•    A low intake of salt. Researchers in Kenya found that children eating a high salt diet (which equals the average salt intake in Britain and other parts of the developed world) were at greater risk of becoming asthmatic. For existing asthmatics, increasing the amount of salt eaten can make asthma worse, while reducing salt can lessen symptoms. Male asthmatics seem to be more vulnerable than females. Salt probably affects the muscles of the airways, making them more likely to contract.
The role of supplements
You should try to get all the nutrients you need from food rather than supplements. However, there are times when a supplement can be useful. Any asthmatic who has to cope with the effects of high air pollution, especially ozone and sulphur dioxide (see pp. 130-31), may find a supplement of Vitamin C beneficial. However, you should avoid very high doses of Vitamin C (e.g. I g/day) as they can cause disturbed sleep. Use natural sources for Vitamin E (see p. 206) if you can, but taking a supplement is better than nothing.
Vegans should think about taking a multi-mineral supplement, given the difficulties of ensuring an adequate intake of zinc, manganese and selenium from vegetable food (see left). Vegetarians may also benefit from a mineral supplement.
Some supplements, in certain circumstances, can do more harm than good. Omega-3 oils (also called w-3 oils, concentrated fish oils, or EPA and DHA) may make asthma worse for some people (see box on p. 221). Beta-carotene (sold alone and as part of mixed antioxidant supplements) may, according to some studies, promote cancer at the high doses used in many supplements. It should only be obtained from food.
Foods and drinks that bring on asthma attacks
The anti-asthma diet tackles the inflammation of the airways and the underlying tendency of the airway muscles to go into spasm – in other words, it is concerned with the long-term treatment or prevention of asthma. In addition, you should obviously avoid any foods which aggravate asthma in the short term. Various foods and drinks can bring on an asthma attack:
•    Foods and drinks containing sulphur-based preservatives tend to give off the irritant gas sulphur dioxide while being chewed or swallowed. Some asthmatics are more sensitive to sulphur dioxide than others. The foods that most commonly cause problems are dried apricots and other dried fruit (except those labelled ‘unsulphured’), shellfish, french fries, ready-made salads and fruit salads. Sulphur-based preservatives are used widely in the catering industry. On packaged food, look for ’sulphite’ and’metabisulphil or E numbers 220-227. Soft drinks, wine, beer and cider almost always contain sulphur-based preservatives.
•    Foods that cause heartburn (GER – see p.38) can aggravate asthma for some people.
•    Alcoholic drinks may make the airways contract for some asthmatics (see box on p. 160).
•    Some asthmatics need to avoid foods containing histamine (see box on p. 67).
•    A few asthmatics respond badly to the smell of food cooking. The most severely affected can suffer an asthma attack from anyfood aroma. Cromog lycate -type drugs (see p. 148) or anti -choli nerg ics (see p. 156) may block this reaction.
Needless to say, if you have a sensitivity reaction to any food listed for the anti-asthma diet you should not eat this food.

Drugs for Asthma

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Drugs for Asthma
The drug treatment of asthma is far more complex than for any other allergic disease. Drugs prescribed for asthma fall into two basic categories: those that open up the airways by relaxing the airway muscles, called relievers, and those that treat the inflammation in the lining of the airways, called preventers. The former offer a ‘quick fix’ - like taking an aspirin when you have a headache. Just as the actual cause of the headache is not treated by an aspirin, so the actual cause of the asthma attack is not addressed by relievers. Preventers, on the other hand, tackle the basic problem - the inflammation that triggers the contraction of the airway muscles (see p. 36).
In the past ten years, there has been a quiet revolution in asthma treatment, with far more people being given preventer inhalers, usually low-dose steroids. The aim is to get the airways in better condition, with the inflammation thoroughly damped down, so that the airway muscles don’t go into spasm. The ultimate objective is to make people far less reliant on reliever inhalers, because the potential hazards of over-using them are now realised.
The details of modern asthma management, and the different approaches used, are described on p. 160, following the discussion of the main types of drug used for asthma treatment.
Beta-2 relievers (beta-agonists)
Our airways open up when we produce adrenaline. This is the body’s natural response to feeling angry or frightened. The adrenaline widens the airways so that we can run faster or fight more vigorously.
Adrenaline (epinephrine), given as a drug, was among the earliest treatments for asthma. However, it also stimulates the heart to beat faster and raises
the blood pressure. While it is useful for emergency treatment (see p. 155) the side effects make it too hazardous for routine use.
The beta-2 relievers work by mimicking adrenaline – they bind to the same receptors in the airways, the beta-2 receptors. Binding to these receptors stimulates the airway muscles to relax, so that the airways open up.
In other respects, the beta-2 relievers are not like adrenaline. Clever chemical manipulation has made them sufficiently different from adrenaline to have little effect on the heart and other organs, when taken at normal doses.
Beta-2 relievers are best taken by inhalation. Although tablets and syrup are available these are far more likely to bring on side effects, because the dose needed is so much bigger.
Inhaled beta-2 relievers target the drug directly on the airways, so the dose can be smaller. They also have the great advantage of taking effect soon after being inhaled, and giving full relief from airway narrowing within 10-15 minutes.
There are two different kinds of beta-2 relievers:
•    the traditional short-acting beta-2 relievers whose effects last for 3-6 hours (usually about four). The modern consensus is that these should be used only when needed, not taken routinely.
•    the newer long-acting beta-2 relievers, which last up to 12 hours. These drugs are prescribed for more severe forms of asthma (see p. 154), and are generally used routinely, twice a day.
A key question for asthma sufferers is: How often can short-acting beta-2 relievers be used? Ideas about this have changed considerably over the last 20 years, and no doctor would now want to have patients using a Ventolin inhaler five, six or more times a day - something that was quite common in the past. This level of need for beta-2 relievers indicates that the asthma is poorly controlled and requires treatment with a preventer, to quell the inflammation in the airways.
Detailed policy on beta-2 relievers still varies from one part of the world to another. British guidelines state that anyone who needs to use a short-acting beta-2 reliever more than once a day, or who suffers from nocturnal asthma, should be given a preventer as well. The international guideline is more stringent: if a short-acting beta-2 reliever is needed more than three times a week, a preventer should also be prescribed.
How safe are these drugs in the long term? The cause of the big re-think on beta-2 relievers was an epidemic of asthma-related deaths in New Zealand between 1976 and 1988. The death rate from severe asthma attacks was 2-4 times its previous level for a while, and over a thousand New Zealanders died in the epidemic.
There has been a huge controversy over what exactly caused these deaths. Most researchers now agree that the main cause was a new brand of inhaler that delivered a double dose of the drug fenoterol, a short-acting beta-2 reliever with a very powerful effect on the airways and quite high levels of side effects involving the heart. The same brand of inhaler may have been linked to increased death rates in Canada and Germany.
Research suggests that the problem was greatest in New Zealand because sales of the new inhaler were highest there, and because many patients got their inhalers through repeat prescriptions. As a result, people whose asthma was deteriorating badly were not seen by a doctor and were using large amounts of beta-2 reliever, rather than taking preventer drugs. This is now believed to be a major cause of asthma deaths. There are three separate factors involved:
•    The beta-2 reliever covers up the effects of the severe inflammation of the airways. People feel reasonably well, because the reliever is opening up their airways, and don’t realise just how bad their asthma really is. The untreated inflammation in the airways can eventually lead to a very serious, and potentially fatal, asthma attack.
•    The short-acting beta-2 reliever, used regularly, makes the airways more sensitive to exercise, and to allergens such as dust mite or pollen. This means that an asthmatic who is already allergic to these allergens reacts to them at much lower levels in the air.
•    The airways become less and less responsive to the beta-2 reliever itself, so that when a serious attack occurs, requiring hospital treatment, huge doses of beta-2 reliever are needed to open up the airways. These massive doses carry a risk of serious side effects involving the heart.
The details of the New Zealand epidemic still evoke controversy. Was fenoterol itself, which is stronger than other beta-2 relievers, the cause of the deaths? Or was it just that the inhaler delivered a double dose - would any short-acting beta-2 reliever be dangerous at twice the normal dose? Or was it over-use of all beta-2 relievers and lack of preventer drugs?
Some common brand names
Common brand names include:
short-acting beta-2 relievers in inhalers - Aerolin, Airomir, Bricanyl, Ventolin short-acting beta-2 relievers in tablets - Bambec, Bricanyl, Volmax short-acting beta-2 relievers in syrup - Monovent, Ventolin
long-acting beta-2 relievers in inhalers - Bambec, Foradil, Oxis, Serevent
Until this is resolved, safety-conscious asthmatics may want to assume that any of these possibilities could be correct. An ultra-cautious approach would include:
•    Avoiding fenoterol (it is no longer available in Britain, except in the Duovent inhaler, combined with an anti -choli nerg ic drug)
•    Not using double-dose inhalers of any beta-2 reliever (i.e. inhalers that deliver 200mcg/ micrograms per puff)
•    Not routinely taking two puffs of a single-dose inhaler (check with your doctor if you have been told to take two puffs)
•    Using any short-acting beta-2 reliever only I as needed’ – which should be once a day or less according to British guidelines. Note that, with this level of use, there is absolutely no risk from these drugs: it is only regular over-use that is damaging and dangerous.
•    Using a peak-flow meter and ensuring that you are assessed regularly by your doctor
•    Always taking your preventer medication as prescribed.
Since about 1990, the death rate from asthma has been falling, particularly in countries with a policy of reducing use of beta-2 relievers, and increasing inhaled steroids. The death rate in New Zealand is now the lowest it has been for 50 years, and at the same level as in other Western countries.
Unnecessary alarm
While investigating the causes of the New Zealand epidemic, medical researchers discovered that patients inhaling a short-acting beta-2 reliever four times a day had more irritable airways after just two weeks. Their airways were also less responsive to the drug, even after this brief period of use.
Some researchers began to ask if the asthma epidemic itself – the increasing number of cases of asthma – could actually be due to these drugs. Maybe children with mild wheezing, which might have cleared up if left untreated (and which would have gone untreated in the past) were becoming full-blown asthmatics because they were now using beta-2 inhalers?
Many doctors became very concerned about these questions, and a leading medical journal
published an article with the provocative title: ‘Worldwide worsening wheezing – is the cure the cause?’ That was in 1992. Since then, much more research has been done, and it is clear that this particular fear about beta-2 relievers was unfounded.
Unfortunately, there are a few books and other publications around that are spreading unnecessary alarm about these drugs by reporting the debate as it was in 1992. They have taken up that question ‘Is the cure the cause?’, assumed that the answer is ‘yes’, and ignored all the subsequent research, which shows the opposite.
Beta-2 relievers in severe asthma
A few patients with severe asthma remain breathless and wheezy, even though they are inhaling moderate doses of a steroid preventer every day. Increasing the dose of inhaled steroids does not make a huge difference to their symptoms, and it substantially raises the risk of steroid side effects.
Taking a long-acting beta-2 reliever often works wonders for such patients. These relatively new drugs relax the airway muscles, and go on working for 12 hours or more.
There has obviously been concern about long-acting beta-2 relievers having the same sort of insidious side effects as their short-acting colleagues (see p. 153), and so increasing the likelihood of deaths from asthma. However, studies of people taking these drugs suggest that the risks are minimal. Certainly, long-acting drugs taken twice a day are very much safer than short-acting drugs taken four times a day.
Other studies show that the chemical differences of the long-acting drugs, as well as prolonging their effects, also give them a more complex set of actions in the body. For example, they improve the effect of steroids in calming inflammation, and may even have some small anti-inflammatory effect of their own.
Doctors believe that, for patients with troublesome asthma, the benefits of long-acting beta-2 relievers greatly outweigh the risks. But they should only be used in combination with inhaled steroids. Various other options, such as allergen avoidance and the new anti - leukotriene drugs (see p. 159), should probably be investigated as well.
If you are taking long-acting beta-2 relievers, do use them regularly, once every 12 hours – the good effect gradually builds up with consistent use.
Generally speaking, you should not take additional doses in between. These are not intended for use if you have a sudden asthma attack – your doctor will prescribe a short-acting beta-2 reliever for this. This limitation on the use of long-acting beta-2 relievers is certainly appropriate for salmeterol (which was the first of the long-acting beta-2 relievers to be developed) because it is very slow to take effect on the airways. However, one of the newer long-acting beta-2 relievers, called formoterol, begins to work just as quickly as a short-acting beta-2 reliever. Formoterol could, in theory, be used on an ‘as-needed’ basis to combat asthma attacks. You may want to discuss this possibility with your doctor.
Finally, don’t stop taking your preventer drug (e.g. inhaled steroid or cromoglycate), even if you feel a lot better. Long-acting beta-2 relievers are not a substitute for preventers.
Some patients with very severe asthma need to take regular doses of short-acting beta-2 relievers as well as long-acting beta-2 relievers. You should obviously follow the advice of your asthma specialist closely if you are on this kind of drug regime, and not change anything without approval. However, it might be worth discussing other options, such as anti -leukotriene drugs. In addition, do all you can to combat your asthma in other ways – by reducing allergen exposure, avoiding asthma triggers (see p. 39), and employing various other self-help measures (see p. 41).
Immediate side effects of beta-2 relievers
Minor immediate side effects of these drugs include:
•    headache
•    nervousness, trembling, restlessness, anxiety; children may become more excitable, and some are badly behaved or even aggressive.
•    flushing
•    dry mouth
•    muscle cramps.
These side effects – all of which are due to the resemblance of beta-2 relievers to adrenaline – usually wear off relatively quickly. Some long-acting beta-2 relievers may cause nausea and vomiting.
A pounding heart is usually a relatively minor side effect, but it can be more serious, and should be reported to your doctor.
A few asthmatics find that their airways tighten up when these drugs are inhaled, rather than opening. This is called paradoxical bronchoconstriction. If this happens, stop using the inhaler and see your doctor as soon as you can.
Even more rarely, asthmatics can develop allergic reactions to the drugs, or suffer hallucinations or seizures. Obviously you should stop using the inhaler immediately if you experience side effects of this kind, and should see your doctor.
There can be an interaction between beta-2 relievers and other drugs or medical conditions. Should you need a diuretic, tell the doctor or pharmacist that you are also taking a beta-2 reliever, and ask which diuretics are safe. If you have high blood pressure, a heart problem, or a thyroid condition, make sure the doctor remembers this when prescribing beta-2 relievers.
Adrenaline inhalers
Adrenaline inhalers are for use in emergencies. Technically, they are not available in Britain, but they can be imported under special licence, and your doctor may be persuaded to obtain one for you if he or she thinks it might be useful. They are given to people who have asthma and have sometimes had attacks of anaphylaxis (see p. 58), for example in reaction to food, latex or an insect sting. The inhaler provides prompt emergency treatment for the kind of severe asthma attack that you may experience during anaphylaxis.
You should probably be carrying an adrenaline auto-injector as well, as you may need to use both (see p. 98). Those who usually have fairly mild reactions to their allergen can use the inhaler first, to treat symptoms in the mouth, throat and airways. If other symptoms develop, such as faintness or widespread nettle rash,
Asthma alert
If you ever find that your short-acting beta-2 reliever has no effect within ten minutes, or is needed more than once every four hours, this indicates a serious asthma attack and you need urgent medical help (see p. 100).
During a severe asthma attack, while getting to hospital or waiting for a doctor to arrive, up to 30 puffs of a short-acting beta-2 reliever should be taken as an emergency treatment, to get the airways open. There is a risk of death if you don’t use the reliever fully in this situation. (This emergency dose is safe for almost everyone, but there may be risks if you have a heart condition – get detailed advice from your doctor in advance.)
then the adrenaline injector can be used. Those with a history of more severe reactions should start with the adrenaline injector and then use the inhaler if there are still symptoms in the mouth or airways.
Don’t exceed the maximum number of puffs stated on the canister, as the propellant can cause problems. If you have a heart condition, your doctor will advise you about using this kind of treatment safely - adrenaline can affect the heart.
Ephedrine
Ephedrine and orciprenaline (brand name Alupent) belong to the previous generation of reliever drugs. They are chemically very similar to adrenaline and therefore cause a lot of side effects, especially involving the heart.
These drugs are no longer recommended, and will soon be phased out completely. Some older asthmatics may still be using them, just because they have been on them for years and no one has reviewed their treatment.
If you are taking such drugs, ask your doctor about switching to a newer form of reliever - it will be more effective in treating your asthma, as well as having fewer side effects.
Anti -cho linerg ics
These drugs, also known as anti-muscarinics, are relievers. However, they work in a completely different way from the beta-2 relievers. They block the action of the parasympathetic nervous system, a set of nerves that are the biological equivalent of auto-pilot - working without the intervention of conscious thought. The parasympathetic nervous system has many effects on the body, including keeping the airway muscles nicely toned (see box on p. 235). By blocking the parasympathetic, anticholinergics help the airway muscles to relax.
Anti-cholinergics are taken by inhaler, and require 30-90 minutes to achieve their full effects. They should continue working for 3-6 hours.
Some common brand names
Common brand names of anti-cholinergics include: inhalers – Atrovent, Oxivent
nasal spray - Rinatec
For most asthmatics, especially those with a strong allergic component to their asthma, anti-cholinergics are generally less effective than beta-2 relievers. But they are useful to children under one year, who may not respond to beta-2 relievers. They also have a role where asthma is combined with chronic bronchitis -here the anti -choli nerg ics can sometimes be more effective than beta-2 relievers - and they are particularly useful for asthma with a lot of mucus, because blocking the parasympathetic tends to reduce mucus production. For severe asthmatics, anticholinergics may be combined with beta-2 relievers.
Anti -choli nerg ics should be taken only when needed, not regularly several times a day. If used regularly, they can make the airways more sensitive, just as short-acting beta-2 relievers can (see p. 153).
Side effects
Minor side effects of anti-cholinergics may include a dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, and irritation of the mouth and throat. A few people suffer nausea or difficulty in passing urine.
Serious side effects are rare. Any increase in the stickiness of the sputum coughed up may be a cause for concern, especially in children. If there is an increase in wheezing or coughing, stop taking the drug and see your doctor.
If you already have glaucoma or prostate problems you should be monitored carefully by your doctor, as these conditions can get worse with anti -choli nerg ic drugs.
When anti -choli nerg ics are used in a nebuliser, it is vital that the mask fits well (see p. 163).
Anti-cholinergics for the nose
Another use for anti-cholinergics is in nasal sprays, for the treatment of vasomotor rhinitis, a non-allergic condition that is frequently mistaken for allergic rhinitis (see p. 29). In this disorder, the constant flow of mucus is caused by a malfunction of the parasympathetic nervous system, which is why anti-cholinergics work well.