Posts Tagged ‘doctors’

Over the last two decades, there has been a significant rise in the number of couples experiencing fertility problems:
•    Sperm counts have dropped by 50 per cent in the last ten years.’
•    Men are showing an increasing number of sperm abnormalities.
•    A quarter of all couples planning a baby have trouble conceiving.
•    It is not uncommon for a couple without any fertility problems to take two to three years to conceive.
•    One in four women miscarry. Some experience repeated miscarriages – as often as ten times.
•    More and more couples are turning to fertility treatments to enable them to have a family.
•    Of the couples who seek medical help, 30 per cent are told they have ‘unexplained infertility’ for which the doctors can offer no treatment.
If you are reading this book, you or your partner may have experienced problems trying to have a baby. You may have gone through fertility treatments that failed. Or you may just be worried that nothing is happening. I see hundreds of couples every year who are trying to conceive and I fully understand their unhappiness and frustration at not being able to achieve something that most of us grew up believing would happen whenever we wanted.
But, as the above statistics reveal, you are not alone. There is an epidemic of infertility and subfertility – and in many cases the doctors do not know the answers.
But, before we discuss these issues, I want to say:
Don’t lose heart
I believe that getting yourself and your partner into optimum health, usin the four-month programme outlined in this book, will give you the best possible chance of having that longed-for, healthy baby.
I don’t just believe it — I know it. By the time you have finished readin), this book, I hope I will have inspired you and your partner to take contrd of your health and fertility.
Nature is wonderfully clever. At this particular moment you may not think so, because on the most fundamental level, reproduction, it seems to have let you down. But the purpose of this book is to encourage you to restore your own and your partner’s fertility to its proper ‘natural’ state by simple lifestyle and dietary changes that eliminate toxins from your bod i and ensure that you have the level of nutrients needed for conception.
Fundamentals of Health
In the animal world, fertility is paramount for the survival of any specie However, the human race today has a number of fertility problems. Men are showing sperm abnormalities (such as sperm with two heads or sperm tha-:
are so sluggish they cannot reach the egg). Some women have a number Or menstrual cycles during which they do not ovulate; or, when fertilisation happens, the embryo does not implant in the womb.
To explain these anomalies, we have to go back to the foundations 0: health.The egg and sperm are only as healthy as the man and woman who produce them. If there are any problems with either the egg or the sperm. however subtle, nature will either try to stop fertilisation occurring or, if i does take place, a miscarriage may follow.
One reason why so many couples are diagnosed with ‘unexplained infer - tility’ is that doctors cannot put it down to a specific, observable medical cause. But I believe that infertility is a multi-factorial problem and should be investigated that way. That means looking at a variety of issues, such a, nutrition, alcohol and smoking habits, levels of lead and other toxic metals pesticides, food additives, genito-urinary infections, allergies, stress and other hazards of modern life.That means your partner taking a close look a: his health and nutrition as well (in four out of ten cases of infertility, the problems are on the male side). The fact is that our modern ‘unnatural lifestyle, combined with the nutrient depletion of much of our food, ha;
left many of us deficient in the vitamins and minerals we need for successful babymaking.
Any specialist who works in a zoo, or breeds champion dogs, cattle or racehorses, will tell you that optimum nutrition is essential. But, while the fertility clinic business is booming (with desperate couples lining up for treatment), there isn’t much incentive to look at whether simple factors, like a deficiency of zinc for instance, may be the main reason for unexplained infertility.
Learning From the Past
We should learn from the folic acid story, which really demonstrates the importance of nutrition and how a crucial deficiency identified by researchers as being responsible for birth abnormalities was ignored by doctors for years.
In 1991 the Medical Research Council (MRC) finally published a study which showed that supplementing with folic acid during preconception and pregnancy could prevent the reccurrence of spina bifida in babies.’ Yet the damaging effects of a folic acid deficiency had been recognised three decades earlier, after rats were born with malformations (including neural tube defects) and other problems (such as club foot and cleft palate) in folic acid trials.’
This knowledge, which could have prevented a great deal of heartache, had been around for over 30 years and yet women were not told to take folic acid for decades.These early findings were confirmed again in humans in 1981 trials that looked at the effects of folic acid on the prevention of spina bifida.’
Even as recently as 1993 the Daily Mail ran an article asking ‘Could this vitamin save your baby?” It said, `The fact that a supplement which can stop women having spina bifida babies remains the best kept secret of preconceptual care has now prompted sharp criticism from the medical world: ‘
Cynically, one might suppose that if folic acid had not been a simple easy-to-obtain supplement but a highly profitable pharmaceutical drug we would all have known about it years ago. You cannot patent a nutrient so there is no commercial incentive to investigate and promote it.
But the big lesson we should learn from the folic acid story is that our diet — what we eat or don’t eat — is absolutely crucial to our fertility.
How to Use This Book
Folic acid is only the tip of the iceberg. Medical and scientific literature contains a great deal of information that call help couples who are having difficulty conceiving or who have had previous problems such as miscarriages and malformations. This book presents that information in an easyto-understand form so that you call use it yourself. Having this knowledge will help you gain control of your own health and fertility.
By following the advice in this book you can increase your fertility anc reduce the possibility of miscarriage. liven if you have a condition like blocked fallopian tubes (which means that you need IVF treatment in order to have a chance of conceiving), this book will increase your chance of success. With assisted conception techniques it is still vital for the sperm anc the egg to be as healthy as possible.
As you read the recommendations, you’ll realise that the changes you make to increase your fertility are the same as those that will protect you from miscarriage and help you produce a healthy baby. They are also, quite simply, recommendations that will improve your general health. The advice
is so logical and makes such sense that you will probably wonder why nc one has told you all this before.
Finding that you can’t conceive when you want is a real shock and it is not something that many of us want to talk about even to our close friends and families. GPs and consultants are busy people and, all too often, overworked. The minute you come out of the consulting room you think of .1 dozen other things you wanted to discuss. There just isn’t time to talk in as much depth as you would like. Yet you want to find out as much as you can.This book is designed to answer your specific queries as well as present a comprehensive self-help programme that will give you and your partner the best chance of conceiving.
•    Section 1 outlines the different aspects of your life and health that could be causing your and your partner’s problem. This will help you identify what may be going wrong.
•    Section 2 explains how you can help improve your and your partner’s fertility, concentrating particularly on good nutrition and Supplementing your diet.This is one of the most crucial sections in the book because it could be the key to solving your infertility problem by making some simple changes that are entirely within your own control.
•    Section 3 explains what tests are available to help you identify any medical cause of infertility. It is important that your partner understands that lie must also be involved in this process.
•    Section 4 describes the different fertility treatments available in the UK and reveals some heartening evidence that you and your partner can dramatically improve your chances of having successful fertility treatment, if you should need it, by following the advice in this book.
•    Section 5 discusses the problem of miscarriage in depth and shows how you can help yourself overcome it.
•    Section 6 puts it all into practice – and shows you how to organise your self-help programme for those vital months of preparation.This is really the most essential part of the book.
•    Section 7 tells you how to care for yourself in pregnancy so as to ensure that you Krill have a healthy baby.
I believe that any couple planning to have a baby would benefit from following the kind of recommendations outlined in this book – not just Couples who have had problems conceiving.
If all this sounds too hard to stick to, just think how important it is … We plan our holidays and we train for a career so why should we expect to just have babies without any proper planning or preparation.- This preconception care period of three or four months shapes your baby’s future, both physically and mentally, so it could be the most important bit of planning you ever do in your life. My aim is to help you and your partner to optimum health to give you both the best chance of having a healthy baby. As a bonus, following these recommendations will make you both feel better, fitter and more energetic.
Self-help Strategies
Most couples who seek fertility treatment find out a great deal about sophisticated medical technologies but very little about the relatively simple measures they themselves can take to improve their chances of conceiving. These highly effective self-help strategies include easily implemented dietary and lifestyle changes. Such measures cost little or nothing, their success has been scientifically documented, and yet most of these couples will not have been told about them.Why on earth is this–
The cynical answer is that infertility has become `big business’.As Professor Robert Winston points out in his book Making Babies, there are now at least 21 IVF units in London alone. And more and more units are opening because they are ‘highly profitable in the private sector’. Couples who desperately want to have a baby are very vulnerable. Even though some IVF units have extremely low success rates, such couples are still willing to gamble a great deal of time and money in order to try to conceive.
In contrast, there are no big financial gains to be made in helping couple to look at their lifestyle or to correct their vitamin and mineral deficiencies Yet this approach makes such sense, and has been shown to give an unprecedented success rate.
Over the last 20 years, Foresight has pioneered an approach to fertility that looks at the fundamentals of health, including lifestyle, diet, pollutants, infections and environmental and occupational hazards and gives an unprecedented 80 per cent success rate. Researchers from the University of Surrey followed the progress of 367 couples over a period of three years (1990-3). The women were aged between 22 and 45, and the men were aged 25 to 59. In all, 37 per cent of the couples had a history of infertility, and 38 per cent had experienced between one and five miscarriages (others had had other problems, including still births, malformations and low birth-weight babies).
Many of the couples were older, coming to the trial as a1ast resort’.They were all asked to eliminate smoking and alcohol, and to follow the recommendations outlined in this book (such as buying organic food, having infections checked and having mineral analysis). All the couples were given personal supplement programmes and were then re-tested to make sure their levels had returned to normal.
By the end of the three-year trial, 89 per cent (327 of the couples) had given birth. Out of those couples with a previous history of infertility, 81 per cent conceived and had babies. Out of those who had experienced a previous miscarriage, 83 per cent had a baby within the three years of the Study, without experiencing another miscarriage.
Of the 327 babies born to the couples in the study, no baby was born before 36 weeks and none was lighter than 51b 2oz (2.368kg).There were no miscarriages, perinatal deaths or malformations. The national average for miscarriages is one in four so one could at least have expected 80 miscarriages, but there were none. No baby was admitted to a special care baby unit.
A number of the couples had already tried IVF – sometimes two or three times – without success.Yet 65 per cent of this group conceived naturally on the Foresight programme without needing another IVF cycle.
These results are undeniably impressive and speak for themselves. Yet sceptics maintain that they are ‘too good to be true’.To date, the results have been published in the Journal of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine but not in a standard medical journal.’ This is because, in order to be accepted by a medical journal, there must be a control group.
Ina normal double-blind placebo controlled trial, to assess the efficacy of a headache remedy, for example, volunteers are randomly assigned to either a control group (placebo) or a treatment group (headache remedy). The volunteers don’t know if they are taking the placebo or the remedy, and nor does the scientist running the trial. All the volunteers in the treated group get the same dose of headache remedy.
However, in this study each person was given an individual supplement programme according to their needs. So they were all taking different dosages and supplements, depending on how deficient or toxic they were.
This is an important point because the double-blind placebo controlled trial is the ‘gold standard’ in medicine but it cannot take into account that we are all unique and that we may need different treatments to increase our fertility. And it is this ‘individually tailored’ approach which I believe is the key to finding a natural solution to infertility. The fact is that 37 per cent of the couples in this study had an established history of fertility problems and had undergone medical investigation. They did something different – changed their dietary habits and lifestyle – and then conceived. The information contained in this book explains in detail my enhanced version of this preconception programme.
It worked for them. It could work for you.

Generic Name
Clotrimazole (kloe-TRIM-uh-zole) 0
Brand Name Mycelex
The information in this profile also applies to the following drug:
Generic Ingredient: Sertaconazole Ertaczo
Type of Drug Antifungal.
Prescribed For
Fungal infections of the mouth, skin, and vaginal tract.
General Information
clotrimazole is useful against a variety of fungal organisms that other drugs do not affect. The exact way in which clotrimazole works is unknown. Sertaconazole is used for athlete’s foot in people age 12 and older with compromised immune systems.
Cautions and Warnings
Do not use this product if you are allergic or sensitive to any of its ingredients.
If clotrimazole causes local itching or irritation, stop using it. Do not use clotrimazole in your eyes.
Proper diagnosis is essential for effective treatment. Do not use this product without first consulting your doctor.
Possible Side Effects
Side effects are infrequent and usually mild.
Cream and Solution
V Most common: redness, stinging, blistering, peeling, itching, and swelling of local areas.
Vaginal Tablets
♦ Most common: mild burning, rash, mild cramps, and frequent urination. Your sexual partner may also experience some burning or itching.
Lozenges
V Most common: stomach cramps or pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.
Drug Interactions
None known.
Food %%ractions
The oral form of clotrimazole is best taken on an empty stomach, at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after meals. However, you may take it with food as long as you allow the lozenge to dissolve fully in your mouth.
Usual Dose
Topical Cream and Solution
Adult and Child (over age 2): Apply to clean, dry, affected areas morning and night for 7 consecutive days or as needed. For athlete’s foot and ringworm, use daily for 4 weeks. For jock itch, use daily for 2 weeks.
Vaginal Cream
Adult: 1 applicator’s worth at bedtime for 3-7 consecutive days.
Vaginal Tablet
Adult: 1 tablet inserted into the vagina at bedtime for 3 days, or 2 tablets a day for 3-7 consecutive days.
Lozenge
Adult and Child (over age 3): 1 lozenge 5 times a day for 2 weeks or more.
Overdosage
Little is known about the effects of clotrimazole overdose or accidental ingestion. Call your local poison control center for more information. If you seek treatment, ALWAYS bring the prescription bottle or container.
Special Information
If treating a vaginal infection, you should refrain from sexual activity. Call your doctor if burning or itching develops or if the condition does not improve within 7 days.
If you are using the vaginal cream, you may want to wear a sanitary napkin to avoid staining your clothing. Do not use a tampon during treatment.
Dissolve the lozenge slowly in the mouth. This may take up to 30 minutes.
This medicine must be taken on consecutive days. If you forget a dose of oral clotrimazole, take it as soon as you remember. Do not double your dose.
When using clotrimazole for skin infections, do not cover the area with any kind of bandage unless directed to do so by your doctor. For athlete’s foot, wear well-fitting, ventilated shoes, and change your socks at least once a day.
clotrimazole is not effective on scalp or nails.
Special Populations
Pregnancy/Breast-feeding: Women who are or might be pregnant should talk to their doctor about the medication’s risks and benefits. Women who are in the first 3 months of pregnancy should use this drug only if directed to do so by their doctor. If you are pregnant, your doctor may want you to insert vaginal tablets by hand rather than use a vaginal applicator.
It is unknown whether the drug passes into breast milk. Use with caution or use infant formula.
Seniors: Seniors may use this medication without special precaution.

Generic Name
Clozapine (KLOE-zuh-pene) 03
Brand Names
Clozaril    FazaClo Orally Disintegrating Tablets
Type of Drug  Antipsychotic.
Prescribed For  Severe schizophrenia.
General Information
Clozapine is a unique antipsychotic that has the capacity to treat people who do not respond to or cannot tolerate other drugs. It works by a mechanism that differs from those of other antipsychotic drugs.
A very small number of people who take clozapine develop a rapid drop in their white-blood-cell count, known as agranulocytosis. This effect usually reverses itself when the drug is stopped, but the drug must be stopped as soon as it is discovered. An unusually large number of people who have developed clozapine algllaTwlocytosis in the United States are of Eastern European Jewish descent, but the association is not very strong. Most cases of agranulocytosis occur between week 4 and week 10 of treatment. It is essential that blood samples be taken approximately every week and for 4 weeks after the drug is stopped to watch for this effect. Because of the risk of agranulocytosis, clozapine should not be tried until at least 2 other antipsychotic medicines have failed.
Some people taking antipsychotic drugs develop tardive dyskinesia, a potentially irreversible condition marked by uncontrollable movements. Tardive dyskinesia has not been seen in patients taking clozapine, a major advantage of this drug over other antipsychotic medicines. However, there is still a risk that this set of symptoms could occur with clozapine.
Cautions and Warnings
Do not take clozapine if you are allergic or sensitive to any of its ingredients.
Women, seniors, people with serious illnesses, those who are emaciated. those with a history of diseases affecting the white blood cells, or those who are taking other medication that could affect white blood cells may be more susceptible to clozapine agranulocytosis.
Clozapine has been associated with increased mortality in seniors with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. The specific causes of death related to clozapine and other atypical antipsychotic drugs were either due to a heart-related event or infection, mostly pneumonia. Clozapine should not be taken by those with dementia-related psychosis.
About 5% of people taking the drug experience a seizure in the first year of treatment. Seizure is most likely to occur at higher drug doses.
People with heart disease should be carefully monitored while on clozapine because of possible cardiac risks.
Clozapine may cause low blood pressure, especially at the beginning of therapy.
Clozapine has been associated with obesity, high cholesterol, high blood sugar, and diabetes. Diabetics and pre-diabetics (people with elevated blood sugar and a family history of diabetes) should be carefully monitored.
A serious set of side effects, known as neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), includes a high lever and has been associated With clozapine when it is used together with lithium or other drugs. The symptoms that constitute NMS include muscle rigidity, mental changes, irregular pulse or blood pressure, increased sweating, and abnormal heart rhythm. NMS is potentially fatal and requires immediate medical attention.
Use this drug with caution if you have glaucoma, prostate
problems, or liver or kidney disease.
clozapine may interfere with mental or physical abilities because of the sedation it usually causes during the first few weeks
of treatment.
Possible Side Effects
✓    Most common: rapid heartbeat, low blood pressure, dizziness, fainting, drowsiness or sedation, salivation, and constipation.
✓    Less common: headache, tremor, sleep disturbance, restlessness, slow muscle motions, absence of movement, agitation, convulsions, rigidity, restlessness, confusion, sweating, dry mouth, visual disturbances, high blood pressure, nausea, vomiting, heartburn or abdominal discomfort, fever, and weight gain.
♦    Rare: agranulocytosis (symptoms include fever with or without chills, sore throat, and sores or white spots on the lips or mouth), tardive dyskinesia (symptoms include lip smacking or puckering, puffing of the cheeks, rapid or wormlike tongue movement, uncontrolled chewing motions, and uncontrolled arm and leg movements), and NMS (see “Cautions and Warnings”). Other rare side effects can occur in almost any part of the body. Contact your doctor if you experience any side effect not listed above.
Drug Interactions
•    Clozapine’s anticholinergic effects—blurred vision, dry mouth, and confusion—may be enhanced by interaction with other anticholinergics, such as tricyclic antidepressants like amitriptyline.
•    Drugs that reduce blood pressure may enhance the bloodpressure-lowering effects of clozapine.
•    Alcohol and other nervous system depressants, including benzQUIQOmrn and other antianxiety drugs, may enhance clozapine’s sedative action. At least 1 person has died as a result of combining diazepam and clozapine.
•    Combination contraceptive drugs may increase blood levels of clozapine leading to toxic side effects. Women starting on a combination contraceptive may need to have their clozapine dose adjusted.
•    Clozapine should not be used with ritonavir.
•    Cimetidine, caffeine, citalopram, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and ketoconazole may increase blood levels of clozapine resulting in increased side effects. Caution should be used with combining clozapine with paroxetine, fluvoxamine, or sertraline as similar reactions may occur, although these interactions are less well-defined.
•    Clozapine may increase blood levels of digoxin, warfarin, heparin, and phenytoin.
•    Use of clozapine with phenytoin, carbamazapine, and rifampin may cause decreases in blood levels of clozapine, reducing its effectiveness.
•    The combination of lithium and clozapine may cause seizures, confusion, and NMS (see “Cautions and Warnings”).
•    Cigarette smoking may alter clozapine dosage requirements.
•    Combining selective serotonin receptor inhibitors (SSRls) with clozapine may require a lower clozapine dosage.
Food Interactions None known.
Usual Dose
Tablets
Starting dose: 25 mg in divided doses twice a day; maintenance dose    generally, 300-450 mg a day in divided doses. Dosage may be increased gradually to a daily maximum of 900 mg in divided doses if required.
Orally Disintegrating Tablets
Starting dose: 12.5 mg once or twice a day increasing to 300450 mg a day in divided doses by the end of 2 weeks. Dosage may then be increased up to 900 mg a day in divided doses if required.
Overdosage
Symptoms of overdose are delirium, drowsiness, changes in heart rhythm, unusual excitement, nervousness, restlessness, hallucinations, excessive salivation, dizziness or fainting, slow or irregular breathing, and coma, Overdose victims must be taken to a hospital emergency room immediately. ALWAYS bring the prescription bottle or container.
Special Information
Clozapine may cause a fever during the first few weeks of treatment. Generally, the fever is not important, but it may occasionally be necessary to stop treatment due to a persistent fever.
Regular blood tests are necessary to monitor blood composition for any changes that might be caused by clozapine.
Call your doctor at once if you develop lethargy or weakness, a flu-like infection, sore throat, feelings of ill health, fever, sweating, muscle rigidity, mental changes, irregular pulse or blood pressure, mouth ulcers, or dry mouth that lasts for more than 2 weeks.
Dry mouth, a common side effect of clozapine, may be countered by using gum, candy, ice, or a saliva substitute such as Orex or Moi-Stir.
Do not stop taking clozapine without your doctor’s knowledge and approval, because a gradual dosage reduction may be necessary to prevent side effects.
Avoid alcohol or any other nervous system depressants while taking clozapine.
Some of the side effects of clozapine    drowsiness, blurred vision, and seizures—may interfere with the performance of complex tasks like driving or operating hazardous equipment.
While taking clozapine, rapidly rising from a sitting or lying position may cause you to become dizzy or faint.
If you take clozapine twice a day and forget a dose, take it as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, take 1 dose as soon as you remember and another in 5 or 6 hours, then go back to your regular schedule. If you take clozapine 3 times a day and forget a dose, take it as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, take 1 dose as soon as you remember and another in 3 or 4 hours, then go back to your regular schedule. Never take a double dose.
Orally disintegrating tablets should be left in the unopened blister until time of use. They should not be pushed through the foil. Just prior to use, peel the foil from the blister and gently remove the orally disintegrating tablet. Immediately place the tablet in the mouth, allow it to disintegrate and then swallow with saliva. No water is needed.
Special Populations
Pregnancy/Breast-feeding: This drug Should be used during PM Only if your doctor determines that it is absolutely necessary.
clozapine may pass into breast milk. Nursing mothers who must take this drug should use infant formula.
Seniors: Seniors may be more sensitive to the side effects of clozapine, such as dizziness on rapidly rising from a sitting or lying po-sition, confusion, and excitability. Older men are also more likely to have prostate problems, a reason to be cautious with clozapine. Seniors with psychosis due to dementia who take clozapine are more likely to die from heart disorders and infections than those not taking it.

Generic Name
Codeine (KOE-deep) 0
Brand Name
Only available in generic form.
The information in this profile also applies to the following drugs: Generic Ingredient: Fentanyl
Actiq Lozenge on a Stick    Fentora Buccal Tablet
Duragesic (Patch)    lonsys (Patch)
Generic Ingredient: Morphine Sulfate 10
Avinza    Oramorph SR
Kadian    RMS Suppositories
MS Contin    Roxanol MSIR
Generic Ingredient: Oxycodone Hydrochloride RE
Combunox    OxyFAST
Endocodone    OxylR
M-Oxy    Percolone
OxyContin    Roxicodone Oxydose
Generic Ingredient: Oxymorphone Opana
Type Q( UTUg  Narcotic.
Prescribed For
Mild to severe pain, breakthrough cancer pain, and cough. Long-acting narcotics are meant only for people with chronic pain. Also prescribed for pain and anxiety in pediatric burn patients.
General Information
Codeine relieves pain and suppresses cough. The pain-relieving effect of 30-60 mg of codeine is equal to approximately 650 mg, or 2 tablets, of aspirin. Codeine may be less effective than aspirin for pain associated with inflammation because aspirin reduces inflammation and codeine does not. Codeine suppresses the cough reflex but does not cure the underlying cause of the cough. Other narcotic cough suppressants are stronger pain relievers, but codeine remains the best cough medication available.
Morphine sulfate is a pure narcotic that has been in use for many years. In addition to pain relief, morphine’s effects include drowsiness, mood changes, breathing difficulty, slowed movement of the gastrointestinal tract, nausea, vomiting, and changes in the endocrine and autonomic nervous systems. Morphine sulfate liquid, immediate-release tablets, and suppositories must be taken several times a day. The medication they contain is released immediately for absorption into the bloodstream. Extended- and controlled-release morphine products are designed to release some of the narcotic right away and the rest over a 24-hour period, allowing for less-frequent dosage.
Fentanyl is a potent pain reliever that can be substituted for other narcotic drugs. The patch form, which must be replaced about every 3 days, delivers fentanyl to the bloodstream at a steady rate. The lozenge has a shorter length of action than any other narcotic pain reliever, which makes it useful when given to children before surgery because it provides doctors with the flexibility to obtain maximum benefit with minimal side effects. The lozenge on a stick is used for breakthrough cancer pain as a booster for people already taking narcotic pain relievers. These forms should only be used under controlled circumstances because of the risk of side effects or overdose. Low dosages of fentanyl relieve pain—larger amounts cause loss of consciousness and breathing difficulties.
Oxycodone is a narcotic used to control moderate to severe pain. Most people take it together with aspirin (Percodan) or acetaminophen (Percocet), but it can be used by itself. This is a potent pain reliever that carries a risk (31 addiction with continued use.
Cautions and Warnings
Do not take narcotics if you are allergic or sensitive to any of their ingredients.
Long-term use of narcotics may cause drug dependence or addiction.
Use narcotics with extreme caution if you suffer from asthma or other breathing problems.
Narcotics may make it difficult to monitor the progress of people who have suffered head injuries and acute abdominal conditions.
Actiq contains fentanyl in an amount that can be fatal to children. Keep used and unused lozenges and lozenges on a stick out of reach of children.
Possible Side Effects
♦    Most common: lightheadedness, dizziness, sleepiness, nausea, vomiting, appetite loss, and sweating. If these occur, ask your doctor about lowering your dosage. Most of these side effects disappear if you lie down.
♦    Less common: euphoria (feeling “high”), headache, agitation, uncoordinated muscle movement, minor hallucinations, disorientation and visual disturbances, dry mouth. constipation, flushing of the face, rapid heartbeat, palpitations, faintness, urinary difficulties or hesitancy, reduced sex drive or impotence, itching, rash, anemia, lowered or raised blood sugar, and yellowing of the skin or whites of the eyes. Narcotic analgesics may aggravate convulsions in those who have had them.
More serious side effects of codeine are shallow breathing or breathing difficulties.
Drug Interactions
•    Avoid combining narcotics with alcohol, sleeping medications, sedatives, other depressant drugs, or non-prescription drugs that have alcohol as an ingredient. Alcohol speeds the release of morphine from Avinza. The mixture can result in a deadly narcotic overdose.
•    Narcotic analgesics should not be used at the same time as monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants. Separate usage by at least 14 days.
•    Combining a narcotic pain reliever with an anticholinergic medication may result in severe constipation.
•    Combining a narcotic pain reliever with any other medication that lowers blood pressure can lead to excessive blood-pressure lowering. Avoid this combination.
•    Combining cimetidine with a narcotic pain reliever may cause confusion, disorientation, breathing difficulties, and seizure.
•    Reserpine, rifampin, and remifentanil may decrease the pain-relieving effects of morphine.
•    Fentanyl should be used with caution with azole antifungals (e.g. ketoconazole).
Food Interactions
Codeine may be taken with food to reduce upset stomach. Morphine capsules and the fentanyl patch may be used without regard to food.
Usual Dose
Dosing of narcotic pain medications is highly individualized based on patient tolerance and response to medication.
Codeine
Adult: 15-60 mg every 4-6 hours for relief of pain; 10-20 mg every few hours as needed to suppress cough.
Child: 1 mg per lb. of body weight every 4-6 hours for relief of pain; 2.5-10 mg every 4-6 hours to suppress cough.
Fentanyl Lozenge and Lozenge on a Stick
Adult: 200-1600 mcg. Dosage may be repeated up to 4 times daily. Allow the lozenge to dissolve in your mouth. DO NOT CHEW. Child: not recommended.
Fentanyl Patch: Apply to a clean and non-irritated patch of skin as directed, usually once every 3 days.
Morphine Extended-release and Controlled-release
Tablets and Capsules
Adult: 1-3 capsules a day, depending on the specific product and individual need.
Morphine Oral Liquid and Immediate-release Tablets Adult: 5-30 mg every 4 hours.
Morphine Suppositories
Adult: 5-30 mg several times a day.
Oxycodone
Adult: 10-30 mg every 4 hours as needed. OxyContin should be swallowed whole and not broken.
Child: not recommended.
Overdosage
Symptoms include breathing difficulties or slowing of respiration, extreme tiredness progressing to stupor and then coma, pinpointed pupils, no response to pain stimulation, cold and clammy skin, slowing of heartbeat, lowering of blood pressure, convulsions, and cardiac arrest. The victim should be taken to a hospital emergency room immediately. ALWAYS bring the prescription bottle or container.
Special Information
Codeine is a respiratory depressant and affects the central nervous system (CNS), producing sleepiness, tiredness, or inability to concentrate. Be careful when driving or doing any task that requires concentration. Avoid alcohol.
Call your doctor if you develop breathing difficulties, constipation, dry mouth, or any bothersome or persistent side effect.
Apply the fentanyl patch only to non-irritated skin on a flat surface of the upper body. Hair at the application site should be clipped or cut, not shaved, before applying the patch. Do not use oils, soaps, lotions, alcohol, or anything else that might irritate the skin before applying the patch.
If you are taking a controlled-release narcotic product, do not crush, chew, or break the tablet or lozenge. Rapid release may result in a potentially fatal dose of the drug.
If you forget a dose of codeine, take it as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, skip the one you forgot and continue with your regular schedule. Never take a double dose.
Special Populations
Pregnancy/Breast-feeding: Narcotics pass into the fetal circulation. Excessive use of them during pregnancy may cause drug dependence in newborns. Narcotics may also cause breathing difficulties in infants during delivery. Animal studies show that codeine may cause fetal harm. If given to a pregnant woman before cesarean section, fentanyl may cause drowsiness in newborns. When either of these drugs is considered crucial by your doctor, its potemt(a1 bel)elft must be carefully weighed against its risks.
Narcotics pass into breast milk. Nursing mothers who must take codeine should use infant formula.
Seniors: Seniors are more likely to be sensitive to side effects and should be treated with the smallest effective dosage.

Type of Drug
Carbonic-Anhydrase Inhibitors,
Eyedrops (kar-BON-ik an-HYE-drase)
Brand Names
Generic Ingredient: Dorzolamide Trusopt
Generic Ingredient: Brinzolamide Azopt
Combination Product
Generic Ingredients: Dorzolamide + Timolol Cosopt
Prescribed For  Glaucoma.
General Information
These drugs are similar to acetazolamide, a carbonic-anhydrase inhibitor taken by mouth. Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme found in many parts of the body, including the eyes. By blocking the effects of this enzyme, dorzolamide and brinzolamide slow the production of fluid inside the eye, reducing pit:ssure. This cffc,, i3 usetul in ir83t
ino, open-angle glaucoma because the disease is characterized by elevated eye pressure. Dorzolamide and brinzolamide are sulfonamides, or sulfa drugs, and although they are administered topically, they affect the body systemically.
Cautions and Warnings
Do not use these drugs if you are allergic or sensitive to any of their ingredients or to other sulfa drugs. Small amounts of these drugs enter the bloodstream. Rarely, people using them experience side effects or allergies associated with sulfa drugs.
These drugs have not been studied in people with very poor kidney or liver function. Since these drugs are eliminated via the kidneys, people with impaired kidney function should use an alternate glaucoma medication.
These drugs have not been studied in people with acute angle-closure glaucoma.
See Timolol, page 1129, for more information on the combination product Cosopt.
Possible Side Effects
Dorzolamide
✓    Most common: eye burning, stinging, or discomfort and a bitter taste in the mouth immediately after administering the eyedrops.
✓    Less common: allergic reactions, conjunctivitis (pinkeye), blurred vision, tearing, dry eye, and increased sensitivity to bright light.
♦    Rare: headache, nausea, weakness, tiredness, rash, and kidney stones. Dorzolamide can cause the same types of side effects as other sulfa drugs, but this is very unlikely. Contact your doctor if you experience any side effects not listed above.
Brinzolamide
♦    Common: blurred vision and a bitter, sour, or unusual taste in the mouth.
♦    Less common: eyelid inflammation; conjunctivitis (pink-
eyeY, nsh; dry eye; sensation of something in the eye;
headache; eye redness, itching, discharge, or pain; and
runny nose.
✓    Rare: allergic reactions, hair loss, chest pain, diarrhea, nausea, sore throat, tearing, itchy rash, double vision, dizziness, Possible Side Effects (continued)
dry mouth, breathing difficulties, upset stomach, tired eyes, kidney pain, cornea problems, and formation of a crust or sticky sensation around the eyelid. Brinzolamide can cause the same types of side effects as other sulfa drugs, but this is very unlikely. Contact your doctor if you experience any side effect not listed above.
Drug Interactions
• If you are using more than 1 eyedrop product, separate doses of these drugs by at least 10 minutes.
Usual Dose
Adult: 1 drop in the affected eye 3 times a day. Overdosage
Accidental ingestion of a bottle of dorzolamide or brinzolamide may affect blood levels of potassium and other electrolytes. The victim should be taken to a hospital emergency room. ALWAYS bring the prescription bottle or container.
Special Information
Call your doctor and stop using your eyedrops if you develop any unusual eye reaction or condition, including swollen eyelids and conjunctivitis (pinkeye).
Vision may be temporarily blurred when using the eyedrops. Use caution when driving or operating machinery.
If you wear soft contact lenses, take them out before using the eyedrops and put them back in 15 minutes after a dose.
To prevent infection, do not allow the eyedropper tip to touch your fingers, eyelids, or any surface. Wait at least 10 minutes before using any other eyedrops.
If you forget to administer a dose, do so as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, skip the one you forgot and continue with your regular schedule. Do not take a double dose.
Special Populations
Pregnancy/Breast-feeding: Very high dosages of dorzolamide or brinzolamide caused birth defects in animal studies. While the risks of using these drugs during pregnancy are small in people, pregnant women should use dorzolamide or brinzolamide only after discussing its potential benefits and risks with their doctors.
it is not known if these drugs pass into breast milk. Nursing mothers who must use either drug should use infant formula.
Seniors: Seniors may be more sensitive to side effects.

When Leonard Noon reported his first tentative experiments with immunotherapy for hayfever, in 1911 (see p. 164), he believed that pollen contained a toxin. Most people were

‘immune’ to this toxin, he said, in the same way that people might be immune to measles or diphtheria, but hayfever sufferers lacked this immunity. Noon thought that his

steadily increasing doses of pollen, injected just under the skin, were inducing immunity to the pollen toxin, in the same way that a smallpox vaccine could induce immunity to

smallpox.
Noon’s theory was all wrong, as we now know, but the important thing was that the treatment seemed to work. In fact it transformed the lives of some patients, especially those

who were very severely affected by hayfever. One spoke of a ‘marvellous cure’, another of going for walks to kick my old enemy the hay’.
So doctors kept using Noon’s treatment, and in time — when it became clear that Noon’s theory was flawed — medical researchers began trying to figure out how the injections

really worked.
Surprisingly, they have still not succeeded, even though a great deal is now known about the changes that can occur in people undergoing immunotherapy. Despite a wealth of

detailed knowledge (see p. 166), it remains impossible to say exactly how conventional immunotherapy reduces allergic reactions. Surprising discoveries about the effects of

conventional immunotherapy are being made all the time.
New methods of immunotherapy are still being devised today, and there are three different approaches being taken.
Firstly, there are doctors experimenting with modifications of the technique devised by Noon. For example, instead of injecting the allergen extract, some doctors are giving it

to their patients in capsule form. to be swallowed. Others are giving it as a liquid, to be placed under the tongue and held there for a few minutes, then swallowed (see p.

169). Sound scientific trials show that both these methods work well, at least with some allergens.
There are also experiments with speeded-up immunotherapy
(see p. 166), called ultrarush techniques — at the outset, injections are given at hourly intervals, or even more frequently (in hospital, of course, where severe reactions can

be dealt with immediately). Doctors have found that they can induce a remarkably rapid tolerance of the allergen in this way.
The second approach is to apply modern medical knowledge about allergic reactions and so develop entirely new methods of immunotherapy (see p. 168-9). Such research involves

working out, from first principles, novel ways of modifying the immune response in general, or the reaction to one allergen in particular.
This theory-led approach is certainly successful for classical allergies such as hayfever and perennial allergic rhinitis, where there is a good understanding of the basic

mechanism (i.e. the malfunctions of the immune system that produce the disease). But for those diseases where the underlying mechanism is only partially understood, such as

atopic eczema, this approach is not necessarily the best one. And for diseases such as food intolerance, where the cause of the illness remains largely unknown, it is a complete

non-starter.
The third type of approach is to devise a technique by trial and error, and then puzzle out the ‘how’ question later. This is the same sort of path as Noon originally took, and

some believe that this kind of pragmatic experimental approach — practising a method which seems to be effective, even though it’s a mystery how it works — is as valid now as it

was in 1911. Others disagree.
210 complementary therapies The two most widely used methods that have been developed in this way are Provocation-Neutralisation and Enzyme- Potentiated Desensitisation.

Although these techniques are practised by doctors with a conventional medical training, they remain ‘outside the pale’ as far as orthodox medicine is concerned. The

controversies that surround them are discussed below.
Enzyme- Potentiated Desensitisation (EPD)
This technique has been developed by a British doctor, Dr Len McEwen, who began work on it in the 1960s. It is now practised in many parts of the world, as well as Britain,

including the United States, Germany and Italy.
EPD is used for a far wider range of problems than conventional immunotherapy, being given to people with food intolerance and chemical intolerance, as well as to those with

true allergies. This — along with the fact that it is unclear how it works —contributes to the controversies that surround it, because these conditions do not have the same

basic causes.
Dr McEwen began with the observation that, when immune cells are aroused during inflammation — whether caused by allergy or some other stimulus — they release large amounts of

an enzyme called beta-glucuronidase. This enzyme increases the immune response to the allergen or antigen that provoked the inflammation.
Dr McEwen experimented with injecting beta-glucuronidase into the skin, along with very small amounts of allergen, believing that in such circumstances the enzyme might have the

opposite effect, and reduce the immune reaction to the allergen. Eventually he discovered a combination of enzyme and allergen which seemed to have the desired effect.
EPD has been tested, in a rigorous scientific manner, and the results suggest that it can work for hayfever and asthma, as well as for childhood migraine and hyperactivity in

children when these are triggered by foods.
In one trial with hayfever patients, researchers measured the levels of anti-pollen IgE following EPD treatment, and it did not rise during the pollen season as it normally does

in those with hayfever. This kind of finding is impressive because it is unlikely to be due to placebo effect. Not all studies have produced positive results, however.
In addition, doctors using EPD claim that it is very effective for patients with allergies who have not done well on the standard course of immunotherapy injections (see p.

164). This fits in with other studies suggesting that the immune changes brought about by EPD are fundamentally different from those induced by traditional immunotherapy.
Patients with true food allergy have been given EPD, and while it does not enable them to eat their culprit food, it does
seem to reduce their reaction to accidental exposures.
Doctors in the Netherlands are using EPD as a treatment for people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), and report that it helps about 50% of patients.
One point in favour of EPD is that it uses very small amounts of allergen, and is therefore very safe — anaphylaxis has never occurred with this technique.
Provocation-Neutralisation
‘After following conventional methods [of immunotherapy] for thirteen years, I heard Carleton H. Lee deliver a paper on provocative testing in 1965, at a meeting of the American

College of Allergists in Chicago. I was naturally sceptical, but tried his suggestions when I returned to my office. The results can only be described as astounding. Many

patients with unresolved allergic problems responded markedly and rapidly. Many with resistant asthma or perennial allergic rhinitis improved greatly or cleared completely when

food injection therapy was added to their inhalant injection therapy.’ So wrote Dr Joseph B. Miller — a distinguished allergist and paediatrician, and a Professor of Medicine at

the University of Alabama, in 1972.
The technique which he learned from Carleton H. Lee was controversial then and, although Miller developed it with great care and precision during the years that followed, it

remains controversial now.
There are two elements in provocation - neutralisation: testing and treatment. Both are used for a wide range of problems — not just classical allergic diseases, but also food

intolerance and chemical intolerance. As with EPD (see left), this is one of the controversial aspects of the technique.
Although provocation-neutralisation involves an injection technique that looks, superficially, very much like conventional immunotherapy (see p. 164), there are several

important differences. Firstly, the allergen extract used (in the case of true allergies) is a very dilute extract, so that far less of the allergen is injected than in

conventional immunotherapy. Likewise, in the case of food intolerance and chemical intolerance, the extracts of the offending substance are used in highly dilute form.
Secondly, the idea of the neutralising dose — which is the central plank of provocation-neutralisation — is quite different from anything in conventional immunotherapy. Broadly

speaking, the conventional technique (see pp. 165-6) works by slowly reeducating the immune system with a gradually increasing dose of the allergen. Only after a succession of

injections does the immune system start to behave differently on encountering the allergen. By contrast, in provocation-neutralisation treatment, the neutralising dose is

claimed to have an instantaneous and direct effect on the body, ‘turning off’ symptoms that have already begun. This is the neutralisation aspect of the technique. The doctors

who practise this technique do not claim to know how the neutralising dose might work.
According to the theory of provocation-neutralisation, the strength of the extract that acts as a neutralising dose is specific for a particular allergen and a particular

person. It can only be worked out by a rather slow procedure involving a series of injections. These are intradermal injections – they place the allergen extract in the skin, at

a slightly deeper level than a skin-prick test. (For treatment, rather than testing, subcutaneous injections are used – these go deeper than intradermal injections, placing the

allergen extract just underneath the skin. Neither hurts very much.)
Ideally, the neutralising dose should be decided on by measuring the size of the wheal (a raised area of skin around the injection site), and whether it grows, stays the same

size, or disappears. The doctor or nurse carrying out the procedure can, in theory, work out the neutralising dose just by careful examination of the skin wheals.
However, it is part of the tradition of provocation-neutralisation techniques that verbal feedback from the patient is also taken into account – so if the patient says that an

injection has turned off the symptoms, that reinforces the belief that the neutralising dose has been found.
The problem with this aspect of provocation-neutralisation is that expectations, and the power of suggestion, can become involved. So if the doctor or nurse says ‘you may find

that this next injection makes the symptoms go away’, that is often exactly what happens – because the forces of placebo effect (see p. 233) come into play. Unfortunately,

verbal interactions such as this are a key aspect of the provocation-neutralisation procedure in many clinics.
Just the same hazard besets provocation - neutralisation if it is used to test for the existence of allergy or intolerance, because it is quite common for practitioners to tell

patients which allergen (or other offending substance) is being injected and to ask if any symptoms are provoked by the injection. This is not good practice – if someone expects

to react to a particular substance, they are quite likely to produce symptoms through purely psychological mechanisms (see pp. 232-3).
Quite apart from this, the question of allergy testing with provocation-neutralisation techniques is contentious, because the pioneers of the technique, such as Professor

Miller, never advocated using provocation - neutralisation in this way. Using it as a routine test for sensitivity reactions was a later development, and there are many doctors

today who, while they practise provocation-neutralisation as a treatment, say that it does not work well as a test for sensitivity reactions. While they agree that injecting a

dose
which is either stronger or weaker than the neutralising dose may provoke actual symptoms (this is the provocation aspect of the technique) they don’t think the reaction is

reliable enough to form the basis of a test for allergies. Nor do they think that using skin-wheal measurements alone (i.e. silent testing) turns the technique into an accurate

test for allergies. That is not what the provocation-neutralisation technique was designed for – it is about treatment, not testing.
The evidence from research
Recent research from the Nova Scotia Environmental Health Centre in Canada confirms that testing by provocation injections is not reliable. The subjects in this study were all

suffering fr= multiple chemical intolerance, a condition which – for one reasor or another – makes patients liable to develop symptoms at an,, time. No less than 70% of these

patients experienced symptoms in response to a dummy injection which contained none of the offending substance. Indeed, 15% of patients also produced a skin wheal in response to

some of the dummy injections, confirming that even this reaction may be subject to the power of suggestion (see pp. 232-3).
Looking just at the patients who did not react to the placebo injection (i.e. those least susceptible to suggestion) the test still did not yield any reliable result – a person

might react to one injection with a particular substance, but fail to react to a subsequent injection with the same substance. The authors concluded that their patients were ‘in

a state of heightened sensitivity as the result of the chronic irritation by various environmental components and other external and internal stressors’. In this state of

sensitivity. patients are so close to the brink all the time that the smallest thing can trigger symptoms. So the apparent reactions to the test injections were actually

determined by other factors – some psychological factors (including a psychological response to the prick of the needle) and some external ones, such as exposure to smells or

very small amounts of airborne chemicals.
Another recent research study, carried out by scientists at the University of California, confirmed the finding of the Nova Scotia team as regards testing. Although this study

did not set out to look at the use of the neutralising dose for treatment, some of the patients were given neutralising doses during the testing process and the researchers

observed that ‘in most cases a single neutralising injection relieved the symptoms’. This casual observation clearly needs to be confirmed by more rigorous testing. Oddly

enough, despite this positive observation about the neutralising doses, the overall conclusion of the researchers was to completely dismiss all aspects of

provocation-neutralisation as ‘the result of suggestion and chance’. This conclusion has been widely publicised in the United States as part of a general campaign against

provocation-neutralisation and doctors who practise it.
Other researchers have looked at treatment with neutralising doses, using stringent scientific methods (a double-blind placebo-controlled trial — see p. 90), and found that they

do work. In one such trial, patients with asthma. and allergies to dogs or cats, were treated with injections of the neutralising dose. They showed a reduction in the

sensitivity of their airways, as measured by objective tests. In another experiment, patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and an allergy to house-dust mite were studied,

and the neutralising dose was given as drops of allergen extract placed under the tongue (sublingual drops) – an alternative to injections. The blockage of the nose, as measured

by scientific tests, was reduced by the neutralising dose.
A great many more trials of this kind would be required to convince most doctors that provocation-neutralisation works.
Furthermore, the recent study from California – which observed a number of practitioners of provocation-neutralisation at work with their patients — showed that these

practitioners need to be a lot more rigorous and objective in their approach. However, the fact that provocation-neutralisation is often practised badly does not necessarily

mean that the basic technique is without any value. There are a great many level-headed doctors and patients who, while initially very sceptical about

provocation-neutralisation, have found it surprisingly effective – just as Professor Miller did back in 1965.
Deciding for yourself
So is provocation-neutralisation an option that is worth trying for your condition?
As regards testing, the answer is probably ‘no’. The most reliable tests are skin-prick tests or FAST blood tests for true allergies (see pp. 91-2), an elimination diet for food

intolerance (see p. 194), and avoidance followed by re-exposure (a challenge test) for chemical intolerance.
As regards treatment for true allergies, conventional immunotherapy has been far more thoroughly tested and, if you can get it (not easy in Britain — see p. 164), is probably a

better bet. It is definitely the best treatment for allergy to insect stings.
The major advantage that provocation-neutralisation has over conventional immunotherapy, in the case of true allergies, is that it is far safer. Because such small amounts of

allergen are used, anaphylactic reactions (see p. 58) don’t occur.
When it comes to treatment for food intolerance, complete avoidance of the problem food(s), for a period of a year or two, is usually a very effective treatment (see p. 77).

Other forms of treatment are only needed for people who find that they have
intolerance to a great many different foods (on the basis of an elimination diet, not kinesiology, blood tests and the like — see p. 93) and cannot devise an adequate diet from

the foods they are able to eat. For such people, provocation-neutralisation may be worth a try. Many patients feel that they have gained considerable help from this treatment.

They report suffering fewer symptoms and being able to return to a more nutritionally balanced diet.
In the case of chemical intolerance, the first line of treatment should be to avoid the substances concerned as far as possible, eat a good balanced diet, and take a vitamin and

mineral supplement if nutritional deficiencies are suspected. Treating any underlying hyperventilation (see pp. 226-9) can also help considerably. Only if there are persistent

symptoms, and you are sure these are not due to psychological causes, might provocation-neutralisation be worth a try. Some people with chemical intolerance do find it is

helpful, but whether this is a real effect, or simply placebo, remains uncertain.
If you decide to give provocation-neutralisation a try, find a practitioner who has good medical qualifications, who seems objective and sensible in their approach, and who

doesn’t make implausible claims for the technique. Take note of what other treatments the practitioner offers, and whether these seem rational or not – this is often a good

guide to the care and objectivity with which provocation - neutralisation is carried out.
Ask the doctor how he or she assesses the neutralising dose. and avoid anyone who does not use the traditional method of a series of injections combined with wheal measurement.

When the neutralising dose is being assessed, say that you would like it to be done ’single-blind’ – that is, you don’t want to be told anything about what is being injected.

Reporting how you feel to the doctor or nurse during the assessment is fine, but only mention really significant symptoms, or a very definite clearance of the symptoms, if this

occurs. These precautions will help you to be sure that you are getting something which is of genuine benefit, rather than just a very expensive form of placebo treatment.
I always wanted to be a doctor, and I enjoyed
medical school immensely, but once I became a
ell GP, I no longer felt quite so sure about what I was doing. It seemed clear to me that there were a lot of people coming to my surgery who I couldn’t do much for. And there

were others who, while I could treat their obvious medical problems with some success, remained distressed and were not coping well with life. Once I became a senior partner in

this practice, I experimented with having a counsellor come in for one session a week, and then an osteopath for the bad backs. It was popular with the patients, and I saw some

people improve enormously. Now we have stress-management classes too, and one of my colleagues has trained in acupuncture, which he uses for selected patients. We also use

elimination diets for patients with a lot of long-term problems like migraine. Overall, I think of it in terms of having more tools at our disposal - being able to tackle things

from a different angle when standard medicine isn’t hitting the spot.’
Geoffrey, a GP in the north of England, is typical of the reconciliation that is now beginning to occur between conventional medicine and alternative medicine. But he also has

plenty of criticisms to make of the alternative scene. ‘The idea that alternative medicine is “holistic” while conventional medicine isn’t, really raises my hackles. Most GPs

could be magnificently holistic if they had an hour with each patient as alternative therapists usually do. We have just 15 minutes, on average, and we have to pack a lot into

that - including our basic duty to eliminate the possibility of serious organic disease such as cancer. Time pressure is everything now, and it has squeezed the humanity out of

medicine, to a very large extent. But the potential for a holistic approach is there - most doctors have a tremendous store of wisdom and life
experience at their disposal, which could form the basis of a holistic approach to treatment if only there were more time to spend with each patient.’
It is in search of a more unhurried and all-embracing approach to treatment that many people turn to alternative medicine. Frequently, what they get out of the therapy has less

to do with the actual methods used, and still less with the theories behind those methods, but everything to do with spending a quiet hour with someone supportive and caring who

listens to all the complex concerns that surround any illness, gives reassurance or advice, or just offers a `safe space’ in which to talk about life’s difficulties.
Other people turn to alternative therapies due to a more serious disillusionment with orthodox medicine. When patients with inscrutable medical problems -such as persistent

unexplained diarrhoea, joint pain or chronic urticaria - are given a succession of different diagnoses by different doctors, they often lose faith entirely in modern medicine

and reject orthodox treatment in favour of alternatives. This is a great mistake. Modern medicine isn’t perfect, but that is only to be expected, because it is not a fixed body

of knowledge but a process - a continuing journey of questioning, investigation, discovery and improvement. Scientific medicine has come a tremendously long way from the state

of ignorance that prevailed two centuries ago, and it will undoubtedly go farther.
Conventional medicine has a great deal going for it - ask anyone over 50, with severe life-long asthma, what they think of treatment now compared to treatment in the 1950s or

early 1960s. You will hear a hymn of praise to the improvements in both drugs and drug delivery systems. Asthma is just one example -conventional medicine has a lot to offer for

all the classical allergic diseases. Alternative medicine should always be regarded as an adjunct to conventional treatment, not a replacement. That is why many doctors prefer

the term complementary medicine.
A third reason for using alternative medicine is a more philosophical one, a need to understand illness in some larger sense, often part of a general search for meaning in life.

Some types of alternative treatment attempt to offer metaphysical reasons for allergy -rather than the mundane explanations of antibodies and immune cells that are given in this

book - and this can be attractive to some people. There is no harm in this approach, which can prompt you to make a critical review of your life, look at unresolved emotional

issues, or reassess choices that are making you unhappy.
But not all illness, or worsening symptoms, can be explained by emotional causes, and the rigid belief that every illness must have a meaning can be damaging. It easily

degenerates into the wholesale psychologisation of illness, the kind of blame-the-victim mentality which can attribute hayfever to ‘Emotional congestion; fear of the calendar; a

belief in persecution; guilt’ and asthma in babies to ‘Fear of life; not wanting to be here’. Both these diagnoses are taken from the best-selling You
can Heal your Life by Louise Hay, which is very influential among some alternative therapists. This compulsive psychologisation of illness can be profoundly damaging, and if

your complementary therapist is preoccupied by ideas of this kind, you could find yourself on a very long guilt trip indeed.
Apart from the psychological aspects of alternative medicine, there is the question of whether it actually works in a practical sense - whether it provides more than just

emotional support and placebo effect (the benefit that comes from any treatment which you believe in). This is always the central question for scientific medicine in relation to

its own treatments,
and conventional doctors naturally apply the same criteria to alternative medicine. Most of this chapter is concerned with trying to answer that question.
Unfortunately, there are so many different kinds of alternative therapy available today that it is impossible to cover all of them in this book. To complicate matters further,

many complementary therapists now practise two or more different techniques, mixing them to
produce their own unique cocktail of diagnosis and treatment. This eclectic approach can span a remarkable range - you may find a therapist doing distinctly whacky stuff such as

iridology (looking at the eye to diagnose all illness - it has been tested and definitely doesn’t work), combined with something perfectly rational such as an elimination diet.

(The elimination diet might be presented as a ‘detox diet’, but it is actually being used to detect food intolerances.)
With new forms of therapy springing up all over the place, a healthy scepticism is a distinct asset for the consumer. Be sceptical about any diagnostic test or treatment that is

only being practised by one person in the country, or in the world - when doctors hit on something that works, they want other doctors to try it out. World exclusives in

medicine are usually suspect.
Avoid any practitioner who tells you to stop using your drugs without your doctor’s consent. Likewise, avoid those with a messianic gleam in their eye, an evident disregard for

logic or reasonable discussion, or an amazing cure that fixes everything from acne to AIDS. Very few of those who sell bogus cures and phoney diagnostic tests are complete

rogues. Most are nice people who are quite genuinely convinced that they have indeed found the answer to people’s problems. The powers of placebo effect (see p. 233) can sustain

such a conviction for a very long time.

Allergies and Pregnancy
Great care is taken in prescribing drugs during pregnancy. This is something that doctors are now exceedingly cautious about, but do tell the doctor as soon as you decide to try for a baby. The foetus is most vulnerable to damage by drugs during the first three months, and especially the first few weeks after conception.
Your prescription will be changed if the drugs you are currently taking could pose any threat to the unborn child. A drug that has not had sufficiently rigorous testing for safety during pregnancy, or lacks a long track record, will probably be withdrawn. New drugs are generally considered to be slightly more risky than the tried-and-true older drugs: rare side effects may not come to light during the testing which precedes release of a drug, but they do become apparent once the drug is in widespread use for a long time (see pp. 136-7).
If you are already pregnant as you read this, don’t worry too much. With a few notable exceptions – certain antihistamines and antibiotics – most of the drugs used for allergic diseases do not pose any major risk to the unborn child. There is probably nothing to worry about, but see your doctor as soon as you can – and talk to a pharmacist, in the meantime, if you are concerned. Don’t panic, and don’t stop taking your drugs unless you are absolutely sure that you can do without them. Do not stop taking your drugs if you have asthma.
Some non-prescription medicines are best avoided during pregnancy. Read the packet carefully, and talk to your pharmacist if you have any doubts.
From the moment you start trying for a baby, remember to tell any medical personnel who treat you, and any pharmacist you buy medicines from, that you could be pregnant.
Immunotherapy and skin testing
Immunotherapy should not begin during pregnancy, because of the risk of anaphylaxis (see below), but pregnant women who are already undergoing immunotherapy can continue.
The safety procedures described on p. 166-7 should be followed with meticulous care.
Most doctors continue immunotherapy at a steady ‘maintenance dose’ because there is always a small risk of anaphylaxis with immunotherapy when the dose is increased. Some doctors are even more cautious and reduce the maintenance dose during pregnancy, but give more frequent injections – this minimises the chance of bad reactions.
Many doctors do not give skin tests for allergy during pregnancy, as these also carry a very small risk of anaphylaxis. If you do have skin tests, there must be resuscitation equipment available. Intradermal tests (see p. 92) are best avoided.
Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis)
Special care should be taken to avoid anaphylaxis during pregnancy as this may increase the chance of a miscarriage.
Injecting adrenaline during the first three months of pregnancy may carry some small risk of malformation of the baby. But the evidence here is uncertain, whereas the danger to your own life, if you don’t use adrenaline when you need it, is both certain and substantial. If you have an adrenaline self-injection kit, talk to your doctor now about what you should do in an emergency. The best policy is to be ultra-careful about avoiding your allergen, so that anaphylaxis does not happen.
Women who suffer from exercise-induced anaphylaxis (see p. 59) generally play safe by exercising less strenuously while pregnant. The problem can get worse during pregnancy, but it does not usually do so. Labour itself is very strenuous of course, but problems during the birth are uncommon. If anaphylaxis does occur, the reaction is usually quite mild – nettle rash only – and the baby is delivered alive and well. However, many women find that the attacks of exercise-induced anaphylaxis are more frequent and severe when they start exercising again after the baby is born. It is best to resume exercise very gradually.
Eczema and other skin problems
Atopic eczema may improve during pregnancy, probably because the body produces slightly more of its own natural steroid, hydrocortisone. Contact dermatitis may either improve or flare up.
Stretch marks often itch a great deal, and widespread itchy skin, with or without a rash, is a common problem during pregnancy. These are not usually allergic reactions, and no cause can be identified in most cases. The skin tends to recover a few days after the birth.
If there is itching in the vulva) area, this could be due to a Candida infection (your doctor can prescribe a safe treatment) or it might be just another of those unexplained itches of pregnancy.
Hayfever and other nasal allergies
The natural hormone changes of pregnancy affect the nose, which can become more blocked. If you have allergic rhinitis this will add to your woes. See your doctor and make sure that your drug treatment is adequate (see p. 29). The nose-clearing exercises on pp. 230-31 might also help.
Asthma
Severe asthma can be bad for both the pregnant mother and the unborn child. Uncontrolled asthma increases the risk of the baby being born prematurely – and premature babies are more likely to develop asthma themselves. The death rate for newborn babies is also higher if the mother has poorly controlled asthma.
Treating a severe asthma attack promptly helps to prevent any damage to the baby, so don’t hesitate to call an ambulance –and tell the operator you are pregnant. The ambulance should be carrying oxygen which is particularly important for helping the unborn baby through the attack.
If you have asthma, don’t stop using your drugs or reduce the dose unless advised to do so by a doctor. Because it is so important to keep asthma under control during pregnancy, your doctor may want to add, or increase, preventer drugs such as inhaled corticosteroids or sodium cromoglycate (see p. 148). It
also makes sense to monitor your peak flow twice a day (see p. 97) so that you have advance warning of serious attacks.
Unfortunately, some asthmatics – usually those who have severe asthma to begin with – get much worse during their pregnancy. In such cases, careful monitoring and increased use of preventer medicines are essential. The symptoms usually increase from week 24 to week 36 of the pregnancy. The last four weeks tend to be much better, and things are back to normal by about three months after the birth.
Some women with asthma have fewer symptoms while they are pregnant, and for others their asthma stays about the same.
Asthma can also appear for the first time during pregnancy, and may be quite severe. However, a relatively mild breathlessness can be due simply to the fact that, as the pregnancy advances, the chest cavity, and therefore the lungs, become compressed. This is not necessarily asthma.
This simple physical effect can also add to the difficulties experienced by women who were already asthmatic before they became pregnant.
GER (acid reflux) – see p. 38 – can contribute to asthma during pregnancy, and treating this problem may help.
Asthma attacks during the birth
Severe asthma attacks very rarely occur during labour, but it is still important that all the medical staff in attendance know you have asthma. They should also be told if you have taken steroid tablets during the previous two years. A record of when you took steroids, how long for, and at what dose, will be valuable. You may need a low dose of steroid to get you through the physical stress of labour (see p. 142). Some doctors believe that patients who have been using high-dose inhaled steroids should be treated in the same way.
Smoking
Smoking is a bad idea if you have allergies or any allergic tendency in the family. Smoking is a very bad idea indeed if you are pregnant, or a parent. This is the moment, if ever there was one, to give up.
Enlist your doctor’s help, and ask if counselling, psychotherapy or other forms of support are available. If you have tried all this before, and failed, then talk to your doctor about the possibility of using nicotine patches. Some doctors believe that, for pregnant women who smoke 20 cigarettes or more a day, the advantages of nicotine patches outweigh the risks to the foetus. Nicotine levels in the blood are lower with patches than with heavy smoking, and your baby is not enduring the hundreds of other toxins found in cigarette smoke.

FOOD SENSITIVITY IN ASTHMA, ECZEMA AND OTHER ALLERGIC DISEASES
In 1995, medical researchers in North Carolina, USA, asked over a hundred dermatologists how they treated atopic eczema. All used standard treatments such as moisturisers and steroid creams, but only 14% mentioned the possible role of food to the parents of children with eczema.
Between them, the dermatologists in this study treated about 17,000 children with atopic eczema per year. Using the most widely accepted estimates for food sensitivity in atopic eczema –38% of eczematous children are sensitive to food – one can calculate that there were over 5000 children in this study area who might perhaps have benefited from avoiding a problem food, but whose parents were never told about this treatment option.
North Carolina is by no means unique. The situation is much the same in other parts of the world, which adds up to millions of children and parents not even being told about a treatment that is frequently effective.
Other allergic diseases (see right) can also be triggered by food, although the percentage of patients affected is much lower than for atopic eczema. Here too, many doctors are unaware of (or sceptical about) the possible role of food.
These reactions are best described as ‘food sensitivity’. They cannot be called food allergy (see p. 62) if there are no symptoms in the mouth or gut and if skin-prick tests are negative – as is often the case. Negative skin tests suggest that the reaction is not IgEmediated (see box on p. 12).
However, in some children with atopic eczema. the skin-prick tests to culprit foods are positive. When these foods are eaten after a period of avoidance, such children sometimes suffer an
immediate reaction, with symptoms typical of true food allergy. For these individuals, their atopic eczema seems to be a symptom of IgE-mediated food allergy.
How can an atopic eczema reaction in response to food be IgE-mediated in one individual and not in another? Research is finally beginning to answer this question (see pp. 18-19).
The allergic conditions that may sometimes be induced, or simply aggravated, by a non-immediate reaction to food are:
• atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis)
• asthma
• perennial allergic rhinitis (constantly blocked or runny nose)
• chronic sinusitis
• secretory otitis media (’glue ear’).
In all of these conditions, many other causes exist. Except in the case of eczema, the other causes are far more likely than sensitivity to food. This fact will weigh heavily with your doctor, whose instinct, quite sensibly, is to look for likely causes first.
Taking asthma as an example, food sensitivity is relatively unusual as a primary cause, whereas allergy to airborne items. such as pollen or house-dust mite, is very common. Food probably affects only 8-10% of asthmatics overall, but is much more important for those with brittle asthma (the most severe and unstable form), affecting as many as 60% in a recent study.
The pollen connection
People who suffer from both birch-pollen allergy and atopic eczema may have worsening eczema when they eat certain fruits and vegetables, e.g. apples and carrots. These same foods cause Oral Allergy Syndrome (see box on p. 63) in some with birch-pollen hayfever, but they can aggravate eczema without causing Oral Allergy Syndrome.
Diagnosis
Consider other likely allergens first. Look at p. 28 for the airborne allergens that could play a part in perennial allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, secretory otitis media (’glue ear’), and asthma. Only in the case of children with atopic eczema is food a prime suspect (between 38% and 69% of children with atopic eczema are affected by food), but even here there are a lot of other factors to consider (see pp. 43-4).
If you do decide to investigate the role of food, don’t abandon basic treatments in the meantime. By neglecting these. you could make the whole problem a great deal worse.
There are various clues that food is at fault:
• If you have other symptoms that suggest food intolerance (see p. 76). These problems often seem to go together with food-induced asthma or rhinitis.
• If you have noticed that a particular food makes your symptoms worse. Where there is intolerance to one food, there could well be intolerance to another, which you have not noticed.
• If you have exercise-induced asthma (see p. 41) and sometimes respond severely to exercise but sometimes have little or no reaction. Sensitivity to a food or foods may be instrumental in changing the response to exercise.
• If you have brittle asthma – but you must get your doctor’s consent for an elimination diet. Foods must be tested under medical supervision as severe life- threatening asthmatic reactions can occur on testing.
• If there are also digestive problems such as diarrhoea, vomiting or belching. This is a strong clue in the case of children with atopic eczema. Symptoms such as diarrhoea frequently precede atopic eczema, and it seems likely that a reaction to food in the gut increases the leakiness of the gut wall, allowing more food molecules through to the blood.
• If there is pronounced eczema around the mouth in children (but this can also be due to constant licking),
• For adults with atopic eczema, if there is a persistent rash on the hands, or the lips. Where there is a blistering rash on the hands that erupts at regular intervals, food is often the problem – or it may be metal contaminants of food such as nickel (see pp. 55-6). In general, food sensitivity is rarer among adults with atopic eczema than it is among children.
Skin-prick tests (see p. 91) for commonly eaten foods are worth
trying in all the diseases – if they give a positive result, they should
be noted, but if they give a negative one, they should be disre-
garded. The many alternative tests being marketed (see p. 93) are
highly inaccurate and unlikely to help.
Research from Tampere University Hospital in Finland suggests that babies are much more likely to give false-negative skin-prick tests for food than older children and adults with atopic eczema. The Finnish researchers found that 52% of babies with atopic eczema give a negative skin-prick test despite having a genuine reaction when tested by food challenge. In an attempt to tackle this problem, they have devised a patch test, similar to those used for contact dermatitis. The patch test, in which food is applied to intact skin and left there for two days, gives false negatives in only 39% of babies.
The best way to detect food-sensitive eczema, according to Dr Erika Isolauri. who heads the Finnish research team, is to use both tests, and take note of a positive reaction to either. This detects 80-90% of eczema-causing food reactions in infants.
Few other doctors are currently using patch tests for atopic eczema; because so much controversy surrounds this topic, and no standardised method has yet been devised. You may be lucky and find a specialist who does these tests.
To confirm the role of particular foods in atopic eczema, a food challenge test is essential, having first avoided the food carefully for two weeks. Great care is needed in testing (see p. 198).
If you cannot get suitable tests done. a simple elimination diet will be needed (see p. 198).
Treatment
There is a choice here, between avoiding the offending food, or eating normally and controlling the symptoms with drugs.
The difficulty comes when parents have to make this decision on behalf of their children. Unfortunately, there is insufficient evidence as regards the consequences of this decision. Treating food sensitivity can reduce the eczema symptoms substantially in the short term, but it does not necessarily improve the long-term prospects for the child. Orthodox doctors tend to think that eating a normal diet is much better for a child nutritionally and socially, and they have a point.
Doctors with a special interest in food sensitivity generally believe that treating the problem at source, rather than just suppressing the symptoms with drugs, must take the pressure off the child’s immune system, and give the child a better chance of growing out of sensitivity reactions in the long run.
The decision is yours – but it is vital that the diet is not more of an encumbrance than the disease itself, and that the child’s interests come first (see pp. 170-71). Whatever you do, don’t allow a child to become malnourished (see p. 198).

Sinus cavities are something that most people just don’t know they have. It’s only when they start to

hurt that you find out where they are. ‘There is this terrible throbbing pain above and around my eyes,

and in my cheeks. It’s the most unpleasant feeling, but it’s hard to describe to anyone who hasn’t felt

it,’ says Gina, who suffers from chronic sinusitis (long-term inflammation of the sinus cavities).

There are no figures, but chronic sinusitis seems to be increasingly common.
A sinus cavity has no function, it is just empty space without which our skulls would be much heavier.

In other words, these airy spaces seem to have evolved simply to help us feel more ‘light-headed’. If

you have sinusitis, unfortunately, you feel just the opposite. ‘I had sinusitis for years,’ says Dr

Wellington S. Tichenor, a New York allergist who now specialises in treating chronic sinusitis. ‘I kept

working but felt like I wanted to die.’
Sinus cavities are lined with a membrane which is essentially similar to that lining the nose. It

contains immune cells and can produce mucus when necessary. Most of the time it doesn’t need to produce

much, because relatively few microbes or foreign particles get into the sinus cavities.
Any mucus that is produced should escape from the sinus cavities through narrow drainage channels,

called Ostia, leading to the nose. Unfortunately, the Ostia are very narrow – the diameter of a

pin-head – and U-shaped, making them prone to blockage. And that is not the only problem. These

drainage channels are situated at the top rather than the bottom of the main sinus cavities – this

arrangement was fine for our ancestors who walked on all fours, and therefore did not have to fight

gravity when clearing their sinuses. Sadly for
us, natural selection has not got around to reorganising things yet. It would be a completely hopeless

arrangement if not for the tiny hairs known as cilia, which lie like a carpet across the membranes

lining the sinus cavities. The cilia beat rhythmically. 18 times a second, to waft the mucus upwards to

the top of the sinus cavity.
This is a far-from-perfect system, and it is hardly surprising that it sometimes goes wrong. Chronic

sinusitis can begin in at least three different ways:
• The sinus membranes become inflamed due to an allergic reaction – 28 for likely airborne

allergens.
• The drainage channels from the sinus cavities become blocked due to events in the nose

(infection or allergy) or due to the growth of polyps (non-cancerous jelly-like lumps that can block

the drainage channels). When mucus cannot drain away, it stagnates in the sinus cavities encouraging

infection by bacteria or fungi. These infections cause inflammation.
• A bout of acute sinusitis (see box on p. 31), due to bacterial infection, never really goes

away and the persistent infection causes longterm inflammation. Note that this is unlikely: it is rare

for acute sinusitis not to clear up.
Whether the problem begins through allergy or blockage or infection, once it has begun a vicious circle

can be set up all too easily. Mucus output increases when there is inflammation, blocking the drainage

channels even more, so the sinus cavities become clogged up and increasingly uncomfortable. More mucus

pooling in the sinus cavities perpetuates any existing infections and fosters new ones.
All this infection results in more severe inflammation, causing the membranes which line the sinus

cavities to swell up. Inflammation also makes polyp growth more likely. The cilia may be lost or

severely depleted, and the mucus gets thicker. All this means yet more blockage. To cap it all, there

can be allergic reactions to some of the microbes involved (see right), fuelling the inflammation

further.
The body’s own attempts to clear the sinuses are defeated, and the problem is also very resistant to

medical treatment. This may make depressing reading, if you have chronic sinusitis, but don’t despair.

Understanding the complexities of the problem is a large part of the battle. Chronic sinusitis is not

invincible, if you have a good doctor to help you - that means a doctor who also understands these

complexities.
The symptoms of sinusitis are:
• pain and a sense of swelling or unpleasant fullness around the cheeks, or over and between the

eyes
• earache or headache; pain around the teeth
• reduction in the senses of smell and taste
• sore throat
• coughing, particularly at night
• post-nasal drip (mucus from the back of the nose running into the throat and airways)
• bad-smelling breath
• feverishness
• for some people, severe fatigue, poor concentration and even (but very rarely) psychiatric

symptoms
• irritability, especially in children.
Note that any of these symptoms can be caused in other ways, and even if you have several of them, you

may not necessarily have sinusitis. On the other hand, sinusitis can go unrecognised - to some people

it may seem like nothing more than a lingering cold.
Acute or chronic?
In medical terms, ‘acute’ means short-lived, while ‘chronic’ means long-lasting.
Acute sinusitis — a short, sharp dose of it, lasting less than 3-4 weeks - usually follows on from a

cold. Colds are caused by viruses, but a bacterial infection can follow, and it is the bacteria that

move into the sinus cavities and cause trouble. Some people are far more susceptible than others and

have an attack of sinusitis after every cold.
Chronic sinusitis means symptoms lasting more than three months, according to some authorities, but the

time point is a little arbitrary. This article deals with chronic sinusitis.
If your sinusitis has been going on for between four weeks and three months you will obviously be

asking ‘Is this acute or chronic?’ At this point, no one can say, but you would certainly be wise to

seek some expert medical treatment now, on the basis that it could be the start of chronic sinusitis.

Tackling chronic sinusitis before the problem becomes
entrenched and complex is a good plan.
Allergy and chronic sinusitis
Chronic sinusitis is not necessarily an allergic disease, but it can be connected with allergies (or

other forms of immune sensitivity) in various ways:
• Allergic reactions can occur in the sinuses, usually in conjunction with allergic reactions in

the nose.
• Even if the allergic reaction does not affect the sinuses directly, allergic reactions in the

nose can block the drainage channels from the sinuses, causing an accumulation of mucus there. This may

lead to sinus infections.
• Once sinusitis has begun, infectious fungi (moulds) in the sinuses may provoke allergic

reactions, or other forms of immune sensitivity. This allergy to ‘the enemy within’ fuels more

inflammation and more mucus production. Right now, allergic fungal sinusitis (as it is known) is a

source of heated debate - 32. Allergic reactions to some of the bacteria that are present may also

occur.
• Chronic sinusitis - however caused - can contribute to asthma. Research on children with both

sinusitis and asthma found that 80% no longer needed asthma drugs once their sinusitis had been

treated, and 85% no longer wheezed. The link may be due to post-nasal drip, increased mouth-breathing,

or to a nerve-connection between the sinuses and the airways (the sinobronchial reflex) which can

stimulate airway inflammation. Alternatively, the sinusitis may simply fire up the immune system with

messenger chemicals in the bloodstream, resulting in more powerful responses throughout the body.
• Chronic sinusitis can also be the root cause of long-standing nettle rash (chronic urticaria),

and treating the sinusitis can result in a prompt and remarkable clearance of the skin symptoms.
• Some people who have chronic sinusitis are sensitive to aspirin (see box on p. 28) - a

sensitivity which is also linked with asthma, nasal polyps, rhinitis and chronic urticaria. Avoiding

aspirin and all other aspirin-like drugs (151) may substantially improve the sinusitis.
Diagnosis
Because so many different factors can play a part in chronic sinusitis, diagnosis should, ideally,

consider the problem from several different angles:
• The sinuses are viewed using X-rays and CT scans (computed tomographic scans - they use X-rays

but give a much more precise picture). These reveal how badly swollen the sinus membranes are, which

sinus cavities are blocked, and how much mucus has collected in the sinuses.
• Endoscopy (92) may be used to look inside the sinus cavities. Polyps are best located by this

method.
• Where allergies seem to be part of the picture, the doctor may employ skin-prick tests (91) to

identify allergies to airborne allergens (from house-dust mites, moulds, pets, pollen, cockroaches,

etc.)
• Laboratory tests on samples taken from your sinus cavities will be used to show which bacteria

and/or fungi have set up home there. There may also be a hunt for the immune cells known as eosinophils

(19) or the typical debris which they generate. The presence of large numbers of eosinophils is one

indication of allergic fungal sinusitis (see below).
• Skin testing with fungi (moulds) found growing in the sinus cavities may also be tried if

allergic fungal sinusitis is suspected.
• In severe cases, there may be tests of immune function, to see whether this is depressed in any

way.
• Children may be tested for an inherited disorder affecting the cilia, or for cystic fibrosis -

mild forms may escape detection, and can produce both chronic sinusitis and wheezing.
The enemy within
The biggest controversy in sinusitis research at the moment concerns allergic fungal sinusitis. The

orthodox view of this condition is that:
• It affects a small minority of chronic sinusitis patients -fewer than 10%.
• There is a true IgE-mediated allergic reaction to the fungus (mould) growing in the sinus

cavities. This allergic reaction is detectable with a skin-prick test (91). Immune cells known as

eosinophils (19) are also key players in the inflammatory reaction to the fungus, but it is an

IgE-response to the fungus that draws the eosinophils into the sinuses.
• There is clear evidence of fungal infection in the mem- banes of the sinus cavities.
• There may also be ‘fungus balls’ - a solid mass of fungus inside the sinus cavity. Or there may

be ‘allergic mucin’, a dark sticky mucus containing fragments of the fungus.
A rare complication
In rare cases, the fungi involved in allergic fungal sinusitis can be invasive, spreading from the

sinuses to the surrounding bone. This problem needs prompt and thorough treatment with anti-fungal

drugs.
In 1996, researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA, caused a rumpus by claiming to

have identified a different form of allergic fungal sinusitis which is overlooked by standard

diagnostic techniques, and which affects 96% of patients with chronic sinusitis.
This is a staggering figure - 96% means, in effect, that they are claiming to have found the

fundamental cause of virtually all chronic sinusitis. ‘Up to now, the cause of chronic sinusitis has

not been known. Our studies indicate that, in fact, fungus is the likely cause of nearly all of these

problems,’ states Dr David Sherris, one of the researchers.
According to the Mayo Clinic team:
• The fungi (moulds) are growing in the mucus of the sinus cavities, not generally in the

membrane itself. They are not detected by normal diagnostic methods which tend to ignore the mucus. A

special method of collecting the mucus is required to detect the fungi.
• The immune reaction to the fungi is not usually an IgEmediated reaction, so skin-prick tests

are often negative.
• Finding evidence of unusual numbers of eosinophils is adequate for diagnosis of allergic fungal

sinusitis because the eosinophils are the prime movers in this sensitivity reaction to the fungi, as in

several other diseases (19).
‘We can now begin to treat the cause of the problem instead of the symptoms,’ says Dr Eugene Kern, head

of the research team. There is a lot of scepticism about these claims among other sinusitis

specialists, and so far no new treatment for chronic sinusitis has emerged.
The Mayo Clinic researchers say that they are in the process of developing a drug treatment, but that

it will take several more years before it is generally available. Existing anti-fungal drugs (taken in

capsule form) could not work on this particular form of allergic fungal sinusitis (if it exists)

because the drug does not get into the mucus. Any new treatment would probably involve inserting an

anti-fungal drug directly into the sinus cavities, which is far from easy.
All we can do for now is wait and see what emerges from the ongoing research. The current treatment for

allergic fungal sinusitis involves all the usual methods (see right) with special emphasis on steroids

to calm the inflammation, plus anti-fungal drugs where fungal infection is detectable in the membrane.

In some countries, immunotherapy is also used to reduce the immune reaction to the fungus, but this is

difficult to obtain in Britain (164).
Clearing moulds from your home may help (34). So may reducing the humidity in the house (119), as humid

conditions seem to be linked with allergic fungal sinusitis.
Treatment
Sinusitis can be very hard to treat, particularly if it has been going on for a long time. You need a

really committed attitude if treatment is to be successful.
All these treatments should be given at the same time:
1 Antibiotics for 2-3 weeks minimum (it takes this long because the antibiotic has such trouble getting

into the sinus cavities – if you are offered a shorter course, this suggests that the doctor does not

have enough expertise with chronic sinusitis, so you might be better off with someone else). It must be

the right antibiotic – commonly used ones such as penicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin are

unlikely to work because the bacteria are usually resistant to them.
2 Steroid drops in the nose to combat the inflammation. It is important to put these in correctly, so

that they have maximum effect (144) especially if you have polyps.
3 Irrigating the nose and sinus cavities daily with sterile salt water (saline). Your doctor will show

you how to do this.
4 Tablets that reduce the congestion in the nose.
5 Nose drops that reduce congestion, but for three days only (29).
6 Steam inhalations to loosen the mucus. There are special steam vaporisers on sale (ask at a

pharmacy), but you can just inhale steam from a bowl of boiling water, with a towel over your head to

keep the steam in. Adding eucalyptus oil to the water may help. For a quick-and-easy version, warm up a

damp flannel in the microwave and place it over your nose. Some doctors recommend having a steam

vaporiser beside the bed at night, when nasal blockage is most likely to occur, but if you have

allergies to house-dust mite or moulds this is not a good idea in the long term, as a damp bedroom will

favour both (and could encourage allergic fungal sinusitis).
7 A drug called guaifenesin which thins the mucus is used in some countries but rarely in Britain.

Alpha-methyl-cysteine is another drug that breaks up mucus. It is mainly used in chronic bronchitis but

some doctors also find it valuable in chronic sinusitis. If steam inhalations didn’t work – suggesting
that the mucus is too solid to be shifted – these drugs may be worth trying.
8 Anti-fungal drugs (taken by mouth) if allergic fungal sinusfis is suspected. Sometimes these have a

dramatic effect on chronic sinusitis that has previously resisted treatment.
You may also be given other drugs, such as steroid tablets. The new anti-leukotriene drugs (149) are

also being tried, with some success. As well as being taken by mouth, they can be applied directly to

the nose in an irrigation fluid, and may be helpful for those with nasal polyps.
Problems with nose drops
Nasal drops and washes contain preservatives and other non-drug ingredients. Some of these may act as

irritants – or the pH (acidity or alkalinity) of the preparation might cause problems. If you

experience burning or irritation after inserting drops or irrigating the sinuses, ask your doctor or

pharmacist about trying a different preparation.
Antibiotic resistance
Bacteria are becoming resistant to the effects of antibiotics: it is probably the biggest headache

facing modern medicine.
This is emerging as a particular problem in chronic sinusitis because many patients have been dosed

very regularly with antibiotics. Although most of the bacteria have been killed each time, the fact

that the sinus cavity is so clogged up with mucus, and so badly accessed by the bloodstream anyway,

means there is always some nook or cranny where a few bacteria survive because they have not been

exposed to the full lethal dose of the antibiotic. As you might expect, these survivors tend to be the

‘tough ones’ – those bacteria that are not just well hidden but also the least sensitive to the

antibiotic.
Repeat this process many times, with frequent courses of antibiotics (separated by intervals during

which the hard-to-kill bacteria multiply in numbers) and what happens? Eventually you breed a race of

bacteria that are completely resistant to one or more of the antibiotics taken.
If you ever get to this point with your sinusitis, treatment is going to be extremely difficult. That’s

why it is so important to treat infections really thoroughly, and get rid of them completely. Expert

medical help is essential for this treatment campaign.
Too many people with chronic sinusitis are careless about taking their antibiotics regularly, or feel

ambivalent about them and stop the course before it’s complete, or don’t see the doctor again when the

tablets are used up. This is courting disaster.
Don’t start antibiotic treatment for chronic sinusitis until you are sure you can see it through. If

you have doubts about taking antibiotics, try all the other treatments and self-help measures first.

They may be sufficient, especially if you find you have an allergy underlying the chronic sinusitis and

can tackle this successfully.
Should there be no improvement, you could then go on to the antibiotic programme: delaying this

treatment for a few months will do no harm. What is hazardous is starting the antibiotic programme and

then stopping, or not taking the drugs consistently.
Antihistamines may be prescribed to treat any allergic reactions, but some specialists feel that they

can also aggravate the problems. In their experience, antihistamines dry out the mucus so that it

sticks to the walls of the sinus cavities, rather than being ushered out by the cilia. Drying out the

mucus may make you feel better initially, by reducing the pressure inside the sinus cavities, but it

makes matters worse in the long run.
Anti-chollnergic drugs (156) are sometimes prescribed for chronic sinusitis, but they too can dry up

the mucus and should be used cautiously.
After three weeks, if the sinusitis has not improved substantially, a different antibiotic is given. If

there are any bacteria resistant to the first antibiotic infesting your sinus cavities, the new

antibiotic is intended to kill them off.
Should you still have sinusitis after another three weeks, you will be given yet another antibiotic.

Changing the antibiotic, and taking prolonged courses, is the best way of exterminating the bacteria

completely, which prevents the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (see box at left).
It is crucial that you always see the doctor promptly at the end of each course, so that there is no

gap between the courses – do not give the bacteria any opportunity to build up their numbers again. The

last antibiotic treatment should continue for at least a week after symptoms clear up.
Dealing with allergic reactions is also important:
• If you cannot get allergy tests, try to work out for yourself if an allergen is playing a part.

Ask yourself if there were any changes in your life before the sinusitis began, such as getting a new

pet, moving house, increased exposure to moulds or house-dust mite, or starting a new job with exposure

to allergens. When thinking about this, remember that allergies to newly encountered allergens do not

develop immediately – it may take up to two years. Try avoiding the allergen concerned and seeing if

you improve.
• Should you discover that an allergen is at the root of the problem, but have difficulty

reducing your exposure to the offending item, try to obtain immunotherapy (164) or another form of

desensitisation treatment (210).
• If you suspect allergic fungal sinusitis (32), it is well worth eliminating any mould growth in

your home (120). One research study showed that the moulds growing in a patient’s sinus cavities were

often the same as those growing in the patient’s house. It is possible that, by inhaling the mould

spores from moulds in their houses, sinusitis sufferers are continually reinfecting their sinuses.
Various other self-help measures can be valuable during this medical treatment:
• Reduce your exposure to cigarette smoke (including other people’s) to an absolute minimum.

Cigarette smoke acts as an irritant to the nose and sinuses, but, more importantly, it paralyses the

cilia, preventing them from shifting mucus out of the sinus cavities.
• Avoid breathing other irritants, especially ozone (130). Think about the chemicals you use both

at work and at home – could any of these be irritants that are aggravating your sinusitis?
• Don’t drink too much alcohol – it dries out the sinus membranes and makes matters worse.
• Drink plenty of water, to keep your mucus from becoming too dry and therefore hard to shift.
• Try to breathe through your nose as much as possible. The amount of oxygen in your sinus

cavities drops drastically if you breathe through your mouth, and the low oxygen level probably fosters

the growth of certain bacteria. Devices, such as nose clips, that help keep the nose open at night may

be worth trying.
• Spicy food can help to clear nasal and sinus congestion, so try eating chilli or hot curry

regularly.
• Some people find that garlic helps – either eaten or sniffed.
• If you suspect that your sinusitis might be related to food sensitivity (68) consider trying an

elimination diet to identify the culprit food.
• Observe your reactions immediately after eating – some foods, such as yeast and red wine, can

cause an immediate swelling of the nasal membranes in certain people. So can sulphite food additives.

Avoid such items if you are affected.
• Treating gastro-oesophageal reflux (acid regurgitation from the stomach after meals) can

improve sinusitis.
• See an osteopath. By gently manipulating parts of your face, a good osteopath may be able to

improve the drainage from the sinus cavities.
• Some patients experience good effects from acupuncture although there are no observable changes

on CT scans. Other alternative therapies, such as homeopathy or Chinese herbal medicines, have not been

investigated scientifically, but some patients report good results.
Prolonged courses of antibiotics destroy many of the beneficial bacteria in the intestine, and may

cause long-term bowel problems. It makes sense to take a bacterial replacer (205).
Surgery for sinusitis
Chronic sinusitis sufferers may be offered surgery to remove polyps, or to correct anatomical problems

such as a deviated septum (the central division of the nose).
These operations can be very useful, but if you have asthma try all other options first, because

surgery to the nose can sometimes make asthma much worse.
Surgery on the sinus cavities themselves is also a possibility, when sinusitis does not respond to

medical treatment. The operation enlarges the natural drainage channels, so that mucus drains away more

easily. This rarely cures chronic sinusitis completely, but it usually makes it much easier to manage.

Once the drainage channels are larger, antibiotics can be put directly into the sinus cavities, for

example, avoiding the need for antibiotic tablets.
Don’t agree to surgery unless other forms of treatment, such as allergen avoidance or immunotherapy,

have been tried to the full. Patients for whom surgery seemed to be the only answer have sometimes

found they did not need an operation once their allergies were treated.
If you decide on having an operation, make sure your surgeon has a proven track-record with this type

of surgery. Don’t be afraid to ask searching questions about how many operations of this kind the

surgeon has done, how many he or she carries out per year, and the complication rates (how often things

go wrong). It’s a delicate job, and you want a real expert.

If you have a child with allergies, sooner or later some friend or relative will tell you not to worry

because your child ‘will probably grow out of it’. Your doctor may well say the same thing. But what

does this mean? Do all children shake off their allergic symptoms as they get older? If the symptoms

go, is the underlying disease completely cured? And why treat allergies if they disappear of their own

accord? The truth is that the relationship between allergy and age is incredibly complex, and doctors

only understand a tiny part of it. The best anyone can offer is a broad overview of how allergies

change with age, with few explanations of the underlying mechanisms, and absolutely no predictions of

what the future holds for any particular allergy sufferer.
It is certainly true that the classical allergic diseases, such as atopic eczema, hayfever and

childhood asthma (see box on p. 11), frequently disappear as children grow up. Babies tend to shrug off

food allergy and eczema by the time they are toddling, and a fair number of asthmatic children lose

their symptoms before they are ten years old, while others do so in their teens or early twenties.
Unfortunately, the disappearance of symptoms does not mean that the underlying disease has necessarily

disappeared, particularly in the case of asthma. Quite a few young adults find themselves wheezy and

breathless again in their late twenties or thirties, especially if they take up smoking. One study of

children who wheezed before the age of seven found that:
• 25% lost their asthma for a time – anything between two years and 25 years – only to get it

back again by their early thirties. Some recovered and relapsed more than once.
• Over 70% shook off asthma and were still symptom-free by their early thirties when the study

ended.
• Only 2% remained asthmatic throughout. Realistically, anyone who has ever been asthmatic should

regard themselves as ‘at risk’ indefinitely and never be careless with their health – don’t smoke, keep

away from smoky bars and clubs, eat a good diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables (206) and avoid

activities that involve an asthma risk, such as strenuous exercise in cold air.
Workplaces with high exposure to allergens, such as saw mills, bakeries or laboratories using animals

(see pp. 133-4) are not recommended for those with a history of allergy. Anyone who has ever had eczema

should also take care with cosmetics and soaps, choosing the gentlest brands. They should also protect

their hands (57) and avoid hairdressing or bricklaying as an occupation, or anything else where skin

irritation is likely.
Moving on
Growing out of classical allergies seems to be a consequence of the child’s immune system changing and

maturing as it grows. This same process, unfortunately, can also substitute one allergic disease for

another.
`When Alex developed eczema as a baby I hoped that she’d grow out of it in time. Well she did,

gradually, and by the time she was five it seemed to have cleared up, but then she started having a

snuffly nose that never really went away. A year or so later, she began wheezing whenever she got a

cold, and this has now developed into asthma.’ The pattern described by Alex’s mother Jenny will be

familiar to many parents, who watch their children slowly work their way through all the allergies in

the medical textbooks. Doctors call it the atopic march or allergic march.
Fortunately, even this type of allergic pattern can have a positive outcome eventually. Many such

children become allergy-free in time, and develop into healthy adults.
In the meantime, there are several itchy, wheezy or sneezy years to get through, and since childhood is

a time to be enjoyed, not endured, treatments that alleviate the symptoms of allergies are generally

welcomed. Being energetic, healthy, ‘normal’ and able to join in with sports and other activities is

particularly important for a child’s social development and self-confidence.
Treating the symptoms also prevents any long-term and irreversible damage, such as the thickening and

loss of elasticity that occurs in the airways of children with untreated asthma.
At the same time as treating the symptoms, it makes sense to maximise the chance of the child growing

out of the allergy. Parents can tip the odds in the right direction by providing an environment that

reduces the chance of new allergies developing. A detailed action programme is described on pp. 248-9.
Allergies that begin in adult life
What about those people who develop classical allergic diseases for the first time as adults - or even

in old age? Will they too ‘grow out of it’ with the passing years?
Only a minority of people develop such allergies for the first time as adults, although the numbers

seem to be increasing. The older you are when your allergies begin, the less likely you are ever to

throw them off. On the positive side, they are unlikely to get a great deal worse than they are at the

outset, especially if you take care of yourself and keep the air at home as unpolluted and

allergen-free as possible (see pp. 114-31).
In the case of asthma that develops in adulthood, there may not be an allergic reaction involved.

Whereas allergies play a part in asthma for 80-90% of children, the figure is thought to be lower for

adults. Nevertheless, it is well worth investigating the possible role of allergens, because avoiding

them is one of the most effective treatments.
The outlook for food intolerance
Food intolerance causes a wide variety of symptoms, from baby colic to migraine. A full list is given

on p. 76. Although far less is understood about food intolerance than about true allergies, there is

much more certainty about the future for affected individuals. With rare exceptions, people find that

the problem clears up as long as they totally avoid their problem food for a year or two. After this

period of strict avoidance, they can eat the food again in moderation but should never forget that the

problem can return. Eating the culprit food very regularly will turn the clock back and all the

original symptoms will return. This change for the worse may be irreversible for people with severe

reactions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Safety first
Anyone who suffers the life-threatening allergic reaction known as anaphylactic shock (58) is probably

going
to have this for the rest of their days. Some children do become tolerant of food allergens in time

(allergies to milk, eggs or soya may well disappear, whereas fish or peanut allergy is probably going

to be permanent) but before concluding that there is no longer any risk, some extremely careful and

cautious testing should take place. Talk to your doctor about how to proceed. Skin-prick tests may be

helpful, but there must be resuscitation equipment close to hand as anaphylaxis can occur. Never give

the child any of the food to eat, until you (or, preferably, the doctor) have first tested it in other,

less risky, ways. For example, you can smear a little on the face to see if there is any reaction. If

there is none within 24 hours, put a tiny amount on the outer lip and watch again.
If both these tests produce absolutely no reaction then a very small amount of the food can be eaten as

a test: this should be done under medical supervision. The amount can be slowly increased with

successive tests, until it seems certain that no reaction will occur even with a normal portion.