Posts Tagged ‘intolerance’

Re-balancing the Gut Flora
The gut flora are a large collection of bacteria and yeasts living, usually without harmful effects, in our intestines. Some of these microbes are acquired by a baby during birth - several of the most useful kinds live in the vagina too, and the baby swallows them en route to the outside world. Recent research shows that babies delivered by Caesarean section take much longer to acquire the normal gut flora. However, they catch up eventually because, like other babies, they pick up bacteria in the months immediately after birth, mainly from the mother.
There are hundreds of different kinds (species) of microbe in the gut flora, with the exact mix varying from one person to another. They eat the remains of our meals, and provide certain benefits in return:
•    they make some useful vitamins that we can then absorb
•    they keep disease-causing bacteria at bay simply by being there, taking up all the potential ‘parking spaces’ on the lining of the gut so that alien bacteria can’t find a foothold
•    they may also aid digestion in some way, although this is less certain.
On the downside, the gut flora also produce toxins, but we have had aeons of evolution to get used to these, and the liver normally breaks them down quite happily. Only if the liver is badly diseased (as in cirrhosis) do these toxins become a problem.
The immune system is familiar with these fellow-travellers and tolerates them, while ensuring that they do not invade the body any further. However, a loss of immune competence, as in AIDS, can allow them to become invasive and cause disease.
Research into the gut flora is a relatively new field of medicine, and most of the studies have been published in rather obscure medical journals. So the majority of doctors are unaware that abnormalities of the gut flora – the increase of some species at the expense of others – have been found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, atopic eczema, irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn’s disease. The relationship between these abnormalities and the disease process is unclear at present: it is not necessarily
a cause-and-effect relationship. The implications, as far as treatment is concerned, are far from clear as yet.
The controversial condition known as ‘candidiasis’ appears to be a particular form of gut-flora imbalance, in which yeasts are overly successful. It is called yeast overgrowth in this book (see p. 82).
Among the factors that can cause an imbalance in the gut flora are:
•    prolonged or repeated treatment with antibiotics; also a single high-dose treatment, as may be given before a hysterectomy operation (see p. 76). These seem to kill off the beneficial bacteria in the gut flora, allowing others to flourish.
•    severe diarrhoea, which can deplete the normal community of bacteria. Usually the effect on the gut flora is temporary, but it can sometimes be long-lasting and may lead to food intolerance (see p. 76).
Additional factors that might contribute to a disturbed gut flora are:
•    a diet that is high in sugar and refined carbohydrates; this is thought to give yeasts an unfair advantage over other members of the gut flora, by providing yeasts with their preferred food
•    taking the contraceptive pill; this is very controversial, but some doctors believe there is a link between the widespread use of the contraceptive pill and the number of cases of suspected yeast overgrowth in young women.
Bacterial replacers or probiotics
Bacterial replacers, also known as probiotics, supply live bacteria to replenish the gut flora with favourable species.
Experimental trials suggest that taking bacterial replacers may be a useful treatment for irritable bowel syndrome, for food sensitivity in babies, and for atopic eczema (including prevention – see p. 243). This approach may also be of value in yeast overgrowth, when combined with dietary treatment (see below).
All bacterial replacers have to be taken every day: the bacteria do not seem to establish themselves permanently in the gut flora. And any benefits from taking them vanish within a few days of stopping the treatment – so this is quite an expensive option.
Unless the bacteria in the product are alive – and alive in considerable numbers – the bacterial replacer is of no value. Refrigeration is the key to keeping the bacteria alive since, after three days at room temperature, their numbers start to decline steeply. Bacterial replacers purchased from a health-food shop may have been stored at room temperature for some time and so contain very few live bacteria. Buying by mall, directly from the supplier, is a good plan: ask how long the delivery usually takes.
Many different brands of bacterial replacer are now available. To locate companies selling by mail order, see p. 255.
The no-yeast-no-sugar diet
Although this diet has not been tested scientifically, it is widely used by doctors who are interested in gut-flora disturbances, and often produces strikingly good results with people who had previously intractable health problems. This is not hard scientific data, but the impressive results with certain patients (see p. 82) suggest that the diet is sometimes worth trying. Those with symptoms ascribed to yeast overgrowth or ‘candidiasis’, especially bowel problems and an itchy anus (see p. 82), benefit most frequently.
The best way to do this diet is to start with a relatively low-key approach (Stage 1). Only progress to more stringent dietary measures if you don’t improve adequately. If there is no improvement at all, even on the Stage 4 diet, then you can be reasonably sure that yeast overgrowth is not the cause of your problems.
Stage 1
If you are taking the contraceptive pill, talk to your doctor about changing to another form of contraception. Although the link between yeast overgrowth and the pill is not in any way established, stopping the pill often seems to be beneficial.
Cut out sugar and all sweet foods, including honey, syrup, jam, chutney, pickles, cakes and biscuits, soft drinks and fruit squash. Note that ‘no-added -sugar’ jam should also be excluded – it is very rich in fruit sugars. Also avoid dried fruits, and change
any medicines taken as syrups to tablet form. Do not eat peanut butter, tinned sweetcorn or baked beans, except sugar-free brands. Avoid sweet potatoes, and any vegetables that become sweet when cooked e.g. baked parsnips, caramelised onions. Your ’sweet tooth’ should be your guide – if it tastes sweet, it’s off the menu. Only artificial sweeteners are allowed.
Not eating sugar is thought to deprive the yeast of much of its food supply. Persist with this diet for 4-6 weeks. If you are no better, or only partially better, go on to Stage 2.
Stage 2
In addition to the restrictions of Stage 1, cut all fruit out of your diet, except for pure, unsweetened lemon juice and lime juice. These juices, plus salads and lightly cooked vegetables, should give you enough Vitamin C – or you could take a supplement.
Cut out white bread and anything made with white flour (e.g. pancakes, pastry, noodles and other pasta). Small servings of wholemeal bread, potatoes and unpolished rice (’brown rice’) are allowed. Your staple diet should be vegetables and high-protein foods such as meat, fish and eggs.
Do eat herbs, spinach and fresh garlic, as these may help to curb the growth of yeast. Don’t eat cheese or anything fermented.
Stick with this diet for at least four weeks, and longer if you begin to feel partially better. If you feel a lot better, continue for several weeks, then gradually reintroduce fruits and other excluded foods – but not sugar, honey, jam, syrup or any other very sweet foods.
Stage 3
In addition to all the restrictions of Stages 1 and 2, cut out any foods containing yeast (see p. 190). Why this should work is not entirely understood (see p. 83).
A response to this diet, even a partial response, is a good sign. Consider going on to Stage 4.
Stage 4
Your doctor must agree to you trying this diet, as it may not be safe for everyone.
Avoid all starchy foods including bread, flour, potatoes, rice, pasta, cornmeal, parsnips, beans, lentils etc. Nuts can be eaten in small quantities, but not cashew nuts. This is an extreme diet which gives the yeast almost nothing to live on. No one should stay on this diet for more than a few weeks: it is only used to confirm the diagnosis, or to get the problem under control before tackling it with other treatments.
If there is any improvement with the Stage 4 diet, talk to your doctor about anti-fungal drugs (see p. 83).

‘I get ill if I do a long coach journey - six or seven hours say. I usually feel sick by the end of the journey, and have a headache. The funny thing is, if I’m walking along

the street and I happen to see a coach of the kind that I do long trips on, I feel a bit sick then too, just for a short while. It seems crazy, but I get ill just from seeing

the coach.’
What Jake is observing is the powerful effect of the mind on the body, in the reaction known as conditioning. Some people are more susceptible to it than others, but no one is

completely immune.
The Russian scientist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov first demonstrated conditioning in 1889, with his famous dog-and-dinner-bell experiment. Pavlov rang a bell every time he fed the

dog, and eventually the dog would salivate each time it heard the bell, whether dinner was being served or not. Its stomach would also begin to secrete acid, in anticipation of

the meal, simply on hearing the bell.
Modern-day experiments have shown that conditioning works with immune reactions too. For example, rats can be conditioned by repeatedly giving them an immunosuppressive drug and

always adding saccharin to their drinking water on the day the drug is given. Subsequently, just the taste of saccharin in the water is enough to- suppress their immune

responses.
This surprising discovery is partially explained by the finding that there are nerves running to the lymph nodes – key areas where the immune responses are coordinated. In other

words, the immune system and the nervous system, once thought of as completely separate domains, are in conversation with each other. In fact this is a three-way discussion,

because the hormones are also involved. The study of these complex interactions,
which we are only just beginning to understand, is known as psychoneuroimmunology.
Even before Pavlov carried out his classic experiment, Dr John MacKenzie of Baltimore had discovered that an artificial rose, in the vase on his desk, would bring on an attack

of rhinitis and asthma in one of his patients who believed that she was allergic to roses. (In fact such an allergy is unlikely –see box on p. 127. It is usually the strong

scent that triggers symptoms, the allergy being to something else, often grass pollen, which is in the air when roses flower.)
Much more recently, something similar happened – this time unintentionally – when a boy with severe hayfever and pollen asthma was undergoing hypnosis aimed at helping him

relax. Part of the hypnotist’s standard technique was to describe an idyllic scene in an alpine meadow, and ask the subject to imagine being there. For this boy, it worked all

too well – the thought of the grass pollen in the meadow brought on a severe asthma attack. The hypnotist, with great presence of mind, asked him to imagine a helicopter

suddenly appearing in the sky and rescuing him from the meadow – and the asthma attack subsided. How allergies affect the mind
In studying the psychological aspects of allergy, researchers have discovered that some patients frequently have thoughts that catastrophise the situation. In the case of atopic

eczema, these thoughts might go along the lines of ‘this terrible itching will never end’ or ‘none of the treatment really makes much difference’.
Such thoughts may be just below the surface of the conscious mind most of the time, and it is only by developing the ability to notice what is going on internally that the

allergy sufferer can become aware of them.
Researchers have also found that, when negative thoughts such as these arise, eczema sufferers are far more likely to scratch their skin and so make the eczema worse. Thus the

thought becomes a reality – a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The tendency to catastrophise difficult situations is something that most people develop (or acquire from others) at a very young age, and it may take some effort to even become

aware of this mental habit, let alone change it. Yet it is possible to start thinking about illness, and about life in general, in a different way – for example, as a difficult

challenge but one that can usually be overcome.
Allergies are in no sense unique. Any long-term disease that causes intense discomfort, makes life unpredictable or limits your activities, is bound to have profound effects on

the personality. However strong a person you are, it affects your life, and influences you in a very deep way – shaping you as a thinking and feeling individual. This is

especially true if illness begins at an early age, becoming part of your formative interactions with your parents (see box on p. 233) or marking you out as different from other

children.
This shaping can have both positive and negative aspects, and it is important to recognise that there is a choice about which aspect you emphasise. It is never too late to try

to change the emphasis. Counselling or psychotherapy (see p. 225) may help with this, especially if the counter-productive attitudes to the illness are deeply rooted in family

experiences.
The role of the mind in asthma
The diagnosis of intrinsic asthma has long since been abandoned. This diagnosis, which was commonplace in the 1950s and 1960s, technically meant ‘asthma with no external cause’.

But the widespread assumption was that the cause was psychological. As older asthmatics will tell you, this made their lives particularly miserable, because they were held

responsible for their disease. Families were often ashamed of having an asthmatic child.
The injustice of this sweeping assumption is clear today. Modern research shows that an external stimulus which initiated the asthma, such as an allergen, can usually be found.

Among asthmatic children, an allergic cause exists in 80-90% of cases. Even where no specific stimulus can be found, there is still a clear-cut state of inflammation in the

airways. No one with any knowledge of asthma would now claim that it is an entirely psychosomatic disease, nor even that it is predominantly psychosomatic.
Nevertheless, once asthma has begun, the mind may play an important role in bringing on attacks, or making them worse, as many asthmatics know from their own experience. This is

entirely understandable when you think how closely breathing is tied up with our emotional lives – fear, sadness, excitement and anger all alter the usual breathing pattern in

different ways, and any of these reactions may trigger an asthma attack.
The interactions between the mind and the airways are complex in the extreme, and vary from one person to another. Anxiety and tension can make asthma a great deal worse for

some people, while others only suffer an asthma attack when the stress is over. A few people actually have less trouble with their asthma when under stress and, oddly enough,

this is the reaction that is easiest to explain. Stress activates the sympathetic nervous system (see box on p.235), which produces adrenaline, and the adrenaline opens up the

airways.
For stress to make asthma worse, as it frequently does, there must be some other reaction going on which overrides the effect of the adrenaline. Doctors don’t know exactly what

this is, but asthmatics who get worse when stressed could be hyperventilating (see p. 226) just a little – not enough for it to be obvious, but enough to make their airway

muscles contract.
Breathing through the mouth, rather than the nose, can also occur under intense stress, and this is bad for the airways because the air they receive tends to be drier, dustier

and possibly colder, for not having passed through the nose first. This raw air may irritate the sensitive airway linings of an asthmatic, and so make the airway muscles

tighten. Small local nerves, that run directly from the airway linings to the airway muscles, could cause this reaction.
Scientific tests, carried out in a laboratory, back up these casual observations. For example, many people who are allergic to grass pollen will suffer an asthma attack if the

experimenter says they are inhaling grass pollen through a mouthpiece – even though they are actually inhaling fresh air.
It can work the other way as well. Telling the same asthmatics that they are now inhaling a reliever drug will stop the attack, even though they are still breathing the same air

as before. This is the basis of placebo effect, the benefit that tends to occur with any treatment, even a dummy pill, as long as patients believe that the treatment will work.
Note that it is not necessarily the immune system producing all these reactions. There are also direct effects of the mind on the skin, in atopic eczema, on the airway muscles,

in the case of asthma, and on the nose, in rhinitis. Some of these are due to the autonomic nervous system (see box on p. 235) while others are much less well understood.
The findings described above should be reassuring for anyone who has noticed that their allergy or asthma symptoms are sometimes affected by their thoughts and feelings. There

is no need to feel bad about this, and it certainly doesn’t mean that your allergies are ‘all in the mind’. Conditioning, and other psychological responses, are an entirely

natural reaction to a very real illness.
However, if you suspect that psychological reactions are making a big contribution to your symptoms, you could try to address the problem directly. Hypnotherapy (see p. 223) can

be particularly useful in this regard, because those who are most susceptible to conditioning are also very responsive to hypnotic suggestion – which can counteract the

conditioning messages. Hypnotherapy can also help those asthmatics who
become psychologically dependent on their inhalers – something that happens quite often, especially in people with severe asthma. In the words of one asthmatic ‘If I found that

I’d left my Ventolin at home, that would sometimes start me off wheezing straight away. I was so afraid of being without it.’ Of course, it is important to carry your reliever

inhaler with you at all times, but this kind of excessive psychological dependence is distinctly unhealthy. At worst, it can lead you to over-use your reliever inhaler, which

can increase your risk of a life-threatening asthma attack (see pp. 153-4).
Sometimes the psychological effects involved in allergies and asthma are far more complex and deep-rooted than this, not just a matter of simple conditioning. It is not uncommon

for asthma attacks, in particular, to be provoked by family tensions and anxieties, or by suppressed memories from childhood. This can occur even though the asthma also has a

clear-cut physical cause, such as an allergy to house-dust mite. Some people find that their asthma always gets worse when they are in a certain place, with a certain person, or

in a particular situation. These problems are usually helped by psychotherapy (see p. 225).
While hypnotherapy and psychological treatments can sometimes be valuable, it is vital to remember that the mental factors in allergic reactions are always operating in

combination with purely physical responses – such as the triggering of mast cells by allergens (see box on p.12). Using psychological treatments alone is as much of a mistake as

ignoring the mental and emotional dimension of ill-health completely. The two aspects of treatment – physical and psychological – should always go hand in hand. Be very wary of

alternative therapists who overemphasise the psychological aspects (see p. 209).
Under the skin
To see a baby with severe eczema is heart-breaking for any parent – tormented by something it cannot understand, the child often experiences touch, not as a comforting and

pleasurable contact, but as a further irritation. According to some psychologists who have studied eczema in depth, suffering from severely itchy skin in the early years of life

may create long-lasting psychological problems. They believe that the discomfort associated with the skin, and especially with being touched, interferes with normal processes of

relating to the world and developing loving relationships with others. That is why it is so important to get the skin symptoms under control, with the proper use of steroid

creams, skin care, dietary changes if appropriate, and an anti-scratching programme (see p. 47).
Psychological symptoms from sensitivity reactions
‘People thought that because the hospital couldn’t find anything wrong with me, and because I wasn’t terminally ill, there was nothing wrong with me at all. No one could

understand how I was feeling, or even believed me. My friends and family lost patience with me. I overheard one member of my family saying they thought I was just

attention-seeking. This hurt me so much. I hated being ill all the time. I wanted to go out and enjoy myself and do the things I’d always done, but I couldn’t because I felt so

bad.’
Josey, who is now 27, was ill in this way for seven years, and her symptoms were so incapacitating that she had to give up work and abandon any sort of social life. Now, as she

puts it, ‘I have my life back again.’
The cause of her symptoms – dizziness, confusion, panic attacks, depression, shortness of breath, and a conviction that she was dying – turned out to be a sensitivity to

caffeine which was inducing hyperventilation (see p. 226). Giving up tea, coffee
and cola drinks restored her to normality very promptly, and she has not relapsed since, except on one occasion, when she unwittingly took a headache remedy that contained

caffeine.
What is clear from Josey’s story is how much the disbelief of those around her added to her problems. She felt trapped by her symptoms, which she could not overcome, while

everyone around her assumed that the whole problem was in her head, and that she could ’snap out of it’ if she chose to.
The suffering of patients like Josey could easily be avoided if more GPs knew how to recognise hyperventilation. This is one of those conditions that is well described in the

medical literature, but does not always get onto the curriculum in medical schools. As a result, many hyperventilating patients go through a lot of expensive and time-wasting

investigations, and may not get a proper diagnosis even then. This is especially sad when hyperventilation is so easy to diagnose and treat (see p. 228).
While the symptoms of hyperventilation are easy to spot, once you know what to look for, this is certainly not true of all
The autonomic nervous system
The autonomic nervous system is a kind of ‘auto-pilot’ – a set of controls that generally keeps you well adjusted to your external circumstances without you having to think

consciously about the situation at all.
The autonomic nervous system controls all the involuntary muscles – those in the heart, around the digestive system, and around the airways. It also controls the state of the

blood vessels, including those in the skin. The autonomic nervous system does its work by issuing two different sets of signals – one set that gears the body up for action and

one set that calms the body down.
Two completely separate nerve networks, the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system, issue these different signals. The target organs – the airways,

heart, skin, and so on – all receive input from both networks.
The ‘get active’ signals are issued by the sympathetic nervous system, which comes into play at times of stress, excitement, fear or anger. When you can hear your heart pounding

or feel your pulse race, that is your sympathetic nervous system at work. It also makes your nasal passages and airways open up, because extra oxygen is needed for intense

physical activity, and it tightens the muscles around the blood vessels, which raises your blood pressure.
‘Chill out’ messages are delivered by the parasympathetic nervous system. This network comes on-stream when you know you can afford to relax. It slows down the heart, lowers the

blood pressure, encourages the digestive system to do its work, and makes the airways grow narrower because less air is needed when you are less active.
Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the messenger substance released by the sympathetic nervous system. Its action in tightening the muscles around the blood vessels allows adrenaline

to be employed as a drug, which saves the lives of people affected by anaphylaxis (see p. 150). During anaphylaxis, there is a massive fall in blood pressure produced by

histamine (see box on p. 12), but an injection of adrenaline can reverse this.
Both adrenaline and its derivatives, the beta-2 relievers such as Ventolin (see p. 152), also help in asthma attacks. They do this by making the muscles around the airways

relax.
The messenger substance of the parasympathetic nervous system is acetylcholine. Drugs which oppose its action – the
anti-cholinergics – can also help relieve an asthma attack (see p. 156) by blocking the airway-narrowing action of the parasympathetic.
One of the ways in which acupuncture appears to work is by adjusting the activity of the autonomic nervous system. When
acupuncture is used to deal with the immediate symptoms of an asthma attack, this is probably how it makes the airways open up.
sensitivity reactions. Food sensitivity can occasionally cause some unexpected psychological symptoms, such as bouts of hysterical crying (see p. 80) that no conventional doctor

would ever associate with food.
Inevitably, patients with sensitivity problems such as these will initially be diagnosed as having a psychological illness rather than a physical one. It may be a very long time

before the correct diagnosis is established.
Even if the patient works out the link between eating the food and experiencing the psychological response, the doctor may well remain unconvinced. What complicates matters for

doctors is that quite a few people with genuine psychological problems would prefer to think that these have a non-psychological cause, such as a sensitivity to food. (In the

opinion of most doctors, patients of this kind are far more common than patients with psychological problems that are genuinely caused by food or chemical intolerance.) For such

patients, accepting that their problems have a psychological cause means thinking about what that cause might be – and it is often something deeply distressing which the person

would rather forget.
Unfortunately, for people who get into this situation, the phoney explanation doesn’t actually help at all, though it can provide a temporary distraction. Ignoring unpleasant

hidden memories is not the answer – the problem does not go away, it just festers. Facing up to the real underlying problem is the only way to get rid of the distress (see p.

225).
If you have psychological symptoms of any kind, bear in mind that psychological causes are by far the most likely. Such causes can include difficult life circumstances, damaging

experiences during childhood, loss of close relationships, or extremely traumatic incidents in the more recent past. Where there are longstanding problems, neurological factors

(damage to the nerves or brain) or metabolic factors (something affecting the balance of chemicals in the brain), might also play a part, or sometimes be the sole cause.
For a busy doctor, without much time to spare, it is immensely difficult to distinguish patients who really do have psychological symptoms due to food or chemical intolerance,

from patients with psychological problems that they have mistakenly attributed to an intolerance reaction.
What adds to the difficulty is that, with time, psychological causes can sometimes be grafted onto a straightforward intolerance problem. This occurs because illness of any kind

can produce some psychological problems of its own, especially if the person affected cannot lead a normal life. The psychological effects of the illness invariably get worse if

the person concerned has been treated with disbelief by doctors, family or friends – as
is frequently the case when a person has indefinite long-term symptoms that are due to food or chemical intolerance. Separating the secondary psychological reactions to the

illness (or to the scepticism of others) from the primary psychological symptoms that are genuinely produced by the intolerance reactions is far from easy.
Hyperventilation and chemical intolerance
Hyperventilation (see pp. 226-9) and chemical intolerance (see p. 84) often go hand in hand. A person who is sensitive to airborne items which they cannot avoid inhaling, such

as perfume or petrol fumes, may well feel apprehensive when they catch a whiff of these, and unconsciously alter their breathing in response. They may hyperventilate.
If they do, this can both aggravate the sensitivity symptoms, and increase their anxious feelings – because one key symptom of hyperventilation is anxiety (see p. 227). In this

way the problem begins to feed upon itself, and can spiral out of control.
Hyperventilation, pure and simple, may also masquerade as chemical intolerance. In these cases, a deep underlying anxiety probably exists in the person concerned, and one way in

which this expresses itself is as a fear of synthetic chemicals. The person’s fear triggers hyperventilation, which is the initial cause of symptoms. That is not how the person

interprets those symptoms however – because the person was anticipating a reaction to synthetic chemicals, the symptoms seem to confirm that a reaction has occurred. Again, a

vicious circle has been started which is hard to break.
Another possible scenario is that someone with a few sensitivity reactions – for example, a reaction to perfume and cigarette smoke – starts to feel concerned about other

chemical sub-
‘ and to suspect that these might also cause problems. If an anxious reaction to the presence of these substances develops into hyperventilation, symptoms will ensue from the

hyperventilation. These symptoms will appear to confirm the person’s fears about yet more sensitivity reactions. In this way, people with relatively mild chemical intolerance

can begin to believe that their chemical intolerance reactions are far more extensive and disabling than they actually are.
Where the symptoms of hyperventilation are all tangled up with symptoms due to genuine chemical intolerance, opinions tend to split. Some doctors will interpret all the symptoms

as psychological, while other doctors will attribute them all to the intolerance. Both are over-simplifying the problem, and missing a crucial ingredient – hyperventilation.

Recognising and treating hyperventilation (see p. 228) can help a great deal to alleviate the illness.
The psychologisation of illness
‘From the moment Joanna was born, she was never hungry’ Sandra recalls. ‘It took all day to force an ounce of milk down, and she seemed to have terrible stomach pains. At six

months old, after countless trips to the doctor, she was admitted to hospital. The hospital doctors couldn’t work out what was wrong, and in the end they said that she was just

very independent and that she wouldn’t eat until she could feed herself. I couldn’t believe my ears – what a thing to say about a six-month-old baby!’ But as far as the doctors

were concerned, that was that.
As Joanna got older, the symptoms got worse. She developed severe constipation, opening her bowels only once every four weeks. Because her over-full bowel put so much pressure

on her bladder, she wet herself several times a day.
‘She hated school, because the other children teased her, saying she smelled. And she had such awful stomach pains that she couldn’t bend down to tie her shoelaces. When she was

six she was admitted to hospital for a second time.
‘Again they said there was nothing physically wrong with her and it was all in her head, and this time they decided that it must be because something traumatic had happened at

home. They wanted her to see a psychiatrist. It was terrible. I knew nothing like that had happened to her at home, but it was impossible to convince them.’ There was talk of

Joanna being taken away from her parents, because of suspicions about child abuse.
Two weeks before seeing the psychiatrist, something happened to change Joanna’s life. Sandra saw an item on television about a book on food allergies. She bought the book and,

remembering how fiercely Joanna had rejected milk as a baby, she hazarded a guess that milk was the problem. She immediately took all dairy products out of Joanna’s diet.
The effect was astonishing. ‘Within 12 hours her tummy ache had gone, and after six weeks she began opening her bowels almost every day. She stopped wetting herself, and was so

much happier and healthier.’ In fact, all of Joanna’s symptoms went away. and she has remained well on a milk-free diet.
Psychologisation is most frequently encountered by patients %vith medical problems that are unrecognised by conventional medicine – Joanna is a typical example of such a

patient. Occasionally, however, those with true allergies find themselves in the same situation. Take, for example, someone who has collapsed after being stung by a wasp but

gives a negative skin-test result to wasp venom. In the case of insect-sting allergy, skin-tests are supposed to give very few false negatives – so the doctor may be sceptical

about the patient’s observation of what happened. A PAST test (see p. 92) may be ordered, but sometimes this too gives a false negative.
Doctors are – not unreasonably – more inclined to believe that the patient is an unreliable witness (there was never any insect involved), or that the patient has a

psychological problem that has led to this consultation, than that both these tests gave a false-negative result. A patient in this position may need to be quite persistent to

get proper treatment. The same goes for anyone else with unusual allergic reactions that are initially labelled ‘psychological’ by their doctor. In such cases, good

communication is everything.
Good communication with your doctor
Given the intense pressure under which they work, doctors often react badly to symptoms that don’t fit into a neat diagnostic pigeonhole, or don’t respond to standard treatment.

They simply do not have the time for unravelling complex problems and there is a common tendency to ‘psychologise’ such symptoms automatically. This often does great damage to

the patients concerned, boxing them into a corner from which it is impossible to escape – the more they try to convince the doctor their symptoms are genuine, and request

further tests or treatment, the more the doctor views them as difficult, demanding patients with psychological problems. Unfortunately, it is part of the dogma about

psychosomatic illness that patients affected by it will object vehemently to such a diagnosis. So the more you insist that the symptoms are not psychological, the more this

confirms the diagnosis as far as many doctors are concerned.
The psychologisation of illness becomes a real nightmare where the patient is a child, and parents are accused of actually causing the symptoms in some way (see Joanna’s story,

left). This has happened more than once to children with unusual sensitivity reactions.
Good communication skills may stop you from sliding into this situation with your doctor. Firstly, whatever else you do, stay very very calm. Getting emotional, agitated or

angry always causes doctors to suspect a psychological cause for your symptoms.
Secondly, be very open with the doctor, and don’t conceal anything. Be clear about describing symptoms, and accurate about times, the intensity of the reaction and any other

details. Never, ever exaggerate. If you are given to describing things quite colourfully in everyday life, tone it down as much as possible for your doctor’s benefit.
Thirdly, don’t make your own diagnosis – doctors are taught to believe that patients who diagnose themselves may well be suffering from hypochondria. Present any medical

knowledge you have acquired from books or the Internet as tactfully as possible. Finally, it will probably help a lot to use the appropriate words to describe your illness when

talking with the doctor.

Allergy: Selecting the Right Food

An avoidance diet is for people who already know what food or foods affect them, and simply need to

avoid those foods. A diagnostic diet is for those whose symptoms suggest that they might be suffering

from food sensitivity of some kind, and who cannot be diagnosed by indirect methods such as skin tests,

because true food allergy is not involved. A diagnostic diet is intended primarily to show whether or

not food is causing the symptoms.
The diagnostic diets themselves fall into two basic categories. Firstly, there are diets that, by a

process of elimination, identify a particular food (or foods) as a cause of symptoms. Called

elimination diets, these are used to diagnose idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74) and certain other

kinds of sensitivity reactions to particular foods. An elimination diet is purely diagnostic - simply a

means to establish which foods are at fault. To this end, all commonly eaten foods are avoided at the

outset, and each food is then tested individually. Once an elimination diet is complete, the

information gathered is used to establish a suitable avoidance diet. For example, if milk, wheat and

oranges caused symptoms during the testing phase of the elimination diet, those foods are all avoided

in future.
Secondly, there are specific diagnostic diets, which are a great deal simpler to carry out than

elimination diets. A specific diagnostic diet aims to reduce the intake of a particular substance that

is found in certain foods. The substances concerned -histamine or nickel, for example - are known to

cause particular symptoms in susceptible people.
A specific diagnostic diet simply cuts out all the foods that contain large amounts of the substance
under suspicion. If this diet alleviates the symptoms, and does so consistently, it is plausible that

the substance concerned is indeed the culprit. However, the diet should be stopped and then started

again, preferably several times, to check the response. Once the sensitivity is confirmed in this way,

the avoidance diet which follows is basically the same as the diet used for diagnosis.
Note that there is no agreed terminology for these different kinds of diet, and the definitions given

above will not necessarily be followed in other publications. You may even come across ‘elimination

diet’ being used to mean ‘avoidance diet’, which is particularly confusing. If you are consulting other

sources of information, check the context carefully to see what meaning is intended.
There is one odd man out in this chapter - the diet to protect against asthma, described on pp. 206-7.

It is neither an avoidance diet nor a diagnostic diet, but a health-promoting diet of the kind commonly

advocated to combat other widespread conditions, such as cancer and heart disease. In fact, it has a

remarkable number of similarities to diets that reduce the risk of these other diseases.
The anti-asthma diet is immensely healthy, whereas many avoidance diets carry a risk of malnourishment.

An allergic individual following any kind of restrictive diet - especially a child - should be

medically assessed for the possible risks. That is why it is important to talk to your doctor before

starting any dietary treatment or investigation. A referral to a dietician or nutritionist may be

necessary, and your doctor can arrange this.
When malnutrition does occur as a result of self-treatment, there are often very complex factors at

work. One potential hazard with dietary treatment is that psychological problems can easily become
entwined with obsessions about food. Eating can be a potent form of self-expression, or a way of

exerting control over oneself and others. Many doctors have seen patients who are mistakenly convinced

that food sensitivity is at the root of their health problems, or those of their children. In some

cases, no amount of objective evidence to the contrary will deflect people from such beliefs.
A few people with mistaken beliefs of this kind impose very restrictive diets on themselves - or

sometimes on the whole family. The food rules that they establish may be a way of limiting contact with

the outside world, avoiding other problems and issues by making diet the central focus, or simply

making demands on other people’s time and attention.
The current fad for identifying ‘food allergy’ using very dubious diagnostic tests (see p. 93) will

probably send many more psychologically vulnerable people down this route.
Another unhelpful trend in the dietary field is the wholesale (and usually ineffective) use of

vitamins, minerals and other supplements for a great variety of diseases, including allergy and other

forms of sensitivity. It is important to realise that none of the sensitivity diseases described in

this book has nutritional deficiency as its primary cause, so supplements are not a major part of

treatment in most cases. For the majority of people with some kind of sensitivity disease, a supplement

will make only a small difference, if any. However, it is true that, with some sensitivity problems,

certain supplements may be helpful to certain individuals. The use of Vitamin C in asthma (see p. 207)

is one example of this, and there are some other instances mentioned in Chapter 2.
Generally speaking, it is better to get the vitamins, minerals and other nutrients you need (such as
antioxidants) from food, not from tablets. Studies of adult-onset asthma have shown that only natural

Vitamin E protects against the disease: supplements have no effect.
Many vitamins and minerals, along with various plant and animal extracts, are now referred to as

nutriceuticals - in other words, substances that are classed as nutritional supplements for legal

purposes, but are being marketed as if they were medicinal drugs (pharmaceuticals). Many doctors are

concerned about this, if only because of the duplicity involved. These substances can be sold freely to

the public only because they are, in theory, nutritional supplements, yet they are actively promoted to

the public as if they were drugs.
The marketing is usually indirect, to avoid falling foul of the law, but very effective nonetheless.

Advertisements for the product avoid making any medicinal claims, since these would be unlawful, and

just speak vaguely of ‘health-giving properties’. The specific medicinal claims are made in magazine

articles (which often appear right beside the advertisement), penned by journalists who have been

supplied with a great many ‘facts’ - actually unsubstantiated claims -by the manufacturer of the

supplement. These claims are reproduced uncritically, so the journalists are simply acting as

mouthpieces for the manufacturer. There is no law preventing this.
This is a ruse that circumvents important laws intended to protect consumers from misleading

advertising. Few of these products are likely to be damaging - although there are concerns about some,

especially beta-carotene supplements (see p. 207). What matters here are the large amounts of money

being made from products that frequently have few benefits for those who take them.

What exactly is in ready-made food? People with food sensitivity, especially those with severe food

allergy or coeliac disease, need a simple answer to this question, but frequently they don’t get one.

Research among food-allergy sufferers has found that, in the course of a year, half of them

inadvertently eat the food they are trying to avoid, owing to a lack of information about ingredients.

Restaurants and canteens are responsible for many of these accidents, and most of the fatalities (see

p. 111), but packaged food also plays a part.
Unfortunately, many food ingredients that are potentially allergenic, such as milk and eggs, appear in

packaged food without this being stated on the label in everyday language. The information is usually

there somewhere, however – you just need to know what words to look for.
Decoding food labels
The problems with food labels fall into two general categories:
•    some of the ingredients are described using technical terms. These are usually specific

constituents of the original foodstuff e.g. lactalbumin, one of the proteins found in milk.
•    some manufactured ingredients can be made from different starting materials. So an item such as

‘edible starch’ could be made from either wheat or maize (corn), while ‘hydrolysed protein’ could be

made from soya, maize or yeast, sometimes with wheat added.
One day, no doubt, manufacturers will realise what a burden this type of obscure labelling imposes on

their allergic customers and will start using plain language. In the meantime, food-allergy sufferers

just have to learn all the terms that may be used for their culprit food or foods.
Labels used in health-food shops and delicatessens are another matter altogether. Here the problem is

with exotic-sounding items, such as kamut, which is actually an allergenic food (wheat).
Maize (Corn)
Items always made from maize: cornflour, cornmeal, cornstarch, dextrose, polenta
Items sometimes made from maize: baking powder, cereal starch, edible starch, food starch, glucose

syrup, hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, malt, malt flavouring, modified starch,

modified food starch, starch, textured vegetable protein, vegetable gum, vegetable protein, vegetable

starch
Note that the gum on envelopes and stamps is sometimes made from maize, and that many medicines contain

cornstarch.
Eggs
Items always made from eggs: ovalbumin
Items sometimes made from eggs: lecithin (In fact this is rare in foods – lecithin is usually derived

from soya. Only in pharmaceuticals is lecithin likely to be derived from egg.)
Terms used for egg on cosmetics and toiletries: Ovum
Fish
Be very cautious when travelling. The use of fish meal as an ingredient of spicy sauces is common in

Southeast Asia, and in some parts of Africa. The strength of the spices may make the flavour of the

fish undetectable.
Milk
Items always made from milk: casein, casemate, lactalbumin, whey
Terms used for milk on cosmetics and toiletries: Lac
If you see the term ‘dairy-free’ on standard packaged foods, you can safely assume that the contents

are free from goat’s and sheep’s milk, as well as cow’s milk. But be more wary with homemade or locally

produced foods labelled ‘dairy-free’ - some
people think that ‘dairy’ refers only to cow’s milk.
Parev or pareve is a term used for kosher (Jewish) food that contains neither milk nor meat. However,

there can be contamination with traces of milk.
Lactose is a sugar produced from milk, and while it is not allergenic itself, it may contain a trace of

allergenic milk proteins. The amounts involved are tiny, and will only affect the most sensitive

individuals.
The label ‘non-milk fat’ sometimes misleads people if they just glance quickly at labels. The fact that

a product contains non-milk fat does not, of course, mean that it is entirely milk-free -remember to

look for all the synonyms of milk (see above).
Nuts
Items always made from nuts: frangipane, marzipan, praline
Standard packaged food will almost always include the nuts by name, but if you are buying other food

(e.g. from a stall selling home-made food) watch out for the above names.
Be very cautious about unrefined nut oils (see p. 110). Almond essence may be produced chemically, in

which case it is safe, but some is made from real almonds and could be allergenic.
Terms used for nuts on cosmetics and toiletries: Prunus, Juglans, Bertholletia, Corylus
Peanuts
Items always made from peanuts: arachis oil, groundnut oil satay sauce
Unrefined peanut oil should be avoided. This is not much used, and unlikely to be encountered except in

Indian and Oriental cooking. Most groundnut oil sold in Britain and Europe, or used in packaged foods,

is refined and considered safe (see p. 110).
Alternative names: arachide, beer nuts, cacahuete, earth nuts, goobernuts, groundnuts, monkey nuts
You are only likely to encounter these names on imported food, or when travelling. Always be very

careful with Indian or Southeast Asian food, where the use of peanuts is very common and often not at

all obvious. Avoid chocolate from Poland, which often contains peanuts that are not declared on the

label.
Items sometimes made from peanuts: hydrolysed vegetable protein. (The usual source is soya or wheat,

but some is derived from peanuts.)
Terms used for peanut on cosmetics and toiletries: Arachis hypogea, Arachis oil
Sesame
Items always made from sesame or containing some sesame: gomashio, halva, hummus (houmus), tahini, the

drink Aqua Libra
Alternative names: ajonjoli, berme, gingelly, teel, til, simsim
Check carefully for sesame in any food from a health-food shop or a stall selling home-made food, and

in foods from the Middle East, or Chinese packaged food (e.g. stir-fry oils). Sesame oil is always

unrefined and therefore allergenic (see p. 110). Watch out for contamination by traces of sesame in

bakeries and delicatessens where goods are sold unwrapped.
Term used for sesame on cosmetics and toiletries: Sesamum indicum
Shellfish
Items sometimes containing shellfish: curry paste, fish sauce and other sauces/pastes used in Southeast

Asian cooking
Standard packaged food should mention shellfish specifically, but you may need to read the label

carefully. Be cautious about bottles of imported sauce, and home-made or takeaway food.
Soya
Items always or usually made from soya: miso, soy sauce, textured vegetable protein, tofu, vegetable

protein
Items sometimes made from soya: hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, lecithin, vegetable

gum, vegetable starch Changes in ingredients
Unfortunately, the ingredients of a product can change without any obvious warning on the label, or any

change in the packaging. You should always check the label in detail, every time - even on foods that

you have eaten before without any trouble.
Wheat
Items always made from wheat: bran, flour, graham flour, hard flour, strong flour, wholemeal flour

(there are non-wheat brans and flours, of course, but the words ‘bran’ or ‘flour’, without any

qualification, usually mean wheat)
Regional names for particular types of wheat: bulgur or bulgar wheat, Chilton, couscous, dinkel, durum,

einkorn, farro, fu, kamut, semolina, spelt, triticum, triticale (a hybrid of wheat and rye)
Items sometimes made from wheat: baking powder, cereal binder, cereal filler, cereal protein, cereal

starch, edible starch, food starch, hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein, modified food

starch, modified starch, starch, textured vegetable protein, vegetable protein, vegetable starch.
Assume that bread, crispbread, pastry, pasta and noodles are made from wheat, unless definitely

labelled otherwise (and read the label in detail too, because a little wheat is often added to items

such as rye bread and rye crackers).
Note that buckwheat is not wheat at all - it is not even a cereal. Nor does it commonly affect

coeliacs, as is sometimes claimed, though a few coeliacs may develop an intolerance reaction to it,

through eating it very regularly.
For more information on avoiding gluten, see p. 177.
Yeast
Items usually made from yeast: leavening
Items sometimes made from yeast: hydrolysed protein, hydrolysed vegetable protein
Labelling loopholes
Manufacturers do not have to include on the label:
•    Any ingredients used in an earlier manufacturing process e.g. yeast used to make bread for

breadcrumbs, wheat flour added to spices or mustard powder during the grinding process, or bread used

to innoculate blue cheeses with mould -this can leave minute traces of gluten in the cheese.
•    Residues left by substances used during processing, such as wheat flour used to dust processing

lines or prevent dried fruits from sticking together. Manufacturers do not need to declare these

residues on the label because the substance serves no function in the final product and is present in

amounts that are considered insignificant. The vast majority of those with coeliac disease or food

allergy will tolerate such microscopic traces, but the most sensitive individuals may not. Some

coeliacs are even affected by food additives manufactured from cereals (see p. 177).
•    The individual constituents of a composite ingredient (such as salami on a pizza), if that

composite ingredient makes up less than 25% of the finished product. This is called the 25% rule. As

from November 2005, this is all set to change, thanks to the European Parliament. The contents of a

composite ingredient like salami will be listed in full. A few composite ingredients with officially

defined contents (such as jam, or chocolate) can be listed just as ‘jam’ or ‘chocolate’ if they make up

less than 2% of the product. Likewise herb mix or spice mix, if less than 2%. But there are certain

items that must always be listed if they are anywhere in the product, and however small the amount.

They are: milk, eggs, tree nuts, peanuts, sesame, mustard, celery/celeriac, fish, crustacean shellfish

(shrimps, prawns, crab etc), soya, wheat and all other cereals that contain gluten. Sulphur dioxide and

sulphites must be listed if more than 1 Oppm. This list will be reviewed from time to time.
`May contain’ labels
Labels reading ‘May contain nut traces’ are springing up like weeds on packaged food. Similar labels

relating to sesame, milk and eggs are also starting to appear.
Allergy sufferers, suddenly unable to eat foods that they formerly enjoyed, feel very frustrated about

this development. Many suspect that these labels are often just a defensive tactic - warning off

consumers with food sensitivity when the chance of the food containing the allergen is actually very

small. The danger is that some allergy sufferers may stop taking the labels seriously. Teenagers, in

particular, are increasingly dismissive of ‘May contain’ labels, and this is a huge worry for parents.
Could the need for ‘May contain’ labels be eliminated altogether with more careful factory procedures?

The problem here is that, with nuts, perfect cleaning of production machinery is extremely difficult.

Most machines have nooks and crannies in which a nut from one production process can become lodged,

only to free itself later during the making of a non-nut product. It is quite possible that someone

could encounter a whole nut, or substantial pieces of nut, in a non-nut product. That is why no one

with nut allergy, even if it is relatively mild, should disregard ‘May contain nut traces’ labels.
Some makers of confectionery and biscuits have now set up dedicated nut-free production lines, with

stringent precautions to avoid any possibility of contamination. This allows them to market products

that are guaranteed nut-free. If you cannot purchase these locally, you may be able to order them by

mail or over the Internet (see p. 255).
Note that packaged foods that have been produced on nut-free production lines in the past can be

switched to different production lines, that necessitate a ‘May contain nut traces’ label.
In some cases, a product is manufactured in two separate places, one of which is nut-free, while the

other is not. Consequently, the same product may sometimes be sold with a ‘May contain’ label and

sometimes without. Don’t disregard these labels, however illogical they might seem.
Packaging errors
As most people with food allergy are now aware, ready-made foods sometimes go out in the wrong

packaging. Alarming cases that have occurred in recent years include hazelnut yoghurts labelled Toffee

Yoghurt, and Vegetable Bake (containing nuts) sold in packets intended for Vegetable Lasagne (no nuts).
Manufacturers are increasingly aware of the hazards and when mistakes are discovered, allergy

information websites and organisations such as the Anaphylaxis Campaign are quickly informed, so that

they can alert allergy sufferers.
Belonging to such an organisation (see p. 255), and/or checking websites regularly, is definitely

recommended for anyone with food allergy. However, you should bear in mind that no information service

can protect you completely from this hazard. The odds against it are high, but one day you might just

be the unlucky person who first discovers a packaging error by suffering an allergic reaction. To

protect yourself as far as possible:
When is a nut not a nut?
Those with nut allergies often worry about eating nutmeg and coconut. In fact, allergic reactions to

these are rare. People with nut allergy are no more likely to react to nutmeg or coconut than anyone

else.
Tiger nuts or chufa nuts are not nuts at all, but the roots of a sedge plant – they are most unlikely

to cross-react with true nuts.
Peanuts, botanically speaking, are not true nuts at all. They are legumes (pulses). There can be

cross-reactions with soya and/or lupin (proceed very carefully with this novel food ingredient) but

reactions with other pulses are rare. Cross-reactions with tree nuts such as almonds and Brazils are

quite common however (see p. 15). Many people with peanut allergy can in fact eat tree nuts, but they

should be aware that a cross-reaction could develop at some stage.
Because cross-reactions between tree nuts are so common, doctors tend to speak simply of ‘nut allergy’.

However, it is possible to be allergic to one type of tree nut, without being allergic to others.
•    always check that the food in the packet looks like the photograph on the packet
•    double-check, when you serve the food, by noting the conspicuous ingredients of the meal

(carrots, for example), and ensuring that they are indeed on the list of ingredients – any discrepancy

should make you suspicious
•    note the smell and appearance of any ready-made food, before you taste it. Do this even for

very simple things such as flavoured yoghurts
•    only have a very tiny mouthful at first, and if you have any tingling of the lips or other

symptoms, however mild, stop eating immediately (this is helpful for true food allergy only, not for

coeliac disease)
•    be especially cautious about vegetarian food if you are allergic to nuts or soya.
Latex in food
Those with latex allergy may react to very small traces of it in food. This sometimes occurs with

packaged food or restaurant food that has been prepared by workers wearing latex gloves. On one

occasion a highly allergic individual reacted to a water glass that had been handled by someone wearing

latex gloves. The amounts of latex involved are minuscule, and only affect those with severe latex

allergy. However, there is a strong case for workers handling food to wear non-latex gloves, especially

with the rise in cases of latex allergy.
There are also reports of people with latex allergy reacting (usually very mildly) to cold-seal

adhesives in food
wrappers, such as those used for ice cream. The reaction only occurs if the wrapper actually touches

the lips or mouth.

Suffering from a long-term illness, especially if it is severe and sometimes limits activity, can easily make a child feel different from other children, and ‘not good enough’. Children with allergies, especially those with severe asthma or food allergies, may also be very frightened and anxious. At the same time, such children often feel that they have to protect their parents by not revealing their fears.
Children may also think that their illness is a punishment for something they have done wrong. Their guilty feelings can be so powerful that they may not confide in you unless you spend time talking with them about their illness, and encourage them to share their feelings with you.
One of the most valuable things you can do for children with allergies is to build up their self-esteem. This is especially important when they first start school, because they have to adjust to other children there, and learn how to deal with questions about their illness, as well as some unkindness.
For children whose allergies limit what they can do physically, or restrict some normal activities, try to find other interests and hobbies that the child can do well. When talking with the child, always emphasise the positive things – the difficulties that you have overcome together in the past, the measures that the child can take to keep the symptoms under control (such as stopping scratching, applying creams, or using a preventer inhaler) and the areas of Iife where he or she is particularly successful. As the child gets older, introduce the idea that coping with illness makes you a stronger, kinder and more resolute person, one who can cope with any of life’s challenges. Show the child how much you value their maturity and perseverance.
Pay attention to what the child’s friends are
saying – a bit of eavesdropping is allowed – and be prepared to counteract any negative messages. Teach your child to be strong and self-confident about choosing their friends, and to prefer those who are sensible, understanding and supportive. Ask casually about what schoolteachers and other adults say when you are not around, because they can, without meaning any harm, undermine a child’s confidence with thoughtless remarks.
For children with problems that are potentially life-threatening, such as true food allergy, your natural anxieties as a parent can lead you to be overprotective. This can make the child feel smothered, but letting go is far from easy. You somehow have to find a middle path that works for you both.
With asthmatic children, focus on letting them live as normal a life as possible. Avoid saying ‘no’ automatically to things that might induce an asthma attack – such as running around outdoors in cold weather. Take some small risks, and let the child make the decision sometimes – he or she will gain a lot from taking the responsibility, especially if the decision is the wrong one.
This is the only way for children to learn how to manage their own condition. The sooner you can begin letting go, the better the child will cope in his or her teenage years, when it really will be necessary to make some difficult decisions without your help.
A pitfall for parents
In bringing up a child with allergies, remember that there should never be any ’secondary gain’ from illness – absolutely no advantages to having the eczema get worse (easily done by scratching) or starting an asthma attack (some children can bring one on by breathing in a particular way).
If your child has to take time off from school because of ill-health, ask the teacher for work that can be done at home, and check that it really is done. Children who are allowed to benefit from being ill can establish an unhealthy pattern for dealing with life’s difficulties (see pp. 94-5), which may be long-lasting. Such a mind-set can seriously limit a child’s development.
Incidentally, the ’secondary gain’ from illness may be quite altruistic in nature. It can include stopping parents from arguing, or from nagging a naughty brother or sister, as well as more obvious things such as getting a parent’s attention – so be aware of all the circumstances in the family that are affecting the child.
Sometimes a child realises, unconsciously, that attending to illness gives a parent welcome distractions from emotional problems and a comforting feeling of being needed and useful. The allergies can become part of the structure of a family, the glue holding everyone together.
Conversely, long-term illness can tear families apart: according to recent research carried out in the United States, divorce is more common in families where a child suffers from severe asthma.
Doctors frequently notice that severe eczema also can create a lot of tension in the home.
If you feel that a child’s illness is affecting the family badly – in whatever way – talk to your doctor, or someone else who you trust. You may need the help of a counsellor or family therapist to sort things out.
Children and medicines
Parents often feel very anxious about all the medication an allergic child uses. On the whole, the drugs prescribed for allergy are very safe, and only children with severe disease are at risk of significant side effects. These children will be carefully monitored by the doctor.
Needless to say, if you can cut down on the drugs by reducing allergen exposure, avoiding irritants (e.g. tobacco smoke) and implementing some of the other measures described in this book, you should do so. But if the child still needs drugs to control the symptoms, it is far better to accept them than to let the child struggle with all the discomfort, limitations and distress that the illness imposes.
Parents who are very concerned about drugs should talk openly to the doctor about their fears. If there are differences of opinion about drugs within the family, try not to expose the child to the disagreements. Sort out a joint policy in advance and always present a united front to the child. Be consistent and reassuring about drug use, otherwise the child may feel confused and anxious about the situation – or may even learn to manipulate it.
The asthmatic child
Children with asthma should have a management plan (see p. 96) and may benefit from using a peak-flow meter (see p. 97). Once your child is old enough to comprehend the difference between preventers and relievers, explain that using the preventer regularly keeps asthma under control, which means no sudden attacks and less need to use the reliever in public — something which most children find intensely embarrassing. You should oversee the child’s treatment closely until the age of seven or eight, then gradually let the child take over some of the responsibilities.
Coping with food allergy
The following concerns true food allergy (see p. 62), which can be life-threatening, not idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74).
Protecting a child with severe food allergies is a major task. You will find it enormously helpful to be in contact with other parents who are facing the same challenge. The practical details are everything here, and you can benefit from other people’s ingenuity in solving day-to-day problems. Several support groups exist (see p. 255), offering a wealth of advice.
For very small children, the main task is to ensure that everyone who looks after the child understands exactly what can and can’t be eaten. Child-minders and baby-sitters should spend time with you as ‘apprentices’ seeing what is involved in preparing food for the child – this is far better than just giving verbal instructions. Also make sure that everyone knows how to use the adrenaline auto-injector (see pp. 98-9).
Once children start going to parties, you should always stay at the party for the whole time, and supervise your child closely. Take food that your child can safely eat, but which other children can also share. Some parents put a label on toddlers warning other adults that certain foods are taboo – for children under reading age this is probably acceptable, and does allow you to relax a little, but with older children the dangers of being teased or stigmatised should always be borne in mind.
Plan ahead all the time. Keep a snack box in the car containing food that the child can safely eat. Whenever you go on a trip, however short, have some safe foods with you, in case you get stuck somewhere and the child gets hungry. If you go out to eat, exert maximum caution about the restaurant food (see p. 111). Some parents take along a guaranteed-safe, but super-delicious sandwich or burger, and ask the restaurant to warm it up in a microwave (where appropriate) and serve it at the same time as the other food. If you do this, be sure the staff understand that the food must not touch any other food.
At home, some parents opt for everyone eating the same allergen-free food, on the basis that this makes for being ‘a real family’. Others, finding this too problematic or expensive, make a virtue out of the allergic child having a different meal. ‘I try to make her feel special about having her own food. The allergen-free dinner or cake always looks and tastes really good.’
As children get older, and more independent, you need to educate them thoroughly about avoiding the offending food. Equip them for difficult situations by role-playing. Act out being offered a tempting item of food by another child, and being jeered at for refusing. Act out suffering an allergic reaction to food and getting help quickly, even though people around don’t understand and are uncooperative.
Allergies and schools
When your child starts at a new school, creche, or kindergarten, request a meeting with staff and teachers to talk about the child’s allergies if there is any likelihood of these becoming a problem. Do this well before your child starts at the school, so that any necessary changes can be made. If your child has a serious food allergy or severe asthma, you may have to make several visits because there are usually a number of different people you should meet, and follow-up sessions may be needed with some staff. If all this sounds daunting and ‘not my style’ then you need, for the sake of your child, to develop your skills in dealing with people and being assertive. Talk to a counsellor, or look for suitable training courses.
In addition to ensuring that the school takes good care of your child’s health (see below), you should also discuss wider issues of adjustment to school life. Teasing or bullying can be a problem for children with any kind of health problem. Ask the teacher to keep an eye on your child and ensure that he or she is coping well – for example, that there is no difficulty about using an inhaler in front of other children when necessary.
Eczema
Ensure all staff realise that the skin rash is not infectious, and that they are aware of the need to communicate this to other children. The appearance of the skin can create a lot of problems with class-mates, and teachers need to be alert for taunting remarks or hurtful nicknames.
Unfortunately, children with eczema are very susceptible to infections caught from others, such as impetigo (see p. 44), but you can’t really protect children from such infections without isolating them socially. The best way to tackle this problem is to deploy all the available treatments so that your child’s skin becomes stronger and more resistant.
Food allergy
If your child has food allergy, go and see the catering manager personally. It may be helpful to take some printed material on food allergy with you, plus lists of synonyms for food ingredients (see pp. 172-4) where appropriate. Concentrate on building up a good relationship with catering staff, while ensuring that they understand how dangerous certain foods can be to your child.
Many parents feel more relaxed if they supply their child with a packed lunch that they know is allergen-free. This is often a good strategy, but don’t be complacent. Most allergic reactions in schools involve food given or traded by another child with entirely good intentions. Some schools with food-allergic children have set up a ‘no trading food’ policy, which seems to work well. Other schools establish milk-free or nut-free tables in the canteen, so that friends can sit together and trade food safely. (The mothers of the other children sitting at these tables need to be well versed in food avoidance, of course, so that their packed lunches are as safe as your own.) In the United States, schools have sometimes tried banning nuts or peanuts altogether, where there is a nut-allergic student, but this does not work well.
Some parents prepare a printed information sheet about their child’s food allergy, with a photograph of the child, and put these up at strategic points around the kitchen and canteen area. This information can include instructions on how to deal with anaphylactic shock (see below) and who to contact in an emergency.
Finally, include the art teacher in your rounds – foodstuffs are often used in art and craft projects.
Anaphylaxis
For children with severe food or insect-sting allergies which can lead to anaphylaxis, check that everyone at the school understands the potentially fatal nature of this condition. Key staff must know how to recognise anaphylactic shock and exactly what to do: show them how the adrenaline injector kit works. You could take along an old one, so that they can practise (see p. 150). Injector kits and adrenaline inhalers must be within easy reach, never locked in a cupboard.
Repeat this educational process at the beginning of each new school year, and before school trips. As an additional precaution, your child should wear a bracelet or pendant (see box on p. 95) that informs medical personnel about his or her allergies –this is also vital for children with latex or drugs allergies.
Asthma
If your child has asthma, ask what arrangements are made for inhalers. Children who can take responsibility for their own treatment should keep their inhalers with them. For younger children, the inhaler should be in the classroom, somewhere that is easily accessible (never locked away) and should be taken along during breaks and mealtimes. The child must always be able to get to the inhaler quickly: even a small delay in using it when an attack occurs can have dire consequences. Make sure everyone at the school understands this, that they know how to recognise an attack, and how to react. Assure the teacher that there is little danger of an asthmatic child overdosing, and if other children take a few puffs they will come to no harm.
If the teacher seems to believe that asthma is a psychological problem (some still do), go and see the head. Suggest that a local asthma nurse or doctor comes in and talks to the staff and pupils about asthma.
Ensure that the teacher knows about the effects of cold air and exercise on asthmatics. Talk to the games teacher or sports coach, and the playground attendants. It is vital that the games teacher is encouraging but understanding towards asthmatic children. They should never be told to continue exercising if they feel breathless.
Allergens and irritants in school
Schools today often have soft furnishings and carpets – these may be full of dust mites. If your child is allergic to mites, and if allergy symptoms are frequent at school, have a look around the classroom and see if this might be the cause. Before discussing the problem with the school, learn all you can about dust mites (see p. 114-117) so that you can assess whether proposed solutions to the problem would actually work.
Pets are common in classrooms and they can cause allergic reactions in sensitised children. Moulds flourish in many school buildings, and will affect a child with mould allergy. Poor ventilation is sometimes a major problem in school buildings, especially those where windows cannot be opened.
Irritants in school air include glue, paint, the solvents from felt-tip pens, disinfectants, air fresheners and the fumes produced during science lessons. Make sure the science teacher is aware of the risks and always uses a fume cupboard if irritant gases such as nitrogen dioxide or sulphur dioxide are likely to be given off during an experiment.
Applying sunscreens to children’s skin is now routine in many schools and preschools. Teachers probably won’t think to ask permission, so if your child is sensitive to any common ingredients of creams or sunscreens, let them know in advance.

Tony had suffered from hayfever since childhood but rarely took any medicines. Outside the grass-pollen season, he was fine, free of allergies and very fit. Then, when he was 35 he bought a run-down cottage in the country. The cottage was very damp and dirty.
The previous owner of the cottage, an elderly man, had died, and everything was much as he had left it. Tony moved in with his wife in late summer, and they began pulling out all the old carpets and furniture. Many of the windows would not open and there were dank musty cupboards and attics to be cleared. Dust filled the air – and Tony’s nose. He began to sneeze a little and within a few days he had a strange and unfamiliar feeling of tightness in his chest. During the following weeks, harvesting began in the surrounding fields, with several huge combine-harvesters working away all day and night. Tony noticed that, when out of doors, his eyes began to stream and the tightness in his chest became more noticeable. A few more days passed, and Tony found it harder to breathe, so he reluctantly went to see the doctor. The diagnosis was asthma. Skin-prick tests showed that Tony had allergic reactions to house-dust mite and moulds.
Tony’s case shows how someone who is already sensitised to an allergen – pollen in this case – may be vulnerable to developing new sensitivities, and new symptoms. It was almost certainly the dust mite and mould spores in the cottage that sparked off the trouble, followed by the mould spores from the cereal leaves, dispersed during harvesting.
For people with a tendency to allergies, the dangers of heavy exposure to potential allergens are something to bear in mind. It is surprising how many people with asthma had their first major attack while away from home, sleeping on an old sofa or in a friend’s dusty spare room. The dose of dust-mite allergen that you get from an ancient mattress or eiderdown can be massive.
Managing your allergy symptoms
As well as avoiding the development of new allergies, you need to manage your existing symptoms, and make sure that they interfere with your life as little as possible. For this you need good information and advice, support from your doctor, optimal drug treatment, and careful avoidance of your allergens.
Quite often people have all the information and drug treatment they need, but they still don’t stay on top of their health problems. There can be two distinct reasons for this: either they are not wholehearted about wanting to be well (ambivalence) – or they have never really accepted that they are ill (denial).
Ambivalence
Sometimes being ill has certain benefits – or being entirely well has certain disadvantages. Our state of health determines how people treat us, especially within the family, and the expectations people have of us. It may be comforting to be ill because others are more supportive then, or it may be less risky, because we are not forced to try things (such as sports or other physical activities) at which we might fail or look foolish. Being ill as a child often sets up a pattern for how we interact with the world, which revolves around caution, the comforts of familiarity, and holding back from new situations.
These habitual patterns can survive in the mind long after any real advantages have evaporated. Many people become stuck with a way of thinking and living where ill-health is a cornerstone of their existence. Doctors at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London, who have developed a radical programme for treating atopic eczema (see pp. 46-8), have noticed this in their patients. ‘Old habits die hard and living with a little bit of eczema is a very tempting prospect for many patients, rather than clearing the skin completely…. As atopic skin disease begins for many in the first year of life, causing sometimes understandable alarm and despondency in the parents, the child learns how relevant their condition can be in their relationship with the external world, and with their parents in particular. Before they are able to speak, they have a powerful means of gaining parental attention which can have long-standing effects in the development of their personality. For some, to live without eczema is understandably a daunting prospect. This can be consciously appreciated and spontaneous-y referred to by some patients, while for others the issue will be buried from view, deep in their unconscious.’
If any of this rings bells with you, try to tackle the problem at source. Such mental blocks are not immovable. Indeed, simply recognising that the block is there can start to change things for some people.
Others may need professional help to overcome these longstanding habits of mind. Counselling or cognitive therapy can be very valuable, and your doctor may be able to help in locating a suitably qualified person for this.
Denial
At the opposite end of the spectrum are those who want to deny that they have any kind of health problem. Often these people cannot quite accept that they have a long-term disease, such as eczema or asthma, so they forget to take their drugs, apply creams to their skin, or carry their inhalers. Ironically, these people frequently wind up having far more trouble with their allergies than they need to, and a very poor quality of life, simply because they neglect preventive treatments.
To be really well, you first have to admit that you do have allergies, and then sort out your conflicting feelings about what this means. Again, counselling, cognitive therapy or some other kind of psychotherapy can be helpful.
Dealing with doctors
The decisions that your doctor makes about your treatment are ones in which you should be fully involved. Quite a few allergy patients don’t feel happy about their doctor’s treatment plan, but they never say so to the doctor’s face.
The usual pattern is to accept what the doctor prescribes without any argument, but then halve the dose of tablets, or only put the cream on once a day instead of twice, or not use the Inhaler at all. Some people stop and start their drugs in a random way because they never quite make up their minds about whether drugs are a good thing or not.
This approach to allergies invariably leads to worsening symptoms. The risks are greatest with complex problems such as
atopic eczema or chronic sinusitis, where a vicious circle can easily be set up if the disease is not brought under control, and for those with a life-threatening condition such as asthma. In the case of asthma, neglecting preventative treatment can be fatal.
It is far better to say what you think in the surgery, and discuss any misgivings you may have about drugs with the doctor. That way you can agree on a treatment regime that you are prepared to stick to – which may or may not involve drugs. Most doctors would far prefer a little plain speaking at the outset to having a patient who is half-hearted about following the treatment plan and never really improves.
A more serious form of communication breakdown occurs when a doctor stops believing what a particular patient says. This usually occurs because the doctor has decided that some or all of a patient’s symptoms are due to psychological rather than physical causes. (This is far more likely to happen to those with intolerance or unusual forms of allergic reaction than to those with classical allergic diseases.) Sometimes doctors say what they think, but often they don’t – they just start treating the symptoms in a different way, or acting impatiently, or saying rather puzzling things that leave the patient trying to guess what is going on.
If you find yourself in such a situation, the main thing to do is stay very calm and be very rational. Getting upset, or challenging the doctor’s opinion in a manner that seems at all aggressive, instantly confirms the ‘psychological’ diagnosis. Unfortunately, insisting firmly that the symptoms are not psychological also confirms the diagnosis as far as many doctors are concerned (see p. 237) which can be extremely frustrating. To begin with, deal with the situation by informing yourself about your illness. Be tactful and patient but persistent with the doctor, trying all the time to keep the relationship pleasant and the channels of communication open. If, after giving it a fair try for some weeks or months, this approach isn’t working, you should look into the possibility of changing doctors (see p. 88).
Emergency alerts
An emergency alert bracelet or pendant should be worn by anyone who:
• is allergic to latex rubber, or to drugs such as penicillin
• has a severe allergy to insect stings
• suffers from exercise-induced anaphylaxis, or anaphylactic shock as a result of food allergy
• has very severe asthma attacks.
Key information is engraved on the bracelet, along with a telephone number which gives medical staff access to a computer database containing vital medical data about you. This valuable service is provided by a non-profit-making company called Medic Alert.
As everyone knows, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. You can use the information in this book to help yourself, but it’s important to remember that there is no substitute for the comprehensive understanding of the human body that your doctor gained during many long years at medical school. Always check with your doctor before changing your diet, stopping your drugs, practising breathing exercises, taking a non-prescription medicine or trying any other experimental treatment.
The information about disease, diagnosis and treatment in this book falls into four categories:
• basic information about the disease that no doctor would disagree with
• the findings of new research, or research that has not become widely known, but which falls within the accepted medical model of the disease concerned. Your doctor may not know about some of this research (there is a terrifying amount of new information bombarding doctors every week, and no one can keep up with it all) but he or she won’t find it unbelievable.
• evidence from research that is entirely valid, but which is widely ignored or dismissed because it falls outside the accepted medical model of the disease concerned (see pp. 86-7)
• information based on the repeated observations of doctors, or of patients – this does not amount to scientifically valid evidence, but it’s included here if it seems plausible and if it could be useful to some readers.
You should be able to tell, from the context in which it is presented, which category any item of information falls into. When talking to your doctor about items that belong in the last two categories above, be prepared for a certain amount of scepticism or possibly outright dismissal.
The important thing to ask the doctor is if there is good reason why you should not try the suggested measures, in addition to your usual treatment – is there any risk involved, given your particular state of health? Make it clear that you want to try the additional treatment with an open mind and will drop it if it is not helping. Ask for the doctor’s help in assessing the effects of the treatment objectively.
Managing asthma
Of all the diseases described in this book, asthma is among the most difficult to live with, especially severe asthma. Learn to recognise asthma symptoms before they get out of hand, and take immediate action.
Studies of patients who die from asthma attacks find that the deaths could, in almost all cases, have been prevented. Factors contributing to fatal attacks include:
• heavy exposure to allergens just before the asthma attack
• cigarette smoking
• failure to use preventer drugs
• repeat prescriptions for inhalers being given without the patient seeing a doctor
• delays in seeing an asthma specialist
• depression in the asthmatic leading to neglect of treatment.
For the day-to-day management of asthma, you should have a written management plan prepared by your doctor or asthma nurse.
This should tell you how often to take your drugs under normal circumstances, and what to do if your symptoms change or you develop a cold or chest infection. The actual brand names of your drugs (or the colour of the inhaler) should be included on the management plan. Assuming you have a peak-flow meter – and you really should have one –specific peak-flow values should be included on your management plan, with instructions for how to respond if your peak flow falls to these levels.
Your plan should tell you how to recognise a severe attack coming on, and what to do at the various stages of the attack. (This personal management plan is specifically geared to you or your child. Although pp. 100-101 give generalised advice, your own plan is invaluable.)
Be sure that you know exactly how the advice in the plan relates to the sort of real-life situations you experience. No matter how good your plan, real life can sometimes be far more complex than anyone anticipates, so there may be times when it is difficult to know what to do. When this occurs, make a note of the situation, and the reasons why you are unsure how to implement the plan. Call your doctor immediately if your asthma is getting worse, and get the asthma attack under control. Save your notes and, at the next opportunity, check with the doctor what you should have done in those circumstances. This will help you to build up your detailed knowledge of how to manage your asthma, or that of your child.
Research shows that asthmatics can, with training, develop a greater awareness of how narrow their airways are – this helps you to detect worsening asthma before things get too serious. You can train yourself in this art by guessing what your peak flow will be and writing your guess down before you use your peak-flow meter (see right) each day. Over a period of weeks, you should find your guesses getting closer to the true value.
A key part of asthma control is having everything with you that you need in case of an attack. It’s tedious, but you have to do it. You should take your reliever inhaler with you wherever you go. Those with severe asthma can also benefit from carrying a collapsible spacer (ask your pharmacist or see p. 255 for contact details of suppliers).
For a long day out, or a stay away from home, check that you also have:
• your management plan
• your peak-flow meter
• your preventer inhaler
• steroid tablets, if you sometimes need these
• your doctor’s phone number.
A little lateral thinking may be needed regarding the problem of carrying all this kit around. One asthmatic friend of mine carries his inhalers in a trendy-looking camera bag that goes everywhere with him. Mothers of asthmatic children have solved the problem by making an ‘inhaler pouch’ from a sunglasses case and attaching it to a favourite belt or by enlarging the pocket in a teenager’s jacket to accommodate inhalers.
Anyone with severe allergies to food or insect stings should take similar steps, so that carrying their auto-injector everywhere is a simple matter.
Peak-flow meters
A peak-flow meter can detect narrowing of your airways – the beginnings of an asthma attack – before there are any obvious symptoms. It measures the maximum speed at which you can force air out of your lungs. The signs of worsening asthma include:
• a morning reading which is less than 75% of the evening reading
• average readings less than 75% of your best-ever reading. (If they get to less than 50% of your best reading, this is a severe and possibly life-threatening attack.)
To use a peak-flow meter:
• push the pointer to zero and hold the meter horizontally
• keep your fingers away from the scale and the pointer
• breathe normally before you start
• stand up and take a deep breath, but don’t puff your cheeks out and don’t hold your breath before you blow
• seal your lips tightly around the mouthpiece
• blow hard into the meter, as if blowing out candles on a birthday cake; don’t move your tongue while doing this
• repeat three times, and record the highest reading of the three.
You must learn how to use a peak-flow meter from your doctor or asthma nurse, who should also check your technique regularly – it is very easy to get into bad habits.

Chemical Intolerance
`To start with, I just used to get this irritation in my throat when I was reading a magazine. Over the years it got much worse, and there was a dreadful burning feeling, not

just in my throat now, but also in my eyes and nose. Sometimes I could scarcely breathe. My doctor said it couldn’t be magazines and diagnosed asthma. Twenty years on, I can’t

look at a magazine, even for a few minutes, and other things affect me now too. If I go in a room with a photocopier running I start to choke and can’t breathe. Whenever I

describe this problem to anyone — apart from the doctor, that is — they almost always say they know someone else who has a similar problem. But the doctors still say that what

happens to me can’t happen.’
Mary has chemical intolerance, which is also known as chemical sensitivity, environmental Illness or idiopathic environmental intolerances. It is a condition that arouses more

passionate controversy than any other described in this book. Many believe that it simply does not exist, or rather that people who claim to have chemical intolerance are

actually victims of psychological problems, which express themselves as physical symptoms. Careful studies show that, while some people with supposed chemical intolerance do

fall into this category, others do not – they have no psychiatric problems, but they do appear to have valid symptoms when exposed to certain synthetic chemicals.
`People with MCS are desperate. They will go to great lengths and do almost anything to find a doctor, anyone, who believes them.’ So speaks one sufferer from MCS (Multiple

Chemical Sensitivity), the most extreme form of chemical intolerance. It is often severely disabling, with symptoms such as exceptional fatigue, nausea, headaches, poor memory

and concentration, dizziness. muscle aches, joint pain, chest pain and digestive problems. Those with MCS react to a very wide range of chemicals, and very often to foods and

food additives as well.
These severely affected patients are a small minority, however, and many more people are like Mary, with sensitivity to just one or two types of chemical exposure. Surveys in

the United States suggest that about 30% of the population are affected in this way. The authors of one such survey note that ‘the widespread idea that chemical sensitivity is a

condition of educated, urban housewives was not supported by our study. The region surveyed was rural… and individuals who reported chemical sensitivity were found in all age,

gender, income, race and employment groups.’
The chemical exposures that are identified as triggering symptoms include:
• perfumes
• pesticides
• cigarette smoke
• paint fumes
• petrol
• exhaust fumes
• cleaning products
• newspaper ink
• plastics, especially those with a strong smell
• glossy paper (e.g. In magazines).
Typical symptoms, in those with sensitivity to just one or two chemical products, are:
• a blocked or runny nose
• sore throat
• irritation of the eyes
• sinus pain and congestion
• headache
• breathlessness and wheezing
• nausea
• skin rashes
• extreme fatigue
• dizziness.
How does chemical intolerance begin?
For some of those with MCS, the problems began with a sudden over-exposure to a toxic chemical, such as a chemical spill, or pesticides from a crop-spraying plane. Others are

first affected by regular doses of pesticide at lower levels, such as spray drift from nearby fields or from a neighbour’s garden. It seems as if, for these people, their inborn

ability to detoxify both natural and manmade toxins is overwhelmed by an unusually heavy exposure, and never fully recovers. Although there have been no systematic studies of

this – it is difficult to imagine how they could be done –the wealth of well-documented cases is convincing. And studies of those exposed to high levels of pesticides in

accidents at work support the idea that this can cause lifelong sensitivity to very small doses of some synthetic chemicals. Sensitivity to alcohol and caffeine usually

increases enormously too.
In some cases, classical allergies also feature in the range of symptoms for those with MCS. If they had an allergic tendency before the accidental exposure to pesticides, this

is especially likely: after the accident, along with chemical intolerance, they have far more pronounced allergic reactions to common allergens.
The loss of tolerance to everyday chemicals may be related to some kind of damage to the enzymes in the liver that carry out the important task of detoxifying toxins that enter

the bloodstream. This detoxification system evolved to deal with natural toxins, such as those in plant foods, and those produced by bacteria living naturally in the gut. These

enzymes can also detoxify the widely used synthetic chemicals, when these are encountered in relatively small amounts, but the enzymes are overwhelmed by large doses.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
This is a disease that probably has multiple causes rather than a single cause. The main symptom is fatigue that is not relieved by rest. Many people with CFS also have a

slightly raised temperature, problems with concentration and memory, headaches, sore throat and swollen lymph nodes (’swollen glands’). The lymph nodes are part of the immune

system, so this symptom suggests some disturbance of immune function. Other findings, related to immune cells in the blood, also support this idea. However, there are often

minor abnormalities in the brain as well, with some loss of the insulating material around the nerves (myelin).
For many patients, the disease develops in the wake of a viral infection, but for others the origin may be unclear. Whatever the origin of the disease, avoiding synthetic

chemicals is very helpful in many cases. Some sufferers also find an elimination diet helpful (see pp. 194-7). Doctors working in this area say that there is no sharp

demarcation between patients with Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and those with MCS.
Autism
In the search for a cause of autism, many possibilities are being investigated. The consensus now is that there is a genetic predisposition which, when combined with certain

trigger factors, leads to autism.
What are those trigger factors? Some researchers suggest that autistic children have poorly performing detoxification enzymes and are therefore sensitive to synthetic chemicals,

both in food and the environment. The suspicion is that these chemicals affect the developing nervous system.
Other researchers pinpoint food as the culprit. They believe that children who develop autism are affected by exorphins (see p. 76) produced from the proteins in wheat and/or

milk, and that these damage the child’s developing nervous system. There are claims that a dairy-free and gluten-free diet can help, but that it must be ultra-strict to work,

and may need to continue for at least six months before any improvement occurs. You must have your doctor’s approval for this.
Before starting them on such a diet, some doctors also give a course of anti-fungal drugs to those autistic children who have been treated repeatedly with antibiotics. This

combined treatment is reported to have very good effects for some children.
Treatment
Assuming that you really do have chemical intolerance rather than some deep-rooted psychological problem – and you have to be honest with yourself here, because otherwise you

will never get better – then careful avoidance of the offending synthetic chemicals is the only effective treatment. If you have eliminated everything that obviously affects you

and are not much improved, then try tackling common indoor pollutants (see pp. 128-30) as well.
Such measures are of value to some with chemical intolerance but may not be adequate for those most severely affected. If you need to take more radical steps, you may benefit

from the bedding, paints and other household items manufactured for those with chemical sensitivity. Once you reduce the level of synthetic chemicals in your everyday

environment, you may find that you can tolerate occasional exposures much more.
Some doctors recommend taking supplements of vitamins and minerals to speed your recovery. These (especially antioxidants – see p. 206) may be helpful for some people, but be

sure to get nutritional advice from someone with good medical qualifications, rather than a self-styled ‘nutrition therapist’.
Neutralisation therapy (see p. 211) seems to be effective for some people with chemical intolerance, but you will still need to avoid the offending substances. Hyperventilation

(see p. 236) can make chemical intolerance much worse.

Using inhalers
The value of using an inhaler rather than taking tablets or syrup is explained on p. 141 for steroids. The same principle applies to all drugs.
The oldest type of inhaler is the ‘puffer’ or aerosol inhaler, properly called a ‘pressurised metered-dose inhaler’ or MDI. It delivers the drug as a fine, moist, spray. In addition, there are now many devices that deliver drugs in dry-powder form.
If you or your child find the aerosol inhalers difficult, you may do better with a dry-powder inhaler. Your doctor should have several different inhalers available for you to try out, to see which one suits you best.
When you are given an inhaler you must be shown how to use it by a doctor or asthma nurse. A great many asthma patients have a ‘poor inhaler technique’, and get too little of the drug as a result. This often leads to their asthma getting out of control. The advice given here for using inhalers is no substitute for proper training, and should only be used to supplement what your doctor or asthma nurse has told you.
When using an aerosol inhaler or MDI, remember to shake the inhaler well or you will not get the right dose. Your in-breath must coincide exactly with pressing the canister down: this is the part that many people find difficult. You must breathe in slowly and deeply, otherwise you do not get much of the drug into your airways.
Many asthmatics stop inhaling the moment the
spray from the aerosol inhaler hits the back of the
throat. The spray contains a propellant, which
makes it very cold, and there is a natural reflex
response to this cold liquid which stops inhalation.
This response may be impossible to control. If so,
you need a dry-powder inhaler (see right), or a
spacer to use with your aerosol inhaler (see p. 162).
Breath-operated aerosol inhalers such as the
Autohaler can be useful for those who find ordinary
aerosol inhalers too hard to use. With these devices, you do not have to push the canister down because your in-breath triggers the release of the drug. Take care not to block the air-intake holes with your hands and don’t stop breathing when you hear the inhaler click. (If there is no click, start again and breathe in more forcefully this time.)
One hazard with aerosol inhalers is that, when almost empty, they produce no drug – just the propellant. Although they still ‘puff’ normally, they are not effective. It may be hard to tell when your inhaler is running low. Ask your doctor or asthma nurse for advice about this.
Many asthmatics find dry-powder inhalers such as the Spinhaler, Rotahaler, Diskhaler, Accuhaler, Clickhaler and Turbohaler are the easiest to use. They have no aerosol device, so none of the problems associated with the coldness of the propellant.
On the other hand, nothing pushes the drug into your mouth and lungs with a dry-powder inhaler: you have to do all the work yourself. This means you have to breathe in quite hard and fast. During a severe asthma attack you may not be able to breathe in hard enough to get a good dose of the drug. Some asthmatics have an aerosol inhaler as well, often combined with a spacer (see p. 162), for use during severe attacks.
For the parents of asthmatics, who want to keep an eye on how much of a drug is being used, most of the dry-powder inhalers allow you to do so.
Arthritis and inhalers
Those who suffer from arthritis in their hands often find inhalers difficult to use. There are several aids now available to help with this problem – ask your doctor or asthma nurse about these.
Do hold your breath
Whichever type of inhaler you use, it is important to give the drugs a chance to do their work. After inhaling, and when your lungs are full, you should hold your breath for at least ten seconds. Then breathe out, but wait at least another 30 seconds before breathing in again.
Side effects from non-drug ingredients
There are other ingredients in inhalers, besides the drug, and they occasionally cause side effects.
Aerosol inhalers are the worst offenders. They can contain up to five non-drug ingredients, such as propellants and surfactants. Some asthmatics are sensitive to one of these, and respond with coughing or bronchospasm when they inhale them.
If inhaled in large amounts, the propellants in aerosol inhalers can give a mild ‘high’, and asthmatic teenagers and their friends may - very rarely - begin abusing inhaled beta-2 relievers. Parents should be alert for the possibility of such problems, but not worry unduly.
Dry-powder inhalers do not need propellants or surfactants, so they are suitable for anyone who develops a sensitivity to these. However, they may contain lactose, or milk sugar, in addition to the drug. Enough lactose is deposited in the mouth and swallowed to provoke symptoms, such as diarrhoea and wind, in people who suffer from severe lactose intolerance (see box on p. 79). Trace amounts of milk proteins in the lactose may be a problem for people with severe milk allergy.
CFCs and inhalers
Aerosol inhalers have long contained CFCs, which are very inert gases (at ground level) and perfectly safe to inhale. Unfortunately, they cause serious damage when they reach the ozone layer high above the earth, so they are being phased out in asthma inhalers, as they are in all aerosols. Other propellants, called hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs), are being introduced to take their place. The spray from an HFA inhaler may taste and feel different, but it should do exactly the same job as a CFC inhaler: the drug it contains remains the same. Research suggests that these new propellants are very safe, but tell your doctor if your reaction to your inhaler seems to change suddenly.
These new propellants deliver medication more efficiently into the lungs, so that usually only half the previous dose is required. Unlike CFC-type inhalers, they will deliver a constant dose until empty. In addition, they are not affected as much by below-freezing temperatures.
Inhale - then clean your teeth
Asthmatic children are more prone to dental decay than other children, and inhalers are suspected of causing the problem. No one knows, as yet, exactly which ingredient of the inhalers is the culprit - it could be a drug, or a non-drug additive such as a propellant. Alternatively, the fact that the spray from some inhalers is slightly acidic could explain this side effect. Brushing the teeth after using the inhaler, or just rinsing out the mouth with water, is recommended as a preventive measure.
Using spacers
A spacer is a large empty chamber that can be fitted to an aerosol inhaler (a puffer or MIDI). to make it more effective and easier to use. The aerosol spray goes into one end of the spacer, and the asthmatic breathes it in from the other end.
When using a spacer, you can breathe normally: you don’t have to take all the drug in at once. or hold your breath after you’ve inhaled. But you should try to breathe as deeply as possible, and hold your breath for up to ten seconds if you can.
Note that spacers are for use with aerosol inhalers only. Spacers allow the aerosol propellant (see p. 161) to evaporate, leaving tiny airborne droplets of the drug to be inhaled. Once the propellant has evaporated, these droplets are no longer cold, so the reflex response that stops inhalation is avoided.
During an asthma attack, spacers are immensely valuable because they allow you to get some of the drug into your airways even though you are unable to take a deep breath. There is a collapsible spacer, called the E-Z Spacer, which folds up into a plastic case small enough to be slipped into a pocket. In a severe asthma attack, having such a spacer could save your life.
In an emergency, if no spacer is available, you can improvise one (see p. 100).
Babies and small children, who cannot yet coordinate the in-breath with pushing the aerosol canister down, need spacers for everyday use. There are spacers designed for children under two years, with masks that fit over the nose and mouth.
When using a spacer, shake the inhaler and then spray it into the spacer once only. Inhale within five seconds. During an asthma attack, you can add another dose from the inhaler every ten seconds, until the attack begins to subside, but keep a count of how many puffs you use (see p. 100).
For a young child, shake the inhaler well, and fit it to the spacer. Put the mouthpiece into the child’s mouth, or put the mask on. Tell the child to breathe in and out steadily. Listen for the clicking of the valve on the spacer - this shows that it is opening and closing. When the child’s breathing is regular, puff a single dose into the spacer. The child should breathe in and out 5-8 times.
Priming a spacer
Prime a new spacer, or one that has been washed, by firing the inhaler into it about five times. Do this before you actually need to use the spacer.
The drug will coat the spacer walls, due to an electrostatic charge on the plastic. You won’t be able to see the drug as it forms a very thin coating.
When you come to use the spacer, no more of the drug will stick to the spacer walls, because they are already coated, so the full dose will be available for you or your child to inhale.
Priming new spacers is particularly important when the asthmatic is a young child, because there may be some delay between firing the inhaler and the child actually getting a proper lungful of the drug. The longer the delay, the more chance the drug has to stick to the unprimed spacer walls.
A spacer can be used on a baby while it is asleep, which may make life easier for you both. If you need to use the spacer while the baby or toddler is awake, stroke the mask against the child’s cheek first. Keep smiling and talking so that the situation doesn’t seem so frightening. If the baby does start to cry, keep the mask in place: crying will bring on a deep in-breath which is just what is needed.
For an older child, decorating the spacer with coloured stickers can make it appear less daunting. Try to make using the spacer seem like a game. If this fails, don’t get into a battle with the child – leave it a while and try again later.
Playing with the spacer when feeling well will help the child to see it as something familiar, not as a frightening piece of equipment associated with asthma attacks.
Nebulisers
A nebuliser delivers high doses of asthma drugs in an easily inhaled form. It is generally used for severe asthma only, or in an emergency to relieve asthma attacks.
A nebuliser can be attached to an oxygen cylinder, which enriches the air–drug mixture with oxygen. This is useful in severe asthma.
The only people who need to have a nebuliser at home for emergencies are those with brittle asthma, whose condition can deteriorate very suddenly and sharply.
For routine use, only a very small minority of asthmatics require a nebuliser. They include:
• Those with such severe asthma that they depend on large doses of drugs to control their symptoms
• Very small children or elderly people with severe asthma, who have difficulty using inhalers. For them, a nebuliser may be the easiest way to take their drugs.
The fact that the hospital’s nebuliser is so effective in an emergency gives it a special mystique for many people, who assume that nebulisers are a magical cure for asthma. Nebulisers are widely advertised in specialist publications for asthmatics and, while they are expensive, they can look like the answer to a prayer. Many asthmatics, or their parents, mistakenly believe that owning a nebuliser would be the answer to all their problems. In fact the nebuliser only works so well because it delivers a much higher dose of the reliever drug – a dose which also carries a higher risk of side effects. This high-dose treatment should not be used on a regular basis unless it is absolutely essential. No one should buy a nebuliser without first discussing the matter with their doctor.
Asthmatics who own a nebuliser should have detailed written instructions from a doctor about when and how to use it, and how much of the drug to put in. One hazard of owning a nebuliser is that it may give you a false sense of security during emergencies, and delay you from getting expert medical help when you need it. If the nebuliser is for emergency use you should be told the exact signs that indicate a need to use it and – no less important – the signs that show the attack is out of control and needs hospital treatment.
Take care, when using a nebuliser, not to allow the mist to escape and settle on the face or eyes. Regular exposure to steroid mist can cause cataracts in the eyes, and thinning of the skin on the face. Anti-cholinergics (see p. 156) can cause glaucoma if they come into contact with the eye. The mask must fit very tightly. As an additional precaution, place a scarf around the upper edge of the mask to cover any gaps. Wash the face after using the nebuliser for steroids.
Keep off the cough mixture
Coughing can be a useful reaction in asthma, evicting mucus from the lungs. But in some asthmatics the cough does not produce mucus and seems to be no more than a reflex reaction to the airway inflammation. This type of cough can be debilitating, but it is not a good idea to treat it with cough mixture which has no benefit and may mask the seriousness of the asthma. Tackling the airway inflammation with preventer drugs such as steroids is the best course. Simple expectorants, which loosen mucus, may be of value – ask your pharmacist about these.

Coeliac Disease
During World War 11, there was no bread to be had in the Netherlands and people were forced to eat tulip bulbs. ‘My mother roasted them,’ one survivor recalls, ‘and they tasted delicious then, because we were so hungry I suppose. I cooked some years later, just to taste them again, and they were absolutely disgusting.’
While most of the population was thin and unwell on this starvation diet, a few children were actually healthier than before. An observant Dutch doctor noted that these were the children who, before the war, had suffered from constant diarrhoea, fatigue, poor growth and muscle wasting. They were suddenly stronger and, his enquiries revealed, their diarrhoea had vanished. But when the food situation improved at the end of the war, all their old problems returned. By carefully experimenting with the diet of these patients, the doctor discovered that eating wheat and rye caused the symptoms. Subsequent research has revealed that both contain a collection of proteins, referred to as gluten, which are the source of coeliac disease.
Belly disease
Coeliac disease (or celiac disease) is an old name which simply means ‘belly disease’. It is derived from the Greek word for’belly’ — koilia. Once the cause of the symptoms became understood, a new name was devised — gluten-sensitivity enteropathy — but it has not really caught on. Other terms that you may come across are non-tropical sprue and coeliac sprue, based on the close resemblance of the symptoms to those of tropical sprue. This disease, found in those who live or have lived in the tropics, is probably caused by bacterial infection. There is no causal link with coeliac disease.
Symptoms
The symptoms of coeliac disease are:
• diarrhoea, with pale, bad-smelling stools
• in a few patients, constipation rather than diarrhoea, but this is very rare
• bloating and wind
• damage to the lining of the intestine. This is of a characteristic type: the complex folded structures (the villi) of the intestinal lining are destroyed. Additionally, huge numbers of immune cells are present.
• the loss of the villi results in failure to absorb nutrients from food (malabsorption) causing poor growth in babies, and weakness and weight-loss in adults.
• poor appetite, especially in babies. This can greatly reduce the diarrhoea.
Coeliac disease usually appears in babies during weaning, a few weeks after cereals are introduced, but it can also begin for the first time in adults. The tendency to coeliac disease is genetically inherited, so it runs in families.
Where coeliac disease runs in the family, another disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, is also likely to occur. Dermatitis herpetiformis has the same basic mechanism as coeliac disease but very different symptoms:
• an intensely itchy rash, sometimes with tiny blisters; the rash is symmetrically distributed on the buttocks, shoulders, scalp, and the outer surfaces of the knees and elbows
• the same characteristic damage to the lining of the intestine as seen in tests for coeliac disease, though generally less severe
• diarrhoea, in some cases, but not all. About 5% of those with coeliac disease actually go on to develop dermatitis herpetiformis. Most people have either one or the other.
Both diseases are caused by the same gene, which results in sufferers developing antibodies against one of their own proteins, an enzyme called tissue-transglutaminase. The job of this enzyme, which is found in the intestines, is to assist with the breakdown of gluten.
If no gluten is present, the enzyme does not arouse the interest of the immune system. It is the process of gluten digestion, in which a particular peptide is produced from gluten, that provokes the autoimmune reaction. (A peptide is any short length of protein chain, obtained from the complete protein chain by digestion.)
What seems to trigger the autoimmune reaction is this enzyme–peptide combination: the offending peptide, newly produced and still attached physically to the enzyme. There is something about the particular ‘chemical picture’ that this combination makes which outrages the immune system of individuals with a particular genetic make-up.
The impact of this autoimmune reaction on the intestinal lining is severe in coeliac disease, less so in dermatitis herpetiformis. What causes dermatitis herpetiformis is a particular type of antibody, called dimeric IgA, which is transported by the bloodstream from the gut to the skin. It is deposited in the skin all over the body, but for some reason only provokes inflammation in certain areas.
In rare cases, an IgE-mediated food allergy to wheat can co-exist with coeliac disease, making reactions more severe.
Secondary problems
Paradoxically, while the damaged gut lining of untreated coeliac disease makes a poor job of absorbing specific nutrients (e.g. iron and vitamins) in a form that the body can use, it also lets through far more intact, or partially digested, food molecules. These get into the bloodstream in such numbers that they can lead to idiopathic food intolerance (see p.74). Sensitivity to soya is a common problem, because it is so heavily used in gluten-free bread and other prepared food. Those with coeliac disease who have not improved fully, despite a strict gluten-free diet, often benefit from an elimination diet (see p. 194). This must be done under medical supervision.
Another possible effect of the intestinal damage is lactose intolerance (see p.79), producing a sensitivity to milk.
The frequency of schizophrenia is higher among those with coeliac disease than among the general population. Coeliacs not following a strict gluten-free diet are also vulnerable to other psychological problems. These might be linked to the effects of food-derived exorphins (see pp. 76-7) and other peptides on the brain. The increased permeability of the gut could play a part in this, allowing more exorphins to reach the bloodstream.
Diagnosis
A biopsy (see p. 92) is the only really reliable form of diagnosis. It is crucial that this is done before removing gluten from the diet, because the damage is repaired if gluten is avoided and the healing process is fairly rapid for some people (though in others it takes many months). If the intestinal lining reverts to a normal appearance quite quickly, an accurate diagnosis is never obtained, which can have serious consequences: if you or your child are coeliac, you need to know.
New blood tests can also be helpful in diagnosis, but they do not give the unequivocal result obtained with a biopsy.
Research from the United States suggests that coeliac disease is under-diagnosed in some countries compared to others – for example, Italy screens children routinely but the States does not. Some authorities suspect that there is a great deal of ‘hidden’ coeliac disease in the States, and this could be true in other countries as well. There is no routine screening of children in Britain.
The symptoms of coeliac disease are not always distinctive. Many cases are first detected when patients with rather non-specific symptoms are discovered, by a blood test, to be anaemic.
Treatment
There are no drug treatments for coeliac disease and avoiding gluten religiously is the only way to remain well. Those who are lax about their gluten-free diet may be more vulnerable to certain cancers of the digestive tract.
A strict gluten-free diet is not easy to follow (see p. 177). The most severely affected coeliacs are so sensitive to gluten that they react violently to even a tiny amount: this is known as coeliac shock and can be fatal.
A gluten-free diet is also the treatment for dermatitis herpetiformis, but at the outset the rash can be controlled with the highly effective drug dapsone.

Hayfever in Allergy

Foxtall grasses release their pollen - a potential source of hayfever symptoms.
`I gradually recognised that it was not an ordinary cold and that the symptoms were much worse on the

golf course or even during a nice day rowing on Loch Lomond.’ Dr John Morrison Smith, then a medical

student, began suffering from hayfever in the late 1930s. ‘At first I did not know what I had, and

neither did any other doctor I encountered in the next two or three years…’
All the classical allergic diseases (see box on p. 11) seem to be increasing, but none has exploded

quite so dramatically as hayfever. The physicians of Ancient Greece described asthma and food allergy,

and the Romans recorded allergy to horses, but there were no reports of hayfever. The only account –

and it is a doubtful one – comes from Persia in AD 925. Two hundred years ago, hayfever was unknown –

and careful research by medical historians has shown that this was not a case of it simply being

ignored, or misinterpreted as a cold.
The first case was reported in 1819, but even in the 1930s it was so rare that a succession of Scottish

doctors and medical students were baffled by Dr Morrison Smith’s symptoms. Today everyone knows what

hayfever is, since huge numbers of people sneeze and snuffle their way through the pollen season. There

are no certain explanations for this meteoric rise, but greater hygiene (21) may be an important

factor.
Symptoms of hayfever
The common symptoms of hayfever are well known:
• itchiness of the nose, mouth, throat and eyes – often the first sign
• a streaming and/or blocked nose
• frequent sneezing
• red, watery eyes (very rarely, hayfever affects the eyes only, with no symptoms in the nose).
Less commonly, there may be:
• dryness of the throat if the nasal blockage results in constant breathing through the mouth
• no sense of smell due to a blocked nose (but nasal polyps can also cause this – 30)
• a feverish sweaty feeling (but the body temperature is usually normal)
• swelling and inflammation of the eyelids, sometimes leading to blistering and ulceration: there

is a risk of blindness if this is not treated promptly
• recurrent sinusitis (30)
• earache, itching or a stuffy feeling in the ears, or ‘glue ear’ (29)
Some sufferers also experience:
• Oral Allergy Syndrome (an itchy tingling mouth) from certain fruits, nuts and vegetables (see

box on p. 63)
• a skin rash from pollen falling on the skin, direct contact with the leaves of the offending

plants, or with droplets of moisture from them – as when mowing a lawn or using a strimmer. If the skin

is cut or grazed, anaphylaxis can (rarely) result from direct contact with the plant (see pp. 58-9).
Even more rarely there can be:
• stomach upsets or even colitis (inflammation of the bowel) possibly due to pollen swallowed

with food or in the saliva
• irritation in the vagina
• migraine
• kidney inflammation (nephritis), leading to puffiness of the face and hands, and possibly other

symptoms
• joint pains.
The last two are probably caused by pollen allergens bound to their antibodies and carried in the blood

(13).
Diagnosis
The standard diagnostic tool here is the skin-prick test (see lo, 91). In diagnosing hayfever there are

three separate questions:
1 Is it actually hayfever?
2 Which pollen or pollens are responsible?
3 Are allergens other than pollen also involved?
Don’t be surprised if none of these questions is asked. In most countries, if you have hayfever-like

symptoms during the pollen season (i.e. when most hayfever sufferers have symptoms), the doctor will

conclude that you have hayfever - and that will be the end of that.
If hayfever seems plausible to you, and you respond to drug treatment, or manage well on pollen

avoidance (126), then -here is probably no reason to go further. Should you want a more thorough

investigation, you will need to be persistent. These are good reasons for requesting a full diagnosis:
• Your symptoms are worse in the pollen season, but they never really go away, suggesting that

you may be allergic to year-round allergens, such as house-dust mite or moulds, as well. It is worth

knowing which ones, so that you can avoid them. If you live in an area that is always warm (such as

California or Southern Australia) it may be that your culprit pollen is in the air all year round -

even so, knowing which pollen it is can help with avoidance. Around the Mediterranean, the pollen from

cypresses can keep hayfever going through the winter (or cause symptoms in winter only).
• Your symptoms are sometimes worse when they should be better, and vice versa. If you are

consistently worse indoors with the windows closed this could indicate that a seasonal indoor allergen

is the culprit - mould spores or cockroach perhaps (cockroach is often seasonal in regions with cold

winters - 118).
• Your symptoms begin before the pollen season begins, or go on long afterwards. Or the severity

of your symptoms does not match the daily pollen count for your suspect pollen. In Britain, the mould

Cladosporium herbarum produces spores in June, roughly coinciding with the grass-pollen season. Allergy

to this mould can easily be mistaken for grass-pollen allergy. You would need skin-prick tests for both

Cladosporium and grasses.
• You are much worse near home than elsewhere. It could just be a garden plant or tree. As one

California resident observed, ‘The worst offender was an olive tree on our front lawn. It’s been

removed.’
• You want to plan holidays free from the culprit pollen.
Moving house - especially to a region with different vegetation
- can be a spur to finding out exactly what your allergens are. If you are going for a full diagnosis

make sure it is done correctly. Don’t accept testing with ‘mixed tree and shrub pollens’ for example,

or ‘weed pollens’. The result tells you very little. Ask for tests with specific pollens.
Treatment
Too many people allow hayfever to spoil the summer months because they are anxious about taking drugs,

or feel that it is nobler to suffer. This book is not in any way complacent about the dangers from

drugs (see Chapter 5), but when it comes to hayfever there really is very little cause for concern. The

risks with drugs used for hayfever are absolutely minimal, and it is such a waste to miss out on the

best time of year.
Most hayfever responds very well to treatment with antihistamines (138). If they make you sleepy,

persist for a while, because this side effect often wears off - or ask for one of the new non-sedating

forms. The sleepiness is annoying, but it is only a minor side effect, and not an indication of the

drug causing any serious harm.
Cromoglycate drops (for the eyes or nose) do not work for everyone, but if they work for you, go for

them. These are absolutely the safest of the anti-allergy drugs. Steroid drops for the nose (144) are

also recommended. The dose of steroid involved is small, and very little gets into the bloodstream, so

there is no risk of serious side effects. If you suffer stinging, burning or dryness, it might be due

to preservatives in the drops, not the drug itself (see box on p. 33). Steroid drops for the eyes

should be used cautiously (144). Don’t use over-the-counter decongestant drops for more than three days

(29).
Immunotherapy is standard treatment for hayfever in many countries, but in Britain you will have a

struggle to get it (see pp. 164-8). Some hayfever sufferers feel they do well with homeopathy (215) or

acupuncture (214).
Pollen asthma
Some people with hayfever also have pollen asthma. Their asthma is worse in the pollen season but it

usually persists all year round (either because there are other allergens or irritants involved, or

just because the inflammation of the airways is self-perpetuating) whereas hayfever itself clears up.

Treating the hayfever fully with antihistamines helps considerably with the asthma symptoms.

 

In medical terms, this article covers a lot of ground.
First there are the classical allergic diseases
 such as hayfever and immediate food allergy, which are caused by the allergy

antibody, IgE .
Then there is non-IgE immune sensitivity, a category which includes a number of quite different

diseases, caused in a great variety of ways. They also vary in severity - there are serious lifelong

problems such as coeliac disease and minor short-lived problems such as contact dermatitis from garden

plants.
Finally the chapter looks at diseases where the immune system seems not to be involved, or

plays only a minor role: the intolerance reactions to food and synthetic chemicals. These are diverse

and rather mysterious in origin. They would not be described as ‘allergies’ by most doctors, though

they often are by complementary therapists (6).
These categories are not nearly as neat and tidy as they might sound. Some problems refuse to fit

anywhere, such as atopic eczema caused by food. A percentage of children with this problem have IgE to

the food concerned, while others do not - so where does it belong?
If you were expecting an answer to that question, you will be disappointed. Nor, quite often, are there

any certain and honest answers to questions such as ‘Has my baby really got asthma?’ or ‘Can you be

sure it’s irritable bowel syndrome?’ There are no answers to
such questions because most diseases do not exist in neat compartments, and the words we use to

describe them really denote rather abstract concepts.
This does not mean that the terms used to describe diseases are invalid - doctors and medical

researchers invent them to try to make sense of a complex, confusing and largely foggy reality. They

also argue over them, split them, unite them and redefine them. There is a constant desire to get the

medical picture of that foggy reality more precise and accurate (although medical politics gets

involved too - 7 -which is unfortunate).
Over time, thanks to huge amounts of research effort, things gradually get clearer. You’ll no longer

hear a doctor talk about ‘rheumatism’ or ‘arthritis’, because it was long since realised that these

categories were useless - they included a number of diverse diseases. And while doctors might say ‘food

poisoning’ or ‘heart attack’ or ’skin cancer’ to a patient, they use much narrower and more precise

terms when talking among themselves, and when ordering tests or prescribing treatment. Each of these

categories has been split into several well-defined sub-categories.
Ideally, this process of splitting continues until each disease category has a set of well-defined

symptoms (this set is known as a syndrome), plus a few simple and definitive diagnostic tests. This

will probably depend on the cause of the disease (the mechanism in medical jargon) being clearly

understood. Once the mechanism is clear, then a disease category is a truly satisfactory tool for

diagnosis and treatment.
Of the disease categories mentioned in this book only a few, such as coeliac disease and hayfever, have

reached that happy state. The majority are still somewhat arbitrary and debatable.
Some disease terms describe a set of symptoms with no clear underlying cause, for example, ‘irritable

bowel syndrome’. Others describe a well-defined response by the body, that can be caused in many

different ways - an endpoint that can be reached by various routes. This is true of ‘asthma’ or

‘urticaria’.
A third type describes a much less well-defined cluster of symptoms. Idiopathic food intolerance,

chemical intolerance and yeast overgrowth all come into this category. A few doctors don’t even see

some of these clusters as real diseases because the symptoms involved are so vague and so widely

encountered. Some of the arguments used to dismiss idiopathic food intolerance are dissected on pp.

74-7. A key point made against these diseases is that the symptoms they produce are non-specific -

common symptoms such as headache, fatigue and diarrhoea, which can arise in a great variety of ways.

Ever since Pasteur and the germ theory, medicine has been based on the idea of each disease having

specific symptoms and specific causes, and it has roared ahead on the basis of this assumption. This is

the prevailing paradigm of modern medicine, and like all
paradigms it blinds people to facts that don’t fit. Evidence is accumulating that there are diseases

which have multiple, non-specific and variable symptoms. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS - see box on p.

85) is one of these, and its recent transformation from a doubtful diagnosis to a reputable disease

recognised by conventional medicine suggests that the paradigm might be starting to crack.
To sum up, the business of identifying and naming diseases is a complex and uncertain process, in which

the concept of most diseases is only ever that - a concept, subject to change and refinement. This does

not make it worthless - quite the opposite. These concepts are the best we can do at the present time,

and accurate diagnosis is the key to getting the best treatment available now.
As regards both diagnosis and treatment, this book covers a very wide spectrum of medical opinion, from

the entirely orthodox to the frankly whacky. I have tried to give an objective view of these different

opinions and approaches, using the evidence currently available, in the hope that it will help readers

to improve their health while wasting as little as possible of their time or money. In using this

information, you should always try to work closely with your doctor (96), respecting the depth and

breadth of knowledge that conventional medicine has to offer.

 

If you have a child with allergies, sooner or later some friend or relative will tell you not to worry

because your child ‘will probably grow out of it’. Your doctor may well say the same thing. But what

does this mean? Do all children shake off their allergic symptoms as they get older? If the symptoms

go, is the underlying disease completely cured? And why treat allergies if they disappear of their own

accord? The truth is that the relationship between allergy and age is incredibly complex, and doctors

only understand a tiny part of it. The best anyone can offer is a broad overview of how allergies

change with age, with few explanations of the underlying mechanisms, and absolutely no predictions of

what the future holds for any particular allergy sufferer.
It is certainly true that the classical allergic diseases, such as atopic eczema, hayfever and

childhood asthma (see box on p. 11), frequently disappear as children grow up. Babies tend to shrug off

food allergy and eczema by the time they are toddling, and a fair number of asthmatic children lose

their symptoms before they are ten years old, while others do so in their teens or early twenties.
Unfortunately, the disappearance of symptoms does not mean that the underlying disease has necessarily

disappeared, particularly in the case of asthma. Quite a few young adults find themselves wheezy and

breathless again in their late twenties or thirties, especially if they take up smoking. One study of

children who wheezed before the age of seven found that:
• 25% lost their asthma for a time – anything between two years and 25 years – only to get it

back again by their early thirties. Some recovered and relapsed more than once.
• Over 70% shook off asthma and were still symptom-free by their early thirties when the study

ended.
• Only 2% remained asthmatic throughout. Realistically, anyone who has ever been asthmatic should

regard themselves as ‘at risk’ indefinitely and never be careless with their health – don’t smoke, keep

away from smoky bars and clubs, eat a good diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables (206) and avoid

activities that involve an asthma risk, such as strenuous exercise in cold air.
Workplaces with high exposure to allergens, such as saw mills, bakeries or laboratories using animals

(see pp. 133-4) are not recommended for those with a history of allergy. Anyone who has ever had eczema

should also take care with cosmetics and soaps, choosing the gentlest brands. They should also protect

their hands (57) and avoid hairdressing or bricklaying as an occupation, or anything else where skin

irritation is likely.
Moving on
Growing out of classical allergies seems to be a consequence of the child’s immune system changing and

maturing as it grows. This same process, unfortunately, can also substitute one allergic disease for

another.
`When Alex developed eczema as a baby I hoped that she’d grow out of it in time. Well she did,

gradually, and by the time she was five it seemed to have cleared up, but then she started having a

snuffly nose that never really went away. A year or so later, she began wheezing whenever she got a

cold, and this has now developed into asthma.’ The pattern described by Alex’s mother Jenny will be

familiar to many parents, who watch their children slowly work their way through all the allergies in

the medical textbooks. Doctors call it the atopic march or allergic march.
Fortunately, even this type of allergic pattern can have a positive outcome eventually. Many such

children become allergy-free in time, and develop into healthy adults.
In the meantime, there are several itchy, wheezy or sneezy years to get through, and since childhood is

a time to be enjoyed, not endured, treatments that alleviate the symptoms of allergies are generally

welcomed. Being energetic, healthy, ‘normal’ and able to join in with sports and other activities is

particularly important for a child’s social development and self-confidence.
Treating the symptoms also prevents any long-term and irreversible damage, such as the thickening and

loss of elasticity that occurs in the airways of children with untreated asthma.
At the same time as treating the symptoms, it makes sense to maximise the chance of the child growing

out of the allergy. Parents can tip the odds in the right direction by providing an environment that

reduces the chance of new allergies developing. A detailed action programme is described on pp. 248-9.
Allergies that begin in adult life
What about those people who develop classical allergic diseases for the first time as adults - or even

in old age? Will they too ‘grow out of it’ with the passing years?
Only a minority of people develop such allergies for the first time as adults, although the numbers

seem to be increasing. The older you are when your allergies begin, the less likely you are ever to

throw them off. On the positive side, they are unlikely to get a great deal worse than they are at the

outset, especially if you take care of yourself and keep the air at home as unpolluted and

allergen-free as possible (see pp. 114-31).
In the case of asthma that develops in adulthood, there may not be an allergic reaction involved.

Whereas allergies play a part in asthma for 80-90% of children, the figure is thought to be lower for

adults. Nevertheless, it is well worth investigating the possible role of allergens, because avoiding

them is one of the most effective treatments.
The outlook for food intolerance
Food intolerance causes a wide variety of symptoms, from baby colic to migraine. A full list is given

on p. 76. Although far less is understood about food intolerance than about true allergies, there is

much more certainty about the future for affected individuals. With rare exceptions, people find that

the problem clears up as long as they totally avoid their problem food for a year or two. After this

period of strict avoidance, they can eat the food again in moderation but should never forget that the

problem can return. Eating the culprit food very regularly will turn the clock back and all the

original symptoms will return. This change for the worse may be irreversible for people with severe

reactions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Safety first
Anyone who suffers the life-threatening allergic reaction known as anaphylactic shock (58) is probably

going
to have this for the rest of their days. Some children do become tolerant of food allergens in time

(allergies to milk, eggs or soya may well disappear, whereas fish or peanut allergy is probably going

to be permanent) but before concluding that there is no longer any risk, some extremely careful and

cautious testing should take place. Talk to your doctor about how to proceed. Skin-prick tests may be

helpful, but there must be resuscitation equipment close to hand as anaphylaxis can occur. Never give

the child any of the food to eat, until you (or, preferably, the doctor) have first tested it in other,

less risky, ways. For example, you can smear a little on the face to see if there is any reaction. If

there is none within 24 hours, put a tiny amount on the outer lip and watch again.
If both these tests produce absolutely no reaction then a very small amount of the food can be eaten as

a test: this should be done under medical supervision. The amount can be slowly increased with

successive tests, until it seems certain that no reaction will occur even with a normal portion.