Posts Tagged ‘elimination diet’

Elimination diet
An elimination diet is a method of diagnosing idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74) and certain other

forms of food sensitivity where indirect tests, such as skin tests, are unhelpful. The principle of the

elimination diet is very simple. It begins by removing from the body every food that could possibly

cause a reaction, and seeing if this produces a symptom-free state. If it does, the elimination diet

then presents the body with different foods, each in its pure form, to see which ones cause symptoms.
While the principle is simple, the practicalities of the elimination diet can be much more complex, and

it is vital to understand the details fully before you start. There is absolutely no room for

‘cheating’ with this diet – one mouthful of cake is enough to ruin the whole thing. You need forward

planning and a lot of self-discipline, backed up by a good stock of the permitted foods for moments

when hunger overcomes you. Some cooked foods, stored in the freezer in individual portions for quick

defrosting, are a great help.
Doing an elimination diet incorrectly is not just a waste of time. Some people acquire new

sensitivities during the diet, which may make it very much more difficult to do a second elimination

diet. So plan ahead and get it right first time.
The planning stage
First of all, start an accurate symptom diary. This will give you a precise picture of how bad things

are now, before you try any dietary measures. A detailed daily symptom record, covering a period of

about two weeks, can be very useful, whether or not you actually do an elimination diet. It can serve
as a baseline against which to judge the effects of any future treatment.
Before you begin an elimination diet, you must see your doctor and ask if it is safe for you to do the

diet. Read through the next four pages first – the more you know about elimination diets, before

talking to your doctor, the better.
There are some conditions where, although an elimination diet can be very helpful, it should not be

attempted without full medical supervision. Two main causes for concern exist:
•    For people who are undernourished to start with, the elimination diet may be too demanding – it

is difficult to eat enough calories during the first few weeks of the diet, unless an elemental diet is

used as a supplement (see box on p. 196). If you are underweight, or have rheumatoid arthritis or

Crohn’s disease, the possible use of elemental diets is something you should discuss with your doctor.
•    With certain diseases (see list that follows), the testing stage may induce severe symptoms.

Sometimes these can be life-threatening and need immediate medical attention.
Medical supervision during food testing is recommended for anyone with these conditions:
•    Crohn’s disease – testing can bring on a prolonged relapse. Very small amounts of food should

be tested initially, and the quantity slowly increased.
•    Brittle asthma – after a period of avoidance, a culprit food can bring on a severe and possibly

life-threatening asthma attack.
•    Atopic eczema – the risk of reactions is higher if skin tests are positive (see p. 198).
•    Chronic urticaria – occasionally there is an immediate reaction to an offending food. It is

advisable to test foods in very small portions oust a mouthful) at first. If there is no reaction

whatever after four hours, a normal portion can be tested.
Note that an elimination diet is not suitable for anyone with true food allergy (see p. 62). If you

have ever had an immediate reaction to any food, or any symptoms in the lips or mouth, testing foods

can be dangerous. Caution is also necessary if you have ever reacted to a food with violent vomiting

and/or diarrhoea some hours after eating. This could be due to an infection, of course, but such

symptoms can also, very rarely, result from true food allergy (see p. 64). Finally, if you have ever

suffered anaphylaxis from any cause – not just food –the testing phase of an elimination diet might be

risky. Ask your doctor’s advice.
Once you have your doctor’s permission to try the diet, work out how the stages of the diet will fit in

with your life over the weeks or months ahead. Until it is over, eating food made by other people is

virtually out of the question. When eating away from home, you must either take prepared food with you,

or just eat very simple foods – such as permitted fruits or nuts. Think about the practicalities of

carrying food for meals away from home.
Finally, devise the diet you will follow during the exclusion phase (see right), locate shops that sell

the more unusual foods, and stock up on everything required.
You will continue to eat a lot of these foods for the first few weeks of the testing stage, so you may

want to buy extra stocks and refrigerate them for
longer storage, especially if the sources of supply are some distance from your home.
Note that food ingredients in medication could interfere with the results of the elimination diet. For

example, if you are very sensitive to maize (corn), the cornflour that is added to many antihistamines

and other drugs could create much confusion. Food-free medicines are available – talk to your

pharmacist about this initially, then to your doctor if you need a different prescription.
The exclusion phase
During the first part of an elimination diet, you exclude all the foods that you normally eat, plus any

closely related foods. For example, if you normally eat oranges, you should avoid all other citrus

fruits, including lemon, limes and grapefruit, even though you do not normally eat these. If you

normally eat plenty of broccoli, you should omit all its relatives, such as cabbage, kale, spring

greens and cress.
The best way to conduct the exclusion phase is not to follow a set menu, such as the well-known

‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet, but to draw up your own list of permitted foods. This can include foods that you

have never eaten before, and those you eat rarely.
The list should run to at least ten items. One problem with an exclusion phase that consists of only

two foods (as in the ‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet) is that you are bound to eat a huge amount of these foods.

This is asking for trouble if you have a tendency to food intolerance, because you can quite quickly

become sensitive to new foods if eating them in large amounts.
Your list of permitted foods should include:
Some starchy items. These are essential for keeping hunger at bay: try some of the more exotic root

crops, such as sweet potatoes, yams, dasheen and cassava. These are available in large supermarkets and

in small shops catering to Indian, African, Chinese and Caribbean communities. (Cook them as you would

potatoes. In the case of cassava, it must be boiled, not baked.) You can also eat parsnips, turnips,

chestnuts and pumpkin. Tapioca, sago, buckwheat, millet, quinoa and sorghum are other possibilities: a

health-food shop is a good source of some of these. Use rice if it is not normally part of your diet.

Do not include sweetcorn or maize meal, even though you do not normally eat these –corn products are

very widely used in packaged food, and sensitivity to corn is not uncommon.
Several fruits and vegetables that you don’t normally eat. Exotic produce such as mangoes and okra can

help a lot in keeping the diet tasty. Avocados, which are very rich and nutritious, can be included if

you don’t eat them often.
Some protein items. For carnivores, this is the easy part – any meat that you don’t normally eat is

suitable. Consider turkey, rabbit, pigeon or game, for example. (Soak rabbit meat in salt water

overnight to get rid of the strong taste, if you dislike this.) Strict vegetarians have more problems

here, since goat’s milk, sheep’s milk and all birds’ eggs are disallowed – their proteins are much too

similar to those of normal milk and eggs. Soya products such as tofu should definitely be avoided, as

should other pulses initially, because sensitivity to these is a possibility among vegetarians. Quorn,

or mycoprotein, could affect anyone sensitised to yeast, and should not be included. Fortunately the

exclusion phase is fairly brief, so a low intake of protein will not be disastrous. Including some nuts

on your list of permitted foods will help, as these contain protein. If nuts are part of your normal

diet, you may have to resort to rarely eaten kinds such as macadamias, cashews or pistachios.
Elemental diets
An elemental diet is a powder that contains all the nutrients the human body needs but is free from the

substances in food that provoke allergic and intolerance reactions. It is mixed with water to create a

complete substitute for food. Originally designed for space travel, this totally synthetic form of

sustenance is also known as ‘the astronaut’s diet’.
Used alone during the exclusion phase, elemental diets are the basis for the ultimate – and

theoretically foolproof – elimination diet. They sustain you through the exclusion phase, and continue

to provide your basic diet during the testing phase.
For anyone with multiple food sensitivity, using an elemental diet circumvents the problem of finding

ten or more safe foods with which the elimination diet can begin.
Those who are underweight can also benefit from using an elemental diet, simply as a calorie-boosting

supplement during the exclusion phase and testing phase.
Unfortunately, elemental diets taste fairly unpleasant and are quite expensive. You
may need a prescription, so talk to your doctor. Ideally you should get an elemental diet that does not

contain sucrose (sugar).
Some items that make good snacks. Nuts, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, fresh fruit and dried fruit are

all useful for times when you are away from home, or feel hungry between meals. At the outset of the

diet, use only unsulphured dried fruit –available from health-food shops. At a later stage, you can

test ordinary dried fruit (all of which is treated with sulphur preservatives – see box on p. 207).
A cooking oil, preferably one that you have not used much in the past. Use this fairly liberally, to

keep the calorie content of your diet at a reasonable level
Note that this is a very plain diet – you eat the permitted foods and absolutely nothing else. You

cannot use spices, herbs or other flavourings. Salt is allowed, but sugar is out, as are tea, coffee,

alcohol and all soft drinks. You must drink only mineral water and pure juices from permitted fruits.
Don’t use canned or packaged versions of the permitted foods. Buy raw food and cook it yourself. The

idea is to avoid food additives and other contaminants, such as those from the linings of cans.
Throughout this phase, and the next, you must be very careful not to eat too much of any one food.

Never eat any food every day, and stay away from any food that you begin to develop a real passion for

– this is always a bad sign in people with food intolerance. It is better to go a little hungry

(assuming you are not underweight to start with) rather than binge on any of the permitted foods.

Acquiring new sensitivities is all too easy.
Assuming you do have food intolerance, and you have excluded all the foods that affect you, there

should be a complete clearance of symptoms within 7-10 days. The response is usually unmistakable. A

partial or slight response is probably just a coincidence, and should be discounted, except for those

with rheumatoid arthritis (see below).
Be warned that you may feel a great deal worse before you get better. For those who do have idiopathic

food intolerance, the first 5-6 days of the diet can be very unpleasant – usually they suffer the same

symptoms as before the diet, but far more severe.
Some conditions, such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, may require a longer exclusion

phase, but there is no point in continuing beyond three weeks. Bear in mind that long-term structural

damage to arthritic joints may prevent a complete recovery. A partial but sustained improvement in the

joints, accompanied by a distinct improvement in general health, suggests that food could well be

playing a part in causing the disease, and that it is worth going on to the testing phase.
Symptoms that are only intermittent, such as chronic urticaria or migraine, pose a special problem. You

need to decide, before starting the diet, how long the exclusion phase should continue in order to give

you a clear sign that your state of health is improved. A symptom diary is vital here. If, for example,

your symptom diary shows that you sometimes have a week that is symptom-free but you never get through

two weeks without an attack, then your exclusion phase should continue for two weeks.
You should only go on to the testing phase if you improve during the exclusion phase. If you do not

improve, you have excluded the possibility of food intolerance, and can give up the diet.
The testing phase
This part of the diet, which is sometimes called the reintroduction phase, takes about eight weeks. It

requires careful observation of your symptoms, and constant self-discipline about everything you eat.

You should not stop or delay the testing unless you are ill – it is vitally important to complete it as

quickly as possible.
Foods have to be reintroduced one at a time, with a space between in which symptoms can be observed. It

sounds simple, but this is where errors can easily occur.
During this phase, as well as noting your symptoms daily, you should also record absolutely everything

you eat.
For the first 2-3 weeks you should test foods that are unlikely to cause symptoms. Start by testing

fruits, vegetables and meats that you do not eat very often normally, but which you do like. If they

pass the test, you can use them to vary your diet. This will make life much easier and reduce the risk

of developing new sensitivities.
Next test foods that you do eat reasonably often, but not every day. Leave the most likely culprits –

the foods you eat very regularly, such as wheat and milk products – until you have established a safe

diet that contains at least 25 different foods. This safe and relatively varied diet should be the

backdrop against which you test staple foods.
The testing procedure changes over time, because your sensitivity may decline as the diet progresses.

During the first eight weeks, you should test one food each day, eating a normal-sized portion for

lunch or supper. A reaction to the food might occur quite soon after the meal, or some hours later. Any

symptoms that occur within the following 24 hours should be provisionally attributed to that food.
Unfortunately, bowel symptoms can sometimes take longer to develop – up to 48 hours. This can confuse

things when a new food is being tested every day.
There may also be uncertainty about intermittent conditions such as chronic urticaria. You may not be

absolutely sure that the problem really responded to the exclusion phase. If so, when the symptoms

recur during the testing phase, this may be due to a food, or it may just be coincidence.
Should there be any doubt about which food caused a particular set of symptoms, cut out all the suspect

foods for now, and retest them after a couple of weeks, using a three-day testing procedure (see

below).
When a reaction does occur to a food, stop all testing and go back to the safe diet until you feel

completely better. But don’t wait too long before resuming testing. You need to get through most of the

testing within eight weeks because, for some people, intolerance to the foods begins to fade after

that.
This does not mean that the intolerance has been ‘cured’, unfortunately. A period of eating the food

regularly will soon bring the problem back.
If you are still testing foods after eight weeks, you must change to three-day testing – eat a normal

portion of the food every day for three days, stopping only if you get symptoms. Should you have no

reaction to the food by the end of the fourth day, you can consider it safe. (But leave it out of your

diet for at least another four days.)
There are some special procedures for testing certain foods:
•    When you test wheat, even if it is quite early on, use the three-day test procedure (see

above). Reactions to wheat can be very slow. (If you have rheumatoid arthritis, you should spend a full

five days testing wheat, and eat it at least twice a day.) Don’t use bread to test wheat because this

also contains yeast and other ingredients. Use a pure wheat cereal such as Shredded Wheat – moisten it

with fruit juice if you cannot have milk. Note that some people who react to whole-wheat are sensitive

to the wheat germ, and can tolerate refined wheat, as in white bread and flour. For others only white

flour is a problem – they are usually reacting to additives in the white flour. Careful testing will

sort out these issues.
•    Test milk before cheese and butter. You may react to one but not the others. If you react to

fresh milk, wait a few weeks, then test evaporated milk. Later, you can test goat’s milk and then

sheep’s milk. Some people can tolerate these, but must be very careful not to consume too much of them.
•    You can test yeast using Marmite or yeast-based B-vitamin tablets. Do this before you test

mushrooms, •    At some point, test a canned food. This is to check for reactions to the lining

material used on cans. Choose something that contains no other ingredients or additives, such as

carrots. Test it first in a frozen or fresh form, so that you are sure you don’t have a reaction to the

food itself.
•    Throughout the testing period, continue with cooking all your own food from scratch. At a

fairly late stage in the testing, when you have tested most foods, spend three days eating packaged

food. The idea is to eat a wide range of different food additives all at once. Read the labels

carefully (see p. 172) to check that all the food ingredients are ones which you have already tested

and found safe. You are unlikely to react to these packaged foods, but if you do, you should then

conduct tests with all the individual food additives. You may need some help from a dietitian for this

(see p. 201).
Testing becomes more and more uncertain after 12 weeks. If you
have not completed it by then, reintroduce all the untested foods.
Should your symptoms come back, cut out all those foods again,
then test them individually.
What next?
For anyone who recovers during an elimination diet, and successfully identifies their problem foods, a

period of complete abstinence from those foods follows. After about a year, it is worth testing the

foods again, as the sensitivity may have subsided. (Don’t do this if you have rheumatoid arthritis –

see p. 23.)
If, after a year or two, you find that a food no longer makes you ill, don’t go back to your old ways –

remember that you must only eat the food occasionally. Once every three or four bays is a good rule of

thumb for a food to which you were previously intolerant. You might get away with having it slightly

more often than this, but never go back to eating it daily. If it starts to become your ‘favourite

food’ again – the thing you fancy more often than anything else – watch out.
Good nutrition is an important issue for anyone avoiding certain key foods. If you have cut out all

milk products, for example, you should probably be taking a calcium supplement, unless you eat a lot of

other calcium-rich foods. Ask your doctor to refer you to a dietician or nutritionist if you feel you

need help.
An elimination diet for children with eczema
Before putting your child on any kind of restrictive diet, it is vital that you talk to your doctor.

The risks of malnutrition are far higher for children, and there can be serious long-term consequences,

such as stunted growth or impaired intelligence. You must therefore have medical consent and

supervision for an elimination diet.
For young children with atopic eczema, there is rarely any need for a stringent elimination diet, such

as that described on pp. 194-7. Children are usually sensitised to only one or two commonly eaten

foods.
In the case of recently weaned infants, it is enough to simply cut out individual foods, one at a time.

Avoid each food for two weeks, while observing symptoms carefully.
For older children a simple elimination diet, with an exclusion phase which avoids just the most likely

culprits, works well. The foods that you should exclude at the outset are:
•    any food which has given a positive skin-prick test (see p. 69)
•    any food which you think may have caused digestive symptoms, such as diarrhoea, either now or

in the past
•    eggs, milk and all milk products
•    beef and chicken
•    citrus fruits (oranges, lemons etc.)
•    food additives.
If the child’s skin is no better after a week of this diet, cut out the following foods as well:
•    peanuts and other nuts
•    soya
•    fish
•    wheat and maize (corn)
•    tomatoes
•    lamb.
If there is no response after another week, food is unlikely to be contributing to the eczema.
For the testing phase, use three-day testing, as described on p. 197, if you have fewer than ten foods

to test. Use one-day testing if you have more than ten foods to test.
You should begin by testing a very small amount of the food. Wait ten minutes for any symptoms (not

just skin symptoms – the mouth or stomach may also be affected) then give a little more if nothing has

happened. Build up gradually to testing a normal portion of the food.
A more cautious approach is required for children who give positive skin-prick tests to foods, or have

a history of symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract. They are more likely to suffer severe symptoms

in the lips, mouth and throat – the type of reaction associated with food allergy. Emergency medical

treatment may be needed. You can see if there is any likelihood of a severe immediate reaction to foods

by starting with a test on the face, and then the outer lip (see box on p. 23). If nothing happens, it

is probably safe to go on to the next stage – giving the child a very small amount of the food to eat.

However, you should have medical supervision for Rare reactions
Very occasionally, atopic eczema sufferers on milk-avoidance diets develop a sensitivity reaction to

calcium supplements. There is no scientific explanation for this, but it has been very well documented

in two children. Should you encounter this problem, the answer may be some alternative natural source

of calcium: sardines or other small fish, eaten whole, are one possibility, assuming your child will

eat fish. A dietician can advise on how much is needed per day.
There has also been one well-documented report of a child reacting to mineral water. When the water she

usually drank was changed to another brand, her eczema cleared up. This is very unlikely to be a common

problem.
this procedure in the case of foods that gave positive skin tests. If your child has both severe eczema

and additional symptoms (such as nettle rash, or symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract) it may be

advisable to have medical supervision when testing all foods.
Bear in mind that atopic eczema naturally fluctuates a great deal. To observe the effects of trying out

a food, you need the child’s skin to be in a steady state. That means being absolutely consistent about

applying steroids and moisturisers, avoiding (for the period of testing) any stressful situations that

could provoke a flare-up, not exposing the skin to sudden doses of irritants or airborne allergens, and

keeping scratching under control. Be aware of other factors that could muddy the waters by provoking a

flare-up of eczema – such as teething, or a cold (see p. 44).
If certain foods are identified as provoking eczema symptoms, and you decide to cut the food from your

child’s diet, a nutritional supplement may well be needed. Ask your doctor to refer you to a

nutritionist or dietician.
Other diagnostic diets
These diets are not used by (or even known to) the majority of doctors. While some, such as the

low-nickel diet, have been subjected to rigorous scientific testing and have shown their worth, others

have not been tested scientifically. The evidence in favour of them is purely anecdotal – in other

words, doctors have used these treatments repeatedly and observed good results with some of their

patients. That is not hard science, but it is how innovations in medicine often begin.
There are few risks with any of these diets – the number of foods to be avoided is small, and you are

most unlikely to become malnourished. Your doctor should not object to you trying any of these diets,

however sceptical he or she may be about its possible benefits.
Low-nickel diet
This diet is sometimes of benefit to adults with eczema. There are various pointers which indicate that

the diet may help, as described on pp. 55-6.
Make sure that you have absolutely no contact with any nickel (e.g. in jewellery, jeans studs, watches

or hair clips) throughout this diet, and for at least two weeks before starting it.
Ideally you should also stop treatment with steroids or antihistamines a week or so before starting the

diet. This allows any improvement to be easily observed. Obviously you should get your doctor’s

permission to do this.
The diet could take anything from six weeks to six months to take full effect. Some people have a

complete clearance of their eczema, while for others there is a partial but distinct improvement.
The foods with a high nickel content, which should be avoided as far as possible, are:
•    shellfish
•    green beans and peas
•    beansprouts and lucerne sprouts
•    dry beans and lentils (pulses) of all kinds; soya protein and products containing it (e.g.

vegetarian sausages and burgers)
•    spinach and kale
•    lettuce, leeks
•    wheat bran (avoid bran cereals and other products; replace wholemeal bread with white bread, or

eat it in moderation only – you can get plenty of fibre from fruits and vegetables; do not eat

multi-grain breads at all)
•    oatmeal, millet and buckwheat
•    raspberries, prunes, pineapple, figs
•    chocolate and cocoa
•    tea from drinks dispensers (restrict intake of other tea and coffee, and don’t make them too

strong)
•    peanuts, hazelnuts, almonds and marzipan
•    liquorice
•    sunflower seeds, linseed
•    baking powder, in large amounts
•    vitamin or mineral preparations that contain nickel (check the label carefully), Nickel is also

found in drinking water, and absorbed from certain cooking utensils, so:
•    Do not use items plated with nickel (e.g. tea balls, some tea strainers, egg beaters). The

extremely shiny appearance of nickel makes these easy to recognise.
•    Do not cook acid fruits in stainless steel pans, since the acid leaches some nickel out of the

stainless steel. An enamel cooking pot is safe.
•    Minimise the amount of tinned food that you eat.
•    In the morning, run off the first litre of water from the tap, as this may contain nickel

released from the tap itself.
Several other foods and drinks seem to aggravate the skin of nickel-sensitive people, even though the

foods are not rich in nickel. These foods and drinks should also be avoided:
•    beer, wine
•    herring, mackerel, tuna
•tomatoes, carrots, onions, apples; oranges and other citrus fruits, including their juices.
Low-chromium and low-cobalt diets
Skin sensitivity to chromium or cobalt can, very occasionally, result in a tendency to react to these

same metals when consumed in food or drink (see pp. 56).
Unfortunately, both chromium and cobalt are essential for good nutrition, so avoiding them is fraught

with problems. You would need the help of a really good dietician, or a doctor with a particular

interest in nutritional problems, to guide you through a diet of this kind.
The only measure you can safely take at home is to cut down on excessive consumption of these metals,

for three weeks only, to see if this produces any improvement in your symptoms. If it does, that should

encourage you to seek expert help for a more thorough avoidance diet.
In the case of cobalt sensitivity avoid:
•    all canned and bottled beer.
In the case of chromium sensitivity avoid:
•    beer, wine and cider
•    yeast extract and yeast tablets
•    black pepper
•    calf’s liver
•    wheatgerm and wholemeal bread
•    cheese.
If you also have nickel sensitivity, avoid nickel-rich foods (see p. 199) at the same time.
Low-histamine diet
Histamine in food is mostly produced by bacterial action. The majority of people can break down any

histamine they eat, as long as the amount is not excessive (see box on p. 67).
Temporary susceptibility to histamine may accompany viral hepatitis or other liver conditions.
A permanently impaired ability to detoxify histamine is relatively unusual. When it does occur it can

result in symptoms such as chronic urticaria, migraine or recurrent headaches. A low-histamine diet may

help in these cases. All of the following should be avoided:
Very high histamine content:
•    red wine, champagne
•    tuna, sardines
•    Emmenthal and Camembert cheeses.
High histamine content:
•    beer, white wine
•    anchovies
•    Gouda, Roquefort, Stilton and all other well-matured cheeses
•    salami and other well-matured sausages, Westphalian ham
•    sauerkraut
•    spinach
•    tomato ketchup.
If you improve only partially on this diet, this may indicate that you are on the right track

(histamine is indeed the problem) but that the bacteria in your gut are undermining your efforts with

the additional histamine which they generate. You can investigate this possibility by trying a

low-carbohydrate diet, as described on p. 53.
Low-amine diet
Naturally occurring substances called amines, found in many different foods, can have a drug-like

effect on the blood vessels, making them open up a little and so increasing the blood flow. The effect

is usually small, but some people are more susceptible than others. A low-amine diet is worth trying if

you have chronic urticaria or migraines, and have not improved with other treatments. A low-amine diet

can also be useful in atopic eczema: amines in food are not a basic cause of eczema, but they can

aggravate the rash by increasing blood flow to the skin. To begin with, cut out all foods listed below:
Very high amine content:
•    all cheeses except cottage cheese
•    dark or plain chocolate
•    yeast extract (Marmite etc.), miso, tempeh, tomato paste, tandoori spice mix, stock cubes,

ready-made sauces •    cola drinks, orange juice, tomato juice
•    any dried, pickled or smoked fish
•    sausages, pies and smoked meats, beef liver, chicken skin
•    broad beans, spinach
•    sauerkraut
•    almonds.
High or moderate amine content:
•    milk chocolate
•    soy sauce
•    beer, wine and cider
•    pork, including bacon and ham, salami, chicken liver, offal
•    all fresh or tinned fish, except white fish
•    all nuts except chestnuts and cashews
•    sesame seeds, sunflower seeds
•    avocados, aubergines, mushrooms, tomatoes, broccoli, cauliflower
•    olives and olive oil
•    oranges, lemons and other citrus fruits
•    pineapples, bananas, raspberries, strawberries, pineapples, plums, grapes, dates, figs, kiwi

fruit, passion fruit.
Continue for at least three weeks, and longer if your symptoms are normally intermittent. if you

improve, you can then experiment with reintroducing small portions of foods from the second list, three

or four times a week. Gradually build up to a higher intake, but cut back if your symptoms return.
Organic diet
The objective here is to avoid pesticides, i.e. chemical sprays applied to kill fungi and insect pests.

This may be helpful for people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
`Chemical-free’ or ‘unsprayed’ food (crops grown without pesticides) will do just as well as 100%

organic food (which is grown without either pesticides or artificial fertilisers).
The highest intake of pesticides is from fresh fruit and vegetables, so if your budget is tight,

concentrate on buying organic or chemical-free versions of these. If you have a garden, growing some of

your own food will reduce the cost.
You can also reduce the pesticide content of ordinary fruits and vegetables by:
•    Storing them for as long as possible before using them, because the pesticides break down quite

quickly
•    Always peeling them. With difficult-to-peel items such as peaches and tomatoes, pour boiling

water over them and leave them to stand for a few minutes first, as this loosens the skin. Rinse in

cold water, then peel.
•    If peeling is not possible, washing them very well with soap or detergent, then rinsing them

thoroughly
•    Cooking them, as this drives off some of the pesticides; avoid inhaling the steam and ventilate

the kitchen well while doing this.
You should drink mineral water from a reputable source, or use a very high-quality water filter (not a

jug filter).
Additive-free diet
Food additives are occasionally the culprit in chronic urticaria (see p. 53). At the same time as

avoiding additives, people with chronic urticaria should cut out other potential culprits – alcohol,

spices and all aspirin-like drugs (see box on p. 151).
An additive-free diet may also be of value for some people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
In the case of children with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), also called Hyperkinetic Syndrome, the

role of additive-free diets is a contentious issue (see p. 81).
An additive-free diet is very healthy but quite hard work. It means making all your own food from 100%

fresh, unmodified produce (you cannot have bacon or ham, and even things like cooked chicken and

ready-to-eat salad can contain some additives; so does most restaurant food). Note that wines, beers

and other alcoholic drinks can contain many additives without declaring them on the label. (German

bottled beer is an exception here.) Baked goods sold unwrapped can also contain many additives without

declaring them.
Stop using toothpaste unless it is an additive-free brand. You can buy such toothpaste from a

health-food shop – or use sodium bicarbonate powder instead. Drink mineral water or filtered water (you

need a good-quality filter for this, not a jug filter).
Medicinal drugs can contain colourings and other additives, so you should try to get additive-free

versions. Talk to your pharmacist about this initially.
Assuming the symptoms clear up, testing can begin, but you will probably need medical help to work out

exactly which additives are at fault. It is difficult to organise these tests at home, because most

foods contain such a mixture of additives.
With chronic urticaria, there is the possibility of quite severe reactions on testing, so medical

supervision is desirable. You can undertake cautious testing with small amounts of tap water, spices

and alcohol at home, but make sure you are in a position to get emergency medical help if you need it.

Aspirin or aspirin-like drugs should not be tested at home. Life-threatening reactions are common in

sensitive individuals, and temporary avoidance can heighten your reaction.

Coeliac Disease
During World War 11, there was no bread to be had in the Netherlands and people were forced to eat tulip bulbs. ‘My mother roasted them,’ one survivor recalls, ‘and they tasted delicious then, because we were so hungry I suppose. I cooked some years later, just to taste them again, and they were absolutely disgusting.’
While most of the population was thin and unwell on this starvation diet, a few children were actually healthier than before. An observant Dutch doctor noted that these were the children who, before the war, had suffered from constant diarrhoea, fatigue, poor growth and muscle wasting. They were suddenly stronger and, his enquiries revealed, their diarrhoea had vanished. But when the food situation improved at the end of the war, all their old problems returned. By carefully experimenting with the diet of these patients, the doctor discovered that eating wheat and rye caused the symptoms. Subsequent research has revealed that both contain a collection of proteins, referred to as gluten, which are the source of coeliac disease.
Belly disease
Coeliac disease (or celiac disease) is an old name which simply means ‘belly disease’. It is derived from the Greek word for’belly’ — koilia. Once the cause of the symptoms became understood, a new name was devised — gluten-sensitivity enteropathy — but it has not really caught on. Other terms that you may come across are non-tropical sprue and coeliac sprue, based on the close resemblance of the symptoms to those of tropical sprue. This disease, found in those who live or have lived in the tropics, is probably caused by bacterial infection. There is no causal link with coeliac disease.
Symptoms
The symptoms of coeliac disease are:
• diarrhoea, with pale, bad-smelling stools
• in a few patients, constipation rather than diarrhoea, but this is very rare
• bloating and wind
• damage to the lining of the intestine. This is of a characteristic type: the complex folded structures (the villi) of the intestinal lining are destroyed. Additionally, huge numbers of immune cells are present.
• the loss of the villi results in failure to absorb nutrients from food (malabsorption) causing poor growth in babies, and weakness and weight-loss in adults.
• poor appetite, especially in babies. This can greatly reduce the diarrhoea.
Coeliac disease usually appears in babies during weaning, a few weeks after cereals are introduced, but it can also begin for the first time in adults. The tendency to coeliac disease is genetically inherited, so it runs in families.
Where coeliac disease runs in the family, another disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, is also likely to occur. Dermatitis herpetiformis has the same basic mechanism as coeliac disease but very different symptoms:
• an intensely itchy rash, sometimes with tiny blisters; the rash is symmetrically distributed on the buttocks, shoulders, scalp, and the outer surfaces of the knees and elbows
• the same characteristic damage to the lining of the intestine as seen in tests for coeliac disease, though generally less severe
• diarrhoea, in some cases, but not all. About 5% of those with coeliac disease actually go on to develop dermatitis herpetiformis. Most people have either one or the other.
Both diseases are caused by the same gene, which results in sufferers developing antibodies against one of their own proteins, an enzyme called tissue-transglutaminase. The job of this enzyme, which is found in the intestines, is to assist with the breakdown of gluten.
If no gluten is present, the enzyme does not arouse the interest of the immune system. It is the process of gluten digestion, in which a particular peptide is produced from gluten, that provokes the autoimmune reaction. (A peptide is any short length of protein chain, obtained from the complete protein chain by digestion.)
What seems to trigger the autoimmune reaction is this enzyme–peptide combination: the offending peptide, newly produced and still attached physically to the enzyme. There is something about the particular ‘chemical picture’ that this combination makes which outrages the immune system of individuals with a particular genetic make-up.
The impact of this autoimmune reaction on the intestinal lining is severe in coeliac disease, less so in dermatitis herpetiformis. What causes dermatitis herpetiformis is a particular type of antibody, called dimeric IgA, which is transported by the bloodstream from the gut to the skin. It is deposited in the skin all over the body, but for some reason only provokes inflammation in certain areas.
In rare cases, an IgE-mediated food allergy to wheat can co-exist with coeliac disease, making reactions more severe.
Secondary problems
Paradoxically, while the damaged gut lining of untreated coeliac disease makes a poor job of absorbing specific nutrients (e.g. iron and vitamins) in a form that the body can use, it also lets through far more intact, or partially digested, food molecules. These get into the bloodstream in such numbers that they can lead to idiopathic food intolerance (see p.74). Sensitivity to soya is a common problem, because it is so heavily used in gluten-free bread and other prepared food. Those with coeliac disease who have not improved fully, despite a strict gluten-free diet, often benefit from an elimination diet (see p. 194). This must be done under medical supervision.
Another possible effect of the intestinal damage is lactose intolerance (see p.79), producing a sensitivity to milk.
The frequency of schizophrenia is higher among those with coeliac disease than among the general population. Coeliacs not following a strict gluten-free diet are also vulnerable to other psychological problems. These might be linked to the effects of food-derived exorphins (see pp. 76-7) and other peptides on the brain. The increased permeability of the gut could play a part in this, allowing more exorphins to reach the bloodstream.
Diagnosis
A biopsy (see p. 92) is the only really reliable form of diagnosis. It is crucial that this is done before removing gluten from the diet, because the damage is repaired if gluten is avoided and the healing process is fairly rapid for some people (though in others it takes many months). If the intestinal lining reverts to a normal appearance quite quickly, an accurate diagnosis is never obtained, which can have serious consequences: if you or your child are coeliac, you need to know.
New blood tests can also be helpful in diagnosis, but they do not give the unequivocal result obtained with a biopsy.
Research from the United States suggests that coeliac disease is under-diagnosed in some countries compared to others – for example, Italy screens children routinely but the States does not. Some authorities suspect that there is a great deal of ‘hidden’ coeliac disease in the States, and this could be true in other countries as well. There is no routine screening of children in Britain.
The symptoms of coeliac disease are not always distinctive. Many cases are first detected when patients with rather non-specific symptoms are discovered, by a blood test, to be anaemic.
Treatment
There are no drug treatments for coeliac disease and avoiding gluten religiously is the only way to remain well. Those who are lax about their gluten-free diet may be more vulnerable to certain cancers of the digestive tract.
A strict gluten-free diet is not easy to follow (see p. 177). The most severely affected coeliacs are so sensitive to gluten that they react violently to even a tiny amount: this is known as coeliac shock and can be fatal.
A gluten-free diet is also the treatment for dermatitis herpetiformis, but at the outset the rash can be controlled with the highly effective drug dapsone.

Food Intolerance
The comments of those who have recovered from food intolerance after many years of ill-health are always memorable. ‘It’s like getting my life back again,’ said one woman. ‘I had actually forgotten what it felt like to be well,’ said another, ‘the effect of cutting out certain foods was just amazing.’
For most of those with food intolerance, the disease begins very subtly and gradually – first one symptom (persistent and unexplained diarrhoea, perhaps) then, some years later, another (migraine or headaches) and then, when a few more years have passed, another symptom (such as joint pain or muscle aches). Steadily increasing levels of irritability, `fuzzy-headedness’ or inexplicable tiredness may accompany this decline in health.
Most patients have no idea that all these symptoms are connected until they try an elimination diet, and everything clears up at once, quite dramatically. As one former sufferer described it: `Some of the stuff that got better – well, I’d been like that so long I thought it was just the way I was –grumpy and exhausted, and feeling terrible if I didn’t eat meals on time. It was an absolute revelation to feel completely OK again.’
What does ‘food intolerance’ mean?
In this book, food intolerance means any reaction to food where the immune system has no proven central role.
All the people I have described so far have idiopathic food intolerance, which means, food intolerance with no established mechanism – in other words, doctors can’t say exactly how it is caused. This is a highly controversial area.
The definition of food intolerance used in this book means that it also includes metabolic abnormalities, which do have a well-established cause. These are due to defective enzymes (see upper box on p. 75).
The question of what words mean is a key part of the debate over idiopathic food intolerance. At one extreme, you may come across doctors who call this problem ‘food allergy’, using the original meaning of the word ‘allergy’ (see p. 6). (Some of these doctors use terms such as delayed food allergy and masked food allergy, to point up the distinction from true food allergy, but not all do.) Using the word ‘allergy’ in this context causes a lot of aggravation and confusion, so the term ‘food intolerance’ has, for a long time, been widely accepted as a useful one that avoids unnecessary conflict.
You will also hear the term ‘food intolerance’ used to mean idiopathic food intolerance only – this is probably the most common usage. When the term is used in this way, metabolic abnormalities are being thought of as a separate entity altogether.
A new twist has recently been added to this long-standing wrangle over meanings. When mentioning food intolerance in their literature, some of the major medical organisations (those who dispute the very existence of idiopathic food intolerance) now say simply ‘food intolerance e.g. lactase deficiency’. To anyone familiar with this field, it looks suspiciously like an attempt to redefine ‘food intolerance’ so that it means nothing more than ‘metabolic abnormalities’. The idea seems to be that, if you deny a disease a name, it will go away!
In the medical wilderness
The main text of this article is about idiopathic food intolerance, a disease with a distinctly dubious reputation among doctors. Because it is so controversial, few doctors actually look at the evidence that it exists – which is in fact quite strong (see box on p. 77). Such evidence is simply ignored in most of what is written by the major medical organisations debunking idiopathic food intolerance.
This lack of medical recognition is very unfortunate for patients with idiopathic food intolerance, whose debilitating symptoms could be eliminated, rather than simply being treated (usually to little effect) with drugs.
This prejudiced attitude to idiopathic food intolerance also plays into the hands of those offering bogus diagnostic tests and phoney treatments, often at a very high price. These practitioners
– who have moved in to fill the gap left by conventional medicine
– are a considerable part of the problem, helping to give idiopathic food intolerance a bad name.
The waters are muddied even more by the fact that some people who believe themselves to have food intolerance are actually suffering from psychological problems, which they prefer to attribute to food. Many more have picked up on food intolerance as something rather glamorous to suffer from, inspired by all the media reports about food intolerance among celebrities. All these patients are a good source of revenue for the less scrupulous fringe practitioners and are unlikely, therefore, to be discouraged from their beliefs.
Fortunately there are enough conventional but open-minded doctors, often GPs, who have come to realise, through experience with their own patients, that elimination diets have a remarkable curative effect for some people. The ones who benefit are often the doctor’s ‘old faithfuls’ – those with long-term multiple symptoms, who have been referred to innumerable specialists and treated with all kinds of drugs, but who never get much better. The conventional view of such patients is that they have psychological problems that are being expressed as physical symptoms. This may well be true for some – but others have idiopathic food intolerance.
One of our enzymes is missing
Metabolic abnormalities are a distinct type of food intolerance. Unlike other kinds of food intolerance, metabolic abnormalities have a clearly understood cause: an enzyme that carries out a crucial task in the body’s metabolism is either missing or inept. The problem is generally caused by a defective gene and is therefore inherited.
The most common metabolic abnormality is lactase deficiency leading to lactose intolerance (see p. 79) — this may or may not be inherited. Other metabolic abnormalities include:
trehalase deficiency, lack of the enzyme which breaks down a substance in mushrooms and most other fungi, including yeast. galactosaemia, a defect in the enzyme which processes galactose, one of the sugars found in milk (cow’s or human). This is a serious disease and sufferers must avoid milk scrupulously.
fructose intolerance, which is extremely rare. Those affected have an unpleasant taste in the mouth on eating fruit and other sources of fructose, so avoidance is no particular problem.
phenylketonuria, also very rare. Those affected are usually identified early in life, by a routine blood test.
Is it just placebo effect?
Doctors who doubt the very existence of idiopathic food intolerance will say that people who recover on an elimination diet are just experiencing placebo effect — a psychological response that operates with any treatment, whether effective or ineffective, simply because people believe that the treatment will work. But this is to ignore certain facts:
• Placebo effect produces a fairly small improvement in most people — you have to be very suggestible to feel enormously better. By contrast, when people respond to an elimination diet (the standard method for diagnosing idiopathic food intolerance —see p. 194) they usually have a sudden and dramatic improvement.
• Most of those with idiopathic food intolerance have had it for years and tried all sorts of treatments. They have often experienced some small benefit from these, probably placebo effect. When they try an elimination diet, they have a response that is in a completely different league.
• The idea that all the different symptoms are linked has never occurred to many people who try an elimination diet — they are often trying it for just one symptom, and are staggered when everything clears up. Placebo effect relies on expectation.
• Placebo effect doesn’t last very long — it fades over the ensuing weeks and months. Avoiding the culprit food usually produces a lasting improvement for those with idiopathic food intolerance.
Symptoms
The symptoms of idiopathic food intolerance come on slowly after eating the offending food, and the foods to blame are often those eaten very regularly, such as wheat or milk. Consequently, the symptoms from one meal tend to overlap with those from the previous meal and people with idiopathic food intolerance are more-or-less unwell for most of the time. It Is usually not obvious that food is at fault.
All the symptoms of idiopathic food intolerance are common ones that can be caused in other ways. And no two patients have exactly the same set of symptoms.
(As far as doctors are concerned, neither of these attributes gives the disease a respectable air.)
These are some of the symptoms commonly reported:
• headache or migraine
•diarrhoea, sometimes with bloating and wind; this is often diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
• in children, stomach aches
• occasionally constipation
• nausea and indigestion
• joint pain
• aching muscles
• a constantly runny or blocked nose (this could be perennial allergic rhinitis linked to food – see p. 68)
• glue ear (see p. 29)
• fatigue and a general feeling of vague ill-health.
Asthma and eczema, triggered by specific foods (see p. 68), can also be part of the picture.
In babies, colic is often caused by food intolerance, including foods the mother is eating which come through into the breast milk in tiny amounts (see p. 202).
Less common symptoms include:
• recurrent mouth ulcers
• stomach or duodenal ulcers
• chronic urticaria (see pp. 50-53)
• swelling (angioedema).
The following diseases have also been linked to idiopathic food intolerance in some patients:
• Crohn’s disease
• palindromic rheumatism (intermittent episodes of joint inflammation)
• rheumatoid arthritis.
Psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, or hyperactivity in children can sometimes be due to food (see p. 80) but it is rare for such psychological effects to occur without any physical symptoms.
Remember that every single one of these symptoms and conditions can be caused in some other way. However, the constellation of migraine/headache, joint pain and diarrhoea is highly characteristic of idiopathic food intolerance.
How might intolerance be caused?
No one knows how idiopathic food intolerance is caused. There are probably many factors involved, with a slightly different mix of factors in each patient. This would help to explain why the symptoms are so extraordinarily varied, with no two sufferers exactly alike.
Although symptoms accumulate over the years, some people can in fact pinpoint the moment when their problems began. ‘I had this terrible bout of diarrhoea from eating too much melon. I lived near a farm and they were free, because of a glut, so I just gorged myself on them. Although I was over the diarrhoea in a couple of days, I was never what you’d call “regular” after that, and the least thing would upset me. Eventually the doctor said it was irritable bowel syndrome. When the other problems began, ages afterwards – headaches and hypoglycaemia and fatigue – it seemed like something quite separate. I never associated them in my mind with the diarrhoea.’
Bad diarrhoea can clear the intestines of their beneficial bacteria, known collectively as the gut flora (see p. 204), and this is probably what initiates food intolerance in such cases. Large doses of antibiotics (as are sometimes given before an operation, e.g. a hysterectomy), or prolonged and repeated courses of antibiotics, given for glue ear or acne, can also disrupt the gut flora and lead to food intolerance. A study of hysterectomy patients has shown that antibiotic treatment before the operation tends to result in irritable bowel syndrome – a common symptom of idiopathic food intolerance – afterwards.
A few interesting observations suggest that minor metabolic abnormalities – a defect in certain detoxification enzymes – may sometimes play a part in idiopathic food intolerance. This is especially likely where there is intolerance to food additives, or where there are behavioural symptoms (such as hyperactivity) or symptoms involving the nervous system (such as migraine).
A third factor that could play a part for some patients are food-derived exorphins. These are fragments of proteins (called peptides) produced by the digestion of food proteins. They happen, probably by pure coincidence, to resemble the substances called endorphins that we all produce for ourselves. Endorphins
are our internal painkillers. They modify nerve impulses in the body and brain, reducing sensations of pain, and improving the sense of well-being. The receptors to which they bind are the same receptors that bind morphine and heroin - it is the intensive stimulation of these receptors that makes these drugs so effective.
Food-derived exorphins may sound like the stuff of science fiction, but they have actually been demonstrated in the digestion products of wheat and milk. They may exist for other foods as well. They are nowhere near as strong as morphine, but do seem to improve mood.
These exorphins may explain the strange observation (made repeatedly, by a great number of initially sceptical doctors) that patients with idiopathic food intolerance often eat huge amounts of their offending food, and ‘can’t live without it’. Often they eat the food several times day, sometimes at every meal. With a ubiquitous ingredient like wheat or milk, this is not particularly difficult - wheat cereal and milk for breakfast, a cheese sandwich at lunchtime, pasta with a creamy sauce for supper, a milky drink and biscuits at bedtime.
Any of these abnormalities is likely to be just one factor in a multi-factorial disease.
Diagnosis
Unfortunately there are no simple accurate tests for idiopathic food intolerance. The kind of tests you may see offered commercially (in advertisements in health magazines for example) are very inaccurate, and a waste of money. Consequently, the only way to diagnose idiopathic food intolerance is through an elimination diet, in which you cut out all the foods you commonly eat, and then -if you get better - test them one by one.
It sounds easy but it isn’t, so make sure you read all the instructions for doing the diet before you start (see pp. 194-7). You should also see your doctor and get his or her approval. Some symptoms - such as severe diarrhoea or headaches -should be investigated by conventional methods first, in case there is some serious underlying cause.
The first step in diagnosis is to decide if a food really is the cause of the symptoms, and the second step is to identify the food or foods concerned.
The first step is crucial. One of the problems with the diagnostic tests that are advertised - such as those using samples of hair or blood - is that they begin with the second step. In other words they assume that food is the problem (see p. 93).
When it comes to the second step, remember that although common foods are often the culprits, almost anything that is eaten can cause idiopathic food intolerance. Every patient with this problem is different in the foods they react to.
Treatment
Avoidance of the food is usually the best treatment for idiopathic food intolerance - however most people do not have to avoid their problem foods for ever. After a while - it could be six months or it could be three years - you can usually go back to eating it again, but in moderation. You must never start eating the food in large amounts again, and it is best not to eat it every day - certainly not at almost every meal, which is the usual pattern for cow’s milk and wheat in the Western diet.
If you find the restrictive diet too difficult, you could try desensitisation treatment (see pp. 210-13). This can work very well.
The patients who should avoid the culprit food indefinitely are those with Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis: a severe and irreversible relapse can occur otherwise.
The evidence
The evidence for idiopathic food intolerance is more substantial than its opponents would have you believe.
One very well-conducted and interesting study involved children with severe migraine who were investigated by a research team at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London. These are children who are very difficult to treat successfully by normal means. On an elimination diet, 88% of those children got better — an astonishing number. Not just their migraine, but all sorts of other symptoms as well, including aching limbs, runny noses, asthma, eczema, diarrhoea, wind, mouth ulcers and hyperactivity. Some of these children also had epileptic fits, and even this symptom cleared up on the diet, recurring when culprit foods were tested.
A notable feature of this study is that, of the five researchers involved, four were deeply sceptical at the outset. Their report notes that they ‘embarked on this study believing that any favourable response, such as that claimed to substantiate the dietary hypothesis, could be explained as a placebo response. The positive double-blind controlled trial… provides clear evidence that a placebo response was not the explanation.’
Other studies with good scientific credentials have demonstrated a role for idiopathic food intolerance in adults with migraine, and for sufferers from irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn’s disease. There are also good studies of individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis and palindromic rheumatism (an episodic form of inflammatory arthritis) who have responded dramatically to avoidance of a particular food. Some of these patients were given several double-blind challenges and showed changes in certain immunological tests, as well as joint symptoms, when challenged with the offending food. This suggests that the immune system could be playing some part in these food reactions.

A blocked or runny nose in Allergy
THAT LASTS ALL YEAR
`Everyone has heard of hayfever, but it’s news to most people that you can have this sort of problem all year round,’ complains Elizabeth. ‘Before we got the treatment sorted out, Benny was “the kid with the constant cold”, and I did notice other mothers looking less than enchanted at the prospect of his coming over to play.’
Benny suffers from allergic reactions to house-dust mites and cats which cause hayfever-style symptoms (26) all year round. This condition doesn’t even have a common name – the medical one is perennial allergic rhinitis – yet it is one of the most common allergic diseases.
Any airborne allergen that is found in the air all year round can cause perennial allergic rhinitis:
• House-dust mite is the number one suspect in most parts of the world. Particles from other insects, such as midges and mosquitoes outdoors, and cockroaches, house flies, bloodworms (used for fish food) or carpet beetles indoors, can also cause nasal allergies.
• Mould spores can be the problem: they are found both indoors and out.
• In some regions, certain types of pollen are airborne all year round (27).
• All pets other than fish produce allergenic particles (even snakes).
• Allergens encountered at work (133) can also produce symptoms in the nose. This is a warning sign gn you should not ignore – it often means that occupational asthma is on its way (132).
Occasionally, the offending substance is being eaten not inhaled. This is less common, so you should investigate inhaled allergens first, before trying an elimination diet (29).
Skin-prick tests (91) will help to identify any airborne allergens that are responsible, but where food is the culprit, skin-prick tests are often negative (69)
Triad and NARES
Diagnosis of perennial allergic rhinitis is complicated by the fact that there are two other conditions – called triad and NARES – which produce similar symptoms and involve the immune system but are not, strictly speaking, allergies.
Triad is so called because it involves three distinct symptoms:
• perennial rhinitis
• polyps in the nose – little fleshy growths that can kill your sense of smell
• asthma.
People with triad tend to collect all three symptoms gradually, in no fixed order, over a period of years or even decades. Many are sensitive to aspirin and related drugs, and almost everyone with triad develops this sensitivity eventually.
Aspirin sensitivity can come on very suddenly and produces a reaction akin to anaphylaxis (101). This can be fatal, so it is probably best to avoid all aspirin-like drugs if you have triad, even though you have not reacted to aspirin in the past Aspirin-like drugs are found in painkillers, arthritis drugs and cold remedies – check with a pharmacist before you buy (151).
If you have asthma, think twice about operations on the nose to remove polyps – they can make the asthma much worse.
The initial letters of Non-Allergic Rhinitis with Eosinophilia have been stretched a bit to get NARES. (This is a medical joke –the Latin word Hares means nostrils.) The problem is caused by eosinophils (19), which flock into the nose and cause severe inflammation. Some people with NARES go on to develop triad.
Collateral damage
Having the nose swamped with mucus can lead to knock-on problems in the ears, sinuses and airways.
If the tube that leads from the ear to the nose (the Eustachian tube) becomes blocked, then fluid cannot drain away from the middle ear. This is called secretory otitis media, or glue ear - it dulls the hearing and causes an unpleasant ‘popping’ sensation. The ears may also feel blocked and itchy, but if children have had this problem since they were tiny they may not complain because they assume that’s just the way ears are supposed to feel. Deafness is often the first sign anyone notices.
Sinusitis is another possible complication, because fluid from the sinuses should also drain into the nasal cavity. With the ouflow blocked, mucus builds up in the sinuses and can become infected by bacteria (30).
Post-nasal drip can also occur with perennial allergic rhinitis. The over-abundant mucus runs down the back of the nose, into the throat and then the airways. This produces a persistent phlegmy cough, which may occasionally be mistaken for asthma.
When the rhinitis is treated effectively, all these problems should sort themselves out, although additional treatment is usually necessary in the case of persistent sinusitis (33).
Treatment
Where an allergen such as house-dust mite or mould spores has been identified as the source of the problem, eradicating it from your house (see Chapter 4) will make a huge difference, and may avoid the need for drugs. If the allergen is unavoidable, immunotherapy (see pp. 164-8) or some alternative form of desensitisation (see pp. 210-13) could be very helpful.
Where drugs are needed, nose drops are best. They get the drugs right to the target so doses are minimal, which means very few side effects. The drugs used are:
• cromoglycate to prevent the allergic reaction before it starts (148)
• antihistamines to block the allergic reaction before it produces inflammation (138)
• steroids to calm down inflammation (144). Steroid nose drops are also useful for NARES and triad. If you are taking steroid drops continuously, your doctor should check the membranes inside your nose every six months. Make sure you put the drops in correctly, especially if you have polyps (144).
If you suffer stinging, burning or dryness, it might be due to preservatives in the drops, not the drug itself (see box on p. 33), so talk to your doctor about a different formulation.
Don’t use over-the-counter decongestant drops: they do nothing to treat the allergy or inflammation, and are little more than a ‘chemical crowbar’ to open up the nose. Your nose gets addicted to them in a few days, and when you stop using them you get ‘rebound congestion’ - absolute and total blockage. It does wear off eventually, but is unpleasant meanwhile. If you are suffering this problem at this very moment, don’t put more decongestant drops in - your nose needs to go ‘cold turkey’ to recover, not have its addiction fed!
If none of the anti-allergy drugs work, but decongestant drops do, then you probably have a non-allergic disease called vasomotor rhinitis. The symptoms are very similar to allergic rhinitis, but without the sneezing and itching. See your doctor again, because there is an effective treatment that uses anticholinergic drugs (see box on p. 156). Acupuncture (see below) can also be helpful.
An elimination diet (194) will diagnose any food reactions. It works wonders for some people with severe and unexplained perennial rhinitis, Including people with such a flood of mucus that they can scarcely work or live normally. You should certainly give this diagnostic diet a try if there are clues that suggest food is the culprit (69) or if no airborne allergen can be identified. Yeast - found in bread, beer and B-vitamin tablets -is quite often the culprit in rhinitis, but it could be any food.
Acupuncture is worth trying, to reduce the blockage in the nose and stem the flow of mucus, because the autonomic nervous system (see box on p. 235) plays some part in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis (and is the sole cause of the symptoms for those with vasomotor rhinitis). For those with severe sinusitis, osteopathy can be good for draining mucus from the sinuses.
Very occasionally, psychological or emotional reactions play a part in perennial allergic rhinitis, with symptoms getting significantly worse during stressful events. One possible manifestation of this is post-coital rhinitis, where sex brings on rhinitis (and sometimes asthma as well). In such cases, psychotherapy should be considered. (But check you are not just allergic to the dust mites in your bed first…)
A nose by any other name…
Rhinitis means inflammation (-itis) of the nose (rhin-). The same Greek word gives us rhinoceros - ‘nose-horn’.