Online Pharmacy - Up to 80% Off Generic Drugs
Compare Prices and Check Full List of Drugs

Posts Tagged ‘eczema’

A-Z Principal Drugs (clobazam - co-dydramol)

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

clobazam A benzodiazepine tranquillizer with the actions and uses of diazepam, but with reduce(] sedative effects. It is used mainly in the short-term treatment of anxiety.
Dose: 20-30 mg as a single nightly dose. III severe anxiety larger but divided doses niav be given under medical control. It is also useful in the auxiliary treatment of epilepsy. (Frkiuni). See page [ 17 and'i'able.5.
clobetasol A potent corticosteroid used as a cream or ointment (0.05%) in the short-term treatment of severe inflammatory skin conditions not responding to less powerful drugs. The application should be used sparingly as absorption with systematic and local side-effects may occur with excessive or prolonged treatment. (Dermovate).
clobetasone A locally acting corticosteroid, used as a cream or ointment (0.05%) in eczema and inflammatory skin conditions not responding to less potent drugs. (Fumovate).
be withdrawn. Clofibrate may potentiate tile action of oral anticoagulants.
clomiphene An anti-oestrogen used to stimulate ovulation in some types of anovulatory sterility.
Dose: 50 mg daily for 5 days a month, repeated if ovulation does not occur, Its use has resulted in occasional multiple births. If pregnancy does not follow tip to 6 courses, further treatment is of little use. Side-effects are hot flushes, and abdominal discomfort; visual disturbances indicate that treatment should be withdrawn. Contraindicated in hepatic disease and ovarian neoplasm. (Cloinid; Scroplictic).
clomipramine A tricyclic antidepressant with the actions, uses and side-effects of inupramine and related drugs, but with reduced sedative properties.
Dose: 30-150 mg daily orally; up to
150 nog daily by im. injection. (Anafranil). See page 128 and Table 11.
clodronate sodium A bisphosphonate used like etidronate and pamidronate in the hypercalcaemia of malignancy.
Dose: 1.6-3.2 g daily as a single dose
I hour before or after food. May also be given i.v. by infusion as a single daily dose of 300 mg for 7-10 days. Long oral treatment is necessary, and serum calcium and phosphate levels should be checked. Side-effects are nausea and diarrhoea. (Hollefos; Loron).
clofazimine An antileprotic agent given in association with dapsone and rifampicin to prevent the incidence of resistance. Dose: 300 Ing monthly; in lepra reactions, 300 ing daily for 3 months. It may cause discoloration of the urine, skin and lesions. (Lunprcric).
clofibrate A plasma lipid-regulating agent used in hyperlipidaernia in conjunction with dietary measures, to reduce excessive plasma levels of cholesterol and
t riglycerides.
Dose: 2 g daily, with regular checks on plasma lipid levels. Side-effects are transient nausea and abdominal discomfort.
It increases the biliary excretion of cholesterol, and gall stones are a contraindication. A myosins-like reaction may occur in renal impairment, and the drug should
clonazepam A benzodiazepine with a marked anticonvulsant action of value in all types of epilepsy.
Dose: I mg daily initially, increased LIP to 8 nog daily according to need. fit status epilepticus, I mg by slow i.v. injection, but apnoea and hypotension, requiring prompt treatment, may occur. Side-effects include drowsiness, dizziness and irritability and occasionally, paradoxical aggression. (Rivotril). See page 136 and Table 15.
Clonidine A centrally acting antihypertensive pertensive agent, now used less frequently.
Dose: 150-300pg daily initially, increased it required up to 1.2 mg daily. Doses of 150-300 pg have been given by slow i.v. injection. Sudden withdrawal of the drug may provoke a I P
hy ertensive crisis.
(Catapres). Clonidine is also used in doses of 100 pg daily in the prophylaxis of migraine. (Dixarit). The side-effects include sedation, dry mouth, fluid retention and bradycardia. See pages 154 andTible 21.
clorazepate A benzodiazepine tranquillizer with the actions, uses and side-effects of diazepam. Used mainly in the short-term treatment of anxiety.
Dose: 7.5-22.5 mg daily, or it single dose of I  mg at night. (Tranxene). See page 117 and Table 5.

clotrimazole An antifungal agent used local]) in vaginal candidiasis.
Dose: 104-200 mg as vaginal tablets or pessaries for nightly insertion. Also used as a 1% cream, lotion or dusting powder for fungal infections of the skin and cars. Side-effecis are local irritation and erythema. (Canestall).
cloxacillin An acid-stable, semi-synthetic penicillin that is not broken down by the enzyme penicillinase, and so is effective in infections due to penicillin-resistant staphylococci.
Dose: 2 g daily before lbod. In severe infeL bons 250-500mg by injection 6-hourly. Now largely replaced by flucloxacillin. The side-coccus are those of the penicillins generally. (Orbenin).
antibacterial action, but when given with a penicillin the antibiotic is able to
penetrate into the cell without loss of
activity. The combination is of value in    33 infections due to penicillin-resistant penicillinase-producing bacteria, including most staphylococci.
Dose: as amoxycillin 750 mg daily, doubled in severe infections, or 3-4 g daily by slow i.v. injection. The side-effects, are similar to those of arnpicillin, but a posttreatment reaction is cholestatic jaundice. (Augmentin).
co-beneldopa tablets of levodopa and henzerazide. (Madopar). See levodopa.
cocaine A local anaesthetic. Still used occasionally in ophthalmology as a 2% solution, often with homatropine.
clozapine A potent but potentially toxic dopamine-receptor blocking agent used in schizophrenia resistant to other drugs.
Dose: 12.5-50 mg daily initially (with care -risk of hypotension), slowly increased to 300 mg daily according to need. A serious side-effect is neutropenia that may lead to agranulocytosis, and treatment must be
Linder hospital supervision with regular blood monitoring. Patient, doctor and hospital pharmacist must be registered with the Clozaril (clozapine) Patient
Monitoring Service to maintain the necessary strict control of treatment. (Clozaril).
coal tar Tile black viscous liquid obtained from the distillation ofcoal. It is used mainly as Zinc and Tar Paste in psoriasis and atophic eczema.
co-amilofruse tablets of the diuretics ainiloricle and frusemide. (Fruinil; Lasoride).
co-amilozide Tablets of the diuretics amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide. (Moduretic).
co-amoxicla A mixture of clavulinic acid and amoxycillin.The resistance to penicillin by staphylococci and other organisms is due to penicillinases such as beta-lactamase in the bacterial cell wall. Those enzymes inactivate penicillin before it call enter the cell and exert its antibacterial action. Such inactivation can be prevented by inhibitors of beta-lactamase such as clavidanic acid. That acid has no
co-careldopa Tablets of levodopa and carbidopa. (Sinemet). See levodopa.
co-codamol Tablets of codeine and paracetamol.
co-codaprin Tablets of codeine and aspirin.
co-darrthramer Tablets of danthron and poloxamer.
cod-liver oil A rich source of vitamins A and 1). It is used as a dietary supplement to improve general nutrition, promote calcification and prevent rickets.
Dose: 2-10 in[ daily.
codeine One of the alkaloids of opium. It depresses the cough centre and is used in the treatment of useless cough. It also reduces intestinal motility, and is useful in the symptomatic treatment of diarrhoea. It also has mild analgesic properties, and is present with aspirin in co-codaprin and similar preparations. In large doses the constipating action may be a disadvantage. Dose: 10 60 mg.
co-dergocrine A cerebral vasodilator, sometimes used in the treatment of senile dementia.
Dose: 1.5 mg daily, but the response is unreliable. Side-effects include nausea, rash and bradycardia. (Hydergine).
co-dydramol Tablets of dihydrocodeine and paracetamol.

A-Z Principal Drugs (bezafibrate - busulphan)

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

bezafibrate A plasma-lipid regulating agent with an action similar to clofibrate, and used in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia not responding to diet.
Dose:daily with food. Contraindicated in renal or hepatic dysfunction. May potentiate oral anticoagulants. Side-effects are nausea, pruritus and urticaria. (Bezalip). See page 146 and Table 20.
Dose: It is given in hypertension and angina in doses of 5-20 nig daily. (Enicor; Monocor). See pages 114 & 148, and fables 4 & 21.
bisphosphonates Substances used in Paget’s disease of bone and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. See alendronate, disodium etidronate, disodium pamidronate and sodium clodronate.
bicalutamide A nonsteroidal anti-androgen that binds, selectively with androgen receptors. It is used with an LH-111-1 analogue such as goserelin in advanced prostatic cancer in doses of 50 mg daily. (Casodex). See page 122 and Table 8.
bipetiden An antispasmodic and parasympatholytic drug used chiefly to control the rigidity and excessive salivation of parkinsonism. It has less effect on tremor.
Dose: 2 ing daily initially, increased, as required, up to 0 mg or more daily. If necessary it may be given by i.m. or slow i.v. injection in doses of 5-20 mg daily. Side-effects include dizziness, blurred vision and drowsiness. (Akineton). See page 160 and Table 26.
BIPP A mixture of bismuth subnitrate, iodoform and liquid paraffin, used occasionally as an antiseptic dressing.
bisacodyl A synthetic laxative that exerts its action by a direct stimulating effect on Ilse nerve endings of the colon.
Dose: 10 mg orally, or as a suppository. Abdominal cramp is an occasional side-effect. It should not be used in intestinal obstruction.
bismuth chelate A potassium-bismuthcitrate complex used to promote the healing of peptic ulcers, mainly by a protective action.
Dose: 480 nig daily for 28 days, repeated if* necessary at monthly intervals. Not to be given with food. It may blacken the faeces. (Dc-NoltalO.
bismuth subgallate A yellow insoluble powder with astringent properties. Used as dusting powder, and as suppositories for rectal conditions.
bisoprolol A beta-blocking agent with the actions, uses and side-effects of propranolol.
bleomycin A cytotoxic antibiotic, exceptional in causing little or any disturbance of bone marrow activity. Used mainly in skin tumours, lymphomas and mycosis fungoides.
Dose: 15-30 ing twice-weekly by i.m. or i.v. injection up to a total dose of 500 ing. The onset of stomatitis is an indication of the maximum tolerated close. Pigmentation of the skin may occur, but a severe close-related, delayed reaction is
pulmonary fibrosis, requiring immediate withdrawal of the drug. There is a risk of respiratory failure during general anaesthesia associated with a high oxygen intake. See page 122 and ‘rable 8.
botulinum toxin complex Botulinuin toxin causes severe respiratory muscle paralysis, but a modified form has a local action. The complex is used in severe blepharospasm and given by injection into the ocular muscle. Response is slow (1-2 weeks) and treatment may need to be repeated at intervals of 8 weeks. (Botox; Dysport).
bretylium An antihypertensive agent, now used on[), in the control of resistant ventricular arrhythmias.
Dose: i mg/kg, i.m., 6-8-hourly. It may also be given by slow i.v. injection in doses of 5-10 mg/kg, repeated as required. Side-effects include nausea, vomiting and severe hypotension. (Bretylate).
brimonidine A selective alpha,-andrenergic receptor agonist. It is used in the treatment of glaucoma when bcta-blockers are not suitable or not tolerated.
Dose: one drop of a 0.2% solution in the eye or eyes twice daily. Some initial burning and stinging may occur, and an ocular allergic reaction may occur with prolonged therapy. (Alphagan).
bromazepam A benzodiampine used mainly
in the short-term treatment of anxiety.

Dose: 9-18 mg daily. Contraindicated in respiratory depression and phobic states. (I-exotan). See page 117 and fable 5.
bromocriptine An inhibitor of the release of prolactin from the pituitary gland. It is used to prevent or suppress lactation when other measures have failed.
Dose: 1-1.5 mg daily initially for a few days, then twice daily for 14 days. It also stimulates dopamine receptors in the brain and is used in parkinsonism, mainly in patients unable to tolerate levodopa, to stimulate any surviving dopamine receptors. Dose: 1.25 mg at night initially, with food, slowly increased according to response up to 40 mg. The use of the drug requires care, as it has many side-effects, including early hypotensive reactions. Bromocriptine is also used in some condi- tions of pituitary dysfunction such as acromegaly. (Pardolcl). See page 160 an(] Table 26.
brompheniramine An antihistamine similar to promethazine, but with shorter action and reduced side-effects. It also has some antitussive properties.
Dose: 12-32 mg daily. (Dimotane). See pate 110 and Table 2.
budesonide A steroid similar to beclomethasone, and used by oral aerosol inhalation in chronic airway obstruction and other asthmatic conditions.
Dose: 200800 pglkg (1-4 puffs) according it) need. A long-acting form (Entocort) is used in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Dose: 9 nig daily before breakfast for up to 8 weeks. Also used locally as a cream (0.025%) in eczema, psoriasis and
dermatitis. (Pulmocort; Preferid).
bumetanide A rapidly acting loop diuretic similar to frusemide, with comparable actions, uses and side-effects.
Dose: 1-5 mg daily. Much larger doses may be needed when renal function is impaired. In acute pulmonary and cardiac oedema, 1-2 mg may be given i.v. Morirxx). See page 148 and “fable 21.
bupivacaine A local anaesthetic related to lignocaine but characterized by its increased potency and long duration of action which may be tip to 8 hours when used for nerve blocks. It is also of value in continuous epidural analgesia. It is used as a 0.25% to 0.5% solution in doses
according to requirements with or without adrenaline. The side-effects are those of lignocaine, but it may cause more severe myocardial depression. (Marcain).
bupronorphine A powerful analgesic, related to morphine, but less likely to cause dependence. Valuable in pain of terminal cancer, after operation or myocardial infarction.
Dose: 200-100 Vg 6-8-hourly as sublingual tablets, or 300-600 pg by i. in. or slow i.v. injection at intervals of 6-8 hours according to need. Side-effects include drowsiness, nausea and dizziness. Naxolone is only a partial antagonist. f *1 enigesic).
buserelin A synthetic gonadotrophinreleasing hormone that indirectly depresses androgen and oestrogen synthesis. It is used in the treatment of testosterone-sensitive prostatic carcinoma.
Dose: 500 Vg by s.c. injection 8-hourly for 7 clays, followed of    bv intranasal mainte- nonce dosesdoseso100 pg’6 times a day. Patients should be warned that an
increase in pain may occur initially. Side-effects are hot flushes and loss of libido. (Suprefact). It is also used its a nasal spray in the long-term treatment of endometriosis in doses of 900 pg daily. Side-effects are menstrual-like bleeding and mood changes. (Suprecur). See goserelin, lcuprorelin and nafarelin.
buspirone A drug for the treatment of anxiety. It acts more selectively than the benzod iazepi ties on serotonin receptors in the brain, but the full response may take 1-2 weeks.
Dose: 10-15 mg daily initially, slowly
in, ceased as required up to a maximum of 45 mg daily. Side-effects are nausea, dizziness and drowsiness. Benzod  must be withdrawn slowly before transfer to buspirone. ( Ruspar). See page 117 and “fable 5.
busulphan A cytotoxic compound used in the palliative treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Close haernatological control is essential during treatment as remission of symptoms may not be complete for some weeks and overdose may cause irreversible myelodepression.
Dose: 0.5-4 mg daily. Side-el’16:ts include pigmentation of the skin. (vIvIeran).

Allergy and Pregnancy

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Few newborns are already capable of mounting an allergic reaction to dust mite. Actual symptoms of allergy may not appear for several months or years, but the essential first

step – making the allergy antibody, IgE, against the mite allergens – seems to have occurred already for some babies.
In situations where IgE does the job it is supposed to do –protecting against worms and other parasites (see p. 13) – this advance programming of the immune system before birth

has definite advantages. A child whose mother is infected with parasites is born with the ability to make IgE against those parasites, even though he or she has had no direct

contact with them before birth. The baby’s immune system has been forewarned of the likely hazards of life in the outside world.
While this is obviously valuable in conditions where parasitic infections are rife, emerging into a carpeted and well-upholstered world with IgE against dust mite already in the

bloodstream is a serious disadvantage, because it can pave the way for rhinitis and asthma. Given the trouble caused by dust-mite allergen, some doctors think that women should

try to reduce their exposure to it during the second half of pregnancy, so that little or none reaches the unborn child. At present it is not known for sure if this can make a

difference to the risk of allergies developing in a child, but it seems plausible.
What is pretty clear, from several previous studies, is that the level of house-dust mite in the home immediately after birth can make a distinct difference as regards the

chance of allergy developing. Minimising a newborn baby’s exposure to dust mite is worthwhile, and the measures needed to achieve this are described on pp. 244-5.
Carrying out these measures will raise the level of dust-mite allergen in the air temporarily, so it makes sense to do the work in the early stages of pregnancy (or – even

better – before conception), rather than expose yourself and the foetus to a tremendous burst of allergen later on in pregnancy. Or, get someone else to do the work, and stay

away while it is done.
There may be other potential allergens which you should try to eliminate from your home before the baby arrives, such as mould allergens (see p. 122).
Pregnancy
First and foremost – don’t smoke while you are pregnant, or afterwards (see box on p. 107). Any other smokers in the household should smoke outdoors.
What about your diet during pregnancy? Certainly you should eat a good balanced diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables. Taking a small supplement of vitamin E, or eating

plenty of sunflower seeds and oil, would be a good idea. Women with a low
intake of vitamin E and antioxidants (see p. 206) during pregnancy run a higher risk of having an allergic child.
Should you also avoid any foods? Food allergens, such as those from cow’s milk, do reach the foetus, passed from the mother’s blood to the baby’s blood via the placenta. And a

few babies are born already capable of making IgE against food allergens. On the basis of these findings, some doctors have suggested that avoiding potentially allergenic foods

(such as eggs, cow’s milk and peanuts) during pregnancy might help to reduce the risk of food allergy. However, evidence from research trials in which pregnant women followed a

restricted diet, and their children were later studied for allergies, does not show any convincing benefit. And in some studies, the women on restricted diets have not gained as

much weight as they should, and the babies have been slightly below average weight at birth. Most doctors now think that dietary restrictions during pregnancy are not worthwhile

– it is more important to eat well and get enough nutrients.
It does seem sensible not to overeat any particular food during pregnancy, although there is no scientific evidence on this point (simply because researchers have not yet looked

for such evidence). In particular, don’t overdo it with milk and milk products. Make sure you get enough calcium, obviously, but don’t force yourself to drink huge amounts of

milk, especially if you have any distaste for it. Talk to your doctor, midwife or health visitor about the possibility of a calcium supplement, if you dislike milk.
Breast-feeding
‘The cornerstone of allergy prevention is breast-feeding,’ according to Dr Erika Isolauri of Tampere University Hospital in Finland.
At one time, this would have been a controversial statement, but there is now a substantial body of scientific evidence to support the ‘breast-is-best’ idea in relation to

allergy prevention. A number of different studies have shown that exclusive breast-feeding, up to at least four months of age, reduces the risk of developing food allergy or

atopic eczema (or both) in the early years of life.
Exclusive means exactly that – no solids at all until after four months (and six months is better), and no supplementary feeds with infant formula, which is made from cow’s

milk, and therefore contains cow’s milk allergens. Unfortunately, it is sometimes far from easy to ensure that formula feeds are not given just after birth, by well-intentioned

nurses on the maternity ward. Given what we now know about the immune system of the newborn, this is the worst possible time to be delivering an onslaught of potentially

allergenic cow’s milk proteins.
Quite apart from the immediate effect of introducing cow’s milk allergens to the baby, a bottle can disrupt the development of a good breast-feeding relationship between mother

and child, and may lead to the early abandonment of breast-feeding.
Why should this happen? Firstly a different technique is needed for sucking on a bottle teat, and your baby may never develop the knack with nipples if given bottles at an early

stage. Secondly, allaying the baby’s hunger with a bottle can also mean that he or she demands less at the next breast-feed – and since the mother’s milk supply is partly

influenced by the level of demand, this can be detrimental. Some experts believe that occasional bottle-feeds can start a downward spiral of ever-diminishing supply from the

mother.
Dr Arne Host of the Department of Paediatrics at Odense University Hospital in Denmark, who has made a special study of breast-feeding, recommends giving a little boiled water

as a supplement during the first 3-4 days of life, if the breast milk supply is inadequate. After that time, the mother’s own supply should increase to meet the needs of her

baby. Introducing bottle-feeds at an early stage can prevent this delicate balance of supply-anddemand from ever being achieved.
Sometimes (though this is rare) despite everything being done just right, a mother’s supply of milk never quite matches her infant’s appetite. When this happens, and the child

concerned is from an allergy-prone family, the breast milk should be supplemented with an ultra-safe formula feed called a hydrolysate (see box on p. 66).
Hydrolysates should also be used for infants at high risk of allergy who, for whatever reason, cannot be breast-fed. Note that there are two categories of hydrolysate –

extensively hydrolysed formula and partially hydrolysed formula. For the purposes of allergy prevention, an extensively hydrolysed formula should always be used because it has

the lowest risk of causing food allergies.
Preparing to breast-feed
Because breast-feeding is natural, many first-time mothers just assume it will come naturally. Sadly, it often doesn’t.
Cracked nipples are a major obstacle. They are the equivalent of chapped hands, and are often caused by the baby not having ‘latched on’ correctly to the nipple. Help from an

expert breast-feeding adviser, right from the start. can avoid this problem.
Because cracked nipples are so sore, breast-feeding can then become a major ordeal rather than a pleasurable experience as it should be. What is more, infectious bacteria can

enter the breast through the cracks in the skin, causing mastitis, which is painful and may require antibiotic treatment: this is not necessarily a good thing for the baby (see

p. 247).
You can minimise the chance of cracked nipples by making the skin on the nipples tougher and more resilient, so that it does
not crack. Start during pregnancy, in about your fourth month. When you have a bath or shower, rub your nipples vigorously with your flannel for a few minutes. After three weeks

of this, graduate to a soft toothbrush, and brush them gently, then more firmly when they feel ready. Progress to a medium, and then a hard toothbrush.
Breast-feeding support groups can be immensely helpful, when you start breast-feeding, or when you feel things are not going right. Some groups have local advisers. all mothers

themselves with first-hand experience of breast-feeding. Having such an adviser with you, watching you breast-feed your new baby and making suggestions, or pointing out where

you are going wrong, can make all the difference. Look for such a group locally, and establish contact with them well before your due date. You may be able to have an adviser

with you at the birth, to help the baby take his or her first feed: this is of enormous value.
Having prepared yourself, you then have to prepare the nursing staff in the hospital where you will give birth, for the fact that you want to breast-feed exclusively. That means

no supplementary feeds from the staff – not even one bottle. The risks of this practice, in sensitising vulnerable babies to cow’s milk, are still not widely known, so you may

need to be persistent and make your feelings very clear. Talk to your midwife about this well before your expected delivery date, and find out what policy the hospital has about

supplementary feeds. Then see the relevant staff at the hospital.
The nurses are most likely to give the baby a bottle because he or she is crying while you are asleep, and they don’t want to wake you. Staff change all the time, so you will

probably need to put a notice on the crib or cot, to be certain that the baby is never bottle-fed while you are sleeping. If this seems ‘over-the-top’, consider the experience

of British researchers investigating allergy prevention who wanted to ensure that a group of newborns were never given supplementary feeds. They put warning stickers on both the

babies’ cots and the mothers’ beds, as well as asking the midwives and mothers to be very vigilant. Despite this effort, several of the babies being studied were given bottles.
Sometimes nurses give a bottle because they believe that the baby is not getting enough milk from the breast. The idea that mothers “don’t have enough milk”, and that this is

quite a common problem, is part of the medical folklore of breastfeeding today. In fact, true milk insufficiency is very rare. Most cases of poor milk supply arise because a

good breastfeeding relationship between mother and child is never established – and supplementary bottle feeds are partly to blame.
It is entirely possible that your milk supply will not be quite adequate in the first few days, but it should increase rapidly. The best thing, if breast- milk supply is

inadequate, is to give boiled water as a supplement during the first 3-4 days of life (see left).
Some preliminary evidence suggests that mastitis may alter the profile of immune cells in the milk, and that this might possibly increase the risk of the child’s own immune

system becoming allergy-prone. A key preventive measure is not to let the breasts become engorged with milk: the build-up of milk can lead on to mastitis. Learning to express

milk (by hand or with a breast pump) will be useful for times when your breasts feel over-full. Talk to a breast-feeding adviser.
Diet during breast-feeding
Pretty much everything you eat works its way into breast milk, though in very tiny amounts.
The food molecules that get through into breast milk can certainly affect babies who are already sensitised to a food. Cow’s milk is the classic example — cow’s milk proteins

get into human milk if the mother consumes any milk, cheese, yoghurt or other milk products. Babies who have already been sensitised to cow’s milk (by a supplementary

bottle-feed, for example, or even in the womb — see p. 241) react badly to the breast milk, unless the mother avoids all dairy products.
What is less certain is whether the traces of allergen in breast milk — cow’s milk allergen or that from any other food — might be capable of starting off allergy or

sensitivity. Are these minute traces enough to sensitise babies with a strong tendency to allergy? If they are, then mothers of high-risk infants might be well advised to avoid

certain allergenic foods while breast-feeding. Some studies do suggest that there is a reduction in food allergy if breast-feeding mothers avoid cow’s milk, eggs, nuts, fish and

soya. But if this restrictive diet makes your life impossible, then it is better to breast-feed your baby and eat what you like, than not to breast-feed at all.
Unfortunately, some babies do get eczema, in spite of being exclusively breast-fed. If this happens with your child, there are a number of steps you can take to deal with the

problem (see box on p. 248).
Treating the gut flora
Taking a probiotic or bacterial replacer (see p. 205) during the later stages of pregnancy, and continuing with this while breast-feeding, may reduce the risk of atopic eczema

in your child.
Weaning — when and how
The key to reducing the allergy risk for babies is to turn that old political jibe ‘too little, too late’ on its head. Research shows that, with weaning, it is ‘too much, too

early’ that increases the chance of allergic reactions developing. Suddenly presenting an infant of three months with a wide variety of solid foods, including potent allergens

such as eggs, peanuts and fish, can increase the likelihood of food allergy and/or eczema developing. Weaning late, with a limited number of safe foods, should be your goal.
At least four months of exclusive breast-feeding, and preferably six months, is now the standard recommendation for allergy prevention, and it is well supported by scientific

evidence.
But how long should breast-feeding continue after weaning begins? There is little concrete evidence here, but there is a strong belief in the medical community that

breast-feeding should go on for several more months, up to or beyond one year of age if possible, allowing the weaning process to be very gradual. The idea is to introduce new

foods one at a time, alongside breast milk.
As well as allowing the baby’s immune system lots of time to adjust to each new food, prolonged breast-feeding may help in another way as well. Recent research shows that breast

milk contains a great many substances which influence the baby’s immune system, nudging it in the right direction — away from any tendency to allergies.
Avoid those expensive little jars of ready-made baby food. Most contain potent allergens such as cow’s milk, wheat or soya. Making your own baby foods is not difficult, and is

the best way to ensure that your child gets only low-risk foods.
Reducing the risk of peanut allergy
Peanut oil, which contains traces of peanut allergen, is an ingredient of some skin creams. Recent research from the United States shows that babies treated with such creams

were seven times more likely to develop peanut allergy later. In the past, concern has focused on traces of peanut allergen that the baby swallows — either in the breast milk

(because the mother has eaten peanuts) or from her nipple cream. What this new research suggests is that peanut allergens absorbed through the baby’s skin are much
more likely to cause sensitisation. Don’t use any skin products if they have ‘Arachis oil’ or ‘Arachis hypogaea’ in the ingredients list — and steer clear of any cream without a

detailed ingredients list. In the same research study, soy formula also emerged as a risk factor: feeding a baby on this doubled the chance of peanut allergy developing later.

Good health is one of the most important things we can give our kids,’ says Martha, now in her sixties with two grown-up children.
`When I see how bad my daughter’s asthma is, and how hard her life is sometimes because of it, I do feel bad about the fact that I smoked when I was pregnant. But we just didn’t

know in those days. Even my doctor smoked. No one thought anything of it.
`I stopped when she was little, because it seemed to me that her wheezing got worse whenever I lit up. I’m sure that stopping then was better than nothing. It must have helped.
`In any case, there’s no point feeling guilty about things now - that won’t change anything. But if I’d known what damage it could do, I would have stopped sooner.’ Martha’s

regrets stem from the discoveries made in the past decade about the effects of smoking on allergies. We now know that smoking during pregnancy increases the amount of IgE (the

allergy antibody) in the blood of a newborn baby - an indication that he or she is at an increased risk of developing allergies. After the birth, exposing a child to cigarette

smoke continues to encourage high levels of IgE in the blood, as well as irritating the airways and making asthma more likely to develop.
The research on smoking is just one part of a worldwide research effort, during the past 20-30 years, into the possible causes of the allergy epidemic. That research can help

parents who are themselves atopic (allergy-prone) to reduce the risk of passing their allergy problems on to their children.
Who should be implementing these preventive measures? Firstly, any prospective parents who have allergies themselves, or had them as children. They are at higher risk (compared

to a non-allergic parent) of producing a child who is susceptible to allergies. The risk is especially high if both parents have or have had them at some point in their lives.
Secondly, these preventive measures could be worthwhile for parents who don’t have allergies themselves, but who come from atopic families (families with a tendency to allergy).

If you or your partner have brothers, sisters or parents with allergies, you are more likely than the average person to produce allergic children.
Finally, if you already have one allergic child - even though you and your partner don’t have allergies yourselves, and no one else in the family does - there is a

higher-than-average chance that subsequent children will have allergies. Your allergic child is a sign that the genes for allergy are there.
Given the important role that genes play in allergy (see p. 8), preventive strategies make a lot of sense for parents-to-be with allergies in the family.
Unfortunately, this is a topic which often generates confusion - some people assume that if a trait is genetic, it will inevitably come out in the child, and that nothing can be

done to prevent this happening. Although that is true for some inherited traits, such as metabolic abnormalities (see upper box on p. 75), it is not at all the case for allergy.
Developing allergic disease is not inevitable unless a child has a very big dose of the genes that favour allergy. Only a few children - generally those whose mother and father

are both badly affected by allergies - will come into this category. Even with these very high-risk children, following the measures described here will probably help to reduce

the severity of their allergic problems.
For most children at risk of allergies, even though they have some pro-allergy genes, there has to be an unfavourable environment to actually produce allergic disease.

‘Environment’ here means everything external that affects the child, including diet, air quality, allergens, diseases and medical treatment. Factors occurring before birth, such

as the mother’s lifestyle during pregnancy, are also part of the child’s environment. It is the interplay between genes and environment that will decide whether your child

develops allergies or escapes them.
This interaction is not a simple one, however, and different aspects of the environment operate in different ways. Firstly, there are some environmental factors that work at the

most fundamental level -conspiring with the pro-allergy genes to make the overall tendency to allergy far stronger. These are factors such as cigarette smoking by the mother

during pregnancy, or excessive hygiene during childhood, which influence the fundamental make-up of the child’s immune system. Secondly, there are environmental factors, such as

early exposure to house-dust mite or grass pollen, which can cause trouble by provoking specific allergic reactions. Note that factors like these will not become important

unless the allergic tendency is already there.
Efforts to reduce the risk of allergy operate on both types of factor.
On the one hand, there are measures such as quitting smoking or easing up on hygiene, which tackle the allergic predisposition itself. These measures are, in effect, trying to

make a Western child’s immune system more like the immune system of a child from a poor rural village in the developing world, whose chance of developing allergy is very low

indeed.
On the other hand, there are measures such as reducing dust-mite levels, that try to stop the development of particular allergic reactions.
Obviously, if measures of the first kind could be truly successful, there would be little or no need for measures of the second kind. But this kind of success is very difficult

to achieve in modern Western society. Although we can certainly improve matters a great deal, and lessen the tendency to allergy, the conditions that would completely reverse it

are beyond our reach at present. So both kinds of preventive measure remain necessary.
In reading the pages that follow, it is important to keep things in perspective, and not feel excessively anxious about your child. Do what you can, but don’t feel guilty if you

can’t manage everything that is suggested here. And if you already have a child with allergies, please don’t feel guilty about things that might have contributed to this. Only

hindsight is perfect, and you no doubt did the best you could, given the information you had at the time, and the many other constraints and difficulties that you faced. That is

the best that any of us can do.

Protecting Children Having Allergies

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

No single factor lies behind the allergy epidemic — the causes are many and various (see p. 20). What this means for parents interested in allergy prevention is that there is no

single measure which will ensure that your children do not develop allergies. Instead there are a great many different things that can be done, each of which reduces the risk to

some extent. The more of these you do, the lower the risk becomes.
Avoiding allergens
Starting before the birth is best, if you want to reduce allergen exposure for your child (see p. 240). But if you have missed the boat with that one, don’t despair – there is

still a lot to be gained by reducing allergen exposure at a later stage.
If you are ridding your home of allergens after the child’s birth, bear in mind that things will get worse before they get better– there will be a temporary surge in airborne

allergen as a result of the clean-up operation, and you will need to protect the child from this. The best strategy is for the child to be away for a few days while the work is

done, especially if you are taking out carpets, furniture or mattresses. Remember to protect yourself as well, if you are allergy-prone (see p. 109).
One of the most important steps you can take to reduce allergen levels is improve the natural ventilation of your home. This lowers the humidity (assuming you don’t live in an

extremely humid climate), which helps combat both moulds and dust mites. Ventilation also flushes out allergens in the air, especially cat, dog and mould allergens. Half the

problem with modern houses is that the airtight seals around doors and windows, introduced to conserve heat and save energy, turn the indoor air into a rich stew of allergens

and irritants.
House-dust mite
Avoiding high levels of house-dust mite in the home is one of the most valuable things you can do to reduce the risk of allergies in your child. Not only is house-dust mite a

powerful allergen in its own right, it may also act as an agent provocateur as far as the immune system is concerned (see p. 12), and may help to initiate allergic reactions to

other potential allergens – such as those from pets or indoor moulds.
Even if you do nothing else to protect your new baby from mite allergen, at least buy a new mattress and pillow for the cot, with ready-fitted allergen-proof covers. Do the same

for the portable crib, if you have one. Choose anti-mite products that are designed for babies and are guaranteed safe – there is a risk of suffocation with some loose covers

sold for older children and adults (see p. 245).
You may want to eliminate house-dust mite from your own bed as well as the baby’s, because there will probably be times when you take the baby into bed with you for a feed or a

cuddle – and times when, as a toddler, he or she just barges in! It is good to know that your child is still breathing air free from dust-mite allergen in these circumstances.
Deal with your own bed as soon as you can. Some doctors believe that lowering your exposure to dust mite during pregnancy may reduce the risk of sensitising your baby before

birth (see p. 241).
When taking anti-mite measures with your own bed, make sure that there is no risk of suffocation to the baby from the allergen-proof materials used. Microporous membranes based

on plastic could, if sucked onto the baby’s face during sleep, cause suffocation. Loose covers on duvets are worrying in this respect. Buy a new duvet with a built-in

allergen-proof cover, for preference, or a duvet that can be laundered at 60°C or above.
All the other measures for combating dust mites, described on pp. 114-17, will help to protect your child. Buy a good anti-allergen vacuum cleaner if you possibly can, and keep

your baby out of the room while vacuuming if you can’t (open the windows too). Make sure the baby only has new soft toys, preferably washable ones (see p. 116).
It is also an excellent idea to reduce dust-mite levels in the carpets and soft furnishings (see p. 117), because children tend to have very close contact with these in their

early years. A crawling baby, motoring enthusiastically around the sitting room floor, is stirring up the stockpile of dust-mite allergen that is found in any carpet, and

inhaling it in full measure. An adult walking around the same room has a far lower exposure, because dust-mite allergen, being relatively heavy, stays near the ground.
The best option is to go for non-carpet flooring, which doesn’t encourage dust mites. Parents tend to worry about the hardness of this, for a baby or toddler. In fact babies are

far more robust than we generally believe, and a hard floor is no problem for a small child who has never known the luxury of carpeting.
If you really hate the idea of your baby having anything other than carpet to play on, the next best option is to get new carpet, so that you start with zero dust mites. You

must then prevent dust-mite numbers from building up too much, by means of good ventilation, or with the use of a powerful dehumidifier (see p. 117).
Although the first year is the most vulnerable time for your baby, you mustn’t let your guard drop too much as time passes. The moment when a toddler moves from a cot to a ‘big

bed’ is sometimes the beginning of allergy symptoms because, after carefully protecting their child from dust mites in infancy, parents then put him or her into a bed with a

used mattress. This sudden exposure to a high dose of
dust-mite allergen can be the start of asthma. Get a new mattress if you can, and put allergen-proof covers on it. Alternatively, put allergen-proof covers on the existing

mattress.
Moulds
Mould spores are another potent allergen, and you should avoid bringing up a vulnerable child in a damp house if you can, because moulds will be growing there in abundance. Some

new research suggests that heavy exposure to mould allergens in childhood makes allergies in general much more likely. Even in a house that is not obviously damp, it is a good

plan to reduce indoor humidity (see p. 119). Carpets and furnishings that are full of mould spores (see p. 122) should be replaced.
Pets
What about pet allergens – should you find another home for your cat or dog when you are expecting a baby? This is a difficult question because the latest research shows that

pets are a double-edged sword as far as allergies are concerned.
A baby with allergic tendencies who is born into a house with a resident cat or dog is more likely to show allergic reactions to cats or dogs some years later. On the other

hand, there is research showing that having a pet in the house reduces the risk of allergies overall, especially for a child with no brothers or sisters. This is probably

because the pet boosts household levels of endotoxin (see p. 21), and generally makes the environment less hygienic for the child, fulfilling the same anti-allergy role as

brothers and sisters would in the early life of a child (see p. 246).
If you are planning to give your child the kind of grubby childhood that seems to protect against allergy (see p. 246), the additional protection provided by a pet is probably

unnecessary. Or, you could view your pet as having both pros and cons, and decide to keep it, while implementing all the other anti-allergy measures described here. If you do

this, ensure that the house is well ventilated (so pet allergens don’t build up to very high levels) and keep the pet out of the child’s bedroom so that he or she is not

breathing huge amounts of pet allergen while asleep. You could also wash the pet regularly (see p. 125) to reduce allergen levels.
If your child begins to show any signs of allergy to the pet, you must then find it another home.
Avoiding irritants
As well as increasing ventilation and eliminating cigarette smoke from the home completely, it may be worth evicting certain specific items that produce irritant gases.
The main ones are:
•    gas cookers (if you can’t afford to switch to an electric cooker, at least improve the ventilation in your kitchen as much as possible)
•    easy-clean plastic wall coverings and flooring
•    materials such as chipboard and MDF, which give off formaldehyde.
The evidence regarding the possible role of these in increasing the risk of allergies and asthma is described on pp. 128-9. In addition, although there is no evidence on this

point, common sense would suggest getting rid of any plastic or lacquered items that have a powerful smell.
Generally speaking, although traffic pollution can act as an irritant, it seems to play a lesser role in causing allergies and asthma than most people imagine. However, it may

sometimes play a part, especially if there are high levels of diesel fumes in the air (see p. 131).
Infections - friend or foe?
A large group of Italian military cadets were recently studied by doctors interested in the causes of allergy. By taking blood samples and testing them for antibodies to common

infections, the doctors could see what diseases the men had been exposed to early in life. At the same time, the young conscripts were assessed for allergies.
Allergies were least frequent among the young men with antibodies against three common infections that are dispersed via food and faeces – Hepatitis A, Toxoplasma gondii and

Helicobacter pylori. Only one in twelve of the cadets in this group had allergies.
Among the men with no antibodies against any of these infections, the rate of allergy was nearly three times as high – one in five of these cadets had allergies.
The doctors who carried out this experiment believe that these three infections are not necessarily important in themselves, but that they identify individuals who were ‘reared

in an environment that provides a higher exposure to many other orofecal or foodborne microbes’. In other words, they grew up in the kind of household where washing your hands

before meals wasn’t considered too important.
This study adds to the growing body of evidence (see p. 21) which shows that an over-clean environment during childhood encourages the development of an allergic disposition.
Those with lower rates of allergy include:
•    children raised on farms with livestock. The more exposure the children have to farm animals, the less the likelihood of them developing allergies.
•    children from homes with high levels of bacterial endotoxin in the household dust (see p. 21)
•    children who have fewer baths, and wash their hands less often (see p. 21)
•    children with brothers and sisters, especially those with older siblings. Some of the protection here may be due to the impact of the mother’s hormones and immune system

on the foetus in the womb: these effects change with successive pregnancies. But close contact with older siblings, and thus exposure to more microbes, probably plays a part.
•    children who go into kindergarten, nursery school or day care with other children at an early age – this is only valuable for children without brothers and sisters
•    children with pets at home – the benefits are much more pronounced for children without brothers and sisters.
The Italian study is especially important because, for the first time, it gives detailed information about the kinds of infections that make a difference in allergy prevention.

The military cadets were also checked for antibodies to measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox and herpes. None of these infections gives protection against allergies – only

infections carried in food and faeces do.
Exactly what practical use you make of these discoveries is up to you. For most of us, the importance of hygiene was so firmly instilled during our own childhood that it is

quite hard to suddenly become more relaxed about it. But do let your children play in the garden, if you have one, and don’t worry so much about how dirty they get. Encourage

them to do some gardening – medical researchers believe that harmless bacteria in the soil may be particularly important in educating the immune system away from allergies (see

p. 21). Let them play with pets, as long as the animals are not carrying harmful parasitic worms (talk to your vet about whether pets should be treated for parasites). Ease up

or, hand-washing and, if this is your first baby, make sure he or she plays with other children as early in life as possible.
A few chest infections do seem to increase the risk of asthma, notably Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). If this Infects babies, it provokes an IgE-reaction (see box on p. 12)

which may encourage the development of allergies. Unfortunately, there is very little you can do to protect your child from this common virus, but it makes sense not to take the

baby to a hospital for unnecessary trips (visiting relatives, for example) because RSV infections are often picked up in hospital.
Taking care with antibiotics
The possible role of antibiotics in making allergies more likely to develop is an exceedingly controversial topic. Before making any practical decisions in this respect, you

must consult your doctor. Never go against your doctor’s advice, if he or she thinks that antibiotics are necessary.
Several different studies have now produced evidence of a link between antibiotic use before the age of one or two, and the later development of allergies, asthma or both. The

best of these studies was carried out by doctors in Oxford, who followed 1900 children up to the age of sixteen. Among children at risk of allergy (because their mothers had

allergies) taking antibiotics before the age of two was linked with an increase in the rate of allergy from 32% to 54%. The more courses of antibiotics a child received, the

greater the risk.
The type of infection for which the drugs were prescribed was not important, as far as the risk of allergy was concerned, but the type of antibiotic did make a difference.

Broad-spectrum antibiotics, which kill a wide range of bacteria, were more risky –suggesting that the depletion of friendly bacteria in the gut (see p. 204) could be responsible

for increasing the allergy risk. Penicillins seemed less likely to promote allergies than erythromycin or cephalosporins.
This research is not widely known, as yet. And because there is a widespread assumption that giving an antibiotic can do no harm, even if it is unnecessary, antibiotics are

sometimes prescribed when they serve no purpose. In particular, antibiotics are often given for virus infections, especially in childhood, despite the fact that antibiotics are

of no value whatever against viruses. Research shows that doctors are sometimes responding to pressure from anxious parents when they prescribe antibiotics – it is difficult for

some parents to accept that a virus infection cannot easily be treated and just has to ‘run its course’. (Although there are drugs that combat viruses, these are expensive and

produce unpleasant side effects – they are reserved for very serious virus infections such as hepatitis.)
Obviously. when a child needs antibiotics to deal with a serious infection there can be no question about giving them. This is why you should always follow your doctor’s advice.

But it is also worth asking the doctor the following questions before giving antibiotics to your child:
•    are you sure that this is a bacterial infection, and not a virus infection?
•    would it be possible to do tests and check that it is a bacterial infection, before prescribing antibiotics?
•    what is the chance of the child overcoming the infection without antibiotics?
•    would it be dangerous to wait and see if the infection clears up naturally?
Vaccination
The same Oxford research team that investigated antibiotics (see left) also looked at the question of vaccination and allergy. They found a link between vaccination for

pertussis (whooping cough) and increases in asthma, eczema and hayfever. However the increases were not large, and a study from Sweden found that whooping cough vaccination did

not have any effect on rates of allergy and asthma. And researchers in Ethiopia have found that whooping cough vaccination actually reduces the risk of allergy in their country.
This is clearly a complex issue. The contradictory results from different parts of the world suggest that the ‘big picture’ is what counts here – the overall combination of

childhood infections, antibiotic treatment and exposure to harmless bacteria such as those in the soil or from animals. Depending on this big picture, vaccination against

whooping cough may push the allergy risk one way or the other.
There are many other arguments both for and against vaccination and, given our current state of ignorance about the possible effect on allergy, these other considerations are

probably more relevant. Discuss the matter in detail with your doctor before making a decision.

Doctors in Japan recently tried a very simple experiment in allergy prevention. They chose babies suffering from atopic eczema who were allergic to foods, but not allergic to

house-dust mite. Dividing the babies into two groups, the doctors put special allergen-proof covers, designed to protect against house-dust mite (see p. 115), on the mattresses

of all the babies in the first group. Babies in the second group were given ordinary cotton covers.
When the babies were one year old, they were tested again for allergy to house-dust mite. Two out of three children in the second group now gave a positive skin test to

house-dust mite.
By comparison, only one in three of the children from the first group gave a positive skin test. In other words, using the anti-allergy covers for these high-risk children had

cut by half the number who developed an allergic reaction to dust mite.
As this experiment shows, even if a child has already developed allergies, it is not too late to bring protective measures into play. Indeed, an allergy problem in infancy, such

as atopic eczema, can be seen as a warning sign to parents, telling them that they should reduce the child’s exposure to allergens as much as possible.
As well as reducing dust-mite levels, you should minimise your child’s exposure to moulds at home by limiting indoor humidity (see p. 119) and cleaning up any existing mould

growth (see pp. 122-3). This will lessen the chance of mould allergy developing.
Try to avoid staying, even temporarily, in any house that is damp or has old carpets and mattresses. When you are moving house, or carrying out any kind of renovation work,

remember that this will stir up a lot of dust-mite and mould allergens. Protect your child by arranging for a stay away from home.
This pro-active approach should not just apply to airborne
allergens, but also to food, in the opinion of some experts. They
suggest that any child with a true allergy to cow’s milk or egg
should not be given peanuts, tree nuts, fish or shellfish until three
years of age, to avoid sensitisation to these potent food allergens.
Pets are a more difficult issue, with both pros and cons as
regards allergy-prone children (see p. 245). If you decide to keep
your cat or dog, always ventilate the house well, and wash the animal regularly if you can (see p. 125). Be alert for your child developing an allergic reaction to your pet –

don’t turn a blind eye to the symptoms, as parents sometimes do because they are reluctant to accept that the child has become allergic to the family’s much-loved pet. If your

child does develop an allergy to the pet, the best option is to find the animal another home as quickly as possible (see p. 124).
Breast-fed babies with atopic eczema
Although breast-feeding is a good way of protecting children against atopic eczema, it is no guarantee. Sometimes babies become sensitised to food, in spite of being breast-fed,

and then they may react to traces of that same food, eaten by the mother and coming through in her breast milk.
Skin-prick tests (see p. 91) may help to identify the foods responsible for the eczema. Otherwise, a simple elimination diet by the mother, as used for colic (see p. 203), may

pinpoint the offending food. Keeping that food out of the mother’s diet will often clear the baby’s eczema.
Sometimes a breast-fed child’s eczema remains severe, despite the elimination of suspect foods from the mother’s diet. In this case, what should be done? New research from Or

Erika Isolauri – a staunch advocate of breast-feeding – suggests that the best option at this point is to stop breast-feeding promptly. Her research team found that breast-fed

children with persistent eczema had a slower growth rate. If these babies are switched to hypoallergenic formula – either an extensively hydrolysed formula or an artificial

amino-acid formula (see box on p.66) – their eczema symptoms usually subside, and their growth picks up.
Is vaccination safe for those with allergies?
The influenza vaccine and a few others (e.g. yellow fever) are grown in eggs and are not usually given to people with egg allergy. Measles vaccine is grown in cells taken from

eggs and may contain a minute trace of egg allergen, but only those who are extremely sensitive will react: there should be resuscitation equipment available for children who

have had anaphylactic reactions to egg and for those with severe asthma as well as egg allergy. Some vaccines come in vials with latex seals that are designed to be pierced by

the needle of the syringe. A different method should be used for latex-allergic patients. Smallpox vaccine (for bio-terrorism threats) is dangerous for children with atopic

eczema.
Never too late?
The role of modern ultra-clean lifestyles in promoting allergies is now well established (see p. 21). If your child already has allergies, it may seem as if these discoveries

have come too late to help —but that is not the case. Some research suggests that the battle for supremacy between Th1 and Th2 cells (see p. 11) — the unseen power struggle

which decides whether a child will be allergy-prone — is not really settled until some time between the ages of five and seven years. So there is still some potential for

intervening right up to this age. Some studies have suggested that the immune system can be pushed away from an allergic disposition at an even later age, right into adulthood,

by exposure to endotoxin, a bacterial product found around livestock and in `lived-in’ homes.
Several research groups are working on vaccination strategies (for example, using extracts of soil bacteria) that might also be able to achieve this. The initial results are

promising and they suggest that these vaccines can even help adults with allergies. Unfortunately, such treatments will not be available for many years. In the meantime, you can

probably reduce your child’s chance of developing new allergies, and perhaps make the existing ones less severe, by easing up on hygiene (see p. 246).
Fresh air and exercise
With the boom in watching TV and videos, and playing on computer games, some modern children hardly go outdoors at all. As far as allergies and asthma are concerned, there are

two big disadvantages to being a juvenile couch potato. For a start, the couch is also home to dust mites in their millions, and secondly the child is not running about and

using his or her lungs to the full. Airways that are never stretched (because the child never gets out of breath) lose their youthful flexibility in time. Once this has

happened, the airways can never be stretched to their full capacity. Some doctors believe that this may make asthma more likely to develop, or help to make it more severe once

it has developed. Inactivity also encourages obesity, which increases the risk of asthma developing.
Getting outside and running around, or engaging in other vigorous exercise, should be encouraged for any child with allergies. Obviously, you should balance this against the

need to protect the child from pollution peaks and (if your child has hayfever) pollen peaks. Children with exercise-induced asthma should use their reliever inhalers to allow

them to take exercise (see p. 41).
Keep the air at home free from irritants such as nitrogen dioxide (see p. 128), formaldehyde, air fresheners, paint, polish and strong-smelling cleaning fluids. These may

encourage new allergies to develop, and can make existing asthma worse.
Medical treatments
Antihistamines may have a preventive role in very young children with allergies. A study of one- to two-year-olds with atopic eczema found that the antihistamine cetirizine,

taken daily for 18 months, halved the chances of the children developing asthma later.
The children who benefited in this study were those with several risk factors for becoming asthmatic. They had moderate to severe atopic eczema, at least one close relative with

allergies, and allergic sensitisation to pollen or house-dust mite, as shown by skin-prick tests (see p. 91).
The cetirizine was taken at fairly low doses and had no bad effects on the children in this study. What is more, it seemed to benefit their skin as well as reducing the risk of

asthma: those taking the drug had less need of high-strength steroid creams. There is some controversy about the validity of these results, so few children with atopic eczema

are receiving antihistamines at present.
No one yet knows if other antihistamines might have the same effect as claimed for cetirizine. Ketotifen, which is an atypical antihistamine (see p. 159), may do so.
Immunotherapy may also have a protective effect. One study, involving children suffering from nasal allergies, found that those given immunotherapy were less likely to develop

asthma (see p. 165). Another study shows that immunotherapy for children with mite allergy halves the risk of their developing new allergic reactions to other allergens.

Elimination Diet against Allergy

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Elimination diet
An elimination diet is a method of diagnosing idiopathic food intolerance (see p. 74) and certain other

forms of food sensitivity where indirect tests, such as skin tests, are unhelpful. The principle of the

elimination diet is very simple. It begins by removing from the body every food that could possibly

cause a reaction, and seeing if this produces a symptom-free state. If it does, the elimination diet

then presents the body with different foods, each in its pure form, to see which ones cause symptoms.
While the principle is simple, the practicalities of the elimination diet can be much more complex, and

it is vital to understand the details fully before you start. There is absolutely no room for

‘cheating’ with this diet – one mouthful of cake is enough to ruin the whole thing. You need forward

planning and a lot of self-discipline, backed up by a good stock of the permitted foods for moments

when hunger overcomes you. Some cooked foods, stored in the freezer in individual portions for quick

defrosting, are a great help.
Doing an elimination diet incorrectly is not just a waste of time. Some people acquire new

sensitivities during the diet, which may make it very much more difficult to do a second elimination

diet. So plan ahead and get it right first time.
The planning stage
First of all, start an accurate symptom diary. This will give you a precise picture of how bad things

are now, before you try any dietary measures. A detailed daily symptom record, covering a period of

about two weeks, can be very useful, whether or not you actually do an elimination diet. It can serve
as a baseline against which to judge the effects of any future treatment.
Before you begin an elimination diet, you must see your doctor and ask if it is safe for you to do the

diet. Read through the next four pages first – the more you know about elimination diets, before

talking to your doctor, the better.
There are some conditions where, although an elimination diet can be very helpful, it should not be

attempted without full medical supervision. Two main causes for concern exist:
•    For people who are undernourished to start with, the elimination diet may be too demanding – it

is difficult to eat enough calories during the first few weeks of the diet, unless an elemental diet is

used as a supplement (see box on p. 196). If you are underweight, or have rheumatoid arthritis or

Crohn’s disease, the possible use of elemental diets is something you should discuss with your doctor.
•    With certain diseases (see list that follows), the testing stage may induce severe symptoms.

Sometimes these can be life-threatening and need immediate medical attention.
Medical supervision during food testing is recommended for anyone with these conditions:
•    Crohn’s disease – testing can bring on a prolonged relapse. Very small amounts of food should

be tested initially, and the quantity slowly increased.
•    Brittle asthma – after a period of avoidance, a culprit food can bring on a severe and possibly

life-threatening asthma attack.
•    Atopic eczema – the risk of reactions is higher if skin tests are positive (see p. 198).
•    Chronic urticaria – occasionally there is an immediate reaction to an offending food. It is

advisable to test foods in very small portions oust a mouthful) at first. If there is no reaction

whatever after four hours, a normal portion can be tested.
Note that an elimination diet is not suitable for anyone with true food allergy (see p. 62). If you

have ever had an immediate reaction to any food, or any symptoms in the lips or mouth, testing foods

can be dangerous. Caution is also necessary if you have ever reacted to a food with violent vomiting

and/or diarrhoea some hours after eating. This could be due to an infection, of course, but such

symptoms can also, very rarely, result from true food allergy (see p. 64). Finally, if you have ever

suffered anaphylaxis from any cause – not just food –the testing phase of an elimination diet might be

risky. Ask your doctor’s advice.
Once you have your doctor’s permission to try the diet, work out how the stages of the diet will fit in

with your life over the weeks or months ahead. Until it is over, eating food made by other people is

virtually out of the question. When eating away from home, you must either take prepared food with you,

or just eat very simple foods – such as permitted fruits or nuts. Think about the practicalities of

carrying food for meals away from home.
Finally, devise the diet you will follow during the exclusion phase (see right), locate shops that sell

the more unusual foods, and stock up on everything required.
You will continue to eat a lot of these foods for the first few weeks of the testing stage, so you may

want to buy extra stocks and refrigerate them for
longer storage, especially if the sources of supply are some distance from your home.
Note that food ingredients in medication could interfere with the results of the elimination diet. For

example, if you are very sensitive to maize (corn), the cornflour that is added to many antihistamines

and other drugs could create much confusion. Food-free medicines are available – talk to your

pharmacist about this initially, then to your doctor if you need a different prescription.
The exclusion phase
During the first part of an elimination diet, you exclude all the foods that you normally eat, plus any

closely related foods. For example, if you normally eat oranges, you should avoid all other citrus

fruits, including lemon, limes and grapefruit, even though you do not normally eat these. If you

normally eat plenty of broccoli, you should omit all its relatives, such as cabbage, kale, spring

greens and cress.
The best way to conduct the exclusion phase is not to follow a set menu, such as the well-known

‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet, but to draw up your own list of permitted foods. This can include foods that you

have never eaten before, and those you eat rarely.
The list should run to at least ten items. One problem with an exclusion phase that consists of only

two foods (as in the ‘Iamb-and-pears’ diet) is that you are bound to eat a huge amount of these foods.

This is asking for trouble if you have a tendency to food intolerance, because you can quite quickly

become sensitive to new foods if eating them in large amounts.
Your list of permitted foods should include:
Some starchy items. These are essential for keeping hunger at bay: try some of the more exotic root

crops, such as sweet potatoes, yams, dasheen and cassava. These are available in large supermarkets and

in small shops catering to Indian, African, Chinese and Caribbean communities. (Cook them as you would

potatoes. In the case of cassava, it must be boiled, not baked.) You can also eat parsnips, turnips,

chestnuts and pumpkin. Tapioca, sago, buckwheat, millet, quinoa and sorghum are other possibilities: a

health-food shop is a good source of some of these. Use rice if it is not normally part of your diet.

Do not include sweetcorn or maize meal, even though you do not normally eat these –corn products are

very widely used in packaged food, and sensitivity to corn is not uncommon.
Several fruits and vegetables that you don’t normally eat. Exotic produce such as mangoes and okra can

help a lot in keeping the diet tasty. Avocados, which are very rich and nutritious, can be included if

you don’t eat them often.
Some protein items. For carnivores, this is the easy part – any meat that you don’t normally eat is

suitable. Consider turkey, rabbit, pigeon or game, for example. (Soak rabbit meat in salt water

overnight to get rid of the strong taste, if you dislike this.) Strict vegetarians have more problems

here, since goat’s milk, sheep’s milk and all birds’ eggs are disallowed – their proteins are much too

similar to those of normal milk and eggs. Soya products such as tofu should definitely be avoided, as

should other pulses initially, because sensitivity to these is a possibility among vegetarians. Quorn,

or mycoprotein, could affect anyone sensitised to yeast, and should not be included. Fortunately the

exclusion phase is fairly brief, so a low intake of protein will not be disastrous. Including some nuts

on your list of permitted foods will help, as these contain protein. If nuts are part of your normal

diet, you may have to resort to rarely eaten kinds such as macadamias, cashews or pistachios.
Elemental diets
An elemental diet is a powder that contains all the nutrients the human body needs but is free from the

substances in food that provoke allergic and intolerance reactions. It is mixed with water to create a

complete substitute for food. Originally designed for space travel, this totally synthetic form of

sustenance is also known as ‘the astronaut’s diet’.
Used alone during the exclusion phase, elemental diets are the basis for the ultimate – and

theoretically foolproof – elimination diet. They sustain you through the exclusion phase, and continue

to provide your basic diet during the testing phase.
For anyone with multiple food sensitivity, using an elemental diet circumvents the problem of finding

ten or more safe foods with which the elimination diet can begin.
Those who are underweight can also benefit from using an elemental diet, simply as a calorie-boosting

supplement during the exclusion phase and testing phase.
Unfortunately, elemental diets taste fairly unpleasant and are quite expensive. You
may need a prescription, so talk to your doctor. Ideally you should get an elemental diet that does not

contain sucrose (sugar).
Some items that make good snacks. Nuts, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, fresh fruit and dried fruit are

all useful for times when you are away from home, or feel hungry between meals. At the outset of the

diet, use only unsulphured dried fruit –available from health-food shops. At a later stage, you can

test ordinary dried fruit (all of which is treated with sulphur preservatives – see box on p. 207).
A cooking oil, preferably one that you have not used much in the past. Use this fairly liberally, to

keep the calorie content of your diet at a reasonable level
Note that this is a very plain diet – you eat the permitted foods and absolutely nothing else. You

cannot use spices, herbs or other flavourings. Salt is allowed, but sugar is out, as are tea, coffee,

alcohol and all soft drinks. You must drink only mineral water and pure juices from permitted fruits.
Don’t use canned or packaged versions of the permitted foods. Buy raw food and cook it yourself. The

idea is to avoid food additives and other contaminants, such as those from the linings of cans.
Throughout this phase, and the next, you must be very careful not to eat too much of any one food.

Never eat any food every day, and stay away from any food that you begin to develop a real passion for

– this is always a bad sign in people with food intolerance. It is better to go a little hungry

(assuming you are not underweight to start with) rather than binge on any of the permitted foods.

Acquiring new sensitivities is all too easy.
Assuming you do have food intolerance, and you have excluded all the foods that affect you, there

should be a complete clearance of symptoms within 7-10 days. The response is usually unmistakable. A

partial or slight response is probably just a coincidence, and should be discounted, except for those

with rheumatoid arthritis (see below).
Be warned that you may feel a great deal worse before you get better. For those who do have idiopathic

food intolerance, the first 5-6 days of the diet can be very unpleasant – usually they suffer the same

symptoms as before the diet, but far more severe.
Some conditions, such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, may require a longer exclusion

phase, but there is no point in continuing beyond three weeks. Bear in mind that long-term structural

damage to arthritic joints may prevent a complete recovery. A partial but sustained improvement in the

joints, accompanied by a distinct improvement in general health, suggests that food could well be

playing a part in causing the disease, and that it is worth going on to the testing phase.
Symptoms that are only intermittent, such as chronic urticaria or migraine, pose a special problem. You

need to decide, before starting the diet, how long the exclusion phase should continue in order to give

you a clear sign that your state of health is improved. A symptom diary is vital here. If, for example,

your symptom diary shows that you sometimes have a week that is symptom-free but you never get through

two weeks without an attack, then your exclusion phase should continue for two weeks.
You should only go on to the testing phase if you improve during the exclusion phase. If you do not

improve, you have excluded the possibility of food intolerance, and can give up the diet.
The testing phase
This part of the diet, which is sometimes called the reintroduction phase, takes about eight weeks. It

requires careful observation of your symptoms, and constant self-discipline about everything you eat.

You should not stop or delay the testing unless you are ill – it is vitally important to complete it as

quickly as possible.
Foods have to be reintroduced one at a time, with a space between in which symptoms can be observed. It

sounds simple, but this is where errors can easily occur.
During this phase, as well as noting your symptoms daily, you should also record absolutely everything

you eat.
For the first 2-3 weeks you should test foods that are unlikely to cause symptoms. Start by testing

fruits, vegetables and meats that you do not eat very often normally, but which you do like. If they

pass the test, you can use them to vary your diet. This will make life much easier and reduce the risk

of developing new sensitivities.
Next test foods that you do eat reasonably often, but not every day. Leave the most likely culprits –

the foods you eat very regularly, such as wheat and milk products – until you have established a safe

diet that contains at least 25 different foods. This safe and relatively varied diet should be the

backdrop against which you test staple foods.
The testing procedure changes over time, because your sensitivity may decline as the diet progresses.

During the first eight weeks, you should test one food each day, eating a normal-sized portion for

lunch or supper. A reaction to the food might occur quite soon after the meal, or some hours later. Any

symptoms that occur within the following 24 hours should be provisionally attributed to that food.
Unfortunately, bowel symptoms can sometimes take longer to develop – up to 48 hours. This can confuse

things when a new food is being tested every day.
There may also be uncertainty about intermittent conditions such as chronic urticaria. You may not be

absolutely sure that the problem really responded to the exclusion phase. If so, when the symptoms

recur during the testing phase, this may be due to a food, or it may just be coincidence.
Should there be any doubt about which food caused a particular set of symptoms, cut out all the suspect

foods for now, and retest them after a couple of weeks, using a three-day testing procedure (see

below).
When a reaction does occur to a food, stop all testing and go back to the safe diet until you feel

completely better. But don’t wait too long before resuming testing. You need to get through most of the

testing within eight weeks because, for some people, intolerance to the foods begins to fade after

that.
This does not mean that the intolerance has been ‘cured’, unfortunately. A period of eating the food

regularly will soon bring the problem back.
If you are still testing foods after eight weeks, you must change to three-day testing – eat a normal

portion of the food every day for three days, stopping only if you get symptoms. Should you have no

reaction to the food by the end of the fourth day, you can consider it safe. (But leave it out of your

diet for at least another four days.)
There are some special procedures for testing certain foods:
•    When you test wheat, even if it is quite early on, use the three-day test procedure (see

above). Reactions to wheat can be very slow. (If you have rheumatoid arthritis, you should spend a full

five days testing wheat, and eat it at least twice a day.) Don’t use bread to test wheat because this

also contains yeast and other ingredients. Use a pure wheat cereal such as Shredded Wheat – moisten it

with fruit juice if you cannot have milk. Note that some people who react to whole-wheat are sensitive

to the wheat germ, and can tolerate refined wheat, as in white bread and flour. For others only white

flour is a problem – they are usually reacting to additives in the white flour. Careful testing will

sort out these issues.
•    Test milk before cheese and butter. You may react to one but not the others. If you react to

fresh milk, wait a few weeks, then test evaporated milk. Later, you can test goat’s milk and then

sheep’s milk. Some people can tolerate these, but must be very careful not to consume too much of them.
•    You can test yeast using Marmite or yeast-based B-vitamin tablets. Do this before you test

mushrooms, •    At some point, test a canned food. This is to check for reactions to the lining

material used on cans. Choose something that contains no other ingredients or additives, such as

carrots. Test it first in a frozen or fresh form, so that you are sure you don’t have a reaction to the

food itself.
•    Throughout the testing period, continue with cooking all your own food from scratch. At a

fairly late stage in the testing, when you have tested most foods, spend three days eating packaged

food. The idea is to eat a wide range of different food additives all at once. Read the labels

carefully (see p. 172) to check that all the food ingredients are ones which you have already tested

and found safe. You are unlikely to react to these packaged foods, but if you do, you should then

conduct tests with all the individual food additives. You may need some help from a dietitian for this

(see p. 201).
Testing becomes more and more uncertain after 12 weeks. If you
have not completed it by then, reintroduce all the untested foods.
Should your symptoms come back, cut out all those foods again,
then test them individually.
What next?
For anyone who recovers during an elimination diet, and successfully identifies their problem foods, a

period of complete abstinence from those foods follows. After about a year, it is worth testing the

foods again, as the sensitivity may have subsided. (Don’t do this if you have rheumatoid arthritis –

see p. 23.)
If, after a year or two, you find that a food no longer makes you ill, don’t go back to your old ways –

remember that you must only eat the food occasionally. Once every three or four bays is a good rule of

thumb for a food to which you were previously intolerant. You might get away with having it slightly

more often than this, but never go back to eating it daily. If it starts to become your ‘favourite

food’ again – the thing you fancy more often than anything else – watch out.
Good nutrition is an important issue for anyone avoiding certain key foods. If you have cut out all

milk products, for example, you should probably be taking a calcium supplement, unless you eat a lot of

other calcium-rich foods. Ask your doctor to refer you to a dietician or nutritionist if you feel you

need help.
An elimination diet for children with eczema
Before putting your child on any kind of restrictive diet, it is vital that you talk to your doctor.

The risks of malnutrition are far higher for children, and there can be serious long-term consequences,

such as stunted growth or impaired intelligence. You must therefore have medical consent and

supervision for an elimination diet.
For young children with atopic eczema, there is rarely any need for a stringent elimination diet, such

as that described on pp. 194-7. Children are usually sensitised to only one or two commonly eaten

foods.
In the case of recently weaned infants, it is enough to simply cut out individual foods, one at a time.

Avoid each food for two weeks, while observing symptoms carefully.
For older children a simple elimination diet, with an exclusion phase which avoids just the most likely

culprits, works well. The foods that you should exclude at the outset are:
•    any food which has given a positive skin-prick test (see p. 69)
•    any food which you think may have caused digestive symptoms, such as diarrhoea, either now or

in the past
•    eggs, milk and all milk products
•    beef and chicken
•    citrus fruits (oranges, lemons etc.)
•    food additives.
If the child’s skin is no better after a week of this diet, cut out the following foods as well:
•    peanuts and other nuts
•    soya
•    fish
•    wheat and maize (corn)
•    tomatoes
•    lamb.
If there is no response after another week, food is unlikely to be contributing to the eczema.
For the testing phase, use three-day testing, as described on p. 197, if you have fewer than ten foods

to test. Use one-day testing if you have more than ten foods to test.
You should begin by testing a very small amount of the food. Wait ten minutes for any symptoms (not

just skin symptoms – the mouth or stomach may also be affected) then give a little more if nothing has

happened. Build up gradually to testing a normal portion of the food.
A more cautious approach is required for children who give positive skin-prick tests to foods, or have

a history of symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract. They are more likely to suffer severe symptoms

in the lips, mouth and throat – the type of reaction associated with food allergy. Emergency medical

treatment may be needed. You can see if there is any likelihood of a severe immediate reaction to foods

by starting with a test on the face, and then the outer lip (see box on p. 23). If nothing happens, it

is probably safe to go on to the next stage – giving the child a very small amount of the food to eat.

However, you should have medical supervision for Rare reactions
Very occasionally, atopic eczema sufferers on milk-avoidance diets develop a sensitivity reaction to

calcium supplements. There is no scientific explanation for this, but it has been very well documented

in two children. Should you encounter this problem, the answer may be some alternative natural source

of calcium: sardines or other small fish, eaten whole, are one possibility, assuming your child will

eat fish. A dietician can advise on how much is needed per day.
There has also been one well-documented report of a child reacting to mineral water. When the water she

usually drank was changed to another brand, her eczema cleared up. This is very unlikely to be a common

problem.
this procedure in the case of foods that gave positive skin tests. If your child has both severe eczema

and additional symptoms (such as nettle rash, or symptoms in the mouth or digestive tract) it may be

advisable to have medical supervision when testing all foods.
Bear in mind that atopic eczema naturally fluctuates a great deal. To observe the effects of trying out

a food, you need the child’s skin to be in a steady state. That means being absolutely consistent about

applying steroids and moisturisers, avoiding (for the period of testing) any stressful situations that

could provoke a flare-up, not exposing the skin to sudden doses of irritants or airborne allergens, and

keeping scratching under control. Be aware of other factors that could muddy the waters by provoking a

flare-up of eczema – such as teething, or a cold (see p. 44).
If certain foods are identified as provoking eczema symptoms, and you decide to cut the food from your

child’s diet, a nutritional supplement may well be needed. Ask your doctor to refer you to a

nutritionist or dietician.
Other diagnostic diets
These diets are not used by (or even known to) the majority of doctors. While some, such as the

low-nickel diet, have been subjected to rigorous scientific testing and have shown their worth, others

have not been tested scientifically. The evidence in favour of them is purely anecdotal – in other

words, doctors have used these treatments repeatedly and observed good results with some of their

patients. That is not hard science, but it is how innovations in medicine often begin.
There are few risks with any of these diets – the number of foods to be avoided is small, and you are

most unlikely to become malnourished. Your doctor should not object to you trying any of these diets,

however sceptical he or she may be about its possible benefits.
Low-nickel diet
This diet is sometimes of benefit to adults with eczema. There are various pointers which indicate that

the diet may help, as described on pp. 55-6.
Make sure that you have absolutely no contact with any nickel (e.g. in jewellery, jeans studs, watches

or hair clips) throughout this diet, and for at least two weeks before starting it.
Ideally you should also stop treatment with steroids or antihistamines a week or so before starting the

diet. This allows any improvement to be easily observed. Obviously you should get your doctor’s

permission to do this.
The diet could take anything from six weeks to six months to take full effect. Some people have a

complete clearance of their eczema, while for others there is a partial but distinct improvement.
The foods with a high nickel content, which should be avoided as far as possible, are:
•    shellfish
•    green beans and peas
•    beansprouts and lucerne sprouts
•    dry beans and lentils (pulses) of all kinds; soya protein and products containing it (e.g.

vegetarian sausages and burgers)
•    spinach and kale
•    lettuce, leeks
•    wheat bran (avoid bran cereals and other products; replace wholemeal bread with white bread, or

eat it in moderation only – you can get plenty of fibre from fruits and vegetables; do not eat

multi-grain breads at all)
•    oatmeal, millet and buckwheat
•    raspberries, prunes, pineapple, figs
•    chocolate and cocoa
•    tea from drinks dispensers (restrict intake of other tea and coffee, and don’t make them too

strong)
•    peanuts, hazelnuts, almonds and marzipan
•    liquorice
•    sunflower seeds, linseed
•    baking powder, in large amounts
•    vitamin or mineral preparations that contain nickel (check the label carefully), Nickel is also

found in drinking water, and absorbed from certain cooking utensils, so:
•    Do not use items plated with nickel (e.g. tea balls, some tea strainers, egg beaters). The

extremely shiny appearance of nickel makes these easy to recognise.
•    Do not cook acid fruits in stainless steel pans, since the acid leaches some nickel out of the

stainless steel. An enamel cooking pot is safe.
•    Minimise the amount of tinned food that you eat.
•    In the morning, run off the first litre of water from the tap, as this may contain nickel

released from the tap itself.
Several other foods and drinks seem to aggravate the skin of nickel-sensitive people, even though the

foods are not rich in nickel. These foods and drinks should also be avoided:
•    beer, wine
•    herring, mackerel, tuna
•tomatoes, carrots, onions, apples; oranges and other citrus fruits, including their juices.
Low-chromium and low-cobalt diets
Skin sensitivity to chromium or cobalt can, very occasionally, result in a tendency to react to these

same metals when consumed in food or drink (see pp. 56).
Unfortunately, both chromium and cobalt are essential for good nutrition, so avoiding them is fraught

with problems. You would need the help of a really good dietician, or a doctor with a particular

interest in nutritional problems, to guide you through a diet of this kind.
The only measure you can safely take at home is to cut down on excessive consumption of these metals,

for three weeks only, to see if this produces any improvement in your symptoms. If it does, that should

encourage you to seek expert help for a more thorough avoidance diet.
In the case of cobalt sensitivity avoid:
•    all canned and bottled beer.
In the case of chromium sensitivity avoid:
•    beer, wine and cider
•    yeast extract and yeast tablets
•    black pepper
•    calf’s liver
•    wheatgerm and wholemeal bread
•    cheese.
If you also have nickel sensitivity, avoid nickel-rich foods (see p. 199) at the same time.
Low-histamine diet
Histamine in food is mostly produced by bacterial action. The majority of people can break down any

histamine they eat, as long as the amount is not excessive (see box on p. 67).
Temporary susceptibility to histamine may accompany viral hepatitis or other liver conditions.
A permanently impaired ability to detoxify histamine is relatively unusual. When it does occur it can

result in symptoms such as chronic urticaria, migraine or recurrent headaches. A low-histamine diet may

help in these cases. All of the following should be avoided:
Very high histamine content:
•    red wine, champagne
•    tuna, sardines
•    Emmenthal and Camembert cheeses.
High histamine content:
•    beer, white wine
•    anchovies
•    Gouda, Roquefort, Stilton and all other well-matured cheeses
•    salami and other well-matured sausages, Westphalian ham
•    sauerkraut
•    spinach
•    tomato ketchup.
If you improve only partially on this diet, this may indicate that you are on the right track

(histamine is indeed the problem) but that the bacteria in your gut are undermining your efforts with

the additional histamine which they generate. You can investigate this possibility by trying a

low-carbohydrate diet, as described on p. 53.
Low-amine diet
Naturally occurring substances called amines, found in many different foods, can have a drug-like

effect on the blood vessels, making them open up a little and so increasing the blood flow. The effect

is usually small, but some people are more susceptible than others. A low-amine diet is worth trying if

you have chronic urticaria or migraines, and have not improved with other treatments. A low-amine diet

can also be useful in atopic eczema: amines in food are not a basic cause of eczema, but they can

aggravate the rash by increasing blood flow to the skin. To begin with, cut out all foods listed below:
Very high amine content:
•    all cheeses except cottage cheese
•    dark or plain chocolate
•    yeast extract (Marmite etc.), miso, tempeh, tomato paste, tandoori spice mix, stock cubes,

ready-made sauces •    cola drinks, orange juice, tomato juice
•    any dried, pickled or smoked fish
•    sausages, pies and smoked meats, beef liver, chicken skin
•    broad beans, spinach
•    sauerkraut
•    almonds.
High or moderate amine content:
•    milk chocolate
•    soy sauce
•    beer, wine and cider
•    pork, including bacon and ham, salami, chicken liver, offal
•    all fresh or tinned fish, except white fish
•    all nuts except chestnuts and cashews
•    sesame seeds, sunflower seeds
•    avocados, aubergines, mushrooms, tomatoes, broccoli, cauliflower
•    olives and olive oil
•    oranges, lemons and other citrus fruits
•    pineapples, bananas, raspberries, strawberries, pineapples, plums, grapes, dates, figs, kiwi

fruit, passion fruit.
Continue for at least three weeks, and longer if your symptoms are normally intermittent. if you

improve, you can then experiment with reintroducing small portions of foods from the second list, three

or four times a week. Gradually build up to a higher intake, but cut back if your symptoms return.
Organic diet
The objective here is to avoid pesticides, i.e. chemical sprays applied to kill fungi and insect pests.

This may be helpful for people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
`Chemical-free’ or ‘unsprayed’ food (crops grown without pesticides) will do just as well as 100%

organic food (which is grown without either pesticides or artificial fertilisers).
The highest intake of pesticides is from fresh fruit and vegetables, so if your budget is tight,

concentrate on buying organic or chemical-free versions of these. If you have a garden, growing some of

your own food will reduce the cost.
You can also reduce the pesticide content of ordinary fruits and vegetables by:
•    Storing them for as long as possible before using them, because the pesticides break down quite

quickly
•    Always peeling them. With difficult-to-peel items such as peaches and tomatoes, pour boiling

water over them and leave them to stand for a few minutes first, as this loosens the skin. Rinse in

cold water, then peel.
•    If peeling is not possible, washing them very well with soap or detergent, then rinsing them

thoroughly
•    Cooking them, as this drives off some of the pesticides; avoid inhaling the steam and ventilate

the kitchen well while doing this.
You should drink mineral water from a reputable source, or use a very high-quality water filter (not a

jug filter).
Additive-free diet
Food additives are occasionally the culprit in chronic urticaria (see p. 53). At the same time as

avoiding additives, people with chronic urticaria should cut out other potential culprits – alcohol,

spices and all aspirin-like drugs (see box on p. 151).
An additive-free diet may also be of value for some people with chemical intolerance (see p. 84).
In the case of children with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), also called Hyperkinetic Syndrome, the

role of additive-free diets is a contentious issue (see p. 81).
An additive-free diet is very healthy but quite hard work. It means making all your own food from 100%

fresh, unmodified produce (you cannot have bacon or ham, and even things like cooked chicken and

ready-to-eat salad can contain some additives; so does most restaurant food). Note that wines, beers

and other alcoholic drinks can contain many additives without declaring them on the label. (German

bottled beer is an exception here.) Baked goods sold unwrapped can also contain many additives without

declaring them.
Stop using toothpaste unless it is an additive-free brand. You can buy such toothpaste from a

health-food shop – or use sodium bicarbonate powder instead. Drink mineral water or filtered water (you

need a good-quality filter for this, not a jug filter).
Medicinal drugs can contain colourings and other additives, so you should try to get additive-free

versions. Talk to your pharmacist about this initially.
Assuming the symptoms clear up, testing can begin, but you will probably need medical help to work out

exactly which additives are at fault. It is difficult to organise these tests at home, because most

foods contain such a mixture of additives.
With chronic urticaria, there is the possibility of quite severe reactions on testing, so medical

supervision is desirable. You can undertake cautious testing with small amounts of tap water, spices

and alcohol at home, but make sure you are in a position to get emergency medical help if you need it.

Aspirin or aspirin-like drugs should not be tested at home. Life-threatening reactions are common in

sensitive individuals, and temporary avoidance can heighten your reaction.

Diets for Re-balancing the Gut Flora in Allergy

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Re-balancing the Gut Flora
The gut flora are a large collection of bacteria and yeasts living, usually without harmful effects, in our intestines. Some of these microbes are acquired by a baby during birth - several of the most useful kinds live in the vagina too, and the baby swallows them en route to the outside world. Recent research shows that babies delivered by Caesarean section take much longer to acquire the normal gut flora. However, they catch up eventually because, like other babies, they pick up bacteria in the months immediately after birth, mainly from the mother.
There are hundreds of different kinds (species) of microbe in the gut flora, with the exact mix varying from one person to another. They eat the remains of our meals, and provide certain benefits in return:
•    they make some useful vitamins that we can then absorb
•    they keep disease-causing bacteria at bay simply by being there, taking up all the potential ‘parking spaces’ on the lining of the gut so that alien bacteria can’t find a foothold
•    they may also aid digestion in some way, although this is less certain.
On the downside, the gut flora also produce toxins, but we have had aeons of evolution to get used to these, and the liver normally breaks them down quite happily. Only if the liver is badly diseased (as in cirrhosis) do these toxins become a problem.
The immune system is familiar with these fellow-travellers and tolerates them, while ensuring that they do not invade the body any further. However, a loss of immune competence, as in AIDS, can allow them to become invasive and cause disease.
Research into the gut flora is a relatively new field of medicine, and most of the studies have been published in rather obscure medical journals. So the majority of doctors are unaware that abnormalities of the gut flora – the increase of some species at the expense of others – have been found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, atopic eczema, irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn’s disease. The relationship between these abnormalities and the disease process is unclear at present: it is not necessarily
a cause-and-effect relationship. The implications, as far as treatment is concerned, are far from clear as yet.
The controversial condition known as ‘candidiasis’ appears to be a particular form of gut-flora imbalance, in which yeasts are overly successful. It is called yeast overgrowth in this book (see p. 82).
Among the factors that can cause an imbalance in the gut flora are:
•    prolonged or repeated treatment with antibiotics; also a single high-dose treatment, as may be given before a hysterectomy operation (see p. 76). These seem to kill off the beneficial bacteria in the gut flora, allowing others to flourish.
•    severe diarrhoea, which can deplete the normal community of bacteria. Usually the effect on the gut flora is temporary, but it can sometimes be long-lasting and may lead to food intolerance (see p. 76).
Additional factors that might contribute to a disturbed gut flora are:
•    a diet that is high in sugar and refined carbohydrates; this is thought to give yeasts an unfair advantage over other members of the gut flora, by providing yeasts with their preferred food
•    taking the contraceptive pill; this is very controversial, but some doctors believe there is a link between the widespread use of the contraceptive pill and the number of cases of suspected yeast overgrowth in young women.
Bacterial replacers or probiotics
Bacterial replacers, also known as probiotics, supply live bacteria to replenish the gut flora with favourable species.
Experimental trials suggest that taking bacterial replacers may be a useful treatment for irritable bowel syndrome, for food sensitivity in babies, and for atopic eczema (including prevention – see p. 243). This approach may also be of value in yeast overgrowth, when combined with dietary treatment (see below).
All bacterial replacers have to be taken every day: the bacteria do not seem to establish themselves permanently in the gut flora. And any benefits from taking them vanish within a few days of stopping the treatment – so this is quite an expensive option.
Unless the bacteria in the product are alive – and alive in considerable numbers – the bacterial replacer is of no value. Refrigeration is the key to keeping the bacteria alive since, after three days at room temperature, their numbers start to decline steeply. Bacterial replacers purchased from a health-food shop may have been stored at room temperature for some time and so contain very few live bacteria. Buying by mall, directly from the supplier, is a good plan: ask how long the delivery usually takes.
Many different brands of bacterial replacer are now available. To locate companies selling by mail order, see p. 255.
The no-yeast-no-sugar diet
Although this diet has not been tested scientifically, it is widely used by doctors who are interested in gut-flora disturbances, and often produces strikingly good results with people who had previously intractable health problems. This is not hard scientific data, but the impressive results with certain patients (see p. 82) suggest that the diet is sometimes worth trying. Those with symptoms ascribed to yeast overgrowth or ‘candidiasis’, especially bowel problems and an itchy anus (see p. 82), benefit most frequently.
The best way to do this diet is to start with a relatively low-key approach (Stage 1). Only progress to more stringent dietary measures if you don’t improve adequately. If there is no improvement at all, even on the Stage 4 diet, then you can be reasonably sure that yeast overgrowth is not the cause of your problems.
Stage 1
If you are taking the contraceptive pill, talk to your doctor about changing to another form of contraception. Although the link between yeast overgrowth and the pill is not in any way established, stopping the pill often seems to be beneficial.
Cut out sugar and all sweet foods, including honey, syrup, jam, chutney, pickles, cakes and biscuits, soft drinks and fruit squash. Note that ‘no-added -sugar’ jam should also be excluded – it is very rich in fruit sugars. Also avoid dried fruits, and change
any medicines taken as syrups to tablet form. Do not eat peanut butter, tinned sweetcorn or baked beans, except sugar-free brands. Avoid sweet potatoes, and any vegetables that become sweet when cooked e.g. baked parsnips, caramelised onions. Your ’sweet tooth’ should be your guide – if it tastes sweet, it’s off the menu. Only artificial sweeteners are allowed.
Not eating sugar is thought to deprive the yeast of much of its food supply. Persist with this diet for 4-6 weeks. If you are no better, or only partially better, go on to Stage 2.
Stage 2
In addition to the restrictions of Stage 1, cut all fruit out of your diet, except for pure, unsweetened lemon juice and lime juice. These juices, plus salads and lightly cooked vegetables, should give you enough Vitamin C – or you could take a supplement.
Cut out white bread and anything made with white flour (e.g. pancakes, pastry, noodles and other pasta). Small servings of wholemeal bread, potatoes and unpolished rice (’brown rice’) are allowed. Your staple diet should be vegetables and high-protein foods such as meat, fish and eggs.
Do eat herbs, spinach and fresh garlic, as these may help to curb the growth of yeast. Don’t eat cheese or anything fermented.
Stick with this diet for at least four weeks, and longer if you begin to feel partially better. If you feel a lot better, continue for several weeks, then gradually reintroduce fruits and other excluded foods – but not sugar, honey, jam, syrup or any other very sweet foods.
Stage 3
In addition to all the restrictions of Stages 1 and 2, cut out any foods containing yeast (see p. 190). Why this should work is not entirely understood (see p. 83).
A response to this diet, even a partial response, is a good sign. Consider going on to Stage 4.
Stage 4
Your doctor must agree to you trying this diet, as it may not be safe for everyone.
Avoid all starchy foods including bread, flour, potatoes, rice, pasta, cornmeal, parsnips, beans, lentils etc. Nuts can be eaten in small quantities, but not cashew nuts. This is an extreme diet which gives the yeast almost nothing to live on. No one should stay on this diet for more than a few weeks: it is only used to confirm the diagnosis, or to get the problem under control before tackling it with other treatments.
If there is any improvement with the Stage 4 diet, talk to your doctor about anti-fungal drugs (see p. 83).

Allergens and Irritants at Work

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

Allergens and irritants at work
Some workplaces have very high concentrations of allergens in the air, especially if proper safety procedures are not being followed. Occupational allergies can begin with symptoms in the nose, such as sneezing, blockage or constant streaming (allergic rhinitis). You may also suffer with itchy or watery eyes (conjunctivitis), a cough, sweating and a feverish feeling. Alternatively, direct contact with the allergen can produce a skin rash (dermatitis) or itchiness and swelling (contact urticaria/nettle rash and angioedema).
If you work somewhere with an allergy risk (see pp. 133-4), be vigilant for such symptoms and see your doctor immediately. These symptoms can be the forerunners of occupational asthma, which is a serious and potentially irreversible problem. Some allergens, such as latex, can even produce anaphylactic shock (a life-threatening allergic collapse).
Skin-prick tests (see p. 91) can show if you have an allergy to a substance encountered at work.
Acting promptly gives you the best possible chance of recovery and is vital if you have occupational asthma. Only if exposure to the allergen stops promptly do you have a good chance of shaking off the asthma. See your doctor as soon as possible and ask for a referral to a chest specialist, so that a definite diagnosis can be made. This is essential if you are going to make a claim for compensation.
Far too many people with occupational asthma are just sent off with an inhaler when they first see their doctor. By delaying the moment when work is identified as the source of the problem, and the exposure to the allergen is stopped, drug treatment can turn occupational asthma into a disabling lifelong problem. Although drugs can be helpful in speeding your recovery once exposure to the allergen
Latex allergy
Sensitisation to latex usually occurs at work (see pp. 133-4), or as a result of having many surgical operations. But latex allergy sometimes occurs in allergy-prone people even though they don’t work in a high-risk job and haven’t had many operations. Some doctors think that if a child with severe allergies needs surgery, this should be done in latex-free conditions, even though the child has no allergy to latex, because of the risk that the operation will sensitise.
Latex can cause either contact dermatitis (see p. 55) or a Type I allergy, whose symptoms can include urticaria, asthma and anaphylaxis. Latex allergy often goes undiagnosed. Once sensitised, you may react to balloons, elastic bands, condoms and household gloves. Latex in the air,
due to powdered latex gloves being used, can be a hazard for someone who is highly sensitive, as can latex traces in food (see box on p. 175). Medical treatment may be problematic (see p. 98 and box on p. 249). Cross-reactions to certain foods can occur (see p. 15 and p. 51).
For those avoiding latex, there are non-latex gloves (see p. 57), and non-latex condoms. Immunotherapy (see pp. 164-9) may be useful in severe cases: it can reduce sensitivity and eliminate cross-reactions to foods.
Other hazards
This article (pp. 132-5) deals mainly with allergens at work, that is, substances which provoke classical allergies (Type I reactions). In addition, there are skin irritants and antigens in workplaces which can provoke contact dermatitis (see p. 56) or contact urticaria (see p.50).
Some of the most dangerous workplace substances are those that bring on asthma but are not allergens. These are usually called low-molecular-weight asthmagens. The most notorious of these are platinum salts, isocyanates (used in cement, in the manufacture of foam, plastics and varnishes, and for spray-painting cars, aeroplanes and boats), colophony (used as a solder in electronics), glutaraldehyde (used in hospitals for sterilisation procedures), and persulphate (used in hairdressing). Powerful respiratory equipment, supplying air from outside the area (see p. 135) is needed if you work with some of these substances, e.g. isocyanates for spray-painting cars.
has ended, they should not be seen as a way of allowing you to go on working with the offending allergen or asthmagen.
If it seems plausible that your allergies or your asthma are related to your work, your doctor should be able to give you a sickness certificate, so that you can have some time away from the workplace, to see if you recover. The medical service at your workplace may be better at diagnosing occupational asthma than your own doctor, but be cautious. In some workplaces they do operate as they should and offer genuinely confidential treatment. But there have also been cases of information being passed to the management, and workers with the early signs of occupational allergies and/or asthma being dismissed on a pretext, or made redundant, to avoid a possible compensation claim. Most occupational health services claim to be independent, but they actually have to earn the trust of the workforce. Before you make any move, ask your colleagues for their views, especially those who have worked there for many years.
Choosing a job
If you have any tendency to allergies, or come from an allergy-prone family, you should be very choosy about where you work. Try to avoid workplaces where there is heavy exposure to allergens, especially airborne allergens which can provoke asthma:
• Bakeries and flour mills, where the allergens concerned may be wheat proteins in the flour, or enzymes added to the flour mix. These allergies can take years to begin.
• Other food-processing works, particularly those dealing with tea, soyabeans, other beans (e.g. gram flour), shellfish and fish (especially if automated gutting machines are used without adequate ventilation). Food preparation and sandwich-making can cause contact urticaria, if there is prolonged contact with a particular foodstuff (e.g. tomatoes).
• Farms, docks and cotton mills – or any other workplace generating dust from plant products. On farms, it is the dust from grain and hay that is often responsible, although mould spores (see p. 121) can also be the culprit. Allergies to mites (found in hay, grain and flour) sometimes occur and eczema is the most common symptom – often called simply ‘grain itch’.
• Saw mills and joineries, because of the wood dust, especially that from hardwoods and from red cedar (Thuja plicata).
• Paper recycling plants, if there is a lot of paper dust in the air.
• Detergent and pharmaceutical factories handling enzymes – these are added to ‘biological’ washing powders and are potential allergens. The risks are less these days, as the enzymes are in granule form rather than powder.
• Factories processing natural products such as psyllium or ispaghula, which are used as laxatives. Anyone who has been sensitised should avoid taking medicines containing the offending substance in the future, because these can sometimes provoke a dangerous anaphylactic reaction.
• Hospitals, clinics and dental surgeries, mainly due to latex rubber, used in gloves and equipment. Although nursing staff and surgeons are most susceptible, other staff including hospital administrative workers can occasionally be affected. Fears about the spread of the HIV virus has led to a huge increase in the use of latex gloves in medicine and dentistry, and a consequent epidemic of latex allergy. The main problem is with powdered latex gloves, which release 15,000 times as much allergen into the air as unpowdered gloves. Unpowdered, low-allergen gloves greatly reduce the risk of latex allergy developing, and non-latex gloves are even better. There are moves to ban the import of powdered latex gloves into Britain. They are already being phased out in hospitals and other medical facilities, but progress is slow in some areas.
• Other workplaces where powdered latex gloves are used, including
Making the workplace safe for everyone
Note that these choices about employment are for the individual employees to make for their own protection - an employer cannot refuse to take anyone on because they have allergies or come from an atopic (allergy-prone) family.
The reasoning behind this is that the workplace should be safe for everyone, as far as possible. As many as one in three of the population may be susceptible to allergies, and it is clearly wrong to bar all such people from major industries. Current thinking, in most countries, is that the focus should be on getting allergens and asthmagens out of the air, not keeping the more vulnerable workers out of the workplace.
hairdressers, dental surgeries, pathology laboratories and police stations. Construction workers wearing rubber gloves are also at risk. Someone who has been sensitised by powdered latex gloves may then react to other items (see box on p.132). Those severely affected can have great problems in daily life and with medical treatment, so anyone with a strong tendency to allergy should strenuously avoid becoming sensitised.
• Factories making or using rubber items may also expose workers to the risk of latex allergy. Anything made by the ‘dipping method’ (e.g. balloons, condoms, elastic bands and gloves) is highly allergenic. Moulded rubber items, such as tyres, are much less of a problem. Neoprene and other synthetic rubber items are not allergenic.
• Chiropody and podiatry clinics, where there is a risk of allergic reactions to the fungus that causes athlete’s foot. It is inhaled on skin flakes from the patients’ feet.
• Laboratories and other workplaces where animals are kept. In the case of mice, rats and other rodents, the allergen is found in the animals’ urine, and becomes airborne as the urine dries. Insects and spiders (e.g, those reared for biological pest control), are also allergenic due to small airborne particles from their bodies. Those working closely with bees (either honeybees or bumblebees, now reared for pollinating glasshouse crops) are liable to be stung frequently, and this can lead to sting allergy (see pp. 60-61).
• Hairdressing salons, where many different items are used that are potentially allergenic, including latex gloves (see above), permanent-wave solutions and henna. The risks of contact dermatitis are also high (see p. 55).
• Greenhouses, where the enclosed conditions can lead to high levels of allergens from plants, moulds and insect pests. There may also be exposure to pesticide sprays or their residues, which can greatly aggravate any underlying tendency to allergies.
If you have ever suffered from atopic eczema, work situations that can bring on contact dermatitis should also be avoided (see p. 55).
Taking a risky job
If circumstances force you to take a job with an allergy risk, observe all the safety procedures that are in place, and where you have the option of turning on extractor fans, wearing protective gear, or simply opening doors and windows, always do so. If the safety procedures seem inadequate, talk to your trade union Safety Representative, or the local Health and Safety Executive which can run a check on safety procedures in your workplace. This will be presented to the employer as a routine check, so they need never know that a member of the workforce has contacted the HSE.
Whatever you do, if you are in a risky job, don’t smoke. At a salmon processing plant in Scotland, 40% of the smokers developed allergies (resulting in asthma) to the fish allergens in the spray from the fish-gutting machine. Non-smokers - who formed the overwhelming majority of the workers - were not affected at all. In United States cotton mills, smokers are affected by levels of cotton dust in the air that are legally defined as ’safe’, while nonsmokers remain unaffected.
Passive smoking at work is also an important issue. A recent US study showed that non-smokers were more likely to develop asthma if they worked alongside a smoker. Your employer has a duty to provide you with clean air. This includes ensuring that other employees do not impose their cigarette smoke on you.
Respiratory equipment
Where respiratory equipment is needed, your employer must provide this, and it must be the right equipment for the job. It should be inspected, tested, cleaned and repaired after each use, and filters should be replaced regularly. All this is your employer’s responsibility, but check that it is being done, and always look the mask over before you put it on.
Two different types of respiratory equipment are currently in use:
• Those that give you a supply of air from outside the work area, either from a compressed-air cylinder, or via an air-hose (airline) supplied with fresh air. In Britain these are called breathing apparatus.
• Those that use the surrounding air but filter it to remove allergens and asthmagens. In Britain these are called respirators. (In some countries this term describes any kind of respiratory equipment.) Ordinary respirators may pose problems for some asthmatics because they cannot breathe in strongly enough to draw sufficient air through the filter. Powered respirators can be the answer: they have a battery-powered unit to help with pulling in the air.
There are government regulations concerning the type of equipment required for each type of allergen and asthmagen. Large companies generally follow these regulations, but small businesses, such as local sawmills, joineries and car-repainting workshops, may not even know about them.
Any respiratory equipment that has a face mask must form a tight seal with your face. Facial hair will prevent this, and so will stubble, so shave carefully. Faces vary enormously in shape, and if your face mask does not fit, ask for a different type of mask or a different type of respiratory equipment. Persist until you get one that’s right for you.
Carry out a ‘fit check’ each and every time you wear the mask. For example, with respirators, you can check the fit by covering the air intake completely with your hand and breathing in sharply: if the mask fits properly, it should collapse onto your face, and remain stuck to your face for several seconds. Look at the manufacturer’s instruction booklet as there may be a specific fit check recommended for the equipment you are using.
If there is any difficulty in breathing through the respiratory equipment, the replaceable filter cartridge or the equipment itself should be replaced. You should also take action immediately if you can smell the substance being handled – but never rely on this as a danger sign, because an extremely small amount, way beyond the detection capacity of the human nose, may be very damaging indeed to your health.
Keep your mask on throughout the work period. If you find this impossible, talk to your employer or
line manager about getting a different kind of respiratory equipment – a powered device, for example, that assists the inflow of air.
No form of respiratory equipment provides complete protection against allergens and asthmagens: there is always the chance of some small amount getting through. This is why respiratory equipment should not be used by those who have already developed occupational asthma but want to stay in their job.
Those who really cannot change jobs (e.g, farmers) are sometimes able to use a powered respirator helmet, which allows them to go on working despite the allergen. But this is not an ideal solution from a purely health point of view. Farmers can also improve matters, where moulds are the source of allergens, by keeping all harvested crops dry and thoroughly ventilated.
A lasting problem
As long as you catch the problem early, and are no longer anywhere near the allergen, your symptoms should disappear completely, but remember that you may still be highly sensitive to the allergen, even years afterwards. For a year or two at least, avoid contact with it again, even in tiny amounts. If someone else in your family works at the same place, they may bring home traces of the allergen on their clothes and hair: ask them to leave their workclothes outside the house and shower on arriving home.
With occupational allergies to airborne food particles, it is possible that the affected individual will later react to the same food when eaten. Experiment very cautiously, especially if the allergen is fish or shellfish.
The allergy may persist long after the job has ended. In one case, doctors found that a woman who had developed ‘baker’s asthma’, while working briefly in a bakery when young, was still allergic to the enzyme additive in bread 20 years later. She suffered an asthma attack whenever she ate bread.

Allergens:House-dust mite and insect pests

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

Because house-dust mites are a major source of allergic reactions they have been studied intensively, and various ways of killing them devised. But simply killing the mites is not enough. Their allergens will remain, and continue to cause allergic reactions for years. The allergens have to be either removed or inactivated — that is, changed chemically so that they are no longer recognised by the immune system.
Tackling dust mite is easier if you know certain key facts:
1 Dust mites prefer humid conditions. They do not drink, but absorb water from the air. When the relative humidity falls below 50%, the mites gradually dry out and are killed.
2 Mites feed on our skin scales, but only if they have been broken down first by moulds. High humidity (70-90% relative humidity) is a particular problem, for anyone with an allergy to house-dust mites, because it favours the mould that suits dust mites best.
3 Dust mites live inside mattresses, pillows, upholstery, cushions and soft toys. The allergens are blasted out when you settle into an armchair, get into bed, or turn over in the night.
This is when you inhale the biggest dose of allergen, or get the maximum dose to your skin. Carpets also contain dust mites, but the numbers are generally lower.
4 Dust-mite allergen is relatively heavy, compared to cat or mould allergens for example. Little of it floats around in the air, and the most significant exposure is inhaling it close to the source — from a pillow, mattress or teddy bear. This is why air filters are of little value for anyone with dust-mite allergy.
5 Dust mites are everywhere, and are carried around in clothing. Even if you could eliminate all the mites from your house, new ones would soon appear. A new mattress will usually be colonised by dust mites within four months.
The size of the allergen particles
The droppings of the dust mite, not the mites themselves, are the main cause of symptoms. The droppings are 4-20 microns in size, but they can crumble into fragments of 1-3 microns, and the tiniest bits are only 0.5 microns across. The pores of mite-proof covers (which really means mite-allergen-proof) should be less than one micron across, and preferably less than 0.5 microns. Dust masks (see p. 109) should also filter out particles of this size to be effective. The mites themselves are much bigger, 200-300 microns long, (A micron is one thousandth of a millimetre.)
The basics of mite warfare
• A temperature just above boiling point kills dust mites and inactivates Der pl, which is the troublesome allergen for most asthmatics. However Der p2, the other mite allergen, is not affected by heat. (Note that the carpet treatments advertised as ’steam cleaning’ generally just use hot soapy water, not steam. Because they leave the carpet very damp, they can increase the numbers of dust mites.)
• Washing with detergent at 55′C (130′1 or above (i.e. a 60′C wash cycle) kills mites and removes the allergen.
• Cooler washes will not kill mites, but will remove the allergen. This can be useful if the mites have already been killed by some other means. Regular cool washes of clothing or sheets will also remove human skin scales, reducing the mites’ food supply. (This is beneficial if you have eczema, because flaking skin adds to the problem by giving dust mites even more to eat.)
• You can buy mite-killing substances (see p. 255) to add to cooler washes, so that the mites are killed - the chemicals are rinsed out at the end of the wash, so are pretty safe.
• Dry-cleaning kills mites and it removes some of the allergen, but the amount removed is variable (20-70%).
• Freezing for more than six hours kills mites. Three hours’ strong direct sunlight in dry air will kill mites living in rugs and blankets. Neither treatment removes allergen.
• Mites hang on to the carpet fibres when the vacuum cleaner passes overhead, and about 65% of them remain afterwards. An ordinary vacuum cleaner sprays mite allergen into the air as it goes. The amount in the air - and therefore available to be inhaled - is three times higher after vacuuming.
Combating mites
Bear in mind that mites are the enemy - not dust itself. A house may be thick with dust but, because the windows are open a lot and the air is dry, it will have few mites. Another house may look perfectly clean, but be seething with mites because it is thoroughly draught-proofed, warm and slightly humid. The mites will be thriving in the carpets, beds and upholstery. Vacuuming and dusting every day, if done with an ordinary type of vacuum cleaner and a dry duster, will stir up the allergens and ensure that the air is full of them. So a person with mite allergy would feel far worse in the apparently very clean house than in the dusty one.
One crucial aspect of a mite-reduction programme is making the air drier - see p. 119 - so that mites no longer flourish.
Most of the other measures - described below - will involve stirring up dust-mite allergens, so the allergic person should not do the work, nor be in the house (see p. 109).
Too dry or too moist?
It is a well-established fact that the air in most modern houses is too humid, encouraging dust mites and moulds. Yet many people fit humidifiers because they believe that the air is ‘too dry’ and that this irritates the nose. Some very good scientific studies have shown it is indoor pollutants plus overheating that is the problem here, not dryness - even very dry air is not irritating as long as it is clean. Should your nose feel dry and ticklish, try to reduce indoor pollution (see pp. 128-9).
It is true that during an asthma attack, dry air does make matters worse, and very moist air helps. Inhaling steam from a bowl of hot water can be used to ease the attack.
The bed
Begin with the bed because this is the main exposure zone. A Danish study showed that just fitting mite-allergen-proof covers to the mattresses and pillows of dust-allergic children worked well. After a year the children had much less asthma at night, used half as much inhaled steroid, and gave better peak-flow readings.
The best approach is to buy a new mattress and new pillows before putting anti-mite coverings on them. These covers keep skin scales and mites out, which should prevent a new mattress or pillow becoming recolonised. The modern covers have tiny pores which allow perspiration to evaporate - this makes them comfortable to sleep on.
These pores are small enough (see box on p. 114) to keep any mite allergens inside, so they will also work with an old mattress, keeping the existing allergen inside. But the mites themselves will also thrive inside (there’s enough old skin there to keep them in business for years) and there is always the risk that, if a small tear develops, the stores of allergen in the mattress will come pouring out again. So start with a new mattress if you can.
Another possible option is to arrange for a contractor to heat-treat the bed, the mattress and all bedding. This is a new specialist treatment (see p. 255), where the bed is enclosed in a plastic tent and heated to very high temperatures. It is designed to kill all mites, even those right inside the mattress, and inactivate the allergen. (The contractor can also do your living room suite.)
If the covers are for a small child, check with the manufacturer that they pose no threat of suffocation. Mattresses and bedding with built-in covers may be safer.
Buy a new duvet (or wash or dry-clean your existing one) and put an anti-mite cover on it. Alternatively, buy a duvet and pillow that can be washed at 60′C (130′F), and wash them once a month. You must have the use of a tumble dryer, because mites will flourish if bedding is not completely dry.
An upholstered bed base will have its own (much smaller) population of mites. Buy a simple wooden or metal bed frame if possible. Or you could enclose the upholstered base in a mite-proof cover, or in plastic sheeting completely sealed with heavy-duty tape.
Wash all sheets and blankets at 60°C or more, or have blankets dry-cleaned – or buy new ones. From now on, wash sheets once a week and blankets once every two weeks.
Get rid of any other bedding such as patchwork quilts or fleecy underblankets. Alternatively, you can wash or dry-clean them regularly.
Electric blankets can be cleared of mites by washing them, and are very useful in keeping the bed free from moisture. This prevents mites from setting up home in the outer surface of your new mite-proof covers, so that you don’t need to wash the covers, sheets and underblankets so frequently. Leave the electric blanket on at a high setting, with the bed made, for at least twelve hours (check that there is no fire risk first). Note that some mite-proof covers might be damaged by this procedure – check with the manufacturer. If you have not yet purchased mite-proof covers, there are some made from Egyptian cotton which can tolerate this level of heat without damage (see p. 255).
Children’s beds and toys
Where children share a room, all the beds and bedding should be dealt with. Even then, an asthmatic child should never sleep in the lower half of a bunk bed, because mite allergens will shower down from the bed above.
Ali soft toys should spend at least six hours in the freezer once a week, to kill the mites. The first time, wash the toys
immediately afterwards to remove any existing allergen and dry thoroughly in a tumble dryer.
A hot wash, or the freezing/washing treatment, should also be used for ‘comfort blankets’, dressing-up clothes, dolls’ clothes and any other fabric items.
Sheepskins, sometimes used for babies’ cots, especial,. New Zealand and Australia, contain huge amounts of dust-mite allergen. It is advisable to discard these.
The next steps
Clothing is often full of mites, especially sweaters, coats and woollen trousers. Dry-clean all such items, or wash using a m –e-killing wash, then store them in a well-heated place so that they are always very dry.
Dandruff consists of skin flakes, and may help to feed mites Using an anti-dandruff shampoo may help. Semen also gives mites nourishment.
From now on, be careful about exposing your airways to dust. Get someone else to empty the vacuum cleaner bag – and they should, of course, do it outdoors. If you are stripping wallpaper, wash it down first to remove dust. Moving house, going into the attic, spring cleaning, turning out cupboards or moving furniture should all be avoided – unless you have a good mask on.
Do not use fan-heaters or convector heaters which churn up mite allergens from the carpet. Seal off any hot-air ducts from centralised heating systems, as these blow mite allergens around the room.
If possible, invest in a vacuum cleaner that keeps in all the allergens, or vents them outside, rather than spraying them out into the air. Make sure that the vacuum cleaner you buy really
What about sprays?
Chemicals that kill mites (known collectively as acaricides) are sometimes useful but have various limitations. They do not penetrate inside upholstered furniture, cushions or mattresses, so make little difference to the total population of dust mites. Even on carpets, sprays won’t reach most of the mites unless you rub the spray in really hard. (And ‘anti-mite’ carpet shampoos are completely ineffective.)
The safest chemical is benzyl benzoate — so safe that it is used directly on the skin for treating scabies infections. It can cause skin irritation at these doses, but rarely does so at the concentrations used in anti-mite sprays.
However, the idea of constant spraying, over a period of months or years, is worrying. Doctors generally advise against spraying bedding, and carpets or furniture where babies or small children play, to avoid close and prolonged contact with the spray residue.
Even more alarming are sprays containing a pyrethroid (pyrethrum) compound. The latter is derived from a plant and is therefore sold as ‘natural’, but pyrethroids are potentially toxic with prolonged exposure, and they quite often provoke allergic reactions too. They should definitely be avoided.
Sprays that inactivate allergen (rather than killing mites) sometimes have their uses. There are two kinds and both should work against a variety of allergens, not just dust mite. Polysaccharide sprays stick the allergen particles together, so that they don’t float about and get inhaled. Tannic acid sprays change the allergen chemically, making it non-allergenic. Because tannic acid is found in tea it is assumed to be harmless, but the sprays available vary a lot and often contain many impurities, so it is hard to be sure about their long-term safety. Don’t use these sprays on bedding.
Carpets and bedding covers with built-in pesticide are also on sale, but are probably best avoided.
does its job well – a lot of machines now claim to be ‘allergy’ vacuum cleaners but they are not all equally good. Very few have been adequately tested (see p. 255). Alternatively, cover the bed with a clean sheet and open the windows whenever you vacuum, leaving them open for half an hour afterwards. After closing the windows, allow the dust to settle for another half hour, then carefully remove the dust-cover from the bed.
For dusting, use a damp cloth and add a few drops of eucalyptus oil which deters mites. Alternatively, use a special anti-mite duster with an electrostatic charge that holds the dust.
Above all, keep the moisture levels in your house down. Ultimately, this is the key to eliminating dust mite. Look at p. 119 and check you are doing everything possible.
The bedroom in particular should be kept dry. Air your bedroom whenever it’s dry and sunny. Remove pot plants and fish tanks. Don’t dry clothes in the room and don’t shampoo the carpet. Avoid using Calor gas heaters, as these produce a lot of moisture. If your bedroom has an en suite shower, fit a powerful extractor fan, or open a window wide during and after showers – or just stop using this shower. En suite basins may also generate moist air.
Do you need to do more?
Give it some time before deciding if you have done enough. In one study, it took eight months for the full benefits of an anti-mite campaign to be seen.
If you are still not as much improved as you hoped, then you could try a more drastic mite-elimination programme.
Thoroughly clean the bedroom, getting rid of any dust along skirting boards or picture rails, on top of wardrobes or behind furniture. Remove anything stored under the bed, so that vacuuming is easier in future. During this cleaning operation, completely cover the bed.
Get rid of the bathroom carpet, if you have one. In the bedroom, either remove the carpet or buy a special anti-mite steam cleaner that kills mites in the carpet and inactivates the allergen. To work properly, the device must produce steam at a temperature above boiling point, by means of high pressure. Make sure you are buying the right kind of device.
If you take out the carpet, you will need to mop the floor, with a wet or oiled mop, several times a week, as the dust will quickly build up, and is easily made airborne from an uncarpeted floor. One of the advantages of carpet is that it ‘holds’ dust at floor level.
Wash the curtains, or dry-clean them, or replace them with blinds of a kind that can be easily wet-dusted. If you have bought an anti-mite steam cleaner for the carpet, use this on the curtains every 2-3 weeks.
Remove dirty clothes from the bedroom, clean out drawers and shelves, and dry them thoroughly. Only store freshly laundered clothes in the room.
Remove all upholstered items from the bedroom, such as padded headboards, cushions, armchairs, or stools with padded seats. Draught excluders, fabric lampshades and anything covered in velvet should also go.
A different approach
If you are even more allergic to housework than you are to dust mites, consider buying a really powerful dehumidifier, designed for killing mites. This makes the air too dry to breathe (its relative humidity or RH goes down to 25%), so you leave it on in the bedroom during the day, with the bedroom door closed. You must eliminate all sources of moisture that will counteract the dehumidifier, and have fairly tight seals around your windows and doors for it to work. In the evening, turn the dehumidifier off and leave the bedroom door open for an hour or so before going to bed.
Of course, all the allergen which was already there in the bed, carpet, curtains, clothes and soft toys will still be present. You need to either eliminate or inactivate this allergen using the methods described above. But once you have got your daily dehumidifier routine going, you do not need to rewash everything regularly because mites will be a thing of the past, so no new stocks of allergen will be produced.
The rest of the house
A completely mite-free house is hard to achieve, but if you are determined, you can come close. Everything so far described for the bedroom, such as reducing moisture in the air, and dealing with carpets and curtains, is applicable to the rest of the house.
The exception – and the toughest nut to crack – is the upholstered furniture in the living room. Fixed upholstery (i.e. everything other than removable cushions) is a safe haven for mites that is especially hard to deal with.
One option is to give all such furniture a specialist heat-treatment, if this is available locally (see p. 115). The mites inside will be killed, and the allergen inactivated. If you drastically reduce moisture levels at the same time – with a powerful dehumidifier used at night, perhaps – you should avoid serious reinfestation.
Alternatively, you could replace all your existing upholstered furniture with leather-covered or vinyl-covered furniture. Both are impenetrable to mites. Furniture made of wood or bamboo with loose cushions and no fixed upholstery can also work. Fit the cushions with tailor-made mite-proof covers (hard to get, but ask around) when new. Then put the ordinary covers on top, and wash these regularly.

Breathing Exercises as Allergy Treatment

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

Breathing Exercises
Breathing is a delicate art, and it is possible to get it wrong, in a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons. A poor breathing pattern can gradually become habitual,

without the person concerned being aware that his or her breathing is at all abnormal.
Allergy and sensitivity reactions sometimes play a part in causing abnormal breathing, and the symptoms produced by a poor breathing pattern may then augment the symptoms of

sensitivity, creating a vicious circle. Correcting an abnormal breathing pattern, by means of breathing exercises and re-training, can produce remarkable improvements in health

for some people.
Breathing too much
Taking in too much air, often called over-breathing or hyperventilation, is the most common breathing disorder. It can produce a variety of rather strange symptoms (see p. 227)

that are sometimes diagnosed correctly, and treated appropriately, but often get overlooked or misdiagnosed.
The primary purpose of breathing is to obtain oxygen from the air and absorb it into the blood. The lungs are a crucial interface here, a trading post for gases that are

exchanged between the bloodstream and the external air. The delicate, moist membranes that cover the inner surface of the lungs are accessed by millions of tiny thread-like

blood vessels known as capillaries. Oxygen from the air seeps into the blood through the thin walls of these capillaries. At the same time, the lungs clean the blood of carbon

dioxide, a waste gas produced by the body’s metabolism. As oxygen seeps into the blood, carbon dioxide seeps out.
That is the school-textbook view of breathing, and it is correct up to a point. But it is over-simplified and misleading if it simply portrays oxygen as totally
good and carbon dioxide as totally bad. In fact, there is a correct level in the blood for both gases, and too little or too much of either can cause problems.
Carbon dioxide plays an important role in the equilibrium of the blood because, when dissolved in any liquid, carbon dioxide makes a weak acid. So the amount of carbon dioxide

present is crucial in deciding the acidity of the blood. Given that the blood reaches every part of the body, it is not surprising that any changes from its normal composition

have far-reaching effects.
Normally, blood is very slightly acidic, and that is what the body is accustomed to. While some body parts can cope with small changes in the acidity of the blood, other parts

respond very badly. The nerve cells are particularly vulnerable to changes in acidity.
Hyperventilation, or over-breathing, has relatively little effect on the level of oxygen in the blood, which is carefully controlled, but it can lower the level of carbon

dioxide in the blood, thus making it less acid. More commonly, hyperventilation just makes the level of carbon dioxide vary a great deal.

When the carbon dioxide levels in the blood yo-yo about all the time, this has some unpleasant effects. In particular, it disrupts the smooth running of the nerve cells, which

is why many of the symptoms of hyperventilation involve the senses, feelings or behaviour.
The symptoms of hyperventilation can include:
•    numbness or pins-and-needles in the hands and feet, occasionally affecting the lips and tongue as well
•    difficulty in swallowing
•    aching muscles, cramps, tremors and twitches
•    sudden loss of strength in the muscles
•    dizziness, confusion, unreal or spaced-outfeelings
•    blurred vision, ringing in the ears
•    headache, migraine
•    breathlessness
•    aching in the chest
•    abnormal heart rhythm
•    sensitivity to bright lights and loud noises.
There may also be some severe psychological symptoms:
•    panic – a brief but intense state of anxiety
•    prolonged anxiety or depression
•    hallucinations, although this is rare
•    mood swings and phobias, most frequently a fear of dying. The irrational conviction that death is imminent can be overwhelming, even in someone who is young and

apparently in good health.
Each of these symptoms can, of course, be caused in several other ways, but when this whole cluster of symptoms – or a large number of them –occurs together in an individual,

that person is very likely to be a hyperventilator.
When there are short self-contained bursts of hyperventilation, the effects are often described as a panic attack. Doctors usually have no trouble recognising this problem, but

– not surprisingly – are often misled by the sustained psychological symptoms of chronic (long-term) hyperventilation. Many people with chronic hyperventilation are diagnosed as

having some kind of mental illness, and they may go for years without getting the right diagnosis.
Hyperventilation and sensitivity reactions The link between sensitivity reactions and hyperventilation seems to be a complex one. Unfortunately, very little research has been

done in this area, so what follows is based on the case-histories of patients, and the collective experience of doctors, not on hard scientific data.
In some cases, a sensitivity reaction may
directly provoke a change in breathing pattern. This
is what appears to happen for some people with
caffeine sensitivity. Cutting out all caffeine-con-
taining drinks (coffee, tea and colas) seems to put a
stop to the hyperventilation symptoms, because the
multiple symptoms promptly disappear (see p. 235).
In other cases, a severe sensitivity problem such
as multiple chemical intolerance results in an anxious
state of mind, and the anxiety leads to hyperventi-
lation. Hyperventilation, pure and simple, may also
masquerade as chemical intolerance (see p. 236).
Wheezy as a mountain breeze
Ionisers — devices that supposedly turn indoor urban air into a fresh mountain breeze — are often promoted as alternative devices that can clear allergens from the air. They do

remove some allergens, but in the case of asthma, research shows that some ionisers can actually make symptoms worse, by generating ozone which irritates the airways. It is

usually the cheaper ionisers that do this. More expensive models are less likely to produce ozone, but they are unlikely to help either. Several scientific trials show that

ionisers have no significant benefits when used by asthmatics.
Hyperventilation and asthma
While hyperventilation can develop in anyone, asthmatics are particularly vulnerable. During an asthma attack, especially a severe one, developing an abnormal breathing pattern

is an entirely understandable reaction. In an attempt to get more air, you may start breathing more rapidly and taking air into the upper chest, using the accessory muscles of

breathing (see p. 230). These muscles should not normally be used when you are at rest — they exist to give you extra breathing capacity when running fast.
As long as the asthma attack lasts, this forced breathing does no harm, because its effects are cancelled out by the narrowing of the airways. But if this over-breathing

persists after the attack has ended, then too much air is going in and out of the lungs, so carbon dioxide levels in the blood begin to fall.
Simply feeling anxious can also trigger off rapid upper-chest breathing. If you get very worried when an asthma attack starts, you may begin hyperventilating just out of

anxiety.
For asthmatics, in addition to the usual symptoms of hyperventilation (see p. 227) there are some subtle effects of hyperventilation that can make asthma worse:
•    The airway muscles (and all other muscles that are not under voluntary control) contract slightly when carbon dioxide levels in the blood fall.
•    Mast cells are quicker to degranulate (see box on p.12) when
there is less carbon dioxide, and this triggers allergic symptoms. Just to complicate matters, one of the symptoms of hyperventilation is breathlessness. Sometimes this is the

most prominent symptom in non-asthmatic hyperventilators, and the doctor overlooks the other symptoms and gives a diagnosis of asthma. In such cases, people are told they have

asthma when they are actually suffering from hyperventilation alone.
Testing for hyperventilation
You can do two simple tests for hyperventilation at home, if you think that it could be playing a part in your symptoms. (If you are asthmatic, only do these tests when you have

no asthma symptoms and your peak-flow reading is good. Make sure your reliever inhaler is nearby, in case of a bad reaction to the test.)
The first test should be done when you have some symptoms that might indicate hyperventilation (see p. 227).
Find a clean paper bag and hold it over your nose and mouth while breathing normally. Any symptoms that are due to hyperventilation should clear up, because, by re-Inhaling the

air that you have just breathed out, you will increase the level of carbon dioxide in your blood.
The second test is done when you don’t have any of the symptoms listed for hyperventilation.
Speed up your breathing, and inflate your upper chest with each breath. Do this for a few minutes. Do any of your usual symptoms appear? If they do, this suggests that they may

be caused by hyperventilation.
If either of these tests indicates hyperventilation, make an appointment to see your doctor. It is important that you should have a proper medical diagnosis, so that you get the

right professional treatment.
Treating hyperventilation
If you hyperventilate, you could be taught a more healthy breathing pattern by a physiotherapist — ask your doctor for a referral. Certain complementary therapists, such as

osteopaths and Feldenkrais practitioners, can also teach good breathing patterns, and so can experienced yoga teachers (see p. 224). A teacher or therapist who works at a

relaxed pace, is not too dogmatic, and helps you to find your own way to healthy breathing, is preferable to one who tries to impose a regimented breathing pattern on you.
On the assumption that most hyperventilators don’t just over-breathe, but also breathe with their upper chest and under-use the diaphragm (see pp. 229-230), all these different

practitioners will take a combined approach — tackling both sides of the problem at once. This represents an important difference from the Buteykc, method (see below).
The Buteyko method
The stated aim of the Buteyko method (also called the Buteyko treatment) is to stop people from hyperventilating. However, Buteykc, practitioners do not work with people who

have the symptoms of hyperventilation, as recognised by conventional medicine (see p. 227). Instead they work with asthmatics — any asthmatics, not just those whose symptoms

suggest that they might be hyperventilators.
The rationale for this is the claim, by the originator of the exercises, Professor Konstantin Buteyko, that asthma is actually caused by hyperventilation. (What is more,

Professor Buteyko cites hyperventilation as the cause of no fewer than 150 different diseases, including allergies, eczema, migraines, insomnia, bronchitis, high blood pressure

and haemorrhoids. However, his treatment is only marketed for asthma.)
The claims made for the success of the Buteyko method in treating asthma are startling. According to one training centre, it can get 97% of asthmatics off most of their drugs

and able to control attacks within a week of starting.
Not surprisingly, this is a bit of an exaggeration. But the real achievements of the Buteykc, method are still quite impressive: an Australian research study showed that during

the course of Buteyko lessons, the overall use of reliever inhalers (e. g. Ventolin) fell substantially and remained relatively low three months later. However, the patients’

average peak flow stayed the same, and 15% of those studied were admitted to hospital with a severe asthma attack during the trial. In the eight months that followed, 30% needed

a course of steroid tablets – indicating a substantial worsening in their condition. In other words, the Buteyko method can give some help to many asthmatics, but the claim that

it can get almost everyone off asthma drugs and free of asthma is just hype.
Professor Buteyko’s claim to have discovered the fundamental cause of asthma is clearly untrue. What he seems to have discovered is that there are many more hyperventilators

among asthmatics than was widely realised, and that they generally show no obvious symptoms of hyperventilation. His other important contribution is to suggest that

mouth-breathing may create a lot more problems for asthmatics than previously recognised.
The Buteyko method has three aspects:
•    unblocking the nose
•    training to breathe through the nose, not the mouth
•    training to take fewer breaths and pause between breaths. Unlike other treatments for hyperventilation (both conventional and alternative), the original Buteyko method

pays no attention to teaching asthmatics to breathe with the diaphragm. However, a few Buteyko practitioners are now beginning to incorporate this aspect of treatment.
If you decide you would like to try the Buteyko method, there are several different options. Classes are the most expensive route, with very high fees being charged. There are

video cassettes you can buy, which are less expensive. Alternatively, there are various books, which are much less costly, and which explain how to do the exercises (see p.

255).
Whichever option you choose, it is vital that you get your doctor’s permission before starting. Ensure that your reliever inhaler is in your pocket while doing the exercises,

because they could provoke an asthma attack. Keep taking your preventer drugs regularly throughout the treatment. If you start to feel much better and want to reduce your dose

of preventer, you must talk to your doctor first.
Don’t follow the Buteyko method blindly, because some of the advice given is dangerous. For example, some Buteyko publications advise you to refuse oxygen if you are taken to

hospital with a severe asthma attack. They claim that oxygen levels in the blood are not reduced during a severe asthma attack, but this is just not true. Measurements clearly

show that the level of oxygen
gets very low, and this is frequently the cause of death.
Another very peculiar Buteyko idea is that you should not try to shift mucus from your airways because mucus ‘protects you’ against losing too much carbon dioxide. This too is

dangerous advice. Accumulated mucus narrows the airways, adding to your asthma symptoms, and it can even block a small airway completely. The part of the lung served by that

airway then collapses – a serious complication that no asthmatic would want.
Using the right muscles
Hyperventilation is often linked with an abnormal way of breathing, in which the wrong muscles are used. This is one common pattern that conventional doctors recognise for

hyperventilators:
•    The main muscle of breathing – the diaphragm (see below) is not used fully
•    The muscles of the upper chest become involved in breathing, even at rest, when they should not be needed
•    There are lots of rapid, shallow breaths
•    The breathing is quite irregular, with deep, sighing breaths from time to time, or frequent yawning.
Even in those who do not hyperventilate, breathing with the upper chest, and/or neglecting the diaphragm, can become a problem. This pattern of breathing is sometimes linked to

anxiety and emotional problems (see p. 230).
To understand what goes wrong, you need first to know about the healthy way to breathe.
The rib-cage and the diaphragm are the work-horses of breathing. You can feel your rib-cage through your skin, and feel its movements, but the diaphragm is far more

inaccessible. It lies below the lungs, but above the stomach and intestines.
In its contracted state, the diaphragm becomes a thick slab of muscle, with a slight curve, like an inverted saucer. When it relaxes, it becomes far more curvaceous, changing to

a shape like an inverted bell. In this shape, there is less space for the lungs above the diaphragm.
If you are breathing correctly, the diaphragm contracts when you breathe in and relaxes when you breathe out. The contraction lowers the dome of the diaphragm, pulling the base

of the lungs downwards and so making them expand.
Breathing out requires no muscular force whatever, as long
as you are just sitting or walking about (and therefore not breath-
ing hard). The lungs are naturally elastic, like balloons, so they
automatically contract and force out the air, once the diaphragm
relaxes into its bell-like shape and stops pulling them downwards.
While you cannot feel the diaphragm itself, you can feel the
effect of its in-breath contraction. As it contracts, the diaphragm
pushes down on the stomach and intestines, so that your abdomen bulges out a little with each breath. Western women, conditioned to admire an unnatural flat-bellied body shape

(unnatural for a woman, that is), often breathe badly because they are trying to ‘hold the tummy in’. This steely tightening of the muscles across the front of the abdomen

opposes the contraction of the diaphragm, and prevents a natural and relaxed in-breath.
The diaphragm should do virtually all the work of breathing in, when you are not exerting yourself much. The upper part of the rib-cage should hardly expand at all and the

muscles that run between the ribs, the intercostal muscles, should not be working.
When you become more active, and therefore need more oxygen, the upper chest automatically starts to expand with each in-breath. At this point the intercostal muscles become

involved, along with a whole team of other muscles in the chest region —these are known as the accessory muscles of breathing.
The effects of an asthma attack
In the grip of a severe asthma attack, you may well start using the accessory muscles of breathing to try to take in more air. If you have frequent attacks, or if this way of

breathing gets to be a habit and goes on between attacks, then the chest may be distorted by the constant use of the accessory muscles, plus the over-inflation of the lungs.

Severe asthmatics often have high shoulders and a `barrel-chested’ look as a result of this. Hyperventilation may also start in this way.
Observing how you breathe
To discover whether you are breathing with your diaphragm or your upper chest, lie on your back with your left hand on your belly, and your right hand on your upper chest. Just

lie still for a few minutes, let your arms relax, then start to pay attention to your hands. When you breathe in, which hand rises? It should be the left hand, with little or no

movement in the right.
Alternatively, bend over and hold the back of a chair with your hands. Your back, head and arms should form a straight horizontal line, at right angles to your legs. Just stay

quietly in this position for a while. It is very difficult to breathe with the upper chest in this pose, whereas breathing with the diaphragm is easy. If you feel fine in this

position, then you are probably breathing well normally.
Correcting upper-chest breathing
Learning to breathe with the diaphragm is often an important part of correcting hyperventilation (see p. 228). It should also be taught to anyone who has the kind of chest

deformities that develop in severe asthma (see above).
Diaphragmatic breathing, or abdominal breathing as it is sometimes called, should help make you feel more relaxed
because the in-breath can disperse tensions in your abdomen. This is where many people ‘hold on to’ their fears, with chronically tense abdominal muscles. When you start

breathing into this area of tension, it is important to take things gently and not force the breath downwards. Be aware of any resistance to the in-breath in the abdomen, and of

any emotional reactions that occur when you challenge this resistance.
Sometimes breathing in this way for the first time can bring up emotional difficulties that may need careful handling. That is why it may be better to learn abdominal breathing

from someone who has time to deal with such issues, and with whom you feel very comfortable and relaxed — for example, a yoga teacher or an alternative therapist who you like

and trust. Physiotherapists tend to take a very brisk and practical approach to breathing, which may not be entirely appropriate or helpful when habitual ways of breathing are

tied up with emotional problems.
When learning to breathe with the diaphragm, be careful not to get carried away and become a ‘belly breather’, whose every in-breath sends the abdomen bulging out like a

mainsail. The abdominal muscles should oppose the downward movement of the diaphragm to some extent, without being too tense.
Clearing the nose
Breathing through the nose, rather than the mouth, is beneficial for asthmatics, because it cleans and warms the air. It can also help those with chronic sinusitis because it

oxygenates the air in the sinuses, which discourages some of the more troublesome microbes responsible for sinus infections.
This technique for clearing a blocked nose, part of a set of breathing exercises for opera singers, is based on a time-honoured yoga exercise called alternate nostril breathing:
•    Sit with your mouth closed.
•    Press your right nostril against your nose to close it, using the thumb of your right hand.
•    Breathe out through your left nostril.
•    Press your left nostril against your nose with the index finger of your right hand, to close it. (The hand makes only a very small movement from side to side.)
•    Breathe in through your right nostril.
•    Repeat the sequence.
Once you have got the hang of this, do ten fairly rapid breaths, with no pause between out-breath and in-breath. Pause and rest.
Repeat using your left hand, and reversing the flow of the breath: out through the right nostril and in through the left. Again, do ten breaths and then rest.
Alternatively, try the following exercise, which is recommend by Buteyko practitioners for unblocking the nose. This technique has not been tested scientifically, but the

reports of asthmatics who have used it suggest that it often works wonders, even with children who could never breathe through their noses previously:
•    Have your reliever inhaler to hand, just in case the exercise brings on an asthma attack.
•    Breathe as you do normally, and at the end of a normal out-breath, close your mouth and hold your nose
•    Stay like this, without inhaling, for as long as you can without discomfort. Walk around the room while you are doing this or, if you are young and fit, do something

more strenuous – either walk upstairs or squat-then-stand several times.
•    When you need to breathe in, keep your mouth shut but release your nose
•    Breathe in slowly through the nose
•    Repeat the exercise if your nose becomes blocked again.
Special exercises for asthma
In addition to tackling the problem of hyperventilation, if one exists, asthmatics can use other breathing exercises to tackle specific aspects of their asthma.
Clearing mucus from the lungs A physiotherapist can teach methods of clearing mucus from the airways which are suitable for asthmatics. Ask your doctor for a referral. You could

also try the following exercises:
Huffing Take an in-breath, then tighten your abdominal muscles very sharply, to push the air out. Imagine there is a candle in front of you, and you are trying to extinguish it,

but using your belly muscles only. Your out-breath should make a short soft ‘huff’ sound – if it is more of a loud ‘w000sh’, you are contracting the muscles in your chest as

well as those in the belly. Try again, and focus your attention on your belly as you make the out-breath.
The in-breath should be effortless with this exercise – it just bounces back in. Do as many huffs as you can without feeling breathless. Rest and repeat. The aim is to build up

stamina until you can do 30 or more huffs in succession.
Pursed-lips breathing Take a fairly deep in-breath, then purse your lips together. As with huffing, your belly muscles have to do all the work of the out-breath, but in this

exercise they are working against the muscles of the lips. The aim is to divide the out-breath into as many fragments as possible – to push the air out through the lips in a

succession of tiny, forceful blasts.
One objective of these exercises is to encourage mucus to start moving up to the top of the airways. From there, it can be cleared with a little throat-clearing cough. Note that

the mucus will probably take a while to reach the throat – this may happen some time after you do the exercise. For maximum effect, repeat these exercises several times each

day.
Coping with asthma attacks
The crucial thing during an asthma attack is to focus on your out-breath, not your in-breath. Of course this goes against the grain, because you feel so desperate for air, but

remember that the central problem is stale air from your last in-breath, now trapped in your lungs by the narrow airways. If you can focus on exhaling this used air, you will

have more space for fresh air to come in with the next in-breath.
At times when you are not suffering from an asthma attack, it is worth doing some exercises that improve the strength of your out-breath. The key problem during an asthma attack

is that the natural elasticity of the lungs, which should power the out-breath, is not equal to the challenge of pushing out all that air through narrowed airways in a short

space of time. In this situation, contracting your abdominal muscles so that they push upwards and assist in emptying the lungs is helpful.
The two exercises described above for clearing mucus –huffing and pursed-lips breathing – also strengthen those abdominal muscles which can assist you with your out-breath

during asthma attacks.
Strengthening exercises
Several different exercises or pursuits that strengthen the breathing muscles seem to produce an improvement in asthma. The reasons for this are not understood.
Asthmatics who take up a wind instrument, such as the flute, often report that their asthma improves considerably. The same effect has regularly occurred with asthmatics who

undertake classical training in singing. One set of exercises, taught to aspiring opera singers and designed specifically to strengthen the diaphragm, has been scientifically

tested and shown to improve asthma and reduce the need for drugs. These exercises can be learned at home (see p. 255). There are also some mechanical devices which can

strengthen the breathing muscles (see p. 255).

Allergens Overview

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

Many countries have special schools for children with severe asthma and other allergies. Italian children are sent to one in the Italian Alps, where there is no trace of pollen, house-dust mite, or animal allergens. After nine months these children are a great deal healthier and more active - all their lung function tests are vastly improved. Blood tests show that they are actually less allergic to common allergens than before.
You may not be able to do quite this well at home, but all allergens and irritants can be avoided to some extent. Even if you can’t eliminate them completely, you can certainly reduce your exposure.
Before you start, it is important to be clear about exactly what affects you, otherwise you will be wasting a lot of effort. For example, people who are allergic to dust mite often think that a dusty house will necessarily be worse for them than an apparently clean house, but this is not so (see p. 115). Or they may say ‘Oh, I got asthma on holiday, because the roads were so dusty and I’m allergic to dust,’ forgetting that only house dust contains dust mites. The road dust may have acted as an irritant, and helped to spark the asthma attacks, or it may have contained pollen or mould spores - but it does not contain dust mites or their allergens. Blaming the wrong thing for the asthma attack means that the real culprit is not identified.
If you are not absolutely sure what causes your allergies, skin-prick tests (see p. 91) can identify the allergen. These are especially recommended if your reactions to the presumed allergen are inconsistent, or you don’t respond to the anti-allergen programmes described here. For example, a few people who react to house dust are not allergic to dust mites, but to something else in the dust such as wool fibres or mould spores, or particles from cockroaches, house
flies, carpet beetles or a long-departed cat. Even pollen that has accumulated in house dust can provoke allergic reactions - if you are not an over-keen duster, it can still be there long after the pollen season.
If you have hayfever, knowing which pollens cause your symptoms (and learning to recognise the plants concerned) is useful. You will probably need skin-prick tests to be sure. ‘Hayfever’ can even be a seasonal mould allergy in some people (see p. 27).
Tackling allergens is now big business. There are a lot of people out there competing for your money and false claims are common, especially for anti-mite products. Only a few manufacturers are deliberately misleading, and most false claims probably stem from ignorance or wishful thinking, but be very sure you know the facts about your allergen before you buy.
Air cleaners are a good example. A really good quality air cleaner (which uses a HEPA filter - a High Efficiency Particulate Air filter) is an expensive purchase and, as the advertising tells you, it takes out very small particles with staggering efficiency. But this is entirely irrelevant if the source of those particles is no distance at all from your nose - your mite-infested pillow, for example, or the cat on your lap.
Something else that advertisements for air cleaners rarely mention is that unless you reduce allergen production - tackling mould growth in the house, for example, or keeping the dog outside - the filter can’t help much. In short, air cleaners do have their uses for some allergens, but they can’t work miracles.
The products mentioned here, if not available in your locality, can be bought mail-order from specialist suppliers of anti-allergy products (see p. 255). Note that some offer both very good products and distinctly doubtful products, so judge each item on its individual merits. Ask to see scientific evidence that it works.
Don’t be taken in by vague statements such as anti-allergenic’ - get the facts. This label is often used on pillows with synthetic filling, for example, and people assume that it refers to dust-mite allergy, whereas it simply means that the pillow does not contain feathers. But unless you are allergic to feathers, there is no reason to avoid feather pillows. (In fact, if not covered with mite-proof covers, synthetic pillows collect more dust-mites than feather pillows, because the fabric used for the cover is less tightly woven and the mites and skin particles get in more easily.)
Bad advice is also a hazard. Some of it just wastes your time and effort, but some could actually increase your exposure to the allergen. Advice to vacuum floors daily, or to vacuum beds, is commonplace but this achieves little and it means breathing much more allergen unless you have the right kind of vacuum cleaner. One health magazine even advised its readers with dust-mite allergy to ‘air mattresses by regularly turning them’. This will not affect mite numbers at all, but it will shoot massive amounts of mite allergen out of the mattress and into the nose and lungs.
Ridding your house of allergens and irritants is, in itself, a hazardous procedure because more of the offending substances will be released into the air during the work. If you take up carpets or remove mattresses, dust-mite allergens and mould spores will be churned up in their millions. Just bundling up a duvet will produce invisible clouds of dust mite allergen - and cat allergen, if your pet once slept on the bed.
Ideally, the allergic individual should not do the work, nor be in the house until it is 100% complete and the house has been very thoroughly aired. This is particularly important for those with chronic sinusitis and mould growth in the house, because of the risk of fungal infections in the sinuses (see p. 32).
If you are an allergy sufferer and have absolutely no choice but to do the work yourself, or to be present, then you should get a good quality dust mask and wear it throughout - only take it off when you go outdoors. Those with atopic eczema and sensitivity to airborne allergens should cover their skin carefully -with clothing, not barrier cream.
An ordinary hardware-shop dust mask is not adequate for most allergens - it only takes out really big particles and lets through all the common airborne allergens except pollen. You need a more serious sort of mask, designed for workplace use and conforming to official standards. Before buying one, ask what is the smallest size of particle that it filters out (at 90% efficiency, or better). Compare this with the particle size of your allergen (given in the articles that follow).
You must be able to breathe well through the mask when physically active, and it must fit tightly against your face, forming a seal at all edges. Beards and moustaches tend to prevent this - as does stubble.
Masks that combine an activated carbon filter with a dust filter will take out gases and chemical vapours as well as particles. Cycle shops now sell such masks -or try an industrial supplier. Such a mask can be useful if you are affected by traffic exhaust or industrial pollution as well as an allergen, for example, or if you are exposed temporarily to wet paint or other fumes at home. Activated carbon masks should also filter out the irritant substances from oil-seed rape plants.
Some people who try the anti-allergen programmes feel much better quite fast. But generally these are long-term strategies - you may not reap any benefits for a few weeks, and the improvement may be small at first. Sometimes it takes several months for the full effects to be felt, so be persistent.